Case Studies
Sep 8, 2022

Application of Copula Functions for Bivariate Analysis of Rainfall and River Flow Deficiencies in the Siminehrood River Basin, Iran

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 11

Abstract

In this study, the frequency analysis of river flow deficiency (FD) of the Siminehrood River in the south of Lake Urmia located in northwest Iran was investigated with regard to rainfall deficiency (RD) during the period of 1992–2013 using copula functions. The main purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive method for bivariate simulation and forecasting based on marginal distribution and joint behavior of the studied series. For this purpose, the FD and RD values were extracted using the deficiency value method. By preparing deficiency values, 57 different distribution functions were fitted to the studied values, and the generalized extreme value (GEV) distribution was selected as the best marginal distribution function based on the evaluation criteria. Before fitting the copula function, the correlation between the RD and FD values was examined using Kendall’s tau, and a correlation of 70% was obtained. After selecting the marginal distribution function and examining the correlation, the goodness of fit of seven different copula functions was examined for frequency analysis of RD and FD values in the Siminehrood River at the Dashband station. The results indicated that the Clayton copula had the best performance for creating a joint distribution of RD and FD values. It was also determined from the joint analysis of deficiency values that the FD values can be estimated with high accuracy for RD values of more than 0.68 mm. Also, the results indicated that if rainfall in the study area were less than long-term mean for 10-day and 60-day durations, with different return periods and probabilities, different conditions will occur for FD values, which can be used as typical curves for water resources management and allocation in the basin. Finally, the accuracy of the copula-based model and its conditional density in the two phases of simulation and forecasting were investigated. The accuracy of the copula-based model and its conditional density in the simulation phase was confirmed [R2=0.87, root mean square error (RMSE)=0.1  m3/s, and nash-sutcliffe efficiency (NSE)=0.86]. In the forecasting phase, the forecasting equation based on the proposed method had a RMSE of 0.14  m3/s and NSE of 0.89. By using the violin plot, the model certainty was also confirmed. According to the proposed equation, FD values can be forecasted affected by RD values for 10-day duration with high certainty and accuracy.

Practical Applications

In this paper, a method for forecasting and simulation of meteorological and hydrological parameters is presented that considers two parameters simultaneously. This study discusses meteorology and hydrology from a different perspective. Given the current climate change, this study uses deficiency values. The proposed forecasting method provides regional results that can be used in the water resources management in each basin specifically. By implementing this method, it is easy to forecast the desired values in the basin with different probabilities and return periods. In this study, river flow deficiency (FD) affected by rainfall deficiency (RD) can be forecasted. The difference between the proposed method and other methods and models of simulation and forecasting is in the connection of two variables with each other, which makes the results more certain and reliable. This method can be used in the field of basin management and water resources allocation and also water resources monitoring.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Politecnico di Milano for providing the facilities for the first author as a visiting researcher. Also, the authors would like to thank Iran Water Resources Management Company for providing the data.

References

Aas, K., C. Czado, A. Frigessi, and H. Bakken. 2009. “Pair-copula constructions of multiple dependence.” Insur. Math. Econ. 44 (2): 182–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2007.02.001.
Abdi, A., Y. Hassanzadeh, S. Talatahari, A. Fakheri-Fard, and R. Mirabbasi. 2017. “Regional drought frequency analysis using L-moments and adjusted charged system search.” J. Hydroinf. 19 (3): 426–442. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2016.228.
Abdollahi, S., A. M. Akhoond-Ali, R. Mirabbasi, and J. F. Adamowski. 2019. “Probabilistic event based rainfall-runoff modeling using copula functions.” Water Resour. Manage. 33 (11): 3799–3814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02339-z.
Ahmadi, F., F. Radmaneh, G. Parham, and R. Mirabbasi. 2017. “Comparison of the performance of power law and probability distributions in the frequency analysis of flood in Dez Basin, Iran.” Nat. Hazard. 87 (3): 1313–1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2819-1.
Ahmadi, F., F. Radmaneh, M. R. Sharifi, and R. Mirabbasi. 2018. “Bivariate frequency analysis of low flow using copula functions (Case study: Dez River Basin, Iran).” Environ. Earth Sci. 77 (9): 643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7819-2.
Ayantobo, O., Y. Li, and S. Song. 2019. “Multivariate drought frequency analysis using four-variate symmetric and asymmetric Archimedean copula functions.” Water Resour. Manage. 33 (1): 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2090-6.
Bedford, T., and R. M. Cooke. 2001. “Probability density decomposition for conditionally dependent random variables modeled by vines.” Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 32 (1–4): 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016725902970.
Besharat, S., K. Khalili, and M. N. Tahrudi. 2014. “Evaluation of SAM and moments methods for estimation of log Pearson type III parameters (Case study: Daily flow of rivers in Lake Urmia basin).” J. Appl. Environ. Biol. Sci. 4 (1): 24–32.
Bevacqua, E., D. Maraun, I. Hobæk Haff, M. Widmann, and M. Vrac. 2017. “Multivariate statistical modelling of compound events via pair-copula constructions: Analysis of floods in Ravenna (Italy).” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 21 (6): 2701–2723. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2701-2017.
Bezak, N., S. Rusjan, M. Kramar Fijavž, M. Mikoš, and M. Šraj. 2017. “Estimation of suspended sediment loads using copula functions.” Water 9 (8): 628. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9080628.
Brunner, M. I., R. Furrer, and A. C. Favre. 2019. “Modeling the spatial dependence of floods using the Fisher copula.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 23 (1): 107–124. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-107-2019.
Cooke, R. M., D. Kurowicka, and K. Wilson. 2015. “Sampling, conditionalizing, counting, merging, searching regular vines.” J. Multivariate Anal. 138 (Feb): 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2015.02.001.
Dastourani, M., and M. Nazeri Tahroudi. 2022. “Toward coupling of groundwater drawdown and pumping time in a constant discharge.” Appl. Water Sci. 12 (4): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01606-6.
De Michele, C., and G. Salvadori. 2003. “A generalized Pareto intensity-duration model of storm rainfall exploiting 2-copulas.” J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 108 (2): 534. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002534.
Gräler, B., M. van den Berg, S. Vandenberghe, A. Petroselli, S. Grimaldi, B. De Baets, and N. Verhoest. 2013. “Multivariate return periods in hydrology: A critical and practical review focusing on synthetic design hydrograph estimation.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17 (4): 1281–1296. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1281-2013.
Joe, H. 1997. Multivariate models and multivariate dependence concepts. London: Chapman & Hall.
Kavianpour, M., M. Seyedabadi, and S. Moazami. 2018. “Spatial and temporal analysis of drought based on a combined index using copula.” Environ. Earth Sci. 77 (22): 769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7942-0.
Khalili, K., M. N. Tahoudi, R. Mirabbasi, and F. Ahmadi. 2016. “Investigation of spatial and temporal variability of precipitation in Iran over the last half century.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 30 (4): 1205–1221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1095-4.
Khan, F., G. Spöck, and J. Pilz. 2020. “A novel approach for modelling pattern and spatial dependence structures between climate variables by combining mixture models with copula models.” Int. J. Climatol. 40 (2): 1049–1066. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6255.
Khashei-Siuki, A., A. Shahidi, Y. Ramezani, and M. Nazeri Tahroudi. 2021. “Simulation of potential evapotranspiration values based on vine copula.” Meteorol. Appl. 28 (5): e2027. https://doi.org/10.1002/met.2027.
Kim, J. E., J. Yoo, G. H. Chung, and T. W. Kim. 2019. “Hydrologic risk assessment of future extreme drought in South Korea using bivariate frequency analysis.” Water 11 (10): 2052. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11102052.
Kurowicka, D., and R. M. Cooke. 2007. “Sampling algorithms for generating joint uniform distributions using the vine-copula method.” Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 51 (6): 2889–2906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2006.11.043.
Mendenhall, W., and J. Reinmuth. 1982. Statistics for management and economics. 4th ed. Boston: PWS Publishers.
Mirabbasi, R., E. N. Anagnostou, A. Fakheri-Fard, Y. Dinpashoh, and S. Eslamian. 2013. “Analysis of meteorological drought in northwest Iran using the joint deficit index.” J. Hydrol. 492 (Apr): 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.019.
Mirabbasi, R., A. Fakheri-Fard, and Y. Dinpashoh. 2012. “Bivariate drought frequency analysis using the copula method.” Theor. Appl. Climatol. 108 (1–2): 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-011-0524-7.
Nash, J. E., and J. V. Sutcliffe. 1970. “River flow forecasting through conceptual models Part I—A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol. 10 (3): 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6.
Nazeri Tahroudi, M., M. Pourreza-Bilondi, and Y. Ramezani. 2019. “Toward coupling hydrological and meteorological drought characteristics in Lake Urmia Basin, Iran.” J. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 138 (3): 1511–1523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-019-02919-4.
Nazeri Tahroudi, M., Y. Ramezani, C. De Michele, and R. Mirabbasi. 2020. “Analyzing the conditional behavior of rainfall deficiency and groundwater level deficiency signatures by using copula functions.” Hydrol. Res. 51 (6): 1332–1348. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2020.036.
Nazeri Tahroudi, M., Y. Ramezani, C. De Michele, and R. Mirabbasi. 2021. “Flood routing via a copula-based approach.” Hydrol. Res. 52 (6): 1294–1308. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2021.008.
Nazeri Tahroudi, M., Y. Ramezani, C. De Michele, and R. Mirabbasi. 2022a. “Multivariate analysis of rainfall and its deficiency signatures using vine copulas.” Int. J. Climatol. 42 (4): 2005–2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7349.
Nazeri Tahroudi, M., Y. Ramezani, C. De Michele, and R. Mirabbasi. 2022b. “Trivariate joint frequency analysis of water resources deficiency signatures using vine copulas.” Appl. Water Sci. 12 (4): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01589-4.
Nelsen, R. B. 2006. An introduction to copulas. New York: Springer.
Nguyen-Huy, T., R. C. Deo, S. Mushtaq, J. Kath, and S. Khan. 2019. “Copula statistical models for analyzing stochastic dependencies of systemic drought risk and potential adaptation strategies.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 33 (3): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-019-01662-6.
Ramezani, Y., M. N. Tahroudi, and F. Ahmadi. 2019. “Analyzing the droughts in Iran and its eastern neighboring countries using copula functions.” Q. J. Hung. Meteorol. Serv. 123 (4): 435–453. https://doi.org/10.28974/idojaras.2019.4.2.
Sahoo, B. B., R. Jha, A. Singh, and D. Kumar. 2020. “Bivariate low flow return period analysis in the Mahanadi River basin, India using copula.” Int. J. River Basin Manage. 18 (1): 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2019.1576698.
Salvadori, G., and C. De Michele. 2004. “Frequency analysis via copulas: Theoretical aspects and applications to hydrological events.” Water Resour. Res. 40 (12): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003133.
Salvadori, G., and C. De Michele. 2007. “On the use of copulas in hydrology: Theory and practice.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 12 (4): 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:4(369).
Salvadori, G., C. De Michele, N. T. Kottegoda, and R. Rosso. 2007. “Extremes in nature: An approach using copulas.” In Vol. 56 of Springer science & business media. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Shafaie, M., A. Fakheri-Fard, Y. Dinpashoh, R. Mirabbasi, and C. De Michele. 2017. “Modeling flood event characteristics using D-vine structures.” Theor. Appl. Climatol. 130 (3–4): 713–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-016-1911-x.
Shiau, J. T. 2006. “Fitting drought duration and severity with two-dimensional copulas.” Water Resour. Manage. 20 (5): 795–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-005-9008-9.
Sklar, A. 1959. Fonctions de Repartition and Dimensions et LeursMarges. Publications de L’Institute de Statistique, 229–231. Paris: Université de Paris.
Tahroudi, M. N., Y. Ramezani, and F. Ahmadi. 2019. “Investigating the trend and time of precipitation and river flow rate changes in Lake Urmia Basin, Iran.” Arabian J. Geosci. 12 (6): 219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4373-5.
Vazifehkhah, S., F. Tosunoglu, and E. Kahya. 2019. “Bivariate risk analysis of the droughts using a nonparametric multivariate standardized drought index and copulas.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 24 (5): 05019006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001775.
Wilcoxon, F. 1945. “Individual comparison by ranking methods.” Biometrics 1 (6): 80–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001968.
Yue, S., T. B. M. J. Ouarda, and B. Bobée. 2001. “A review of bivariate gamma distributions for hydrological application.” J. Hydrol. 246 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00374-2.
Zhang, D., M. Yan, and A. Tsopanakis. 2018. “Financial stress relationships among Euro area countries: An R-vine copula approach.” Eur. J. Finance 24 (17): 1587–1608. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2017.1419273.
Zhang, Q., Y. D. Chen, X. Chen, and J. Li. 2011. “Copula-based analysis of hydrological extremes and implications of hydrological behaviors in the Pearl River basin, China.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 16 (7): 598–607. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000350.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 27Issue 11November 2022

History

Received: Mar 15, 2022
Accepted: Jun 7, 2022
Published online: Sep 8, 2022
Published in print: Nov 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Feb 8, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Graduate, Dept. of Water Engineering, Univ. of Birjand, Birjand 9717434765, Iran. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6871-2771. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Water Engineering, Univ. of Birjand, Birjand 9717434765, Iran (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8085-9290. Email: [email protected]
Carlo De Michele [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, Milano 20133, Italy. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Water Engineering, Shahrekord Univ., Shahrekord 64165478, Iran. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9897-0042. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Maximum Entropy–Mixed Copula Method for the Simulation of Monthly Streamflow, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 10.1061/JHYEFF.HEENG-6018, 29, 1, (2024).
  • Application of copula-based and ARCH-based models in storm prediction, Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 10.1007/s00704-022-04333-9, (2023).
  • Multivariate analysis of flood characteristics in Armand Watershed, Iran using vine copulas, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 10.1007/s12517-022-11102-5, 16, 1, (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share