Gowanus Canal Superfund Site. III: Leaching of In Situ Stabilization/Solidification Mix Designs
Publication: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 24, Issue 4
Abstract
An in situ stabilization/solidification (in situ S/S or ISS) field pilot was conducted in the Gowanus Canal on the manufactured gas plant (MGP) impacted sediments using 9 mix designs including 5%–10% by dry weight (wt%) type I/II Portland cement (PC), type V PC, and NewCem (NC) slag cement in various combinations. Naphthalene was the primary contaminant with total contents between 187 and 54,500 mg/kg and a median value of 1,320 mg/kg. A mobile nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) was observed in many of the untreated sediment samples. USEPA 1316 testing modified (M) for organics showed that 7 out of 9 untreated samples had naphthalene effective solubilities on the order of 11.5–14 mg/L and its leaching was solubility controlled. Leaching of S/S-treated samples using USEPA 1315M was completed using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) liner inserts and in both deionized (DI) and saltwater (SW) baths to compare the impact of simulated brackish conditions (approximately 22.4 g/L salt) on the leaching of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The main differences were that the pH of the DI water bath was approximately 3–3.5 units higher than the SW bath but the conductivity of the latter was typically 30–50 times greater. Visible crusts were observed on all SW bath samples, the most significant crusts being associated with the lowest VOC leaching rates. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) leaching was relatively unaffected by bath type. The naphthalene percent leaching reductions (% LRs) for the top five mixes (> 97% LRs) versus the untreated sediment were 5%–14% higher under SW conditions, presumably due to the surface crusts. The interval mass releases from the top 3 mixes under SW conditions were approximately100 times lower than the corresponding DI water bath values. Because 3 out of the top 5 mixes were the 60/40 (w/w) type V PC/NC blend, a minimum dose of 7.5 wt% of this blend was recommended for remedial construction.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work was performed for the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Region 2 under the USEPA Region 10 AES task order 0072 Contract Number 68-S7-04-01. Field implementation was performed by the pilot testing contractor and its associated subcontractors [Geo-Solutions Inc. (New Kensington, PA) and D.A. Collins Environmental, Inc. (Wilton, NY)]. Chemical and leaching tests were performed by the CH2M Applied Sciences Laboratory (Corvallis, Oregon), and geotechnical testing was performed by GeoTesting Express (Acton, MA). Numerous current and former Jacobs/CH2M staff contributed to the work effort associated with the pilot study, sampling, and testing data sets [J. Hess (Project Manager), D.R.V. Berggren, T. Olean, M. Bruno, and A. Dalton-Atha to name a few]. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jacobs or the USEPA.
References
ASTM. 2014. Standard test methods for moisture, ash, and organic matter of peat and other organic soils. ASTM D2974-14. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2016. Standard test methods for measurement of hydraulic conductivity of saturated porous materials using a flexible wall permeameter. ASTM D5084-16a. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). ASTM D2487-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Enell, A., S. Lundstedt, H. P. H. Arp, S. Josefsson, G. Cornelissen, O. Wik, and D. Berggren Kleja. 2016. “Combining leaching and passive sampling to measure the mobility and distribution between porewater, DOC, and colloids of native oxy-PAHs, N-PACs, and PAHs in historically contaminated soil.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 50 (21): 11797–11805. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02774.
EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute). 2009. Leaching assessment methods for the evaluation of the effectiveness of in situ stabilization of soil material at manufactured gas plant sites. Palo Alto, CA: EPRI.
Finney, D. S., T. Himmer, J. J. Morris, and S. Coladonato. 2014. “Demonstrating leaching reductions of NAPL-impacted soils treated with stabilization/solidification using modified EPA method 1315.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 19 (1): C4014002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000250.
Freeze, R. A., and J. A. Cherry. 1979. Groundwater. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Gentry, J. L., M. R. Niemet, D. G. Grubb, M. Bruno, D. R. Berggren, and C. D. Tsiamis. 2014. “Gowanus canal superfund site. II: Stabilization/solidification of MGP-impacted sediments.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 19 (1): C4014004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000252.
GeoSyntec. 2015. PD-7 Groundwater upwelling investigation report. Draft. Prepared for Gowanus Canal Remedial Design Group.
Gordon, J. E., and R. L. Thorne. 1967a. “Salt effects on the activity coefficient of naphthalene in mixed aqueous electrolyte solutions. I. Mixtures of two salts.” J. Phys. Chem. 71 (13): 4390–4399. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100872a035.
Gordon, J. E., and R. L. Thorne. 1967b. “Salt effects on non-electrolyte activity coefficients in mixed aqueous electrolyte solutions—II. Artificial and natural sea waters.” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 31 (12): 2433–2443. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(67)90013-0.
Haftka, J. J. H., P. Scherpenisse, M. T. Jonker, and J. L. M. Hermens. 2013. “Using polyacrylate-coated SPME fibers to quantify sorption of polar and ionic organic contaminants to dissolved organic carbon.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (9): 4455–4462. https://doi.org/10.1021/es400236a.
Johnson, W. P., and G. L. Amy. 1995. “Facilitated transport and enhanced desorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by natural organic matter in aquifer sediments.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 29 (3): 807–817. https://doi.org/10.1021/es00003a032.
Jonker, M. T. O., S. A. van der Heijden, M. Kotte, and F. Smedes. 2015. “Quantifying the effects of temperature and salinity on partitioning of hydrophobic organic chemicals to silicone rubber passive samplers.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 (11): 6791–6799. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00286.
Moldrup, P., T. Olesen, D. E. Rolston, and T. Yamaguchi. 1997. “Modeling diffusion and reaction in soils: VII. Predicting gas and ion diffusivity in undisturbed and sieved soils.” Soil Sci. 162 (9): 632–640. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-199709000-00004.
Niemet, M. R., J. L. Gentry, M. Bruno, D. R. Berggren, and C. D. Tsiamis. 2014. “Gowanus Canal Superfund site. I: NAPL mobility testing of MGP-impacted sediments.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 19 (1): C4014003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000251.
Olean, T. J., J. L. Gentry, A. J. Salter-Blanc, T. M. Himmer, M. Bruno, and C. D. Tsiamis. 2016. “In-canal stabilization/solidification of NAPL-impacted sediments.” Rem. J. 26 (3): 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21467.
Pilson, M. E. Q. 1998. “Major constituents of seawater.” Chap. 4 in An introduction to the chemistry of the sea, 66–73. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Reible Research Group. 2019. “CAPSIM version 3.8 updated September 23.” Accessed December 21, 2019. https://www.depts.ttu.edu/ceweb/research/reiblesgroup/.
Stegemann, J. A., and P. L. Côte. 1996. “A proposed protocol for evaluation of solidified wastes.” Sci. Total Environ. 178 (1–3): 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(95)04802-2.
Ter Laak, T. L., F. J. Busser, and J. L. M. Hermens. 2008. “Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as passive sampler material for hydrophobic chemicals: Effect of chemical properties and sampler characteristics on partitioning and equilibration times.” Anal. Chem. 80 (10): 3859–3866. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac800258j.
Ter Laak, T. L., J. C. van Eijkeren, F. J. Busser, H. P. van Leeuwen, and J. L. M. Hermens. 2009. “Facilitated transport of polychlorinated biphenyls and polybrominated diphenyl ethers by dissolved organic matter.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 43 (5): 1379–1385. https://doi.org/10.1021/es802403v.
USEPA. 2004a. SW-846 test method 9045D: Soil and solid waste pH. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods SW-846 Method 9045D. Washington, DC: USEPA.
USEPA. 2004b. SW-846 test method 9060A: Total organic carbon. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods SW-846 Method 9060A. Washington, DC: USEPA.
USEPA. 2011. Draft gowanus canal remedial investigation report. Prepared for the USEPA. Englewood, CO: CH2MHILL.
USEPA. 2012. Method 1316—Liquid-solid partitioning as a function of liquid-to-solid ratio in solid materials using a parallel batch procedure. Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery. Washington, DC: USEPA.
USEPA. 2013a. Record of decision gowanus canal superfund site; Kings County, New York. Washington, DC: USEPA.
USEPA. 2013b. Method 1315—Mass transfer rates of constituents in monolithic and compacted granular material using a semi-dynamic tank leaching procedure. Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery. Washington, DC: USEPA.
USEPA. 2013c. Bench scale testing pre-design investigations. Prepared for USEPA. Englewood, CO: CH2MHILL.
USEPA. 2017. Leaching environmental assessment framework (LEAK) how-to guide: Understanding the LEAF approach and how and when to use it. Washington, DC: USEPA.
USEPA. 2018a. SW-846 test method 8260D: Volatile organic compounds by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods SW-846 Method 8260D. Washington, DC: USEPA.
USEPA. 2018b. SW-846 test method 8270E: Semivolatile organic compounds by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods SW-846 Method 8270E. Washington, DC: USEPA.
USEPA. 2019. “Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) Database.” Accessed January 10, 2019. https://www.epa.gov/iris.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 24 • Issue 4 • October 2020
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 26, 2019
Accepted: Mar 4, 2020
Published online: Jun 24, 2020
Published in print: Oct 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Nov 24, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.