Regression-Based Interpretation Method for Confined Aquifer Pumping Tests
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 2
Abstract
The constant-discharge pumping test is a widely used aquifer characterization tool for estimating hydrogeological parameters. Various graphical and numerical solution techniques have been devised for interpretation of pumping test results. This study proposes an alternative regression-based solution approach for analyzing pumping tests conducted in nonleaky, confined aquifers. A regression model was developed by making use of the similarity solution that describes the temporal drawdown behavior at a monitoring well within a pumping period. The field curve obtained from a pumping test (drawdown versus time data) and the theoretical type curve (dimensionless drawdown versus dimensionless time) exhibit identical behavior in logarithmic scale. Correspondingly, based on the equivalence of the area above these two curves, the proposed regression equation establishes a link between a selected drawdown value and its dimensionless counterpart. Once this drawdown value is associated with the corresponding dimensionless drawdown, the explored aquifer transmissivity and storativity can be retrieved easily with the similarity solution. The proposed fit equation enables users to retrieve hydrogeological parameters effortlessly by eradicating the difficulties encountered while implementing conventional graphical or optimization-based methods. The method was tested for a large number of hypothetical noise-free and noise-perturbed time drawdown data sets, each synthesized with different aquifer parameters within a wide range, and in all these attempts the proposed algorithm achieved providing highly accurate parameter estimates. In addition, two published test cases were employed to assess the estimation performance of the method in comparison with the existing techniques. The developed solution scheme was revealed to yield results in very good agreement with those reported in previous works. Considering the accuracy of the method and the ease of its implementation, the proposed approach can be a practical tool for analyzing constant-discharge tests performed in confined aquifers.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Avcı, C. B., A. U. Sahin, and E. Ciftci. 2011. “Aquifer parameter estimation using an incremental area method.” Hydrol. Processes 25 (16): 2584–2596. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8029.
Barry, D. A., J.-Y. Parlange, and L. Li. 2000. “Approximation for the exponential integral (Theis well function).” J. Hydrol. 227 (1–4): 287–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00184-5.
Bateni, S. M., M. Mortazavi-Naeini, B. Ataie-Ashtiani, D. S. Jeng, and R. Khanbilvardi. 2015. “Evaluation of methods for estimating aquifer hydraulic parameters.” Appl. Soft Comput. 28 (Mar): 541–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.12.022.
Batu, V. 1998. Aquifer hydraulics: A comprehensive guide to hydrogeologic data analysis. New York: Wiley.
Chow, V. T. 1952. “On the determination of transmissibility and storage coefficients from pumping test data.” Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 33 (3): 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR033i003p00397.
Çimen, M. 2008. “Confined aquifer parameters evaluation by slope-matching method.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 13 (3): 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:3(141).
Cooper, H. H., and C. E. Jacob. 1946. “A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well field history.” Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 27 (4): 526–534. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR027i004p00526.
Copty, N. K., P. Trinchero, and X. Sanchez-Vila. 2011. “Inferring spatial distribution of the radially integrated transmissivity from pumping tests in heterogeneous confined aquifers.” Water Resour. Res. 47 (5): W055262. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009877.
Delnaz, A., G. Rakhshandehroo, and M. R. Nikoo. 2019. “Optimal estimation of unconfined aquifer parameters in uncertain environment based on fuzzy transformation method.” Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply 19 (2): 444–450. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2018.089.
Domenico, P. A., and F. W. Schwartz. 1998. Physical and chemical hydrogeology. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
Duffield, G. M. 2007. AQTESOLV for Windows user’s guide. Version 4.5. Reston, VA: HydroSOLVE.
Naderi, M. 2019. “Estimating confined aquifer parameters using a simple derivative-based method.” Heliyon 5 (10): e02657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02657.
Renard, P. 2009. “Understanding diagnostic plots for well-test interpretation.” Hydrogeol. J. 17 (3): 589–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-008-0392-0.
Sahin, A. U. 2021. “Automatic shifting method for the identification of generalized radial flow parameters by water cycle optimization.” Water Resour. Manage. 35 (15): 5205–5223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02995-0.
Samani, N., M. Gohari-Moghadam, and A. A. Safavi. 2007. “A simple neural network model for the determination of aquifer parameters.” J. Hydrol. 340 (1–2): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.03.017.
Sen, Z. 1986. “Determination of aquifer parameters by the slope matching method.” Ground Water 24 (2): 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1986.tb00997.x.
Singh, S. K. 2001. “Confined aquifer parameters from temporal derivative of drawdowns.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 127 (6): 466–470. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2001)127:6(466).
Sobol, I. M. 2001. “Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates.” Math. Comput. Simul. 55 (1–3): 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-6.
Srivastava, R., and A. Guzman-Guzman. 1994. “Analysis of slope-matching methods for aquifer parameter determination.” Ground Water 32 (4): 570–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1994.tb00892.x.
Srivastava, R., and A. Guzman-Guzman. 1998. “Practical approximations of the well function.” Ground Water 36 (5): 844–848. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1998.tb02203.x.
Swamee, P. K., and C. S. P. Ojha. 1990. “Pump test analysis of confined aquifer.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 116 (1): 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1990)116:1(99).
Theis, C. V. 1935. “The relationship between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground-water storage.” Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 16 (2): 519–524. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR016i002p00519.
Todd, D. K., and L. W. Mays. 2005. Groundwater hydrology. New York: Wiley.
Trinchero, P., X. Sanchez-Vila, N. Copty, and A. Findikakis. 2008. “A new method for the interpretation of pumping tests in leaky aquifers.” Ground Water 46 (1): 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2007.00384.x.
Virtanen, P., et al. 2020. “SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python.” Nat. Methods 17 (3): 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2.
Walton, W. C. 1962. Selected analytical methods for well and aquifer evaluation. Champaign, IL: Illinois State Water Survey.
Wolfram Research, Inc. 2021. Mathematica, version 13.0.0. Champaign, IL: Wolfram Research.
Yeh, H. 1987. “Theis’ solution by nonlinear least-squares and finite-difference Newton’s method.” Ground Water 25 (6): 710–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1987.tb02212.x.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 26, 2022
Accepted: Aug 30, 2022
Published online: Dec 6, 2022
Published in print: Feb 1, 2023
Discussion open until: May 6, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.