Hydraulic Analysis and Design of Pipe Culverts: USGS versus FHWA
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 139, Issue 8
Abstract
Culvert performance curves relate the flow through a culvert to the headwater and tailwater elevations. These curves are calculated differently by the USGS and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), leading to the possibility of significant discrepancies in predicted culvert performance under some flow conditions. The FHWA methodology generally leads to conservative culvert designs relative to designs based on the USGS equations, and the degree of conservatism is the focus of this paper. The largest discrepancies in estimated headwater elevations for given flow rates occur under high-headwater and low-tailwater conditions, and these discrepancies are due in large part to the uncertainty in whether Type 5 or 6 flow will exist. The results of this paper show that for horizontal culverts with square-edge entrances and smooth surfaces the overestimation in the headwater depth can range from 9–45% for headwater depths in the range of 1.5–3 culvert diameters, with lesser overestimations of 7–30% in cases of rounded entrances. The amount of overestimation will be less for high-roughness culverts. In cases for which the culvert is not horizontal, the overestimation, if any, will depend on the slope of the culvert, length-to-diameter ratio, and roughness.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Bodhaine, G. (1968). “Measurement of peak discharge at culverts by indirect methods.” Chapter A3, Techniques of water-resources investigations of the United States Geological Survey, USGS, Washington, DC.
Charbeneau, R., Henderson, A., and Sherman, L. (2006). “Hydraulic performance curves for highway culverts.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 132(5), 474–481.
Chow, V. (1959). Open-channel hydraulics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2012a). Culvert hydraulics software, HY-8, version 7.3, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2012b). Hydraulic design of highway culverts, 3rd Ed., Washington, DC.
Feurich, R., Boubée, J., and Olsen, N. (2011). “Spoiler baffles in circular culverts.” J. Environ. Eng., 137(9), 854–857.
Franz, D., and Melching, C. (1997). “Full equations utilities (FEQUTL) model for the approximation of hydraulic characteristics of open channels and control structures during unsteady flow.” Water-Resources Investigations Report No. 97-4037, USGS, Reston, VA.
Fulford, J. (1998). “User’s guide to the U.S. Geological Survey culvert analysis program, version 97-08.” Water-Resources Investigations Rep. 98-4166, USGS, Reston, VA.
Haderlie, G., and Tullis, B. (2008). “Hydraulics of multibarrel culverts under inlet control.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 134(4), 507–514.
Meselhe, E., and Hebert, K. (2007). “Laboratory measurements of flow through culverts.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 133(8), 973–976.
Tullis, B., and Robinson, S. (2008). “Quantifying culvert exit loss.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 134(2), 263–266.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 7, 2012
Accepted: Feb 19, 2013
Published online: Feb 21, 2013
Discussion open until: Jul 21, 2013
Published in print: Aug 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.