Hydraulic Behavior and Performance of Breastshot Water Wheels for Different Numbers of Blades
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 143, Issue 1
Abstract
Thanks to their efficiency and simplicity of contruction, breastshot water wheels represent an attractive low head hydropower converter. In this work, a breastshot wheel is investigated by numerical simulations, and the results are validated with experimental tests. The average discrepancy between the numerical shaft torque and the experimental torque is lower than 5%. The numerical model is then used to investigate the performance and the hydraulic behavior of the wheel for different numbers of blades (16, 32, 48, and 64 blades) and at different hydraulic conditions. The increase in efficiency from 16 blades to the optimal blades number ranges between 12 to 16% in function of the hydraulic conditions. Empirical laws are also reported to quantify the improvement in efficiency with the blades number. These laws can support the design process of similar breastshot water wheels. The optimal blades number for this kind of wheel is identified in 48.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The research leading to these results has received funding from ORME (Energy optimization of traditional water wheels)—Granted by Regione Piemonte via the ERDF 2007–2013 (Grant Number: #0186000275)—Partners Gatta srl, BCE srl, Rigamonti Ghisa srl, Promec Elettronica srl and Politecnico di Torino.
References
Akinyemi, O. S., and Liu, Y. (2015a). “CFD modeling and simulation of a hydropower system in generating clean electricity from water flow.” Int. J. Energy Environ. Eng., 6(4), 357–366.
Akinyemi, O. S., and Liu, Y. (2015b). “Evaluation of the power generation capacity of hydrokinetic generator device using computational analysis and hydrodynamics similitude.” J. Power Energy Eng., 3(8), 71–82.
Bach, C. (1886). Die Wasserräder: Atlas (The water wheels: Technical drawings), Konrad Wittwer Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany (in German).
Barstad, L. F. (2012). “CFD analysis of a pelton turbine.” M.Sc. thesis, Norwegian Univ. of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Bódis, K., Monforti, F., and Szabó, S. (2014). “Could Europe have more mini hydro sites? A suitability analysis based on continentally harmonized geographical and hydrological data.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 37, 794–808.
Bozhinova, S., Kisliakov, D., Müller, G., Hecht, V., and Schneider, S. (2013). “Hydropower converters with head differences below 2.5 m.” Proc. ICE-Energy, 166(3), 107–119.
Capecchi, D. (2013). “Over and undershot waterwheels in the 18th century. Science-technology controversy.” Adv. Historical Stud., 2(3), 131–139.
Chaudy, F. (1896). “Machines hydrauliques.” Bibliothèque du conducteur de travaux publics, Vve. C. Dunod et P. Vicq (in French), Sablonse, France.
Church, I. P. (1914). Hydraulic motors, with related subjects, including centrifugal pumps, pipes, and open channels, designed as a text-book for engineering schools, Wiley, London.
ESHA (European Small Hydropower Association). (2014). Small and micro hydropower restoration handbook, National Technical Univ. of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Garuffa, E. (1897). “Macchine motrici ed operatrici a fluido.” Meccanica industrial, Univ. of California, Oakland, CA (in Italian).
Gotoh, M., Kowata, H., Okuyama, T., and Katayama, S. (2001). “Characteristics of a current water wheel set in a rectangular channel.” Proc., ASME Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, Vol. 2, ASME, New York, 707–712.
Liu, Y. C., and Peymani, F. Y. (2015). “Development and computational verification of an analytical model to evaluate performance of paddle wheel in generating electricity from moving fluid.” Distrib. Gener. Altern. Energy J., 30(1), 58–80.
Luther, S., Wardana, I. N. G., Soenoko, R., and Wahyudi, S. (2013). “Performance of a straight-bladed water-current turbine.” Adv. Nat. Appl. Sci., 7(5), 455–461.
Menter, F. (1994). “Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications.” AIAA J., 32(8), 1598–1605.
Morin, A., and Morris, E. (1843). Experiments on water wheels having a vertical axis, called turbines, Franklin Institute, Metz, Paris.
Müller, G., Denchfield, S., Marth, R., and Shelmerdine, R. (2007). “Stream wheels for applications in shallow and deep water.” Proc., 32nd IAHR Congress, IAHR, Venice, Vol. 32, 707–716.
Müller, G., Jenkins, R., and Batten, W. M. J. (2010). Potential, performance limits and environmental effects of floating water mills, A. Dittrich, Ka. Koll, J. Aberle, and P. Geisenhainer, eds., Univ. of Southampton, Highfield, U.K.
Müller, G., and Kauppert, K. (2004). “Performance characteristics of water wheels.” J. Hydraul. Res., 42(5), 451–460.
Olsson, E., Kreiss, G., and Zahedi, S. (2007). “A conservative level set method for two phase flow II.” J. Comput. Phys., 225(1), 785–807.
Osher, S., and Sethian, J. A. (1988). “Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations.” J. Comput. Phys., 79(1), 12–49.
Poncelet, J. V. (1843). Memoria sulle ruote idrauliche a pale curve, mosse di sotto, seguita da sperienze sugli effetti meccanici di tali ruote, E. Dombré, ed., Dalla tipografia Flautina, Napoli, Italy.
Pujol, T., Solà, J., Montoro, L., and Pelegrí, M. (2010). “Hydraulic performance of an ancient Spanish watermill.” Renewable Energy, 35(2), 387–396.
Quaranta, E., and Müller, G. (2016). “Zuppinger and Sagebien water wheels for very low head applications.” J. Hydraul. Res., in press.
Quaranta, E., and Revelli, R. (2015a). “Output power and power losses estimation for an overshot water wheel.” Renewable Energy, 83, 979–987.
Quaranta, E., and Revelli, R. (2015b). “Performance characteristics, power losses and mechanical power estimation for a breastshot water wheel.” Energy, 87, 315–325.
Quaranta, E., and Revelli, R. (2016). “Optimization of breastshot water wheels performance using different inflow configurations.” Renewable Energy, 97, 243–251.
Tevata, A., and Chainarong, I. (2011). “The effect of paddle number and immersed radius ratio on water wheel performance.” Energy Procedia, 9, 359–365.
Vidali, C., Fontan, S., Quaranta, E., Cavagnero, P., and Revelli, R. (2016). “Experimental and dimensional analysis of a breastshot water wheel.” J. Hydraul. Res., 54(4), 473–479.
Weisbach, J. (1849). Principles of the mechanics of machinery and engineering, Lea & Blanchard, PA.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 143 • Issue 1 • January 2017
Copyright
© 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 5, 2015
Accepted: Jun 21, 2016
Published online: Aug 16, 2016
Published in print: Jan 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Jan 16, 2017
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.