Actual and Reference Evaporative Losses and Surface Coefficients of a Maize Field during Nongrowing (Dormant) Periods
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 135, Issue 3
Abstract
Effective water resources planning, allocation, management, and use in agroecosystems require accurate quantification of actual evapotranspiration during growing and nongrowing (dormant) periods. Prediction of for a variety of vegetation surfaces during the growing season has been researched extensively, but relatively little information exists on evaporative losses during nongrowing periods for different surfaces. The objectives of this research were to evaluate in relation to available energy, precipitation, and grass and alfalfa-reference ET ( and ) for a maize (Zea mays. L) field and to analyze the dynamics of surface coefficients during the nongrowing period (October 15–April 30). The evaporative losses were measured using a Bowen ratio energy balance system (BREBS) on an hourly basis and averaged over for three consecutive nongrowing periods: 2004–2005 (Season I), 2005–2006 (Season II), and 2006–2007 (Season III). BREBS-measured was approximately 50% of available energy ( ; is net radiation and is soil heat flux density) during normal and wet seasons (Seasons I and III) and 41% of available energy during a dry season (Season II). Cumulative ranged from in Season II to in Season III and exceeded precipitation by 21% during the dry season. The ratio of to precipitation was 0.85 in Season I, 1.21 in Season II, and 0.41 in Season III. was approximately 50% of and 36% of in both Seasons I and III, whereas in Season II, was 32% of and 23% of . Overall, measured during the dormant season was generally most strongly correlated with radiation terms, particularly , albedo, incoming shortwave radiation, and outgoing longwave radiation. Average surface coefficients over the three seasons were 0.44 and 0.33 for grass and alfalfa-reference surfaces, respectively. Using geometric mean values to calculate using a approach over the entire nongrowing season yielded adequate predictions with overall root mean square deviations of 0.64 and for and , respectively. Estimates of using a dual crop coefficient approach were good on a seasonal basis, but performed less well on a daily basis. Regression equations that were developed (accounting for serial autocorrelation in the and time series) yielded good estimates of . Considering nongrowing period evaporative losses in water budget calculations would enable water regulatory agencies to better account for water use in hydrologic balance calculations over the entire year rather than only for the growing season and to better assess the progression and availability of water resources for the next growing season.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This paper is a contribution of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Agricultural Research Division, Lincoln, Nebraska. The mention of trade names or commercial products is solely for the information of the reader and does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation for use by the writers or the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
References
Allen, R. G. (1996). “Nongrowing season evaporation in northern Utah.” Proc., North American Water and Environment Congress, ASCE, Reston, Va.
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M. (1998). “Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements.” FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56, Rome.
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Smith, M., Raes, D., and Wright, J. L. (2005a). “FAO-56 dual crop coefficient method for estimating evaporation from soil and application extensions.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 131(1), 2–13.
Allen, R. G., Pruitt, W. O., Raes, D., Smith, M., and Pereira, L. S. (2005b). “Estimating evaporation from bare soil and the crop coefficient for the initial period using common soils information.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 131(1), 14–23.
American Society of Civil Engineers–Environmental and Water Resources Institute (ASCE–EWRI). (2005). The ASCE standardized reference evapotranspiration equation, R. G. Allen et al., eds., ASCE, Reston, Va.
ASCE. (1993). “Criteria for evaluation of watershed models.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 119(3), 429–442.
Hammer, R. R., Ragon, L. G., and Buechle, A. A. (1981). Soil survey of Clay County, Nebraska, Soil Conservation Service and Univ. of Nebraska Conservation and Survey Division, Lincoln, Neb.
Harell, F. E., Jr. (2001). Regression modeling strategies, Springer, New York.
High Plains Regional Climate Center. (2007). ⟨http://www.hprcc.unl.edu⟩ (November 2007).
Irmak, A., and Irmak, S. (2008). “Reference and crop evapotranspiration in south central Nebraska. II: Measurement and estimation of actual evapotranspiration for corn.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 134(6), 700–715.
Irmak, A., Irmak, S., and Martin, D. L. (2008a). “Reference and crop evapotranspiration in south central Nebraska. I: Comparison and analysis of grass and alfalfa-reference evapotranspiration.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 134(6), 690–699.
Irmak, S., et al. (2008b). “On the scaling up leaf stomatal resistance to canopy resistance using photosynthetic photon flux density.” Agric. Forest Meteorol., 148, 1034–1044.
Irmak, S., Allen, R. G., and Whitty, E. B. (2003). “Daily grass and alfalfa-reference evapotranspiration estimates and alfalfa-to-grass evapotranspiration ratios in Florida.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 129(5), 360–370.
Irmak, S., Howell, T. A., Allen, R. G., Payero, J. O., and Martin., D. L. (2005). “Standardized ASCE-Penman-Monteith: Impact of sum-of-hourly vs. -timestep computations at reference weather station sites.” Trans. ASAE, 48(3), 1063–1077.
Irmak, S., Irmak, A., Howell, T. A., Martin, D. L., Payero, J. O., and Copeland, K. S. (2008c). “Variability of alfalfa-reference to grass-reference evapotranspiration ratios in growing and dormant seasons.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 134(2), 147–159.
Irmak, S., and Mutiibwa., D. (2008). “Dynamics of photosynthetic photon flux density and light extinction coefficient for assessing some radiant energy interactions for maize canopy.” Trans. ASABE, 51(5), 1633–1673.
Irmak, S., Payero, J. O., Martin, D. L., Irmak, A., and Howell, T. A. (2006). “Sensitivity analyses and sensitivity coefficients of the standardized ASCE-Penman-Monteith equation to climate variables.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 132(6), 564–578.
Nichols, W. E., and Cuenca, R. H. (1993). “Evaluation of the evaporative fraction for parameterization of the surface energy balance.” Water Resour. Res., 29(11), 3681–3690.
Prueger, J. H., Hatfield, J. L., and Sauer, T. J. (1998). “Surface energy balance partitioning over rye and oats cover crops in central Iowa.” Geotech. Test. J., 53(3), 263–268.
Sauer, T. J., Hatfield, J. L., Prueger, J. H., and Logsdon, S. D. (1998a). “Energy balance of a corn residue-covered field during snowmelt.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 34(6), 1401–1414.
Sauer, T. J., Hatfield, J. L., Prueger, J. H., and Norman, J. M. (1998b). “Surface energy balance of a corn residue-covered field.” Agric. Forest Meteorol., 89(3–4), 155–168.
Shelton, D., Smith, J., and Jasa, P. (2000). “Estimating residue cover.” Conservation tillage systems and management, 2nd Ed., R. Reeder, ed., MWPS-45, MidWest Plan Service, Ames, Iowa, 35–46.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Mar 11, 2008
Accepted: Sep 2, 2008
Published online: Jan 21, 2009
Published in print: Jun 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.