Abstract

Flood frequency estimation in the United States has been primarily driven by statistical analysis for the past one hundred years. For ungauged locations, the regionalized equations are developed to provide annual exceedance probability discharge estimates. These equations establish a relationship between discharge quantiles and drainage area through statistical regression. Predictors consisting of catchment physical properties can also be included based on minimization of residuals. For Iowa, only one-third of developed regional equations use a climatic parameter (i.e., precipitation), which is a critical driver of hydrologic processes. The authors explore an alternative approach to regional flood quantile estimation analysis by analyzing the performance of the Iowa Flood Center’s physically based, calibration-free, and spatially distributed Hillslope-Link Model (HLM). They conducted continuous simulations for a 40-year period across the state of Iowa. Compared to the observations, the HLM can accurately capture the observed magnitude of annual maximum discharge, making it a viable physically based alternative to regional regression. In the study, regional flood quantile estimation is conducted at 445 ungauged communities to compare flood frequency estimates using HLM simulations with regionally developed regression equations. The results show similar discharge values between simulation and regional regression models for all annual exceedance probability where regional equations contain rainfall as a predictor. However, in areas where regional equations are only based on catchment properties, regional regression equations overestimated discharge for all quantiles. These results highlight inconsistencies in current regional regression equations for flood quantile estimates in Iowa and provide support for the reevaluation of flood quantile estimates with physically based hydrologic models.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Iowa Department of Transportation (Project No. 20-SPR2-002). The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Iowa Department of Transportation or the United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Support by the Iowa Flood Center, IIHR—Hydroscience & Engineering, and the US Army Corps of Engineers’ Institute for Water Resources is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Nancy Barth (USGS) for her suggestions on PeakFQ. Additionally, we thank Renato Amorim, Hanbeen Kim, and Taereem Kim, and three anonymous reviewers for their suggestions and comments on the paper’s content.

References

Ayalew, T. B., and W. F. Krajewski. 2017. “Effect of river network geometry on flood frequency: A tale of two watersheds in Iowa.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 22 (8): 06017004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001544.
Ayalew, T. B., W. F. Krajewski, R. Mantilla, and S. J. Small. 2014. “Exploring the effects of hillslope-channel link dynamics and excess rainfall properties on the scaling structure of peak-discharge.” Adv. Water Resour. 64 (Feb): 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.11.010.
Baeck, M. L., J. A. Smith, G. Villarini, D. B. Wright, and W. Krajewski. 2013. “Extreme flood response: The June 2008 flooding in Iowa.” J. Hydrometeorol. 14 (6): 1810–1825. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-0191.1.
Ball, J. E. 2022. “Modelling accuracy for urban design flood estimation.” Urban Water J. 19 (1): 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2021.1955283.
Berne, A., G. Delrieu, J.-D. Creutin, and C. Obled. 2004. “Temporal and spatial resolution of rainfall measurements required for urban hydrology.” J. Hydrol. 299 (3–4): 166–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(04)00363-4.
Blazkova, S., and K. Beven. 2002. “Flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation for a catchment treated as ungauged (with uncertainty).” Water Resour. Res. 38 (8): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000500.
Blazkova, S., and K. Beven. 2009. “A limits of acceptability approach to model evaluation and uncertainty estimation in flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation: Skalka Catchment, Czech Republic.” Water Resour. Res. 45 (12): W00B16. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006726.
Bobée, B., G. Cavadias, F. Ashkar, J. Bernier, and P. Rasmussen. 1993. “Towards a systematic approach to comparing distributions used in flood frequency analysis.” J. Hydrol. 142 (1): 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(93)90008-W.
Bonferroni, C. 1936. “Teoria statistica delle classi e calcolo delle probabilita.” Pubblicazioni del R Istituto Superiore di Scienze Economiche e Commericiali di Firenze 8: 3–62.
Boughton, W., and O. Droop. 2003. “Continuous simulation for design flood estimation—A review.” Environ. Model. Software 18 (4): 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00004-5.
Bradley, A. A., and K. W. Potter. 1992. “Flood frequency analysis of simulated flows.” Water Resour. Res. 28 (9): 2375–2385. https://doi.org/10.1029/92WR01207.
Cameron, D. S., K. J. Beven, J. Tawn, S. Blazkova, and P. Naden. 1999. “Flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation for a gauged upland catchment (with uncertainty).” J. Hydrol. 219 (3): 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00057-8.
Cohn, T. A., J. F. England, C. E. Berenbrock, R. R. Mason, J. R. Stedinger, and J. R. Lamontagne. 2013. “A generalized grubbs-beck test statistic for detecting multiple potentially influential low outliers in flood series.” Water Resour. Res. 49 (8): 5047–5058. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20392.
Cunha, L. K., P. V. Mandapaka, W. F. Krajewski, R. Mantilla, and A. A. Bradley. 2012. “Impact of radar-rainfall error structure on estimated flood magnitude across scales: An investigation based on a parsimonious distributed hydrological model.” Water Resour. Res. 48 (10): W10515. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012138.
Cunnane, C. 1973. “A particular comparison of annual maxima and partial duration series methods of flood frequency prediction.” J. Hydrol. 18 (3): 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(73)90051-6.
Daly, C., W. P. Gibson, G. H. Taylor, G. L. Johnson, and P. Pasteris. 2002. “A knowledge-based approach to the statistical mapping of climate.” Clim. Res. 22 (2): 99–113. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr022099.
Dawdy, D. R., V. W. Griffis, and V. K. Gupta. 2012. “Regional flood-frequency analysis: How we got here and where we are going.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 17 (9): 953–959. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000584.
Dornes, P. F., B. A. Tolson, B. Davison, A. Pietroniro, J. W. Pomeroy, and P. Marsh. 2008. “Regionalisation of land surface hydrological model parameters in subarctic and arctic environments.” Phys. Chem. Earth, Parts A/B/C 33 (17–18): 1081–1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2008.07.007.
Eagleson, P. S. 1972. “Dynamics of flood frequency.” Water Resour. Res. 8 (4): 878–898. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR008i004p00878.
Eash, D. A., K. K. Barnes, and A. G. Veilleux. 2013. Methods for estimating annual exceedance-probability discharges for streams in Iowa, based on data through water year 2010. US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Rep. No. 2013–5086. Reston, VA: USGS.
ElSaadani, M., and W. F. Krajewski. 2017. “A time-based framework for evaluating hydrologic routing methodologies using wavelet transform.” J. Water Resour. Prot. 9 (7): 723–744. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2017.97048.
England, J. F., Jr., T. A. Cohn, B. A. Faber, J. R. Stedinger, W. O. Thomas Jr., A. G. Veilleux, J. E. Kiang, and R. R. Mason Jr. 2019. “Guidelines for determining flood flow frequency—Bulletin 17C.” Chap. B5 in U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, 148. Reston, VA: USGS. https://doi.org/10.3133/tm4B5.
Fang, X., J. W. Pomeroy, C. R. Ellis, M. K. MacDonald, C. M. DeBeer, and T. Brown. 2013. “Multi-variable evaluation of hydrological model predictions for a headwater basin in the Canadian Rocky Mountains.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17 (4): 1635–1659. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1635-2013.
Fang, X., J. W. Pomeroy, C. J. Westbrook, X. Guo, A. G. Minke, and T. Brown. 2010. “Prediction of snowmelt derived streamflow in a wetland dominated prairie basin.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 14 (6): 991–1006. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-991-2010.
Ficchì, A., C. Perrin, and V. Andréassian. 2016. “Impact of temporal resolution of inputs on hydrological model performance: An analysis based on 2400 flood events.” J. Hydrol. 538 (Jul): 454–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.04.016.
Gabellani, S., G. Boni, L. Ferraris, J. von Hardenberg, and A. Provenzale. 2007. “Propagation of uncertainty from rainfall to runoff: A case study with a stochastic rainfall generator.” Adv. Water Resour. 30 (10): 2061–2071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2006.11.015.
Ghimire, G. R., W. F. Krajewski, T. B. Ayalew, and R. Goska. 2022. “Hydrologic investigations of radar-rainfall error propagation to rainfall-runoff model hydrographs.” Adv. Water Resour. 161 (Mar): 104145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2022.104145.
Gupta, V. K., B. M. Troutman, and D. R. Dawdy. 2007. “Towards a nonlinear geophysical theory of floods in river networks: An overview of 20 years of progress.” In Nonlinear dynamics in geosciences, edited by T. A. Anastasios and J. B. Elsner, 121–151. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34918- 3_8.
Hrachowitz, M., et al. 2013. “A decade of predictions in ungauged basins (PUB)—A review.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 58 (6): 1198–1255. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.803183.
Kandel, D. D., A. W. Western, and R. B. Grayson. 2005. “Scaling from process timescales to daily time steps: A distribution function approach.” Water Resour. Res. 41 (2): W10515. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003380.
Kendall, M. 1975. Rank correlation methods. London: Charles Griffin.
Klemes, V. 1974. “Some problems in pure and applied stochastic hydrology.” In Proc., Symp. on Statistical Hydrology, 2–15. Washington, DC: USDA.
Krajewski, W. F., et al. 2017. “Real-time flood forecasting and information system for the state of Iowa.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 98 (3): 539–554. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00243.1.
Krajewski, W. F., V. Lakshmi, K. P. Georgakakos, and S. C. Jain. 1991. “A Monte Carlo study of rainfall sampling effect on a distributed catchment model.” Water Resour. Res. 27 (1): 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1029/90WR01977.
Lin, Y., and K. E. Mitchell. 2005. “The NCEP Stage II/IV hourly precipitation analyses: Development and applications.” In Proc., 19th Conf. Hydrology. San Diego: American Meteorological Society.
Mallakpour, I., and G. Villarini. 2015. “The changing nature of flooding across the central United States.” Nat. Clim. Change 5 (3): 250–254. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2516.
Mann, H. B. 1945. “Nonparametric tests against trend.” Econometrica 13 (3): 245–259. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907187.
Mantilla, R., W. F. Krajewski, N. Velasquez, S. J. Small, T. B. Ayalew, F. Quintero, N. Jadidoleslam, and M. Fonley. 2022. “The hydrological hillslope-link model for space-time prediction of streamflow: Insights and applications at the Iowa Flood Center.” In Extreme weather forecasting, edited by M. Astitha and E. I. Nikolopoulos. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
Massey, F. J. 1951. “The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 46 (253): 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1951.10500769.
Mitchell, K. E. 2004. “The multi-institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): Utilizing multiple gcip products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system.” J. Geophys. Res. 109 (D7): D07S90. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003823.
Murphy, A. H., and R. L. Winkler. 1992. “Diagnostic verification of probability forecasts.” Int. J. Forecasting 7 (4): 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2070(92)90028-8.
Nikolopoulos, E. I., E. N. Anagnostou, M. Borga, E. R. Vivoni, and A. Papadopoulos. 2011. “Sensitivity of a mountain basin flash flood to initial wetness condition and rainfall variability.” J. Hydrol. 402 (3–4): 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.12.020.
O’Connell, P. 1868. “On the relation of the freshwater floods of rivers to the areas and physical features of their basins and on a method of classifying rivers and streams with reference to the magnitude of their floods.” In Proc., Minutes of the Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 204–217. London: Thomas Telford-ICE Virtual Library. https://doi.org/10.1680/imotp.1868.23121.
Pathiraja, S., S. Westra, and A. Sharma. 2012. “Why continuous simulation? The role of antecedent moisture in design flood estimation.” Water Resour. Res. 48 (6): W06534. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010997.
Perez, G., R. Mantilla, and W. F. Krajewski. 2018. “The influence of spatial variability of width functions on regional peak flow regressions.” Water Resour. Res. 54 (10): 7651–7669. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023509.
Perez, G., R. Mantilla, W. F. Krajewski, and F. Quintero. 2019. “Examining observed rainfall, soil moisture, and river network variabilities on peak flow scaling of rainfall-runoff events with implications on regionalization of peak flow quantiles.” Water Resour. Res. 55 (12): 10707–10726. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026028.
Perica, S., D. Martin, S. Pavlovic, I. Roy, M. S. Laurent, C. Trypaluk, D. Unruh, M. Yekta, and G. Bonnin. 2013. NOAA Atlas 14 volume 8, precipitation-frequency atlas of the United States, Midwestern States. Silver Spring, MD: NOAA, National Weather Service.
Praskievicz, S., and P. Bartlein. 2014. “Hydrologic modeling using elevationally adjusted NARR and NARCCAP regional climate-model simulations: Tucannon River, Washington.” J. Hydrol. 517 (Sep): 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.06.017.
Prior, J. C. 1991. Landforms of Iowa. Iowa: University of Iowa Press.
Quintero, F., and W. F. Krajewski. 2018. “Mapping outlets of Iowa Flood Center and National Water Center River Networks for hydrologic model comparison.” JAWRA 54 (1): 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12554.
Quintero, F., W. F. Krajewski, R. Mantilla, S. Small, and B.-C. Seo. 2016. “A spatial–dynamical framework for evaluation of satellite rainfall products for flood prediction.” J. Hydrometeorol. 17 (8): 2137–2154. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0195.1.
Quintero, F., W. F. Krajewski, B.-C. Seo, and R. Mantilla. 2020. “Improvement and evaluation of the Iowa Flood center Hillslope Link Model (HLM) by calibration-free approach.” J. Hydrol. 584 (May): 124686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124686.
Quintero, F., R. Mantilla, C. Anderson, D. Claman, and W. Krajewski. 2018. “Assessment of changes in flood frequency due to the effects of climate change: Implications for engineering design.” Hydrology 5 (1): 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology5010019.
Santhi, C., N. Kannan, J. Arnold, and M. Di Luzio. 2008. “Spatial calibration and temporal validation of flow for regional scale hydrologic modeling.” JAWRA 44 (4): 829–846. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2008.00207.x.
Schaake, J., A. Henkel, and S. Cong. 2004. “Application of PRISM climatologies for hydrologic modeling and forcasting in the western US.” In Proc., 18th Conf. on Hydrology. Seattle, WA: American Meteor Society.
Shuster, W. D., J. Bonta, H. Thurston, E. Warnemuende, and D. R. Smith. 2005. “Impacts of impervious surface on watershed hydrology: A review.” Urban Water J. 2 (4): 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/15730620500386529.
Sivapalan, M. 2003. “Prediction in ungauged basins: A grand challenge for theoretical hydrology.” Hydrol. Processes 17 (15): 3163–3170. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5155.
Taylor, K. E., R. J. Stouffer, and G. A. Meehl. 2012. “An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93 (4): 485–498. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1.
USGS. 2021. “Streamstats: Streamflow statistics and spatial analysis tools for water-resources applications.” Accessed October 20, 2021. https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/.
Veilleux, A. G., T. A. Cohn, K. M. Flynn, R. R. Mason, and P. R. Hummel. 2014. Estimating magnitude and frequency of floods using the PeakFQ 7.0 program. Reston, VA: USGS.
Villarini, G., J. A. Smith, M. L. Baeck, and W. F. Krajewski. 2011a. “Examining flood frequency distributions in the Midwest U.S.” JAWRA 47 (3): 447–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00540.x.
Villarini, G., J. A. Smith, M. L. Baeck, R. Vitolo, D. B. Stephenson, and W. F. Krajewski. 2011b. “On the frequency of heavy rainfall for the Midwest of the United States.” J. Hydrol. 400 (1–2): 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.01.027.
Villarini, G., J. A. Smith, and G. A. Vecchi. 2013. “Changing frequency of heavy rainfall over the Central United States.” J. Clim. 26 (1): 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00043.1.
WDN (USGS Water Data for the Nation). 2021. USGS water data for the nation. Washington, DC: US Dept. of the Interior, USGS.
Wright, D. B., G. Yu, and J. F. England. 2020. “Six decades of rainfall and flood frequency analysis using stochastic storm transposition: Review, progress, and prospects.” J. Hydrol. 585 (Jun): 124816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124816.
Zhu, Z., D. B. Wright, and G. Yu. 2018. “The impact of rainfall space-time structure in flood frequency analysis.” Water Resour. Res. 54 (11): 8983–8998. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023550.
Zoccatelli, D., M. Borga, G. B. Chirico, and E. I. Nikolopoulos. 2015. “The relative role of hillslope and river network routing in the hydrologic response to spatially variable rainfall fields.” J. Hydrol. 531 (Part 2): 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.014.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 27Issue 12December 2022

History

Received: Apr 28, 2022
Accepted: Jul 28, 2022
Published online: Sep 30, 2022
Published in print: Dec 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Feb 28, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Research Assistant, IIHR—Hydroscience & Engineering, The Univ. of Iowa, 323-9 C. Maxwell Stanley Hydraulics Laboratory, Iowa City, IA 52242 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0123-0428. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Research Scientist, IIHR—Hydroscience & Engineering, The Univ. of Iowa, 323-9 C. Maxwell Stanley Hydraulics Laboratory, Iowa City, IA 52242. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9517-4895. Email: [email protected]
Professor, IIHR—Hydroscience & Engineering, The Univ. of Iowa, 107C C. Maxwell Stanley Hydraulics Laboratory, Iowa City, IA 52242. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9566-2370. Email: [email protected]
Witold F. Krajewski, Aff.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, IIHR—Hydroscience & Engineering, The Univ. of Iowa, 323-9 C. Maxwell Stanley Hydraulics Laboratory, Iowa City, IA 52242. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share