Technical Papers
Nov 24, 2021

Environmental Performance and Cost Assessment of Precast Structural Elements for Cleaner Construction Solutions: LCA Approach

Publication: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 26, Issue 2

Abstract

The construction sector across the world involves constructing huge buildings, which usually consumes enormous energy, causing an incredibly damaging effect on the environment in terms of raw material usage, greenhouse gases (GHGs) emitted, and waste generated in huge quantities, which has drawn much attention from conservationists. Though several preventive measures have been developed to reduce the impact of construction, they are often ignored or mismanaged. Thus, things must be examined in detail with appropriate environmental tools to provide a clear view of the emission released into the environment and mitigate the problem from a broader perspective. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is one tool used for quantifying the emissions into the environment and economic impacts of the chosen product/process. As a result, this study investigates the effects of the precast structural elements for building and their carbon footprint at the different construction phases based on the LCA methodology. The construction phases include (a) the preoperational phase/building construction, (b) the operation phase, and (c) the postoperational phase/building demolition and inventory data are collected from the selected building. The results show that the precast structure’s energy (23.33 kW · h/m2) was less compared with reviewed case studies. The global warming potential (GWP) of the present study, 16.55 kg CO2 eq/m2, was the least among all the studies. The life cycle cost (LCC) analysis of buildings was performed, and the LCC of precast structures was 4.78% less than the conventional construction. The study evaluates and compares each phase’s emissions and identifies specific hotspots for emissions into the environment. Finally, the authors believe that the study provides valuable insights into the potential environmental impacts for the relevant stakeholders and experts.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The Seed grant received from National Institute of Technology Andhra Pradesh to carry out this work is duly acknowledged.

References

Abey, S. T., and K. B. Anand. 2019. “Embodied energy comparison of prefabricated and conventional building construction.” J. Inst. Eng. Ser. A 100 (4): 777–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-019-00394-8.
Ansah, M. K., X. Chen, H. Yang, L. Lu, and P. T. I. Lam. 2020. “An integrated life cycle assessment of different façade systems for a typical residential building in Ghana.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 53: 101974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101974.
Aye, L., T. Ngo, R. H. Crawford, R. Gammampila, and P. Mendis. 2012. “Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy analysis of prefabricated reusable building modules.” Energy Build. 47: 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.11.049.
Bahramian, M., and K. Yetilmezsoy. 2020. “Life cycle assessment of the building industry: An overview of two decades of research (1995–2018).” Energy Build. 219: 109917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109917.
Bonamente, E., M. C. Merico, S. Rinaldi, G. Pignatta, A. L. Pisello, F. Cotana, and A. Nicolini. 2014. “Environmental impact of industrial prefabricated buildings: Carbon and energy footprint analysis based on an LCA approach.” Energy Procedia 61: 2841–2844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.319.
Chang, C. C., W. Shi, P. Mehta, and J. Dauwels. 2019. “Life cycle energy assessment of university buildings in tropical climate.” J. Cleaner Prod. 239: 117930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117930.
Evangelista, B. L., L. P. Rosado, and C. S. G. Penteado. 2018a. “Life cycle assessment of concrete paving blocks using electric arc furnace slag as natural coarse aggregate substitute.” J. Cleaner Prod. 178 (3): 176–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.007.
Evangelista, P. P. A., A. Kiperstok, E. A. Torres, and J. P. Gonçalves. 2018b. “Environmental performance analysis of residential buildings in Brazil using life cycle assessment (LCA).” Constr. Build. Mater. 169: 748–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.045.
Fouquet, M., A. Levasseur, M. Margni, A. Lebert, S. Lasvaux, B. Souyri, and M. Woloszyn. 2015. “Methodological challenges and developments in LCA of low energy buildings: Application to biogenic carbon and global warming assessment.” Build. Environ. 90: 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.03.022.
Gu, Y., H. Wang, J. Xu, Y. Wang, X. Wang, Z. P. Robinson, F. Li, J. Wu, J. Tan, and X. Zhi. 2019. “Quantification of interlinked environmental footprints on a sustainable university campus: A nexus analysis perspective.” Appl. Energy 246: 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.015.
Herrmann, H., and H. Bucksch. 2014. “Demolition waste.” In Dictionary Geotechnical Engineering/Wörterbuch GeoTechnik. Berlin: Springer.
Hong, J., G. Q. Shen, C. Mao, Z. Li, and K. Li. 2016. “Life-cycle energy analysis of prefabricated building components: An input-output-based hybrid model.” J. Cleaner Prod. 112 (Part 4): 2198–2207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.030.
Jaillon, L., and C. S. Poon. 2009. “The evolution of prefabricated residential building systems in Hong Kong: A review of the public and the private sector.” Autom. Constr. 18 (3): 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.09.002.
Kvočka, D., A. Lešek, F. Knez, V. Ducman, M. Panizza, C. Tsoutis, and A. Bernardi. 2020. “Life cycle assessment of prefabricated geopolymeric façade cladding panels made from large fractions of recycled construction and demolition waste.” Materials 13 (18): 3931. https://doi.org/10.3390/MA13183931.
Lamnatou, C., and D. Chemisana. 2017. “Concentrating solar systems: Life cycle assessment (LCA) and environmental issues.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 78: 916–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.065.
Liu, G., T. Gu, P. Xu, J. Hong, A. Shrestha, and I. Martek. 2019. “A production line-based carbon emission assessment model for prefabricated components in China.” J. Cleaner Prod. 209: 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.172.
Mallick, H., and M. K. Mahalik. 2010. “Constructing the economy: The role of construction sector in India’s growth.” J. Real Estate Finance Econ. 40 (3): 368–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-008-9137-z.
Mosteiro-Romero, M., U. Krogmann, H. Wallbaum, Y. Ostermeyer, J. S. Senick, and C. J. Andrews. 2014. “Relative importance of electricity sources and construction practices in residential buildings: A Swiss-US comparison of energy related life-cycle impacts.” Energy Build. 68 (Part A): 620–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.09.046.
Motuziene, V., A. Rogoža, V. Lapinskiene, and T. Vilutiene. 2016. “Construction solutions for energy efficient single-family house based on its life cycle multi-criteria analysis: A case study.” J. Cleaner Prod. 112 (Part 1): 532–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.103.
Nässén, J., J. Holmberg, A. Wadeskog, and M. Nyman. 2007. “Direct and indirect energy use and carbon emissions in the production phase of buildings: An input-output analysis.” Energy 32 (9): 1593–1602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2007.01.002.
Rama Jyosyula, S. K., S. Surana, and S. Raju. 2020. “Role of lightweight materials of construction on carbon dioxide emission of a reinforced concrete building.” Mater. Today: Proc. 27 (12): 984–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.294.
Rodrigues, V., A. A. Martins, M. I. Nunes, A. Quintas, T. M. Mata, and N. S. Caetano. 2018. “LCA of constructing an industrial building: Focus on embodied carbon and energy.” Energy Procedia 153: 420–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.10.018.
Sangwan, K. S., V. Bhakar, V. Arora, and P. Solanki. 2018. “Measuring carbon footprint of an Indian university using life cycle assessment.” Procedia CIRP 69: 475–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.111.
Shrivastava, S., and A. Chini. 2005. Construction materials and C&D waste in India, 72–76. Gainesville, FL: Univ. of Florida.
Tao, X., C. Mao, F. Xie, G. Liu, and P. P. Xu. 2018. “Greenhouse gas emission monitoring system for manufacturing prefabricated components.” Autom. Constr. 93: 361–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.05.015.
Tavares, V., N. Lacerda, and F. Freire. 2019. “Embodied energy and greenhouse gas emissions analysis of a prefabricated modular house: The “Moby” case study.” J. Cleaner Prod. 212: 1044–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.028.
Teng, Y., and W. Pan. 2020. “Estimating and minimizing embodied carbon of prefabricated high-rise residential buildings considering parameter, scenario and model uncertainties.” Build. Environ. 180: 106951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106951.
Tulevech, S. M., D. J. Hage, S. K. Jorgensen, C. L. Guensler, R. Himmler, and S. H. Gheewala. 2018. “Life cycle assessment: A multi-scenario case study of a low-energy industrial building in Thailand.” Energy Build. 168: 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.03.011.
Tumminia, G., F. Guarino, S. Longo, M. Ferraro, M. Cellura, and V. Antonucci. 2018. “Life cycle energy performances and environmental impacts of a prefabricated building module.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 92: 272–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.059.
Wang, H., Y. Zhang, W. Gao, and S. Kuroki. 2020. “Life cycle environmental and cost performance of prefabricated buildings.” Sustainability 12 (7): 2609. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072609.
Zhang, X., L. Shen, and L. Zhang. 2013. “Life cycle assessment of the air emissions during building construction process: A case study in Hong Kong.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 17: 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.09.024.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 26Issue 2April 2022

History

Received: Aug 13, 2021
Accepted: Sep 30, 2021
Published online: Nov 24, 2021
Published in print: Apr 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Apr 24, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jagadeesh Nagireddi
Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Tadepalligudem 534101, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Santhosh Kumar Gedela
Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Tadepalligudem 534101, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Mahabu Subhani Shaik
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Tadepalligudem 534101, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Tadepalligudem 534101, Andhra Pradesh, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9525-713X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Review of Microfibres from Various Industries and Its Life Cycle Burden on Environment, Progress on Life Cycle Assessment in Textiles and Clothing, 10.1007/978-981-19-9634-4_10, (261-281), (2023).
  • Global review of circular economy and life cycle thinking in building Demolition Waste Management: A way ahead for India, Building and Environment, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109413, 222, (109413), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share