Abstract

Modeling urban flooding is challenging because of complex spatial variations and interactions between precipitation, land cover, and drainage networks. This paper presents a case study of the development of two hydrology and hydraulics models—the semidistributed storm water management model (SWMM) and the fully distributed gridded surface/subsurface hydrologic analysis (GSSHA) model—to simulate the hydrologic response of two neighboring urban watersheds with large storm sewer networks in the city of Roanoke, Virginia. Both models were calibrated and validated for the two watersheds based on nine events (May–October 2018), and the models were assessed on their ability to replicate measured stream discharge and storm sewer flow depths. The findings from the study indicate that both models reasonably capture the observed hydrologic responses but that each model offers unique benefits. Overall, SWMM’s value to the city is its ability to provide detailed information regarding the hydraulic conditions within the city’s storm sewer network, whereas GSSHA’s value to the city is its ability to predict the duration and spatial extent of flooding in two dimensions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request (SWMM R calibration code, SWMM R precipitation IDW interpolation code).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the City of Roanoke, Virginia (VT Fund No. 466187) and the Virginia Tech Via Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Special thanks to the City of Roanoke Stormwater Division for their helpful feedback and valuable insights throughout the development and evaluation of the watershed models.

References

Aguilar, M. F., R. L. Dymond, and D. R. Cooper. 2019. “History, mapping, and hydraulic monitoring of a buried stream under a central business district.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 145 (12): 05019019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001131.
Ahmadisharaf, E., R. A. Camacho, H. X. Zhang, M. M. Hantush, and Y. M. Mohamoud. 2019. “Calibration and validation of watershed models and advances in uncertainty analysis in TMDL studies.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 24 (7): 03119001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001794.
Aquaveo. 2019. “WMS—The all-in-one watershed solution.” Accessed October 29, 2019. https://www.aquaveo.com/software/wms-watershed-modeling-system-introduction.
Arizona DOT. 2014. Highway drainage design manual volume 2—Hydrology appendix B rainfall loss parameters. Phoenix: Arizona DOT.
Bartles, M. 2014. “Hydrologic analysis of Prompton Dam using a physically-based rainfall runoff model.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Villanova Univ.
Borah, D. K., E. Ahmadisharaf, G. Padmanabhan, S. Imen, and Y. M. Mohamoud. 2019. “Watershed models for development and implementation of total maximum daily loads.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 24 (1): 03118001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001724.
Brendel, C. E., R. L. Dymond, and M. F. Aguilar. 2019. “An interactive web app for retrieval, visualization, and analysis of hydrologic and meteorological time series data.” Environ. Modell. Software 117 (Jul): 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.03.003.
Brendel, C. E., R. L. Dymond, and M. F. Aguilar. 2020a. “PUFFIN.” Accessed May 28, 2020. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3687334.
Brendel, C. E., R. L. Dymond, and M. F. Aguilar. 2020b. “PUFFIN probabilistic urban flash flood information nexus.” Accessed May 25, 2020. https://bigbadcrad.shinyapps.io/PUFFIN/.
Chittum, M. 2017. “After 4 floods swamp downtown in a year, Roanoke officials look for answers.” Accessed November 7, 2019. https://www.roanoke.com/news/after-floods-swamp-downtown-in-a-year-roanoke-officials-look/article_ac03c944-6dfc-5c9c-9cdf-2edb79aef3f1.html.
Chow, V. T. 1959. Open-channel hydraulics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Deo, I., P. Modi, M. Zarekarizi, and J. Valle. 2018. Sensitivity of urban flooding to presence of subsurface storm drainage systems in hydrologic models for low-gradient watersheds. National Water Center Innovators Program Summer Institute.
Dhami, B. S., and A. Pandey. 2013. “Comparative review of recently developed hydrologic models.” J. Indian Water Resour. Soc. 33 (3): 34–41.
Diaz-Ramirez, J., B. E. Johnson, W. McAnally, and J. Martin. 2010. “Comparison of lumped and distributed hydrologic models for the runoff simulation of a large watershed in Alabama and Mississippi.” In Proc., Northern Gulf Institute Conf. Starkville, MS: Northern Gulf Institute.
Downer, C. W., and F. L. Ogden. 2004. “GSSHA: Model to simulate diverse stream flow producing processes.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 9 (3): 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2004)9:3(161).
Downer, C. W., and F. L. Ogden. 2006. Gridded surface subsurface hydrologic analysis (GSSHA) user’s manual, Version 1.43 for watershed modeling system 6.1. Vicksburg, MS: Engineer Research and Development Center, Coastal and Hydraulics Lab.
Downer, C. W., N. R. Pradhan, and A. R. Byrd. 2014. Modeling subsurface storm and tile drain systems in GSSHA with SUPERLINK. Vicksburg, MS: Engineer Research and Development Center, Coastal and Hydraulics Lab.
Dymond, R. L., M. F. Aguilar, P. Bender, and C. Hodges. 2017a. Lick Run watershed master plan. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Dymond, R. L., M. F. Aguilar, M. Mika, and C. Hodges. 2017b. Trout Run watershed master plan. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
El Hassan, A. A., H. Sharif, T. Jackson, and S. Chintalapudi. 2013. “Performance of a conceptual and physically based model in simulating the response of a semi-urbanized watershed in San Antonio, Texas.” Hydrol. Processes 27 (24): 3394–3408. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9443.
Elmore, A. J., and S. S. Kaushal. 2008. “Disappearing headwaters: Patterns of stream burial due to urbanization.” Front. Ecol. Environ. 6 (6): 308–312. https://doi.org/10.1890/070101.
Engman, E. T. 1986. “Roughness coefficients for routing surface runoff.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 112 (1): 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1986)112:1(39).
EPA. 2019. “Storm water management model (SWMM).” Accessed October 29, 2019. https://www.epa.gov/water-research/storm-water-management-model-swmm.
FEMA. 2019a. “Hydraulic numerical models meeting the minimum requirement of national flood insurance program.” Accessed October 25, 2019. https://www.fema.gov/hydraulic-numerical-models-meeting-minimum-requirement-national-flood-insurance-program.
FEMA. 2019b. “Hydrologic models meeting the minimum requirement of national flood insurance program.” Accessed October 25, 2019. https://www.fema.gov/hydrologic-models-meeting-minimum-requirement-national-flood-insurance-program#1.
Fry, T. J., and R. M. Maxwell. 2017. “Evaluation of distributed BMPs in an urban watershed—High resolution modeling for stormwater management.” Hydrol. Processes 31 (15): 2700–2712. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11177.
Galloway, G. E., A. Reilly, S. Ryoo, A. Riley, M. Haslam, S. Brody, W. Highfeld, J. Gunn, J. Rainey, and S. Parker. 2018. The growing threat of urban flooding: A national challenge. College Park, MD: A. James Clark School of Engineering.
GSSHA (Gridded Surface/Subsurface Hydrologic Analysis). 2019. “GSSHA download.” Accessed November 4, 2019. https://www.gsshawiki.com/GSSHA_Download.
Hamedi, A., and H. R. Fuentes. 2015. “Comparative effectiveness and reliability of NEXRAD data to predict outlet hydrographs using the GSSHA and HEC-HMS hydrologic models.” In Proc., World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2015, 1444–1453. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Hammond, M. J., A. S. Chen, S. Djordjevic, D. Butler, and O. Mark. 2015. “Urban flood impact assessment: A state-of-the-art review.” Urban Water J. 12 (1): 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2013.857421.
Hydro Engineering Solutions. 2013. Wolf Bay watershed study. Bay Minette, AL: Baldwin County Commission.
Ji, Z. 1998. “General hydrodynamic model for sewer/channel network systems.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 124 (3): 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1998)124:3(307).
Kaushal, S. S., and K. T. Belt. 2012. “The urban watershed continuum: Evolving spatial and temporal dimensions.” Urban Ecosyst. 15 (2): 409–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-012-0226-7.
Leutnant, D., A. Doring, and M. Uhl. 2019. “SWMMR: R package to interface SWMM.” Urban Water J. 16 (1): 68–76.
Manger, G. E. 1963. Porosity and bulk density of sedimentary rocks. Washington, DC: USGS.
McGrane, S. J. 2016. “Impacts of urbanisation on hydrological and water quality dynamics, and urban water management: A review.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 61 (13): 2295–2311. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2015.1128084.
Moore, M. F., J. G. Vasconcelos, and W. C. Zech. 2017. “Modeling highway stormwater runoff and groundwater table variations with SWMM and GSSHA.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 22 (8): 04017025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001537.
Moriasi, D. N., J. G. Arnold, M. W. Van Liew, R. L. Bingner, R. D. Harmel, and T. L. Veith. 2007. “Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations.” Trans. ASABE 50 (3): 885–900. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153.
Moussa, R., and C. Bocquillon. 2009. “On the use of the diffusive wave for modelling extreme flood events with overbank flow in the floodplain.” J. Hydrol. 374 (1–2): 116–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.006.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Framing the challenge of urban flooding in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Niazi, M., C. Nietch, M. Maghrebi, N. Jackson, B. R. Bennett, M. Tryby, and A. Massoudieh. 2017. “Storm water management model: Performance review and gap analysis.” J. Sustainable Water Built Environ. 3 (2): 04017002. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSWBAY.0000817.
Niedzialek, J. M., and F. L. Ogden. 2003. “Physics-based distributed rainfall-runoff modeling of urbanized watersheds revisited with GSSHA.” In Proc., World Water and Environmental Resources Congress 2003, 1–10. Reston, VA: ASCE.
NRC (National Research Council). 2009. Urban stormwater management in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2019. “Web soil survey.” Accessed October 29, 2019. https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx.
Ogden, F. L., P. Y. Julien, V. Singh, and D. Frevert. 2002. “CASC2D: A two-dimensional, physically-based, Hortonian hydrologic model.” In Mathematical models of small watershed hydrology and applications. Littleton, CO: Water Resources Publications.
Ogden, F. L., J. M. Niedzialek, and A. R. Byrd. 2012. Storm drain effects on urban flooding. Vicksburg, MS: Engineer Research and Development Center, Coastal and Hydraulics Lab.
Ogden, F. L., N. R. Pradhan, C. W. Downer, and J. A. Zahner. 2011a. “Relative importance of impervious area, drainage density, width function, and subsurface storm drainage on flood runoff from an urbanized catchment.” Water Resour. Res. 47 (12): W12503. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010550.
Ogden, F. L., N. R. Pradhan, E. J. Nelson, and C. W. Downer. 2011b. “Predicting hydrologic effects of land-use change: Problems with the curve number approach.” In Proc., World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2011: Bearing Knowledge for Sustainability, 4801–4810. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ogden, F. L., and B. Saghafian. 1997. “Green and Ampt infiltration with redistribution.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 123 (5): 386–393. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1997)123:5(386).
Onset. 2019. “Onset.” Accessed October 29, 2019. https://www.onsetcomp.com/.
Paudel, M., E. J. Nelson, C. W. Downer, and R. Hotchkiss. 2011. “Comparing the capability of distributed and lumped hydrologic models for analyzing the effects of land use change.” J. Hydroinf. 13 (3): 461–473. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2010.100.
Pina, R. D., S. Ochoa-Rodriguez, N. E. Simoes, A. Mijic, A. S. Marques, and C. Maksimovic. 2016. “Semi- vs. fully-distributed urban stormwater models: Model set up and comparison with two real case studies.” Water 8 (2): 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8020058.
Pitt, R., S.-E. Chen, S. E. Clark, J. Swenson, and C. K. Ong. 2008. “Compaction’s impacts on urban storm-water infiltration.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 134 (5): 652–658. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:5(652).
Rawls, W. J., D. L. Brakensiek, and K. E. Saxton. 1982. “Estimation of soil-water properties.” Trans. ASAE 25 (5): 1316. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.33720.
Rossman, L. 2015. SWMM 5.1 storm water management model user’s manual. Cincinnati: USEPA.
Rossman, L., and W. Huber. 2016. Storm water management model reference manual volume I—Hydrology (revised). Cincinnati: USEPA.
Senarath, S. U., F. L. Ogden, C. W. Downer, and H. O. Sharif. 2000. “On the calibration and verification of two-dimensional, distributed, Hortonian, continuous watershed models.” Water Resour. Res. 36 (6): 1495–1510. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900039.
Sharif, H. O., A. A. Hassan, S. Bin-Shafique, H. J. Xie, and J. Zeitler. 2010. “Hydrologic modeling of an extreme flood in the Guadalupe River in Texas.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 46 (5): 881–891. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00459.x.
Shen, Y., J. L. Goodall, D. K. Harris, and B. Smith. 2016. Integrated data for improved asset management. Charlottesville, VA: Virginia Transportation Research Council.
Sith, R., and K. Nadaoka. 2017. “Comparison of SWAT and GSSHA for high time resolution prediction of stream flow and sediment concentration in a small agricultural watershed.” Hydrology 4 (2): 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology4020027.
Sitterson, J., C. Knightes, R. Parmar, K. Wolfe, M. Muche, and B. Avant. 2017. An overview of rainfall-runoff model types an overview of rainfall-runoff model types. Washington, DC: USEPA.
Skahill, B. E., C. W. Downer, and J. S. Baggett. 2012. A practical guide to calibration of a GSSHA hydrologic model using ERDC automated model calibration software-efficient local search. Vicksburg, MS: Engineer Research and Development Center, Coastal and Hydraulics Lab.
Smith, B. K., J. A. Smith, M. L. Baeck, and A. J. Miller. 2015. “Exploring storage and runoff generation processes for urban flooding through a physically based watershed model.” Water Resour. Res. 51 (3): 1552–1569. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016085.
Sorooshian, S., Q. Duan, and V. K. Gupta. 1993. “Calibration of rainfall-runoff models: Application of global optimization to the Sacramento soil moisture accounting model.” Water Resour. Res. 29 (4): 1185–1194. https://doi.org/10.1029/92WR02617.
Titterington, J., G. Squibbs, C. Digman, R. Allitt, M. Osborne, P. Eccleston, and A. Wisdish. 2017. Code of practice for the hydraulic modelling of urban drainage systems 2017. London: Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management.
UNDESA (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs). 2012. World urbanization prospects: The 2011 revision. New York: UNDESA.
USACE. 2015. Tookany Creek flood risk reduction study appendix B-1. Montgomery County, PA: Cheltenham Township.
VGIN (Virginia Geographic Information Network). 2016a. “Virginia land cover dataset.” Accessed January 28, 2019. https://vgin.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=d3d51bb5431a4d26a313f586c7c2c848.
VGIN (Virginia Geographic Information Network). 2016b. “Virginia LiDAR.” Accessed June 11, 2019. https://vgin.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=1e964be36b454a12a69a3ad0bc1473ce.
Walsh, C. J., A. H. Roy, J. W. Feminella, P. D. Cottingham, P. M. Groffman, and R. P. Morgan. 2005. “The urban stream syndrome: Current knowledge and the search for a cure.” J. North Am. Benthological Soc. 24 (3): 706–723. https://doi.org/10.1899/04-028.1.
Wuebbles, D. J., D. W. Fahey, and K. A. Hibbard. 2017. Climate science special report: Fourth national climate assessment, Volume I. Washington, DC: US Global Change Research Program.
Yang, L., J. A. Smith, M. L. Baeck, and Y. Zhang. 2016. “Flash flooding in small urban watersheds: Storm event hydrologic response.” Water Resour. Res. 52 (6): 4571–4589. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018326.
Zahner, J. A. 2004. “Influence of storm sewers, drainage density, and soil moisture on runoff from an urbanizing catchment.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Connecticut.
Zhang, Y., and W. Shuster. 2014. “The comparative accuracy of two hydrologic models in simulating warm-season runoff for two small, hillslope catchments.” JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 50 (2): 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12135.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 26Issue 1January 2021

History

Received: Nov 8, 2019
Accepted: Jul 15, 2020
Published online: Oct 30, 2020
Published in print: Jan 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Mar 30, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24060 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5199-0580. Email: [email protected]
Randel L. Dymond, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24060. Email: [email protected]
Senior Stormwater Research Engineer, City of Roanoke Dept. of Public Works, 1802 Courtland Rd. NE, Roanoke, VA 24012. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4431-9596. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share