Technical Papers
Dec 16, 2020

Improved Generalized Calibration of an Impedance Probe for Soil Moisture Measurement at Regional Scale Using Bayesian Neural Network and Soil Physical Properties

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 26, Issue 3

Abstract

Regional-scale precise soil moisture measurements are required for remote sensing-based soil moisture product validation besides, complimenting in several hydrological and agricultural applications. Though the gravimetric method provides the most accurate soil moisture measurements, it cannot be extended to the regional-scale due to the large number of sampling requirements. An impedance probe is a suitable substitute for the time-intensive gravimetric method; however, it needs soil/field-specific calibrations for precise measurements. The present study aims to develop a generalized calibration of an impedance probe (i.e., ThetaProbe) for precise measurements of soil moisture at the regional-scale within the root-mean-square-error (RMSE) of 0.04  m3m3 to fulfil the accuracy requirement of current satellite missions. A few methods for calibrating impedance probe were investigated using 496 gravimetric samples and coincident impedance probe measurements collected over 83 locations through field campaigns in a paddy dominated tropical Indian watershed that covers an area of 500  km2. The manufacturer generalized calibration was found to have high RMSE (0.0523  m3m3) and considerable bias (0.0241  m3m3) in soil moisture measurements. Developed generalized and soil-specific calibration based on a linear regression technique that resulted in RMSE values of 0.0468 and 0.0422  m3m3, respectively. Further, a Bayesian neural network (BNN) based method, a nonlinear technique, was used for developing a generalized calibration of the impedance probe. The results illustrated that BNN-based generalized calibration (RMSE<0.04  m3m3) performs better than the linear regression–based calibrations (RMSE>0.04  m3m3). Moreover, the performance of BNN-based generalized calibration was further improved by the inclusion of soil physical properties as input and yielded an RMSE value up to 0.0352 and 0.0366  m3m3 during training and cross-validation process, respectively.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The field data and trained BNN models with the best performance are available with the corresponding authors and can be shared upon request.

Acknowledgments

Authors greatly acknowledge the funding support from the project funded by the Department of Science and Technology (DST), India (Grant No. DST/CCP/MRDP/99/2017) to carry out this research work. The funding support under a project Grant “ITRA/15(67)/WATER/IGLQ/01” funded by the Information Technology Research Academy (ITRA), Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, India for the soil moisture field campaigns is also sincerely acknowledged. We sincerely thank the anonymous reviewers for their elaborate comments and suggestions in improving the manuscript.

References

Akaike, H. 1974. “A new look at the statistical model identification.” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 19 (6): 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705.
Al-Ghobari, H., M. Marazky, A. Aboukarima, and M. Minyawi. 2016. “Calibration of soil water content data from EnviroSCAN system using artificial neural network.” Am. J. Exp. Agric. 12 (5): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJEA/2016/26237.
Arsoy, S., M. Ozgur, E. Keskin, and C. Yilmaz. 2013. “Enhancing TDR based water content measurements by ANN in sandy soils.” Geoderma 195–196 (Mar): 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.11.019.
Bittelli, M., F. Salvatorelli, and P. R. Pisa. 2008. “Correction of TDR-based soil water content measurements in conductive soils.” Geoderma 143 (1–2): 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.10.022.
Bosch, D. D., V. Lakshmi, T. J. Jackson, M. Choi, and J. M. Jacobs. 2006. “Large scale measurements of soil moisture for validation of remotely sensed data: Georgia soil moisture experiment of 2003.” J. Hydrol. 323 (1–4): 120–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.08.024.
Brocca, L., L. Ciabatta, C. Massari, S. Camici, and A. Tarpanelli. 2017. “Soil moisture for hydrological applications: Open questions and new opportunities.” Water 9 (2): 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9020140.
Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. New York: Springer.
Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2004. “Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection.” Sociological Methods Res. 33 (2): 261–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644.
Campbell, J. E. 1990. “Dielectric properties and influence of conductivity in soils at one to fifty Megahertz.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54 (2): 332–341. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400020006x.
Chen, F., W. T. Crow, P. J. Starks, and D. N. Moriasi. 2011. “Improving hydrologic predictions of a catchment model via assimilation of surface soil moisture.” Adv. Water Resour. 34 (4): 526–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.01.011.
Cosh, M. H., T. J. Jackson, R. Bindlish, J. S. Famiglietti, and D. Ryu. 2005. “Calibration of an impedance probe for estimation of surface soil water content over large regions.” J. Hydrol. 311 (1–4): 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.01.003.
Curtis, J., R. Narayanan, and S. Member. 1998. “Effects of laboratory procedures on soil electrical property measurements.” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 47 (6): 1474–1480. https://doi.org/10.1109/19.746715.
Dan Foresee, F., and M. T. Hagan. 1997. “Gauss-Newton approximation to Bayesian learning.” In Vol. 3 of Proc., Int. Conf. on Neural Networks (ICNN'97), 1930–1935. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNN.1997.614194.
Dawson, C. W., R. J. Abrahart, and L. M. See. 2007. “HydroTest: A web-based toolbox of evaluation metrics for the standardised assessment of hydrological forecasts.” Environ. Modell. Software 22 (7): 1034–1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.06.008.
Delta-T Devices. 2013. User manual for the ML3 theta probe. Cambridge, UK: Delta-T Devices.
Dirksen, C., and S. Dasberg. 1993. “Improved calibration of time domain reflectometry soil water content measurements.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57 (3): 660–667. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700030005x.
Entekhabi, D., et al. 2010. “The soil moisture active passive (SMAP) mission.” Proc. IEEE 98 (5): 704–716. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2010.2043918.
Famiglietti, J., J. A. Devereaux, C. A. Laymon, T. Tsegaye, P. R. Houser, T. J. Jackson, S. T. Graham, M. Rodell, and P. J. van Oevelen. 1999. “Ground-based investigation of soil moisture variability within remote sensing footprints during the Southern great plains 1997 (SGP97) hydrology experiment.” Water Resour. Res. 35 (6): 1839–1851. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999WR900047.
Gardner, W. H. 1986. “Water content.” In Methods of soil analysis. Part 1: Physical and mineralogical methods, SSSA book series SV-5.1, 493–544. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy.
Gaskin, G. J., and J. D. Miller. 1996. “Measurement of soil water content using a simplified impedance measuring technique.” J. Agric. Eng. Res. 63 (2): 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1996.0017.
Haykin, S. 1994. Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation. New York: Macmillan College Publishing Company.
Holzman, M., R. Rivas, F. Carmona, and R. Niclòs. 2017. “A method for soil moisture probes calibration and validation of satellite estimates.” MethodsX 4: 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2017.07.004.
Jackson, T. J., M. Cosh, R. Bindlish, P. J. Starks, D. D. Bosch, M. Seyfried, D. C. Goodrich, M. S. Moran, and J. Du. 2010. “Validation of advanced microwave scanning radiometer soil moisture products.” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 48 (12): 4256–4272. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2010.2051035.
Jacobsen, O. H., and P. Schjønning. 1993. “A laboratory calibration of time domain reflectometry for soil water measurement including effects of bulk density and texture.” J. Hydrol. 151 (2–4): 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(93)90233-Y.
Joshi, C., B. P. Mohanty, J. M. Jacobs, and A. V. M. Ines. 2011. “Spatiotemporal analyses of soil moisture from point to footprint scale in two different hydroclimatic regions.” Water Resour. Res. 47 (1): W01508. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR009002.
Kang, J., R. Jin, X. Li, C. Ma, J. Qin, and Y. Zhang. 2017. “High spatio-temporal resolution mapping of soil moisture by integrating wireless sensor network observations and MODIS apparent thermal inertia in the Babao River Basin, China.” Remote Sens. Environ. 191 (Mar): 232–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.01.027.
Kerr, Y. H., et al. 2010. “The SMOS Mission: New tool for monitoring key elements of the global water cycle.” Proc. IEEE 98 (5): 666–687. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2010.2043032.
Köksal, E. S., B. Cemek, C. Artik, K. E. Temizel, and M. Taşan. 2011. “A new approach for neutron moisture meter calibration: Artificial neural network.” Irrig. Sci. 29 (5): 369–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-010-0246-0.
Kolassa, J., et al. 2018. “Estimating surface soil moisture from SMAP observations using a neural network technique.” Remote Sens. Environ. 204 (Jan): 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.10.045.
Koster, R. D., S. P. P. Mahanama, B. Livneh, D. P. Lettenmaier, and R. H. Reichle. 2010. “Skill in streamflow forecasts derived from large-scale estimates of soil moisture and snow.” Nat. Geosci. 3 (9): 613–616. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo944.
Leao, T. P., E. Perfect, and J. S. Tyner. 2010. “Estimation of soil water content using a 50 MHz impedance sensor: Soil texture, structure, and salinity interactions.” Trans. ASABE 53 (1): 163–170. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.29510.
MacKay, D. J. C. 1992. “Bayesian interpolation.” Neural Comput. 4 (3): 415–447. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1992.4.3.415.
Malicki, M. A., R. Plagge, and C. H. Roth. 1996. “Improving the calibration of dielectric TDR soil moisture determination taking into account the solid soil.” Eur. J. Soil Sci. 47 (3): 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01409.x.
Mohanty, B. P., and T. H. Skaggs. 2001. “Spatio-temporal evolution and time-stable characteristics of soil moisture within remote sensing footprints with varying soil, slope, and vegetation.” Adv. Water Resour. 24 (9–10): 1051–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(01)00034-3.
Muller, B., and J. Reinhardt. 1991. Neural networks: An introduction. Berlin: Springer.
Nair, A., G. Singh, and U. C. Mohanty. 2018. “Prediction of monthly summer monsoon rainfall using global climate models through artificial neural network technique.” Pure Appl. Geophys. 175 (1): 403–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1652-5.
National Academies Press. 2007. Earth science and applications from space: National imperatives for the next decade and beyond. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Persson, M., R. Berndtsson, and B. Sivakumar. 2001. “Using neural networks for calibration of time-domain reflectometry measurements.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 46 (3): 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626660109492834.
Persson, M., B. Sivakumar, R. Berndtsson, O. H. Jacobsen, and P. Schjønning. 2002. “Predicting the dielectric constant–water content relationship using artificial neural networks.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66 (5): 1424–1429. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.1424.
Ran, Y., X. Li, R. Jin, J. Kang, and M. H. Cosh. 2017. “Strengths and weaknesses of temporal stability analysis for monitoring and estimating grid-mean soil moisture in a high-intensity irrigated agricultural landscape.” Water Resour. Res. 53 (1): 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018182.
Roth, C. H., M. A. Malicki, and R. Plagge. 1992. “Empirical evaluation of the relationship between soil dielectric constant and volumetric water content as the basis for calibrating soil moisture measurements by TDR.” J. Soil Sci. 43 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1992.tb00115.x.
Roth, K., R. Schulin, H. Flühler, and W. Attinger. 1990. “Calibration of time domain reflectometry for water content measurement using a composite dielectric approach.” Water Resour. Res. 26 (10): 2267–2273. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR026i010p02267.
Rowlandson, T. L., A. A. Berg, P. R. Bullock, E. R. T. Ojo, H. McNairn, G. Wiseman, and M. H. Cosh. 2013. “Evaluation of several calibration procedures for a portable soil moisture sensor.” J. Hydrol. 498 (Aug): 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.05.021.
Schwarz, G. 1978. “Estimating the dimension of a model.” Ann. Stat. 6 (2): 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136.
Scudiero, E., A. Berti, P. Teatini, and F. Morari. 2012. “Simultaneous monitoring of soil water content and salinity with a low-cost capacitance-resistance probe.” Sensors 12 (12): 17588–17607. https://doi.org/10.3390/s121217588.
Seyfried, M. S., and M. D. Murdock. 2004. “Measurement of soil water content with a 50-MHz soil dielectric sensor.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68 (2): 394–403. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.3940.
Singh, G., N. N. Das, R. K. Panda, A. Colliander, T. Jackson, B. P. Mohanty, D. Entekhabi, and S. Yueh. 2019a. “Validation of SMAP soil moisture products using ground-based observations for the paddy dominated tropical region of India.” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 57 (11): 8479–8491. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2019.2921333.
Singh, G., and R. K. Panda. 2015. “Bootstrap-based artificial neural network analysis for estimation of daily sediment yield from a small agricultural watershed.” Int. J. Hydrol. Sci. Tech. 5 (4): 333–348. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHST.2015.072634.
Singh, G., R. K. Panda, and M. Lamers. 2015. “Modeling of daily runoff from a small agricultural watershed using artificial neural network with resampling techniques.” J. Hydroinformatics 17 (1): 56–74. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2014.106.
Singh, G., R. K. Panda, and B. P. Mohanty. 2019b. “Spatiotemporal analysis of soil moisture and optimal sampling design for regional-scale soil moisture estimation in a tropical watershed of India.” Water Resour. Res. 55 (3): 2057–2078. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024044.
Singh, G., R. K. Panda, B. P. Mohanty, and R. B. Jana. 2016. “Soil moisture variability across different scales in an Indian watershed for satellite soil moisture product validation.” In Proc., SPIE 9877, Land Surface and Cryosphere Remote Sensing III, 98772B. Bellingham, WA: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2222743.
Singh, G., R. K. Panda, and A. Nair. 2020. “Regional scale trend and variability of rainfall pattern over agro-climatic zones in the mid-Mahanadi River basin of eastern India.” J. Hydro-environ. Res. 29 (Mar): 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2019.11.001.
Stangl, R., G. D. Buchan, and W. Loiskandl. 2009. “Field use and calibration of a TDR based probe for monitoring water content in a high-clay landslide soil in Austria.” Geoderma 150 (1–2): 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.01.002.
Tague, C., L. Band, S. Kenworthy, and D. Tenebaum. 2010. “Plot-and watershed-scale soil moisture variability in a humid Piedmont watershed.” Water Resour. Res. 46 (12): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008078.
Tokar, B. A. S., and P. A. Johnson. 1999. “Rainfall-runoff modeling using artificial neural networks.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 4 (3): 232–239. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)4:3(232).
Topp, G., and P. A. Ferre. 2002. “3.1 water content.” In Methods of soil analysis. Part 4. Physical methods, SSSA book series SV-5.4, 417–545. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.
Topp, G. C., J. L. Davis, and A. P. Annan. 1980. “Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines.” Water Resour. Res. 16 (3): 574–582. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR016i003p00574.
Topp, G. C., and W. D. Reynolds. 1998. “Time domain reflectometry: A seminal technique for measuring mass and energy in soil.” Soil Tillage Res. 47 (1–2): 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(98)00083-X.
Whalley, W. R. 1993. “Considerations on the use of time-domain reflectometry (TDR) for measuring soil water content.” J. Soil Sci. 44 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1993.tb00429.x.
Yang, J., T. Li, Q. Lu, and Z. Chen. 2010. “Calibration method based on RBF neural networks for soil moisture content sensor.” Agric. Sci. Technol. Hunan 11 (2): 140–142.
Zanetti, S. S., R. A. Cecílio, V. H. Silva, and E. G. Alves. 2015. “General calibration of TDR to assess the moisture of tropical soils using artificial neural networks.” J. Hydrol. 530 (Nov): 657–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.10.037.
Zhao, W., N. Sánchez, and A. Li. 2018. “Triangle space-based surface soil moisture estimation by the synergistic use of in situ measurements and optical/thermal infrared remote sensing: An alternative to conventional validations.” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 56 (8): 4546–4558. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2825284.
Zwieback, S., S. Hensley, and I. Hajnsek. 2017. “Soil moisture estimation using differential radar interferometry: Toward separating soil moisture and displacements.” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 55 (9): 5069–5083. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2017.2702099.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 26Issue 3March 2021

History

Received: Jan 12, 2020
Accepted: Sep 21, 2020
Published online: Dec 16, 2020
Published in print: Mar 1, 2021
Discussion open until: May 16, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, School of Infrastructure, Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar, Argul, Jatni, Odisha 752050, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8340-2632. Email: [email protected]
Rabindra K. Panda
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, School of Infrastructure, Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar, Argul, Jatni, Odisha 752050, India.
Scientist, Western Himalayan Regional Centre, National Institute of Hydrology, Jammu and Kashmir 180003, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0833-780X

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share