A Unified Framework for Deriving Extremal Hypothesis Theories of Hydraulic Geometry
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 12
Abstract
In a river cross section or segment that has attained an equilibrium flow regime, the relationship between geometric (river depth, width, hydraulic radius, bed slope, etc.) and/or hydraulic (velocity, roughness, shear stress, etc.) factors in relation to the river’s equilibrium discharge (i.e., flows of fixed nominal return period or at bankfull depth) is termed hydraulic geometry (HG). HG relations have been proposed from a multitude of approaches: empirical, statistical, physically based, and extremal. Furthermore, multiple extremal hypotheses exist, depending on the variable to be optimized (maximized or minimized). In this study, we (1) present a unified framework by invoking the principle of maximum entropy (or, equivalently, Laplace’s law of insufficient reason), that is, assuming that individual contributions by geometric and hydraulic factors to HG through the optimization of extremal hypotheses (Froude number, frictional resistance, mobility index, stream power, sediment flux, etc.) presumably stem from equiprobable contributions of these factors—in other words, entropy is maximized; (2) enumerate 26 combinations (groups of sizes two to five) of the five basic HG variables, namely depth, width, slope, velocity, and friction, and analyze their interrelations; and (3) relax our initial equiprobability assumption by plugging in a scaling (weighting) parameter and show that 11 special cases of the 26 unique combinations lead to reasonable approximations of benchmark empirical results in the literature in at least one instance for each of the five extremal hypotheses considered here. The benefits of the unified framework include providing a theoretical basis to bring together various hypotheses that result in HG relations and providing an analytical way to quantify (or explain) epistemic uncertainty therein. Ultimately, this unified framework improves our understanding of HG and provides an analytical framework for improving predictions of river flows.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
No data, models, or code were generated or used during the study.
References
Blench, T. 1952. “Regime theory for self-formed sediment-bearing channels.” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 117 (1): 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1061/TACEAT.0006641.
Blench, T. 1960. Mobile-bed fluviology. Edmonton, AB, Canada: University of Alberta Press.
Brooks, N. H. 1958. “Mechanics of streams with movable beds of fine sand.” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 123 (1): 526–549. https://doi.org/10.1061/TACEAT.0007533.
Cao, S. 1996. Fluvial hydraulic geometry. Chengdu, Sichuan: Chengdu University of Science and Technology Press.
Davies, T. R., and A. J. Sutherland. 1980. “Resistance to flow past deformable boundaries.” Earth Surf. Processes 5 (2): 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3760050207.
Dodov, B., and E. Foufoula-Georgiou. 2004. “Generalized hydraulic geometry: Derivation based on a multiscaling formalism.” Water Resour. Res. 40 (6): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002082.
Eaton, B. C., and M. Church. 2007. “Predicting downstream hydraulic geometry: A test of rational regime theory.” J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 112 (F3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JF000734.
Engelund, F., and E. Hansen. 1967. A monograph on sediment transport in alluvial streams. Copenhagen, Denmark: Technical Univ. of Denmark.
Gleason, C. J. 2015. “Hydraulic geometry of natural rivers: A review and future directions.” Prog. Phys. Geogr.: Earth Environ. 39 (3): 337–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133314567584.
Gleason, C. J., and L. C. Smith. 2014. “Toward global mapping of river discharge using satellite images and at-many-stations hydraulic geometry.” PNAS 111 (13): 4788–4791. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317606111.
Griffiths, G. A. 1993. “Sediment translation waves in braided gravel-bed rivers.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 119 (8): 924–937. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1993)119:8(924).
Horton, R. E. 1937. “Hydrologic aspects of the problem of stabilizing stream flow.” J. For. 35 (11): 1015–1027.
Horton, R. E. 1941. “An approach toward a physical interpretation of infiltration-capacity.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 5 (C): 399–417. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1941.036159950005000C0075x.
Huang, H. H., and G. C. Nanson. 2000. “Hydraulic geometry and maximum flow efficiency as products of the principle of least action.” Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 25 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(200001)25:1%3C1::AID-ESP68%3E3.0.CO;2-2.
Inglis, C. C. 1949a. The behavior and control of rivers and canals. Central waterpower irrigation and navigation research station, 13. Poona, Maharashtra: Research Publication.
Inglis, C. C. 1949b. “The effect of variations of change and grade on the slopes and shapes of channels.” In Proc., Int. Association for Hydraulic Structures Research, 3rd Meeting, Greenoble, 1–9. Italy: International Association for Hydraulic Research.
Jaynes, E. T. 1957. “Information theory and statistical mechanics.” Phys. Rev. 106 (4): 620–630. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.106.620.
Jia, Y. 1990. “Minimum Froude number and the equilibrium of alluvial sand rivers.” Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 15 (3): 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290150303.
Julien, P., and J. Wargadalam. 1995. “Alluvial channel geometry: Theory and applications.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 121 (4): 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1995)121:4(312).
Kennedy, R. G. 1985. “The prevention of silting in irrigation canals.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. 119 (1985): 281–290.
Kirkby, M. J. 1977. “Maximum sediment efficiency as a criterion for alluvial channels.” In River channel changes, edited by K. J. Gregory, 429–442. New York: Wiley.
Lacey, G. 1930. “Stable channels in alluvium.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. 229 (1930): 259–292.
Leopold, L. B., and T. Maddock Jr. 1953. “The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications.” In USGS Numbered Series, Professional Paper. 64. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Millar, R. G., and M. C. Quick. 1998. “Stable Width and Depth of Gravel-Bed Rivers with Cohesive Banks.” J. Hydraul. Res.124 (10): 1005–1013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1998)124:10(1005).
Ohara, N., and K. Yamatani. 2019. “Theoretical stable hydraulic section based on the principle of least action.” Sci. Rep. 9 (1): 7957. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44347-4.
Parker, G. 1979. “Hydraulic geometry of active gravel rivers.” J. Hydraul. Div. 105 (9): 1185–1201. https://doi.org/10.1061/JYCEAJ.0005275.
Pickup, G., and R. F. Warner. 1976. “Effects of hydrologic regime on magnitude and frequency of dominant discharge.” J. Hydrol. 29 (1): 51–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(76)90005-6.
Ramette, M. 1980. “A theoretical approach on fluvial processes.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on River Sedimentation, 1–18, Beijing: Chinese Society of Hydraulic Engineering.
Rosgen, D. 1985. “A stream classification system.” In Riparian ecosystems and their management: Reconciling conflicting uses. Fort Collins, CO: Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture.
Singh, V., C. Yang, and Z. Deng. 2003a. “Downstream hydraulic geometry relations: 2. Calibration and testing.” Water Resour. Res. 39 (12): 3-1–3-10. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002498.
Singh, V. P. 2003. “On the theories of hydraulic geometry.” Int. J. Sediment Res. 18 (3): 196–218.
Singh, V. P. 2014. Entropy theory in hydraulic engineering, 785. Reston, VA: ASCE Press.
Singh, V. P., C. T. Yang, and Z. Q. Deng. 2003b. “Downstream hydraulic geometry relations: 1. Theoretical development.” Water Resour. Res. 39 (12): 1337. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002484.
Smith, T. R. 1974. “A derivation of the hydraulic geometry of steady-state channels from conservation principles and sediment transport laws.” J. Geol. 82 (1): 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1086/627939.
Tou, K.-J. 1965. “Hydromorphology of alluvial channels of lowland river and tidal estuaries.” Sci. Sin. XIV (8): 121–1227.
Tranmer, A. W., D. Caamaño, and P. Goodwin. 2020. “Evaluation of extremal hypotheses in an undeveloped alluvial river.” Prog. Phys. Geogr.: Earth Environ. 44 (4): 514–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133319886721.
Vanoni, V. A., and N. H. Brooks. 1957. “Laboratory studies of the roughness and suspended load of alluvial streams.” Accessed September 25, 2021. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechKHR:SedLabRpt-E-68.
Williams, G. P. 1967. Flume experiments on the transport of a coarse sand. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 562-B. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Williams, G. P. 1978. Hydraulic geometry of river cross-sections—Theory of minimum variance. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1029. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Yalin, M. S., and A. M. Ferreira Da Silva. 2000. “Computation of regime channel characteristics on thermodynamic basis.” J. Hydraul. Res. 38 (1): 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221680009498359.
Yang, C. T. 1972. “Unit stream power and sediment transport.” J. Hydraul. Div. 98 (10): 1805–1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/JYCEAJ.0003439.
Yang, C. T., C. C. S. Song, and M. J. Woldenberg. 1981. “Hydraulic geometry and minimum rate of energy dissipation.” Water Resour. Res. 17 (4): 1014–1018. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR017i004p01014.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 27, 2021
Accepted: Jul 27, 2022
Published online: Oct 3, 2022
Published in print: Dec 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Mar 3, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.