Technical Papers
Dec 18, 2020

Parameter Uncertainty of a Hydrologic Model Calibrated with Remotely Sensed Evapotranspiration and Soil Moisture

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 26, Issue 3

Abstract

Remotely sensed (RS) observations are becoming prevalent for hydrological model calibration in sparsely monitored regions. In this study, the parameter uncertainty associated with a hydrological model calibrated with RS evapotranspiration (ET) and soil moisture (SM) is investigated in detail using a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach. The daily Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) ReScaled potential ET (CMRSET) and SM retrievals from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-Earth Observing System (AMSR-E) are used to calibrate a simplified Australian Water Resource Assessment Landscape (AWRA-L) model at 10 small catchments in Eastern Australia. The study inspects the changes in parameter uncertainty with respect to different RS observations and catchment rainfall conditions and the impact of parameter uncertainty on model predictions. Results suggest that uncertainty in posterior parameter distributions increases from high- to low-rainfall catchments due to the intricate nonlinear relationship between rainfall and runoff in low-yielding catchments. Uncertainty is narrower for ET calibrations than SM calibrations, representing higher uncertainty associated with SM data processing. The study concluded that quantification of parameter uncertainty alone is not enough to provide satisfactory prediction uncertainty.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The streamflow data that support the findings of this study are openly available from respective Australian state water-monitoring portals, including http://data.water.vic.gov.au/static.htm, https://realtimedata.waternsw.com.au/water.stm, and https://water-monitoring.information.qld.gov.au/. The forcing AWAP data for the model are available through http://www.csiro.au/awap/ upon request. The reanalysis CMRSET and AMSR-E soil mositure data supporting the findings of the study are openly available from the National Computational Infrastructure (NCI), Australia (http://remote-sensing.nci.org.au/u39/public/html/wirada/) and the National Snow and Ice Department Centre (NSIDC) (source: https://nsidc.org/data/ae_land3), respectively.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge CSIRO and BoM for providing data. They also would like to express their sincere gratitude to the editor and two anonymous reviewers, whose valuable comments/suggestions helped to improve this manuscript.

References

Abdi, B., O. Bozorg-Haddad, and H. A. Loáiciga. 2020. “Analysis of the effect of inputs uncertainty on riverine water temperature predictions with a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm.” Environ. Monit. Assess. 192 (2): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-8062-3.
Abdulla, F. A., and D. P. Lettenmaier. 1997. “Development of regional parameter estimation equations for a macroscale hydrologic model.” J. Hydrol. 197 (1–4): 230–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03262-3.
Alvarez-Garreton, C., D. Ryu, A. W. Western, C. H. Su, W. T. Crow, D. E. Robertson, and C. Leahy. 2015. “Improving operational flood ensemble prediction by the assimilation of satellite soil moisture: Comparison between lumped and semi-distributed schemes.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 19 (4): 1659–1676. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1659-2015.
Boscarello, L., G. Ravazzani, A. Cislaghi, and M. Mancini. 2016. “Regionalization of flow-duration curves through catchment classification with streamflow signatures and physiographic–climate indices.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 21 (3): 05015027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001307.
Brocca, L., F. Melone, T. Moramarco, W. Wagner, V. Naeimi, Z. Bartalis, and S. Hasenauer. 2010. “Improving runoff prediction through the assimilation of the ASCAT soil moisture product.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 14 (10): 1881–1893. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1881-2010.
Campo, L., F. Caparrini, and F. Castelli. 2006. “Use of multi-platform, multi-temporal remote-sensing data for calibration of a distributed hydrological model: An application in the Arno basin, Italy.” Hydrol. Processes 20 (13): 2693–2712. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6061.
Cheng, Q. B., X. Chen, C. Y. Xu, C. Reinhardt-Imjela, and A. Schulte. 2014. “Improvement and comparison of likelihood functions for model calibration and parameter uncertainty analysis within a Markov chain Monte Carlo scheme.” J. Hydrol. 519 (Part B): 2202–2214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.10.008.
Chib, S., and E. Greenberg. 1995. “Understanding the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm.” Am. Stat. 49 (4): 327–335.
Crow, W. T., and D. Ryu. 2009. “A new data assimilation approach for improving runoff prediction using remotely-sensed soil moisture retrievals.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 13 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-1-2009.
Crow, W. T., M. J. van den Berg, G. J. Huffman, and T. Pellarin. 2011. “Correcting rainfall using satellite-based surface soil moisture retrievals: The Soil Moisture Analysis Rainfall Tool (SMART).” Water Resour. Res. 47 (8): W08521. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010576.
Cutore, P., A. Campisano, Z. Kapelan, C. Modica, and D. Savic. 2008. “Probabilistic prediction of urban water consumption using the SCEM-UA algorithm.” Urban Water J. 5 (2): 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/15730620701754434.
DeChant, C. M., and H. Moradkhani. 2012. “Examining the effectiveness and robustness of sequential data assimilation methods for quantification of uncertainty in hydrologic forecasting.” Water Resour. Res. 48 (4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011011.
Gelman, A., and D. B. Rubin. 1992. “Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences.” Stat. Sci. 7 (4): 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177011136.
Guerschman, J. P., A. I. J. M. Van Dijk, G. Mattersdorf, J. Beringer, L. B. Hutley, R. Leuning, R. C. Pipunic, and B. S. Sherman. 2009. “Scaling of potential evapotranspiration with MODIS data reproduces flux observations and catchment water balance observations across Australia.” J. Hydrol. 369 (1–2): 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.02.013.
Gupta, P., R. Singh, N. Raghuwanshi, S. Dutta, and S. Panigrahy. 2008. “Effect of remotely sensed data on the performance of a distributed hydrological model: Case study.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 13 (10): 939–947. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:10(939).
Ha, L. T., W. G. Bastiaanssen, A. V. Griensven, A. I. Van Dijk, and G. B. Senay. 2018. “Calibration of spatially distributed hydrological processes and model parameters in SWAT using remote sensing data and an auto-calibration procedure: A case study in a Vietnamese river basin.” Water 10 (2): 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10020212.
Heimovaara, T. J., J. A. Huisman, J. A. Vrugt, and W. Bouten. 2004. “Obtaining the spatial distribution of water content along a TDR probe using the SCEM-UA Bayesian inverse modeling scheme.” Vadose Zone J. 3 (4): 1128–1145. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2004.1128.
Herman, M. R., A. P. Nejadhashemi, M. Abouali, J. S. Hernandez-Suarez, F. Daneshvar, Z. Zhang, M. C. Anderson, A. M. Sadeghi, C. R. Hain, and A. Sharifi. 2018. “Evaluating the role of evapotranspiration remote sensing data in improving hydrological modeling predictability.” J. Hydrol. 556 (Jan): 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.11.009.
Koster, R. D., Q. Liu, S. P. Mahanama, and R. H. Reichle. 2018. “Improved hydrological simulation using SMAP data: Relative impacts of model calibration and data assimilation.” J. Hydrometeorol. 19 (4): 727–741. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-17-0228.1.
Kunnath-Poovakka, A., D. Ryu, L. J. Renzullo, and B. George. 2016. “The efficacy of calibrating hydrologic model using remotely sensed evapotranspiration and soil moisture for streamflow prediction.” J. Hydrol. 535 (Apr): 509–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.018.
Kunnath-Poovakka, A., D. Ryu, L. J. Renzullo, and B. George. 2018. “Remotely sensed ET for streamflow modelling in catchments with contrasting flow characteristics: An attempt to improve efficiency.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 32 (7): 1973–1992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-018-1528-y.
Laloy, E., and J. A. Vrugt. 2012. “High-dimensional posterior exploration of hydrologic models using multiple-try DREAM(ZS) and high-performance computing.” Water Resour. Res. 48 (1): W01526. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010608.
Lauri, H., T. Räsänen, and M. Kummu. 2014. “Using reanalysis and remotely sensed temperature and precipitation data for hydrological modeling in monsoon climate: Mekong River case study.” J. Hydrometeorol. 15 (4): 1532–1545. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-13-084.1.
Li, Y., D. Ryu, A. W. Western, Q. J. Wang, D. E. Robertson, and W. T. Crow. 2014. “An integrated error parameter estimation and lag-aware data assimilation scheme for real-time flood forecasting.” J. Hydrol. 519 (Part D): 2722–2736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.08.009.
Mokhtari, A., H. Noory, and M. Vazifedoust. 2018. “Improving crop yield estimation by assimilating LAI and inputting satellite-based surface incoming solar radiation into SWAP model.” Agric. For. Meteorol. 250–251 (Mar): 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.12.250.
Mu, Q., M. Zhao, and S. W. Running. 2011. “Improvements to a MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm.” Remote Sens. Environ. 115 (8): 1781–1800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.019.
Nash, J. E., and J. V. Sutcliffe. 1970. “River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I—A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol. 10 (3): 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6.
Owe, M., R. de Jeu, and T. Holmes. 2008. “Multisensor historical climatology of satellite-derived global land surface moisture.” J. Geophys. Res. 113 (F1): F01002.
Rajib, A., G. R. Evenson, H. E. Golden, and C. R. Lane. 2018. “Hydrologic model predictability improves with spatially explicit calibration using remotely sensed evapotranspiration and biophysical parameters.” J. Hydrol. 567 (Dec): 668–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.024.
Rajib, M. A., V. Merwade, and Z. Yu. 2016. “Multi-objective calibration of a hydrologic model using spatially distributed remotely sensed/in-situ soil moisture.” J. Hydrol. 536 (May): 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.037.
Reichle, R. H., and R. D. Koster. 2004. “Bias reduction in short records of satellite soil moisture.” Geophys. Res. Lett. 31 (19): L19501. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020938.
Renzullo, L. J., A. I. J. M. van Dijk, J. M. Perraud, D. Collins, B. Henderson, H. Jin, A. B. Smith, and D. L. McJannet. 2014. “Continental satellite soil moisture data assimilation improves root-zone moisture analysis for water resources assessment.” J. Hydrol. 519 (Part D): 2747–2762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.08.008.
Rientjes, T., L. P. Muthuwatta, M. Bos, M. J. Booij, and H. Bhatti. 2013. “Multi-variable calibration of a semi-distributed hydrological model using streamflow data and satellite-based evapotranspiration.” J. Hydrol. 505 (Nov): 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.10.006.
Sefton, C., and S. Howarth. 1998. “Relationships between dynamic response characteristics and physical descriptors of catchments in England and Wales.” J. Hydrol. 211 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00163-2.
Silvestro, F., S. Gabellani, R. Rudari, F. Delogu, P. Laiolo, and G. Boni. 2015. “Uncertainty reduction and parameter estimation of a distributed hydrological model with ground and remote-sensing data.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 19 (4): 1727–1751. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1727-2015.
Sobol’, I. M. 1990. “On sensitivity estimation for nonlinear mathematical models.” Matematicheskoe Modelirovanie 2 (1): 112–118.
Su, C.-H., D. Ryu, R. I. Young, A. W. Western, and W. Wagner. 2013. “Inter-comparison of microwave satellite soil moisture retrievals over the Murrumbidgee Basin, Southeast Australia.” Remote Sens. Environ. 134 (Jul): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.02.016.
Van Dijk, A. 2010. Landscape model (version 0.5) technical description. Canberra, Australia: Water Information Research and Development Alliance.
Van Dijk, A., and S. Marvanek. 2010. Derivation of a simple soil drainage model. AWRA background paper 2010/1. Canberra, Australia: Water Information Research and Development Alliance.
Van Dijk, A., and L. Renzullo. 2011. “Water resource monitoring systems and the role of satellite observations.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15 (1): 39–55. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-39-2011.
Vrugt, J. A., H. V. Gupta, W. Bouten, and S. Sorooshian. 2003. “A shuffled complex evolution metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters.” Water Resour. Res. 39 (8): 1201.
Vrugt, J. A., C. J. F. ter Braak, M. P. Clark, J. M. Hyman, and B. A. Robinson. 2008. “Treatment of input uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Doing hydrology backward with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation.” Water Resour. Res. 44 (12): W00B09. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006720.
Vrugt, J. A., C. J. F. ter Braak, C. G. H. Diks, B. A. Robinson, J. M. Hyman, and D. Higdon. 2009. “Accelerating Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation by differential evolution with self-adaptive randomized subspace sampling.” Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 10 (3): 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJNSNS.2009.10.3.273.
Wagener, T., and H. S. Wheater. 2006. “Parameter estimation and regionalization for continuous rainfall-runoff models including uncertainty.” J. Hydrol. 320 (1–2): 132–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.015.
Wang, S., G. H. Huang, B. W. Baetz, and B. C. Ancell. 2017. “Towards robust quantification and reduction of uncertainty in hydrologic predictions: Integration of particle Markov chain Monte Carlo and factorial polynomial chaos expansion.” J. Hydrol. 548 (May): 484–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.027.
Wang, S., and Y. Wang. 2019. “Improving probabilistic hydroclimatic projections through high-resolution convection-permitting climate modeling and Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations.” Clim. Dyn. 53 (3–4): 1613–1636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04702-7.
Yadav, M., T. Wagener, and H. Gupta. 2007. “Regionalization of constraints on expected watershed response behavior for improved predictions in ungauged basins.” Adv. Water Resour. 30 (8): 1756–1774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.01.005.
Ye, W., B. C. Bates, N. R. Viney, M. Sivapalan, and A. J. Jakeman. 1997. “Performance of conceptual rainfall-runoff models in low-yielding ephemeral catchments.” Water Resour. Res. 33 (1): 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1029/96WR02840.
Zhang, Y., F. H. S. Chiew, L. Zhang, and H. Li. 2009. “Use of remotely sensed actual evapotranspiration to improve rainfall–runoff modeling in Southeast Australia.” J. Hydrometeorol. 10 (4): 969–980. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JHM1061.1.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 26Issue 3March 2021

History

Received: May 28, 2020
Accepted: Oct 26, 2020
Published online: Dec 18, 2020
Published in print: Mar 1, 2021
Discussion open until: May 18, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Aiswarya Kunnath-Poovakka https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8670-409X
Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400076, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8670-409X
Dongryeol Ryu
Associate Professor, Dept. of Infrastructure Engineering, Univ. of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
Institute Chair Professor and Head, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400076, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4883-3792. Email: [email protected]
Biju George
Honorary Senior Fellow, Dept. of Infrastructure Engineering, Univ. of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share