Evaluation of a Dielectric Sensor for Measurement of Soil-Water Electrical Conductivity
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 136, Issue 8
Abstract
The salinity status of soil can be obtained through the measurement of the pore-water electrical conductivity . In the present study the WET sensor’s capability in predicting through the simultaneous measurements of the soil bulk electrical conductivity and the soil dielectric constant is investigated. The estimation of is based on a model by Hilhorst, which relates to the two other quantities and and an extra fitting parameter which is incorporated in the software of the device. The study involved experimental measurements in the laboratory using four different soils with a large range in soil texture and volumetric water content . In each soil type four different electrical conductivity aqueous solutions were used. The results exhibited a rather strong linear relationship between and . The slope of this linear relationship appeared to depend on both the soil type and the electrical conductivity of the pore water. The value of seems to be soil specific and increases when the salinity level increases. The prediction according to the linear model of Hilhorst deviates for almost all soils tested, except for the case of the sandy soil. Besides the linear model of Hilhorst, the Malicki and Walczak linear model was also tested for all soils under investigation and the model of Munoz-Carpena et al. was tested for sand. Malicki and Walczak model performance at predicting values was approximately the same as the Hilhorst model for sand and slightly better for sandy loam. In general, one could argue that the linear models could predict with some accuracy for the cases of coarse porous media.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Bouksila, F., Persson, M., Berndtsson, R., and Bahri, A. (2008). “Soil water content and salinity using different dielectric methods in saline gypsiferous soil.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 53(1), 253–265.
Delta–T Devices Ltd. (2005). “User manual for the WET sensor (type WET-2).” Cambridge, U.K., ⟨http://www.delta-t.co.uk⟩.
Hamed, Y., Persson, M., and Berndtsson, R. (2003). “Soil solution electrical conductivity measurements using different dielectric techniques.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 67, 1071–1077.
Hamed, Y., Samy, G., and Persson, M. (2006). “Evaluation of the WET sensor compared to time domain reflectometry.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 51, 671–681.
Heimovaara, T. J., Focke, A. G., Bouten, W., and Verstraten, J. M. (1995). “Assesing temporal variations in soil water composition with time domain reflectometry.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 59, 689–698.
Hilhorst, M. A. (1998). “Dielectric characterization of soil.” Doctoral thesis, Wageningen Agric. Univ., Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Hilhorst, M. A. (2000). “A pore water conductivity sensor.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64, 1922–1925.
Hilhorst, M. A., Baalendonck, J., and Kampers, F. W. H. (1993). “A broad band-width mixed analog/digital integrated circuit for the measurement of complex impedances.” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 28(7), 764–769.
Malicki, M., and Walczak, R. (1999). “Evaluating soil salinity status from electrical conductivity and permittivity.” Eur. J. Soil Sci., 50, 505–514.
Malicki, M., Walczak, R., Koch, S., and Fluhler, H. (1994). “Determining soil salinity from simultaneous readings of its electrical conductivity and permittivity using TDR.” Proc., Symp. on Time Domain Reflrctometry in Environmental, Infrastructure and Mining Applications, U.S. Bureau of Mines, Evanston, Ill., 328–336.
Mualem, Y., and Friedman, S. (1991). “Theoretical prediction of electrical conductivity in saturated and unsaturated soil.” Water Resour. Res., 27, 2771–2777.
Munoz-Carpena, R., Regalado, C. M., Ritter, A., Alvarez-Benedi, J., and Socorro, A. R. (2005). “TDR estimation of saline solutes concentration in a volcanic soil.” Geoderma, 124, 399–413.
Persson, M. (2002). “Evaluating the linear dielectric constant-electrical conductivity model using time domain reflectometry.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 47, 269–277.
Regalado C., Ritter, A. and Rodriguez-Gonzalez, R. M. (2007). “Performance of the commercial WET capacitance sensor as compared with time domain reflectometry in volcanic soils.” Vadoze Zone J., 6, 244–254.
Rhoades, J., Ratts, P., and Prather, R. (1976). “Effects of liquid-phase electrical conductivity, water content, and surface conductivity on bulk soil electrical conductivity.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 40, 651–655.
Ritter A. and Regalado, C. M. (2007). “Corrections for simultaneous measurements of soil water content and salinity using a capacitance sensor.” ASABE, Annual International Meeting, Minneapolis.
Robinson, R. A., and Stokes, R. H. (1959). Electrolyte solutions, 2nd Ed., Butterworths, London.
Topp G., Davis, J., and Annan, A. (1980). “Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: measurements in coaxial transmission lines.” Water Resour. Res., 16, 574–582.
U.S. Salinity Laboratory Staff. (1954). “Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils.” USDA Handb. 60, U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, D.C.
Weast, R. C. (1986). CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, CRC, Boca Raton, Fla.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Jun 16, 2009
Accepted: Dec 29, 2009
Published online: Jan 5, 2010
Published in print: Aug 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.