Technical Papers
Sep 27, 2022

A Method Combining Seepage Theory and Model Simulation for the Identification of Potential Groundwater Resources

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 12

Abstract

In recent years, climate change has caused extreme weather all over the world, including in Taiwan. Rainfall in Taiwan is distributed unevenly in both time and space, leading to a shortage of water resources which has become a pressing issue for the island. Groundwater plays a vital role as a backup and supplementary water resource. This study proposes a method that combines the seepage theorem, field observations, and a numerical simulation to identify high-potential groundwater resource regions to meet the demand for water supplies in future development. The Taichung Chingshui Coastal Plain (TCCP) was selected as a study area for testing the method. Two new wells were drilled in the area to obtain additional information to supplement the analysis of groundwater levels (GLs). Results indicate that the hydrological and hydrogeological parameters (e.g., Manning’s coefficients, hydraulic conductivity, and formation thickness) can be obtained reasonably by comparing the numerical simulation with the observed GLs. It was found that the Dadu, Waipu, and Qingshui districts are the top three areas with higher potential groundwater resources in the TCCP. Data from the observations wells and in situ pumping stations verified our simulation results, which showed that our proposed methodology is advantageous. The research results can help improve the effective use of existing groundwater resources and assist with water resource development and sustainable usage.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Water Resources Planning Institute, Water Resources Agency, Ministry of Economic Affairs, under Grant No. MOEAWRA1090264.

References

Abdelfettah, Y., P. Sailhac, H. Larnier, P. D. Matthey, and E. Schill. 2018. “Continuous and time-lapse magnetotelluric monitoring of low volume injection at Rittershoffen geothermal project, northern Alsace–France.” Geothermics 71 (Jan): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2017.08.004.
Al-Abadi, A. M., H. R. Pourghasemi, S. Shahid, and H. B. Ghalib. 2016. “Spatial mapping of groundwater potential using entropy weighted linear aggregate novel approach and GIS.” Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 42 (3): 1185–1199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-016-2374-1.
Alwathaf, Y., and B. El Mansouri. 2012. “Hydrodynamic modeling for groundwater assessment in Sana’a Basin, Yemen.” Hydrogeol. J. 20 (7): 1375–1392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-012-0879-6.
Bailey, R. T., S. Park, K. Bieger, J. G. Arnold, and P. M. Allen. 2020. “Enhancing SWAT+ simulation of groundwater flow and groundwater-surface water interactions using MODFLOW routines.” Environ. Modell. Software 126 (Apr): 104660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104660.
Butler, J. J., Jr., and J. M. Healey. 1998. “Relationship between pumping-test and slug-test parameters: Scale effect or artifact?” Ground Water 36 (2): 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1998.tb01096.x.
Cardenas, M. B., and V. A. Zlotnik. 2003. “A simple constant-head injection test for streambed hydraulic conductivity estimation.” Ground Water 41 (6): 867–871. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2003.tb02428.x.
Cedergren, H. R. 1997. Vol. 16 of Seepage, drainage, and flow nets. New York: Wiley.
Chambers, J. E., O. Kuras, P. I. Meldrum, R. D. Ogilvy, and J. Hollands. 2006. “Electrical resistivity tomography applied to geologic, hydrogeologic, and engineering investigations at a former waste-disposal site.” Geophysics 71 (6): B231–B239. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2360184.
Chen, W., M. Panahi, K. Khosravi, H. R. Pourghasemi, F. Rezaie, and D. Parvinnezhad. 2019. “Spatial prediction of groundwater potentiality using ANFIS ensembled with teaching-learning-based and biogeography-based optimization.” J. Hydrol. 572 (May): 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.013.
Cheng, H.-P., J.-R. Cheng, D. Richards, and G.-T. Yeh. 2006. “Numerical strategies to model surface and groundwater interactions for the Biscayne Bay coastal wetlands project alternatives.” In Proc., 16th Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Water Resources CD-ROM, edited by P. Binning, P. Engesgaard, H. Dahle, W. G. Gray, and G. Pinder. Lyngby, Denmark: Technical Univ. of Denmark. https://doi.org/10.4122/1.1000000505.
Cheng, J. R. C., H. C. Lin, H. W. Cheng, R. M. Hunter, D. R. Richards, and G. T. Yeh. 2004. “Parallelization of the WASH123D code—Phase I: 2-dimensional overland and 3-dimensional subsurface flow.” In Proc., 15th Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Water Resources, 1403–1413. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
Crosbie, R. S., P. Davies, N. Harrington, and S. Lamontagne. 2015. “Ground truthing groundwater-recharge estimates derived from remotely sensed evapotranspiration: A case in South Australia.” Hydrogeol. J. 23 (2): 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-014-1200-7.
De Smedt, F., W. Zijl, and M. El-Rawy. 2018. “Double constraint method for pumping test analysis.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 23 (7): 06018003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001677.
Fetter, C. W. 1994. Applied hydrogeology. New York: Macmillan.
Ghysels, G., S. Mutua, G. B. Veliz, and M. Huysmans. 2019. “A modified approach for modelling river–aquifer interaction of gaining rivers in MODFLOW, including riverbed heterogeneity and river bank seepage.” Hydrogeol. J. 27 (5): 1851–1863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-019-01941-0.
Goodarzi, M., J. Abedi-Koupai, M. Heidarpour, and H. R. Safavi. 2016. “Development of a new drought index for groundwater and its application in sustainable groundwater extraction.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 142 (9): 04016032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000673.
Goyal, D., A. K. Haritash, and S. K. Singh. 2021. “A comprehensive review of groundwater vulnerability assessment using index-based, modelling, and coupling methods.” J. Environ. Manage. 296 (Oct): 113161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113161.
Hamm, S.-Y., M. Kim, J.-Y. Cheong, J.-Y. Kim, M. Son, and T.-W. Kim. 2007. “Relationship between hydraulic conductivity and fracture properties estimated from packer tests and borehole data in a fractured granite.” Eng. Geol. 92 (1–2): 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.03.010.
Harr, M. E. 1991. Groundwater and seepage. Gloucester, MA: Courier.
Jie, Z., J. van Heyden, D. Bendel, and R. Barthel. 2011. “Combination of soil-water balance models and water-table fluctuation methods for evaluation and improvement of groundwater recharge calculations.” Hydrogeol. J. 19 (8): 1487–1502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-011-0772-8.
Khosravi, K., M. Panahi, and D. Tien Bui. 2018. “Spatial prediction of groundwater spring potential mapping based on an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and metaheuristic optimization.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 22 (9): 4771–4792. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4771-2018.
Kim, I., and J. Lee. 2018. “Prediction model for spatial and temporal variation of groundwater level based on river stage.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 23 (6): 06018002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001658.
Kim, I., and J. Lee. 2019. “Proposed correlation model for groundwater level prediction based on river stage considering changes in hydrological and geological conditions.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 24 (10): 04019042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001849.
Lee, S., S. M. Hong, and H. S. Jung. 2017. “GIS-based groundwater potential mapping using artificial neural network and support vector machine models: The case of Boryeong city in Korea.” Geocarto Int. 33 (8): 847–861. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2017.1303091.
Li, J., H. Hu, X. Mao, and Y. Liu. 2017. “Quantification of seepage in a multi-layered disconnected river-aquifer system.” Front. Agric. Sci. Eng. 4 (2): 237–245. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2017135.
Li, R., G. Ou, M. Pun, and L. Larson. 2018. “Evaluation of groundwater resources in response to agricultural management scenarios in the Central Valley, California.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 144 (12): 04018078. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001014.
Lin, H. C. J., D. R. Richards, G. T. Yeh, J. R. Cheng, and H. P. Cheng. 1997. FEMWATER: A three-dimensional finite element computer model for simulating density-dependent flow and transport in variably saturated media. Vicksburg, MS: Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
Linsley, R. K., Jr., M. A. Kohler, and J. L. Paulhus. 1982. Hydrology for engineers, 508. New York: McGraw Hill.
Liu, H. J., N. S. Hsu, and C. W. Liu. 2021. “The quantitative assessment of groundwater resources in coastal plain of Taichung.” J. Taiwan Agric. Eng. 67 (2): 24–31. https://doi.org/10.29974/JTAE.202106_67(2).0003.
Martindill, J. R., R. T. Good, and F. J. Loge. 2021. “Estimating agricultural groundwater withdrawals with energy data.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 147 (5): 04021018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001348.
Mazi, K., E. Akylas, and A. D. Koussis. 2021. “Algebraic estimation of the specific storage from slug tests in confined aquifers in the overdamped case.” Hydrogeol. J. 29 (7): 2545–2553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-021-02382-4.
Mengistu, H. A., M. B. Demlie, and T. A. Abiye. 2019. “Groundwater resource potential and status of groundwater resource development in Ethiopia.” Hydrogeol. J. 27 (3): 1051–1065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-019-01928-x.
MOEA (Ministry of Economic Affairs, ROC). 2015a. Hydro-geological investigation and groundwater recharge model simulations: The recharge areas delineations and resource potential assessments (3/4). Technical Rep. Taipei, Taiwan: MOEA.
MOEA (Ministry of Economic Affairs, ROC). 2015b. Plans for determining the groundwater recharge at geologically sensitive area (Taichung Basin). Technical Rep. Taipei, Taiwan: MOEA.
MOEA (Ministry of Economic Affairs, ROC). 2016. The fundamental plan of water resources in central Taiwan. Technical Rep. Taipei, Taiwan: MOEA.
MOEA (Ministry of Economic Affairs, ROC). 2017. Groundwater disaster prevention Emergency backup well network planning for groundwater disaster prevention. Technical Rep. Taipei, Taiwan: MOEA.
MOEA (Ministry of Economic Affairs). 2020. Comprehensive Assessment of groundwater resources in the coastal regions of Taichung (2/2). Technical Rep. Taipei, Taiwan: MOEA.
Oikonomidis, D., S. Dimogianni, N. Kazakis, and K. Voudouris. 2015. “A GIS/remote sensing-based methodology for groundwater potentiality assessment in Tirnavos area, Greece.” J. Hydrol. 525 (Jun): 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.056.
Perdomo, S., E. E. Kruse, and J. E. Ainchil. 2018. “Estimation of hydraulic parameters using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and empirical laws in a semi-confined aquifer.” Near Surf. Geophys. 16 (6): 627–641. https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12020.
Quinn, P. M., B. L. Parker, and J. A. Cherry. 2013. “Validation of non-Darcian flow effects in slug tests conducted in fractured rock boreholes.” J. Hydrol. 486 (Apr): 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.02.024.
Richards, L. A. 1931. “Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums.” Physics 1 (5): 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1745010.
Romano, G., M. Balasco, V. Lapenna, A. Siniscalchi, L. Telesca, and S. Tripaldi. 2014. “On the sensitivity of long-term magnetotelluric monitoring in Southern Italy and source-dependent robust single station transfer function variability.” Geophys. J. Int. 197 (3): 1425–1441. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu083.
Rutledge, A. T. 1998. Computer programs for describing the recession of ground-water discharge and for estimating mean ground-water recharge and discharge from streamflow records: Update (No. 98). Washington, DC: USGS.
Sanchez, M. A., A. Foyo, and C. Tomillo. 2006. “Application of the Lugeon test in landfill hydrologic studies.” Environ. Eng. Geosci. 12 (2): 125–136. https://doi.org/10.2113/12.2.125.
Shih, D.-S., C.-J. Chen, M.-H. Li, C.-S. Jang, C.-M. Chang, and Y.-Y. Liao. 2019. “Statistical and numerical assessments of groundwater resource subject to excessive pumping: Case study in Southwest Taiwan.” Water 11 (2): 360. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020360.
Shih, D.-S., Y.-C. Chiu, and K. Wang. 2022. “Combined numerical simulation and groundwater depletion sensitivity analysis for dynamic pumping management.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 148 (3): 04022002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001530.
Shih, D.-S., J.-M. Liau, and G.-T. Yeh. 2012. “Model assessments of precipitation with a unified regional circulation rainfall and hydrological watershed model.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 17 (1): 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000414.
Shih, D.-S., and G.-T. Yeh. 2011. “Identified model parameterization, calibration, and validation of the physically distributed hydrological model WASH123D in Taiwan.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 16 (2): 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000293.
Tsakiri, K., A. Marsellos, and S. Kapetanakis. 2018. “Artificial neural network and multiple linear regression for flood prediction in Mohawk River, New York.” Water 10 (9): 1158. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091158.
Wang, H.-W., and G. M. Kondolf. 2014. “Upstream sediment-control dams: Five decades of experience in the rapidly eroding Dahan River Basin, Taiwan.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 50 (3): 735–747. https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12141.
Wang, H.-W., M. Kondolf, D. Tullos, and W.-C. Kuo. 2018. “Sediment management in Taiwan’s reservoirs and barriers to implementation.” Water 10 (8): 1034. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10081034.
Wu, R.-S., and D.-S. Shih. 2018. “Modeling hydrological impacts of groundwater level in the context of climate and land cover change.” Terr. Atmos. Oceanic Sci. 29 (3): 341–353. https://doi.org/10.3319/TAO.2017.10.26.01.
Xu, Y., and H. E. Beekman. 2019. “Review: Groundwater recharge estimation in arid and semi-arid southern Africa.” Hydrogeol. J. 27 (3): 929–943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-018-1898-8.
Yeh, G. T., H. P. Cheng, J. R. Cheng, H. C. J. Lin, and W. D. Martin. 1998. A numerical model simulating water flow and contaminant and sediment transport in watershed systems of 1-D stream-river network, 2-D overland regime, and 3-D subsurface media (WASH123D: Version 1.0). Vicksburg, MS: Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
Yeh, G. T., G. B. Huang, F. Zhang, H. P. Cheng, and H. C. Lin. 2006. WASH123D: A numerical model of flow, thermal transport, and salinity, sediment, and water quality transport in watershed systems of 1-D stream-river network, 2-D overland regime, and 3-D subsurface media. Technical Rep. Orlando, FL: Univ. of Central Florida.
Yeh, G.-T., D.-S. Shih, and J.-R. C. Cheng. 2011. “An integrated media, integrated processes watershed model.” Comput. Fluids 45 (1): 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.11.018.
Zaidel, J., B. Markham, and D. Bleiker. 2010. “Simulating seepage into mine shafts and tunnels with MODFLOW.” Ground Water 48 (3): 390–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00659.x.
Zonge, K. L., and L. J. Hughes. 1991. “Controlled source audio-frequency magnetotellurics.” In Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics: Volume 2, application, Parts A and B, 713–810. Houston: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 27Issue 12December 2022

History

Received: Apr 1, 2022
Accepted: Jul 18, 2022
Published online: Sep 27, 2022
Published in print: Dec 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Feb 27, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Researcher, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ., No. 1001, University Rd., Hsinchu City 300, Taiwan. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6346-3529. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ., No. 1001, University Rd., Hsinchu City 300, Taiwan (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1150-0196. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share