Performance Evaluation of Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) System in Saline Groundwater Regions: Impact of Operational Factors and Well Design
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 12
Abstract
Application of aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) is difficult in highly saline groundwater regions because the recharged freshwater mixes with saline groundwater and makes a thin layer below the capillary fringe. The recovery efficiency (RE) of ASR can be improved by customizing the operational factors and well design of the ASR scheme according to the regional hydrogeology. The RE can be raised in different ways, such as adjusting the operational factors to reduce the mixing or using multiple wells to reduce gravitational segregation. This study developed a variable-density groundwater flow modeling framework for ASR performance estimation in saline groundwater regions, which examined the combined influence of operational factors and well design on RE. The density-driven effect during freshwater injection and its storage within saline groundwater on RE were also investigated. ASR systems with single fully penetrating wells (SFPWs) and multiple partially penetrating wells (MPPWs) were evaluated with respect to operational factors, that is, injection and recovery rates, the volume of injected freshwater, storage duration, and successive number of ASR cycles. The results showed that losses due to mixing are significantly influenced and controlled by successive ASR cycles followed by injection and recovery rates, injection volume, and storage duration. The results also revealed that losses due to gravity could be controlled by using MPPW systems in place of a SFPW system. The model results showed that in three subsequent cycles, no more than 45% of the yearly injected water could be recovered by the SFPW well–type model, which is less than the MPPW case by 11% for the baseline parameters of representative hydrogeology. The results of this study will help in the operational management of ASR schemes to achieve higher RE in the saline groundwater regions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to the Department of Science Technology, India, for supporting this research under the WTI project entitled “An Efficient Aquifer Storage Method for Enhanced Recovery of Recharged Freshwater in Saline Regions.” The first author is thankful to the Ministry of Education, India, for providing a research fellowship. The author also acknowledges the British Council, UK, and IIT Roorkee, India, for the Newton Bhabha fellowship, enabling him to visit Cranfield University, UK, and make progress on this paper. The authors are thankful to Ms. Anuradha Garg (IIT Roorkee) for her assistance in writing and for providing valuable suggestions.
References
Anderson, M. P., and C. S. Lowry. 2004. An assessment of aquifer storage recovery for selected representative hydrogeologic settings in Wisconsin. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Bakker, M. 2010. “Radial Dupuit interface flow to assess the aquifer storage and recovery potential of saltwater aquifers.” Hydrogeol. J. 18 (1): 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-009-0508-1.
Bouri, S., and H. Dhia. 2010. “A thirty-year artificial recharge experiment in a coastal aquifer in an arid zone: The Teboulba aquifer system (Tunisian Sahel).” C.R. Geosci. 342 (1): 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2009.10.008.
Brown, C. J., J. Ward, and J. Mirecki. 2016. “A revised brackish water aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) site selection index for water resources management.” Water Resour. Manage. 30 (7): 2465–2481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1297-7.
Chen, Y. 2014. “Aquifer storage and recovery in saline aquifers.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Dillon, P. 2005. “Future management of aquifer recharge.” Hydrogeol. J. 13 (5): 313–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-004-0413-6.
Gibson, M. T., M. E. Campana, and D. Nazy. 2018. “Estimating aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) regional and local suitability: A case study in Washington State, USA.” Hydrology 5 (1): 7–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology5010007.
Harbaugh, A. W. 2005. “MODFLOW-2005, The U. S. geological survey modular ground-water model—The ground-water flow process.” Model. Tech. 2005 (1): 1–253. https://doi.org/10.3133/tm6A16.
Harbough, W., and M. G. Mcdonald. 1996. User’s documentation for MODFLOW-96, an update to the U.S. geological survey modular finite-difference ground-water flow model. Washington, DC: USGS.
Khan, S., S. Mushtaq, M. A. Hanjra, and J. Schaeffer. 2008. “Estimating potential costs and gains from an aquifer storage and recovery program in Australia.” Agric. Water Manage. 95 (4): 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2007.12.002.
Kimbler, O. K. 1970. “Fluid model studies of the storage of freshwater in saline aquifers.” Water Resour. Res. 6 (5): 1522–1527. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR006i005p01522.
Langevin, C. D., J. D. Hughes, E. R. Banta, R. G. Niswonger, S. Panday, and A. M. Provost. 2017. In Vol. 6 of Documentation for the MODFLOW 6 groundwater flow model: U.S. geological survey techniques and methods. Reston, VA: USGS.
Langevin, C. D., D. T. Thorne, A. M. Dausman, M. C. Sukop, and W. Guo. 2008. SEAWAT Version 4: A computer program for simulation of multi-species solute and heat transport. Washington, DC: USGS.
Lowry, C. S., and M. P. Anderson. 2006. “An assessment of aquifer storage recovery using ground water flow models.” Ground Water 44 (5): 661–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2006.00237.x.
Lu, C., P. Du, Y. Chen, and J. Luo. 2011. “Recovery efficiency of aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) with mass transfer limitation.” Water Resour. Res. 47 (8): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010605.
Majumdar, S., G. R. Miller, and Z. Sheng. 2021. “Optimizing multiwell aquifer storage and recovery systems for energy use and recovery efficiency.” Ground Water 59 (5): 629–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13092.
Maliva, R. G., W. Guo, and T. M. Missimer. 2005. “Hydrogeology and aquifer storage and recovery system performance.” Gulf Coast Assoc. Geol. Soc. Trans. 55 (1): 473–485.
Maliva, R. G., W. S. Manahan, and T. M. Missimer. 2020. “Aquifer storage and recovery using saline aquifers: Hydrogeological controls and opportunities.” Ground Water 58 (1): 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12962.
Merritt, M. L. 1986. “Recovering fresh water stored in saline limestone aquifers.” Ground Water 24 (4): 516–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1986.tb01031.x.
Moulder, E. A. 1970. “Freshwater bubbles: A possibility using saline aquifers to store water.” Water Resour. Res. 6 (5): 1528–1531. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR006i005p01528.
Oz, I., E. Shalev, Y. Yechieli, and H. Gvirtzman. 2015. “Saltwater circulation patterns within the freshwater-saltwater interface in coastal aquifers: Laboratory experiments and numerical modeling.” J. Hydrol. 530 (Oct): 734–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.10.033.
Pavelic, P., P. Dillon, and N. Robinson. 2004. Groundwater modelling to assist well-field design and operation for the ASTR trial at Salisbury, South Australia. Docklands, VIC: CSIRO Land and Water.
Polemio, M., and L. E. Zuffianò. 2020. “Review of utilization management of groundwater at risk of salinization.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 146 (9): 03120002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001278.
Pyne, R. D. G. 1995. Groundwater recharge and wells: A guide to aquifer storage and recovery. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.
Sathish, S., and M. M. Mohamed. 2018. “Assessment of aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) feasibility at selected sites in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, UAE.” Environ. Earth Sci. 77 (3): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7251-7.
Smith, W. B., G. R. Miller, and Z. Sheng. 2017. “Assessing aquifer storage and recovery feasibility in the Gulf coastal plains of Texas.” J. Hydrol. Reg. Studies 14 (Oct): 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.10.007.
Sultana, S., K. M. Ahmed, S. M. Mahtab-Ul-Alam, M. Hasan, A. Tuinhof, S. K. Ghosh, M. S. Rahman, P. Ravenscroft, and Y. Zheng. 2015. “Low-cost aquifer storage and recovery: Implications for improving drinking water access for rural communities in coastal Bangladesh.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 20 (3): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001100.
van Ginkel, M., B. des Tombe, T. Olsthoorn, and M. Bakker. 2016. “Small-scale ASR between flow barriers in a saline aquifer.” Ground Water 54 (6): 840–850. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12427.
Ward, J. D., C. T. Simmons, and P. J. Dillon. 2008. “Variable-density modelling of multiple-cycle aquifer storage and recovery (ASR): Importance of anisotropy and layered heterogeneity in brackish aquifers.” J. Hydrol. 356 (1–2): 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.04.012.
Ward, J. D., C. T. Simmons, P. J. Dillon, and P. Pavelic. 2009. “Integrated assessment of lateral flow, density effects and dispersion in aquifer storage and recovery.” J. Hydrol. 370 (1–4): 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.02.055.
Yobbi, D. K. 1996. Simulation of subsurface storage and recovery of treated effluent injected in a saline aquifer. St. Petersburg, FL: Water-Resources Investigations.
Zuurbier, K. G., N. Hartog, and P. J. Stuyfzand. 2016. “Reactive transport impacts on recovered freshwater quality during multiple partially penetrating wells (MPPW-)ASR in a brackish heterogeneous aquifer.” Appl. Geochem. 71 (Jan): 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2016.05.013.
Zuurbier, K. G., J. W. Kooiman, M. M. A. Groen, B. Maas, and P. J. Stuyfzand. 2015. “Enabling successful aquifer storage and recovery of freshwater using horizontal directional drilled wells in coastal aquifers.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 20 (3): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000990.
Zuurbier, K. G., W. J. Zaadnoordijk, and P. J. Stuyfzand. 2014. “How multiple partially penetrating wells improve the freshwater recovery of coastal aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) systems: A field and modeling study.” J. Hydrol. 509 (18): 430–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.057.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 27 • Issue 12 • December 2022
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 25, 2022
Accepted: Jul 18, 2022
Published online: Oct 6, 2022
Published in print: Dec 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Mar 6, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Shubham Tiwari, Brijesh Kumar Yadav, Role of Hydrogeological Factors on Aquifer Storage and Recovery Performance in Saline Groundwater Regions, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5949, 150, 1, (2024).