Case Studies
Nov 4, 2011

Applying Risk-Benefit Analysis to Select an Appropriate Streambank Stabilization Measure

Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 138, Issue 5

Abstract

Stream stabilization designers are often faced with the challenge of selecting effective bank stabilization measures. The potential benefits of stream stabilization measures can be economic, environmental, or social. Depending on the level of the potential benefit, a designer may be willing to take higher risks in implementing a given measure. A risk-benefit analysis is presented here that involves a qualitative analysis of risk and benefit (using failure modes and effects analysis) and risk and benefit quantification in terms of cost. The initial result of the method is the establishment of risk priority numbers (RPNs) and benefit priority numbers (BPNs), which provide a relative qualitative measure of the potential risk and benefit and can be used to prioritize and rank measures. The results of the qualitative analysis are then used to estimate risk and benefit quantitatively in terms of cost. These quantitative values are then compared for several stabilization alternatives to provide justification and guidance on selecting the most effective alternative. The risk-benefit method is applied to select a stream stabilization measure for a stream rehabilitation project in Indiana.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the City of Bloomington, Indiana, Planning Depart. and in particular Mr. Scott Robinson for all his support, guidance, and technical assistance with the case study portion of this project. We would also like to thank the Civil Engineering Faculty and the Sanzu Environmental Senior Design Team (Keegan Gumbs, Brian Hoesman, Alex McLean, and Stuart Nash) at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, for all their time and effort in completing the Cascades Creek Stream Stabilization Design. Their gratitude is further extended to the editor, associate editor, and the two anonymous reviewers for providing thorough and insightful comments that led to the significant improvement of this paper.

References

Allen, H. H., and Leech, J. R. (1997). “Bioengineering guidelines for streambank erosion control.” Environmental Impact Research Program Technical Rep. EL-97-8, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
Armantrout, N. B. (1991). “Restructuring streams for anadromous salmonids.” Fisheries bioengineering symposium, Colt, J., and White, R. J., eds., American Fisheries Society, Symp. 10, Bethesda, MD, 136–149.
Bentrup, G, and Hoag, J. C. (1998). “The practical streambank bioengineering guide: A user’s guide for natural streambank stabilization techniques in the arid and semi-arid Great Basin and Intermountain West.” Interagency Riparian/Wetland Project, Plant Materials Center, USDA-NRCS, Aberdeen, ID.
Bernhardt, E. S., et al. (2005). “Synthesizing US river restoration efforts.” Science, 308(5722), 636–637.SCIEAS
Brown, K. (2000). “Urban stream restoration practices: An initial assessment.” The Center for Watershed Protection, 〈http://www.cwp.org.〉 (Feb. 4, 2005).
Champoux, O., Pascale, M. B., and Roy, A. G. (2003). “The long-term effectiveness of fish habitat restoration practices: Lawrence Creek, Wisconsin.” Ann. Assoc. Am. Geographers, 93(1), 42–54.AAAGAK
Crispin, V., House, R., and Roberts, D. (1993). “Changes in in-stream habitat, large woody debris, and salmon habitat after the restructuring of a coastal Oregon stream.” N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 13(1), 96–102.NAJMDP
Ehlers, R. (1956). “An evaluation of stream improvement project devices constructed eighteen years ago.” Cal. Fish. Game, CAFGAX42(3), 203–217.
Entrekin, S. A., Tank, J. L., Rosi-Marshall, E. J., Hoellein, T. J., and Lanberti, G. A. (2009). “Response of secondary production by macroinvertebrates to large wood addition in three Michigan streams.” Freshwater Biol., 54(8), 1741–1758.FWBLAB
Escarameia, M. (1998). River and channel revetments: A design manual, Thomas Telford, London.
Eubanks, C. E., and Meadows, D. (2002). “A coil bioengineering guide for streambank and lakeshore stabilization.” USDA, Forest Service, Technology and Development Program, 〈http://fsweb.sdtdc.wo.fs.fed.us〉 (July 2010).
Freeman, G., and Fischenich, C. (2000). “Gabions for streambank erosion control.” ERDC TN-EMRRP-SR22, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
Frissell, C. A., and Nawa, R. K. (1992). “Incidence and causes of physical failure of artificial habitat structures in streams of western Oregon and Washington.” N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 12(1), 182–197.NAJMDP
Gray, D. H., and Sotir, R. B. (1996). Biotechnical and soil bioengineering slope stabilization: A practical guide for erosion control, Wiley, New York.
Hoag, J. C., and Fripp, J. (2002). “Streambank soil bioengineering for low precipitation areas.” Interagency Riparian/Wetland Proj., Plant Materials Center, United States Dept. of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS), Aberdeen, ID.
Holburn, E., Russell, K., and Holmquist-Johnson, C. L. (2008). “River spanning rock structures field investigation, 2008: Pacific Northwest region.” SRH-2009-47, United States Dept. of Agriculture (USDA) Bureau of Reclamation, Denver.
Holburn, E., Varyu, D., and Russell, K. (2009). “Quantitative investigation of the field performance of rock weirs.” SRH-2009-46, United States Dept. of Agriculture (USA) Bureau of Reclamation, Denver.
House, R. (1996). “An evaluation of stream restoration structures in a coastal Oregon stream 1981–1993.” N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 16(2), 272–281.NAJMDP
House, R., Crispin, V., and Monthey, R. (1989). “Evaluation of stream rehabilitation projects—Salem district (1981–1988).” Technical Note, U.S. Dept. of Interior Bureau of Land Management, Portland, OR.
Hunt, R. L. (1969). “Effects of habitat alteration on production and yield of brook trout in Lawrence Creek, Wisconsin.” Symp. on salmon and trout in streams, Northcote, T. G., ed., Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, 281–312.
Jahnig, S. C., et al. (2011). “River restoration success: A question of perception.” Ecol. Appl., 21(6), 2007–2015.ECAPE7
Johnson, A. W., and Stypula, J. M., eds., (1993). Guidelines for bank stabilization projects in the riverine environments of King County, King County Dept. of Public Works, Surface Water Management Division, Seattle, WA.
Johnson, P. A (2006). “A method for assessing stream channel stability at bridges in physiographic regions across the United States.” Publication No. FHWA-HRT-05-072, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/pubs/05072/index.cfm〉 (July 2011).
Johnson, P. A., and Brown, E. (2001). “Incorporating uncertainty in the design of stream channel modifications.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 37(5), 1225–1236.JWRAF5
Johnson, P. A., and Niezgoda, S. L. (2004). “Risk-based method for selecting bridge scour countermeasures.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 130(2), 121–128.JHEND8
Lagasse, P. F., et al. (2009). “Bridge scour and stream instability countermeasures: Experience, selection, and design guidance.” Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 23, Publication No. FHWA-NHI-09-111, 3rd Ed., Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Lewis, L. (2000). “Soil bioengineering: An alternative for roadside management, a practical guide.” 0077 180 1 -SDTDC, USFS Technology and Development Program, San Dimas, CA.
Maryland Dept. of the Environment. (2000). Marylands guidelines to waterway construction, Maryland Dept. of the Environment, Water Management Administration, Baltimore, MD.
McCullah, J., and Gray, D. (2005). “Environmentally sensitive channel and bank-protection Measures.” NCHRP Rep. 544, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington D.C.
Miller, S. W., Budy, P., and Schmidt, J. C. (2010). “Quantifying macroinvertebrate responses to in-stream habitat restoration: Applications of meta-analysis to river restoration.” Restor. Ecol., 18(1), 8–19.
Mooney, D. M., Holmquist-Johnson, C. L., and Holburn, E. (2007). Qualitative evaluation of rock weir field performance and failure mechanisms, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Bureau of Reclamation, Denver.
Niezgoda, S. L., and Johnson, P. A. (2007). “A case study in cost-based risk assessment for selecting a stream restoration design method for a channel relocation project.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 133(5), 468–481.JHEND8
Northwest Regional Planning Commission. (2004). The shoreline stabilization handbook. Northwest Regional Planning Commission. St. Albans, VT.
Palmer, M. A. (2008). Invited Odum Essay: “Reforming watershed restoration: Science in need of application and applications in need of science.” Estuaries CoastsECSOCO, 32(1), 1–17.
Radspinner, R. R., Diplas, P., Lightbody, A. F., and Sotiropoulos, F. (2010). “River training and ecological enhancement potential using in-stream structures.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 136(12), 967–980.JHEND8
Roni, P., Beechie, T. J., Bilby, R. E., Leonetti, F. E., Pollack, M. M., and Pess, G. R. (2002). “A review of stream restoration techniques and a hierarchical strategy for prioritizing restoration in Pacific Northwest watersheds.” N. Am J. Fish. Manage., 22(1), 1–20.NAJMDP
Roni, P., Hanson, K., and Beechie, T. (2008). “Global Review of the physical and biological effectiveness of stream habitat rehabilitation techniques.” N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 28(3), 856–890.NAJMDP
Roni, P., Hanson, K., Beechie, T., Pess, G., Pollack, M., and Bartley, D. W. (2005). “Habitat rehabilitation for inland fisheries. Global review of effectiveness and guidance for rehabilitation of freshwater ecosystems.” Fisheries Biology Technical Paper, No 484, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FOA), Rome.
Roper, B., Konnoff, D., Heller, D., and Wieman, K. (1998). “Durability of Pacific Northwest in-stream structures following floods.” N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 18(3), 686–693.NAJMDP
Saldi-Caromile, K., Bates, K., Skidmore, P., Barenti, J., and Pineo, D. (2004). Stream habitat restoration guidelines: Final draft, Washington Depts. of Fish and Wildlife and Ecology and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Olympia, WA.
Schmetterling, D. A., and Pierce, R. W. (1999). “Success of in-stream habitat structures after a 5-year flood in Gold Creek, Montana.” Restor. Ecol., 7(4), 369–375.
Schueler, T., and Brown, K. (2004). Urban subwatershed restoration manual No. 4: Urban stream repair practices, Center for Watershed Protection, Ellicot City, MD.
Selvakumar, A., O’ Connor, T. P., and Struck, S. D. (2010). “Role of stream restoration on improving benthic macroinvertebrates and in-stream water quality in an urban watershed: Case study.” J. Environ. Eng., 136(1), 127–139.JOEEDU
Shields, F. D. Jr., Cooper, C. M., and Testa, S. III. (1995). “Towards greener riprap: environmental considerations from microscale to macroscale.” River, coastal and shoreline protection: Erosion control using riprap and armourstone, Thorne, C. R., Abt, S. R., Barends, F. B. J., Maynord, S. T., Pilarczyk, K. W., ed., Wiley, Chichester, U.K. 557–574.
Sundermann, A., Stoll, S., and Haase, P. (2011). “River restoration success depends on the species pool of the immediate surroundings.” Ecol. Appl., 21(6), 1962–1971.ECAPE7
Thom, B. A. (1997). “The effects of woody debris addition on the physical habitat of salmonids: A case study on the northern Oregon coast.” Master’s thesis. Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Thompson, D. M. (2002). “Long-term effect of in-stream habitat improvement structures on channel morphology along the Blackledge and Salmon Rivers, Connecticut, USA.” Environ. Manage., 29(2), 250–265.EMNGDC
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (2010). Hydrologic Engineering Center River Analysis System (HEC-RAS), Version 4.1, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA.
United States Dept. of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS). (1998). “Stream visual assessment protocol.” National Water and Climate Center Technical Note 99-1, USDA-NRCS, Washington, D.C.
United States Dept. of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS). (2007). “Stream restoration design.” National Engineering Handbook, Part 654 210VI–NEH, USDA-NRCS, Washington D.C.
Virginia Dept. of Conservation and Recreation. (2004). “The Virginia stream restoration and stabilization best management practices guide.” Government Agency Rep., Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Richmond, VA.
White, R. J. (1996). “Growth and development of North American stream habitat management for fish.” Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 53(S1), 342–363.CJFSDX

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 138Issue 5May 2012
Pages: 449 - 461

History

Received: Apr 15, 2011
Accepted: Nov 2, 2011
Published online: Nov 4, 2011
Published in print: May 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sue L. Niezgoda, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Gonzaga Univ., 502 E. Boone Ave., Spokane, WA 99258 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Peggy A. Johnson, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor and Head, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., 212 Sackett Building, University Park, PA 16802. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share