Technical Papers
Aug 15, 2018

Experimental Investigation of Shear Strength Behaviors of Stone Dust–EPS Geofoam Interface

Publication: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 22, Issue 4

Abstract

The stone crushing industry has doubled in size in India in the last decade because aggregate has been the most useful raw material for various structures. However, during crushing of stone aggregates in quarries, huge amounts of stone dust get generated as by-products at every quarry site, which raises the problems of safe disposal and can cause environmental hazards. The proper utilization or environment-friendly disposal of this stone dust is of concern. In this paper, a series of experimental studies were performed to investigate the interface shear strength property of expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam to stone dust and geofoam to geofoam using direct shear testing in dry and wet conditions. In addition, the internal shear strength behaviors of unit geofoam blocks were investigated through direct shear tests in dry and wet conditions. In order to examine the effect of density on the interface shear strength behaviors, three different densities of geofoam (12, 15, and 20  kg/m3) were used. The effect of stone dust layer thickness and normal stress on the interface shear strength behaviors were also investigated. The test results revealed that the density of geofoam does not have a significant influence on the EPS/EPS and EPS/stone dust interface strengths. The submergence slightly decreased the EPS/EPS interface strength compared with that in dry conditions for the same density and normal stress level, whereas its effect was found to be much lower on EPS/stone dust interface strength.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

AbdelSalam, S. S., and S. A. Azzam. 2016. “Reduction of lateral pressures on retaining walls using geofoam inclusion.” Geosynthetics Int. 23 (6): 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.16.00005.
Arellano, D., T. D. Stark, J. S. Horvath, and D. Leshchinsky. 2011. Guidelines for geofoam applications in slope stability projects. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
ASTM. 1995. Standard test method for measuring pH of soil for use in corrosion testing. ASTM G51. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2000. Standard test method for permeability of granular soils (constant head). ASTM D2434. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2010. Standard test method for compressive properties of rigid cellular plastics. ASTM D1621. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2011a. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). ASTM D2487. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2011b. Standard test method for consolidated drained triaxial compression test for soils. ASTM D7181. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2011c. Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained condition. ASTM D3080. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2012. Standard test method for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort. ASTM D698. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2013. Standard specification for rigid cellular polystyrene geofoam. ASTM D6817. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2014. Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer. ASTM D854. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test method for determining the shear strength of soil-geosynthetic and geosynthetic-geosynthetic interfaces by direct shear test. ASTM D5321. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Atmatzidis, D. K., E. G. Missirlis, and E. B. Theodorakopoulos. 2001. “Shear resistance on EPS geofoam block surfaces.” In Proc., EPS Geofoam 2001: 3rd Annual Conf. Patras, Greece: Univ. of Patras.
Barrett, J. C., and A. J. Valsangkar. 2009. “Effectiveness of connectors in geofoam block construction.” Geotext. Geomembr. 27 (3): 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.11.010.
Beju, Y. Z., and J. N. Mandal. 2016. “Compression creep test on expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam.” Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 10 (4): 401–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2016.1155260.
Beju, Y. Z., and J. N. Mandal. 2017a. “Combined use of jute geotextile-EPS geofoam to protect flexible buried pipes: Experimental and numerical studies.” Int. J. Geosynthetics Ground Eng. 3 (4): 32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-017-0107-5.
Beju, Y. Z., and J. N. Mandal. 2017b. “Expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam: Preliminary characteristic evaluation.” Procedia Eng. 189: 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.038.
Chun, B. S., H. S. Lim, M. Sagong, and K. Kim. 2004. “Development of a hyperbolic constitutive model for expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam under triaxial compression tests.” Geotext. Geomembr. 22 (4): 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2004.03.005.
De, A., A. N. Morgante, and T. F. Zimmie. 2016. “Numerical and physical modeling of geofoam barriers as protection against effects of surface blast on underground tunnels.” Geotext. Geomembr. 44 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.06.008.
Ertugrul, O., and A. Trandafir. 2011. “Reduction of lateral earth forces acting on rigid nonyielding retaining walls by EPS geofoam inclusions.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 23 (12): 1711–1718. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000348.
Farnsworth, C. B., S. F. Bartlett, D. Negussey, and A. W. Stuedlein. 2008. “Rapid construction and settlement behavior of embankment systems on soft foundation soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (3): 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:3(289).
Hazarika, H. 2006. “Stress-strain modeling of EPS geofoam for large strain applications.” Geotext. Geomembr. 24 (2): 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2005.11.003.
Horvath, J. S. 1994. “Expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam: An introduction to material behaviour.” Geotext. Geomembr. 13 (4): 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-1144(94)90048-5.
Horvath, J. S. 1996. “The Compressible inclusion function of EPS geofoam: An overview.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on EPS Construction Method, 71–81. Tokyo: EPS Construction Method Development Organization.
Horvath, J. S. 1997. “The compressible inclusion function of EPS geofoam.” Geotext. Geomembr. 15 (1-3): 77–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(97)00008-3.
Horvath, J. S. 2010. “Emerging trends in failures involving EPS-block geofoam fills.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 24 (4): 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000114.
Huang, X., and D. Negussey. 2007. “Resilient modulus for EPS geofoam.” In Proc., Geo-Denver 2007, Int. Conf., 1–10. Denver: ASCE.
Kadir, A. A., M. I. Hassan, N. A. Sarani, A. S. A. Rahim, and N. Ismail. 2017. “Leachability of quarry dust waste incorporated into fired clay brick using TCLP.” Indian J. Sci. Technol. 10 (8): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2017/v10i8/111459.
Kandolkar, S. S., and J. N. Mandal. 2015. “Behavior of reinforced stone dust walls under strip loading.” Adv. Civ. Eng. Mater. 4 (1): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1520/ACEM20140013.
Kandolkar, S. S., and J. N. Mandal. 2016. “Behavior of reinforced-stone dust walls with backfill at varying relative densities.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste Manage. 20 (1): 04015010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000287.
Kim, H., B. Choi, and J. Kim. 2010. “Reduction of earth pressure on buried pipes by EPS geofoam inclusions.” Geotech. Test. J. 33 (4): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ102315.
Leo, C. J., M. Kumruzzaman, H. Wong, and J. H. Yin. 2008. “Behavior of EPS geofoam in true triaxial compression test.” Geotext. Geomembr. 26 (2): 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2007.10.005.
Madhavan, P., and S. Raj. 2005. Budhpura ‘ground zero’ sandstone quarrying in India, 1–32. Utrecht, Netherlands: India Committee of the Netherlands.
Marjive, V. R., and B. Ram Rathan Lal. 2016. “Compressive strength behaviour of stone dust and eps beads-based material.” In Proc., Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Congress, 862–870. Phoenix: ASCE.
Meguid, M. A., M. G. Hussein, M. R. Ahmed, Z. Omeman, and J. Whalen. 2017. “Investigation of soil-geosynthetic-structure interaction associated with induced trench installation.” Geotext. Geomembr. 45 (4): 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.04.004.
Miki, G. 1996. “Ten year history of EPS method in Japan and its future challenges.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on EPS Construction Method, 394–411. Tokyo: EPS Construction Method Development Organization.
Nadaf, M. B., A. K. Verma, S. Dutta, Y. Z. Beju, and J. N. Mandal. 2016. “Numerical analysis on behavior of buried pipelines with EPS geofoam inclusion over pipe in stone dust fill.” In Proc., 3rd Pan-American Conf. on Geosynthetics, 926–937. Miami Beach: ASCE.
Negussey, D., and X. Huang. 2006. “Modulus of subgrade reaction for EPS geofoam.” In Proc., Geo Shanghai 2006 Int. Conf., 165–172. Shanghai, China: ASCE.
Nomaguchi, A. 1996. “Studies on earthquake resisting performance of EPS embankment.” In Proc. Int. Symp. on EPS Construction Method, 382–392. Tokyo: EPS Construction Method Development Organization.
NRRL (Norwegian Road Research Laboratory). 1992. Expanded polystyrene used in road embankments. Oslo, Norway: NRRL.
Onyelowe, K. C., F. O. Okafor, and D. G. Nwachukwu. 2012. “Geophysical use of quarry dust (as admixture) as applied to soil stabilization and modification-A review.” J. Earth Sci. 1 (1): 6–8.
Özer, A. T., and O. Akay. 2016. “Interface shear strength characteristics of interlocked EPS-block geofoam.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 28 (4): 04015156. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001418.
Padade, A. H., and J. N. Mandal. 2012. “Direct shear test on expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam.” In Proc., 5th European Geosynthetic Congress. Jupiter, FL: International Geosynthetics Society.
Padade, A. H., and J. N. Mandal. 2014. “Interface strength behavior of expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam.” Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 8 (1): 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1179/1938636213Z.00000000056.
Patil, M. A. 2001. “Environmental management scenario in stone crusher industry sector and cleaner production possibilities.” Teri. Inf. Monitor Environ. Sci. 6: 83–92.
Sheeley, M. 2000. “Slope stabilization utilizing geofoam.” M.Sc. thesis, Geofoam Research Center, Syracuse Univ.
Sheeley, M., and D. Negussey. 2000. “An investigation of geofoam interface strength behavior.” In Soft Ground Technology Conf., Geotechnical Special Publication No. 112, 292–303. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Sheikh, A., S. V. S. Rana, and A. Pal. 2011. “Environmental health assessment of stone crushers in and around Jhansi, UP, India.” J. Ecophysiology Occup. Health 11: 107–115.
Shrivastava, A. K., A. Tikariha, S. Patra, and M. R. Sinha. 2014. “Impact of stone crushing industries on leaf anomaly architect of woody plants.” Indian J. Sci. Res. 4 (1): 127–133.
Singh, S. K., V. Srivastava, V. C. Agarwal, R. Kumar, and P. K. Mehta. 2014. “An experimental investigation on stone dust as partial replacement of fine aggregate in concrete.” J. Acad. Ind. Res. 3 (5): 229–232.
Sivacoumar, R., R. Jayabalou, S. Swarnalatha, and K. Balakrishnan. 2006. “Particulate matter from stone crushing industry: Size distribution and health effects.” J. Environ. Eng. 132 (3): 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2006)132:3(405).
Sivakumar, A., and M. Prakash. 2011. “Characteristic studies on the mechanical properties of quarry dust addition in conventional concrete.” J. Civ. Eng. Constr. Technol. 2 (10): 218–235.
Song, Y. S., K. S. Kim, and K. S. Woo. 2012. “Stability of embankments constructed from soil mixed with stone dust in quarry reclamation.” J. Environ. Earth Sci. 67 (1): 285–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1507-9.
Soosan, T. G., B. T. Jose, and B. M. Abraham. 2001. “Use of quarry dust in embankment and highway construction.” In Proc., Indian Geo-technical Conf., 274–277. Indore, India: Phoenix Pub. House.
Soosan, T. G., B. T. Jose, and B. M. Abraham. 2005. “Utilization of quarry dust to improve the geotechnical properties of soils in highway construction.” Geotech. Test. J. 28 (4): 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11768.
Sridharan, A., T. G. Soosan, T. J. Babu, and B. M. Abraham. 2006. “Shear strength studies on soil-quarry dust mixtures.” J. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 24 (5): 1163–1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-005-1216-9.
Stark, T. D., D. Arellano, J. S. Horvath, and D. Leshchinsky. 2004. Guideline and recommended standard for geofoam applications in highway embankments. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Terzaghi, K., R. B. Peck, and G. Mesri. 1996. Soil mechanics in engineering practice. 3rd ed., 549. New York: Wiley.
Tiimub, B. M., P. A. Sarkodie, I. Monney, and O. Maxwell. 2015. “Heavy metal contamination of soil by quarry dust at Asonomaso in the Ashanti region of Ghana.” Chem. Mater. Res. 7 (5): 42–50.
USEPA. 1990. Identification and listing of hazardous waste. Washington, DC: USEPA.
USEPA. 1992. Method 1311, toxicity characteristics leaching procedure (TCLP). Washington, DC: USEPA.
Verma, A. K., M. B. Nadaf, S. Dutta, Y. Z. Beju, and J. N. Mandal. 2016. “Reduction of static load on buried pipes by EPS geofoam inclusions.” In Proc., 19th Southeast Asia Geotechnical Conf. and 2nd AGSSEA Conf., 799–802. Subang Jaya, Malaysia: Dorsett Grand Subang.
WHO (World Health Organization). 2011. Vol. 1 of Guidelines for drinking water quality, 554. Geneva: WHO.
Williams, N. D., and M. F. Houlihan. 1987. “Evaluation of interface friction properties between geosynthetics and soils.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., Geosynthetics ’87, 616–627. New Orleans, Louisiana.
Witthoeft, A. F., and H. Kim. 2016. “Numerical investigation of earth pressure reduction on buried pipes using EPS geofoam compressible inclusions.” Geosynth. Int. 23 (4): 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.15.00054.
Xenaki, V. C., and G. A. Athanasopoulos. 2001. “Experimental investigation of the interaction mechanism at the EPS geofoam-sand interface by direct shear testing.” Geosynth. Int. 8 (6): 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.8.0204.
Zou, Y., J. C. Small, and C. J. Leo. 2000. “Behavior of EPS geofoam as flexible pavement subgrade material in model tests.” Geosynth. Int. 7 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.7.0163.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 22Issue 4October 2018

History

Received: Jan 21, 2018
Accepted: May 11, 2018
Published online: Aug 15, 2018
Published in print: Oct 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Jan 15, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yebeltal Z. Beju, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Research Scholar, Civil Engineering Dept., Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
J. N. Mandal [email protected]
Professor, Civil Engineering Dept., Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share