Assessing Interpolation Methods for Accuracy of Design Groundwater Levels for Civil Projects
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 25, Issue 9
Abstract
This research compared natural neighbor interpolation with other interpolation methods commonly implemented in ArcGIS. It evaluated the relative performance of interpolation methods for various spatial data distributions, including line transects. It characterized locations which are associated with large prediction errors. To assess the relative performance of interpolation methods, a validation procedure was used consisting of 75% training data and 25% test data. Statistical error measures were used to measure the predictive performance of the interpolation methods, and the spatial distribution of errors was used to characterize areas where interpolation methods performed poorly. Results showed that Topo to Raster, natural neighbor, ordinary kriging, and empirical Bayesian kriging methods consistently outperformed other interpolation methods for a variety of spatial distributions of the data. However, natural neighbor interpolation was unsuitable for linear transects. In general, the accuracy of most of the interpolation methods increased with narrow spatial data distributions. Spatial distribution of large prediction errors was predominantly similar, regardless of the interpolation method used, and was related to changes in physical characteristics.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some data, models, or code used during the study were provided by a third party. Direct requests for these materials may be made to the provider as indicated in the Acknowledgements. Some data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the Government of Western Australia, Department of Water and Environmental Regulation and Main Roads WA for providing data. Author Zirakbash gratefully acknowledges Australian Government for Australian Commonwealth Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship.
References
Adhikary, P. P., and C. J. Dash. 2017. “Comparison of deterministic and stochastic methods to predict spatial variation of groundwater depth.” Appl. Water Sci. 7 (1): 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-014-0249-8.
Arslan, H. 2014. “Estimation of spatial distrubition of groundwater level and risky areas of seawater intrusion on the coastal region in Çarşamba Plain, Turkey, using different interpolation methods.” Environ. Monit. Assess. 186 (8): 5123–5134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3764-z.
Arun, P. V. 2013. “A comparative analysis of different DEM interpolation methods.” Egypt. J. Remote Sens. Space. Sci. 16 (2): 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2013.09.001.
Azpurua, M. A., and K. D. Ramos. 2010. “A comparison of spatial interpolation methods for estimation of average electromagnetic field magnitude.” Prog. Electromagnet. Res. 14: 135–145. https://doi.org/10.2528/PIERM10083103.
Bater, C. W., and N. C. Coops. 2009. “Evaluating error associated with lidar-derived DEM interpolation.” Comput. Geosci. 35 (2): 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2008.09.001.
Bhunia, G. S., P. K. Shit, and R. Maiti. 2018. “Comparison of GIS-based interpolation methods for spatial distribution of soil organic carbon (SOC).” J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 17 (2): 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2016.02.001.
Boronina, A., R. Clayton, and C. Gwynne. 2015. “Recommended methodology for determination of design groundwater levels.” Aust. Geomech. J. 50 (3): 11–21.
Burrough, P. A., R. McDonnell, R. A. McDonnell, and C. D. Lloyd. 2015. Principles of geographical information systems. New York: Oxford University Press.
Caruso, C., and F. Quarta. 1998. “Interpolation methods comparison.” Comput. Math. Appl. 35 (12): 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221(98)00101-1.
Chen, S., C. F. Cowan, and P. M. Grant. 1991. “Orthogonal least squares learning algorithm for radial basis function networks.” IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 2 (2): 302–309. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.80341.
da Silva, A. S. A., B. Stosic, R. S. C. Menezes, and V. P. Singh. 2018. “Comparison of interpolation methods for spatial distribution of monthly precipitation in the state of Pernambuco, Brazil.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 24 (3): 04018068. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001743.
Davidson, W. A. 1995. Hydrogeology and groundwater resources of the Perth region. Perth, Australia: Geological Survey of WA.
de Amorim Borges, P., J. Franke, Y. M. T. da Anunciação, H. Weiss, and C. Bernhofer. 2016. “Comparison of spatial interpolation methods for the estimation of precipitation distribution in Distrito Federal, Brazil.” Theor. Appl. Climatol. 123 (1–2): 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-014-1359-9.
Dumitru, P. D., M. Plopeanu, and D. Badea. 2013. “Comparative study regarding the methods of interpolation.” In Proc., of the 1st European Conf. of Geodesy & Geomatics Engineering (GENG ’13), 45–52. Antalya, Turkey: World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society.
Dunn, O. J. 1961. “Multiple comparisons among means.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 56 (293): 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1961.10482090.
Elumalai, V., K. Brindha, B. Sithole, and E. Lakshmanan. 2017. “Spatial interpolation methods and geostatistics for mapping groundwater contamination in a coastal area.” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24 (12): 11601–11617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8681-6.
ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute). 2016 “What is empirical Bayesian kriging?” Accessed April 19, 2019. http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/10.3/guide-books/extensions/geostatistical-analyst/what-is-empirical-bayesian-kriging-.htm.
Friedman, M. 1937. “The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 32 (200): 675–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1937.10503522.
Friedman, M. 1939. “A correction: The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 34 (205): 109.
Fürst, J., A. Bichler, and F. Konecny. 2015. “Regional frequency analysis of extreme groundwater levels.” Ground Water 53 (3): 414–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12223.
GISResources. 2014. “Types of interpolation methods.” Accessed April 19, 2019. http://www.gisresources.com/types-of-interpolation-methods_2/.
Hsu, S., A. Mavrogianni, and I. Hamilton. 2017. “Comparing spatial interpolation techniques of local urban temperature for heat-related health risk estimation in a subtropical city.” Procedia Eng. 198 (Jan): 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.091.
Hutchinson, M. 1988. “Calculation of hydrologically sound digital elevation models.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Symp. on Spatial Data Handling. Sydney: International Geographical Union Sydney.
Hutchinson, M. 1989. “A new procedure for gridding elevation and stream line data with automatic removal of spurious pits.” J. Hydrol. 106 (3–4): 211–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(89)90073-5.
Hutchinson, M. 1996. “A locally adaptive approach to the interpolation of digital elevation models.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. /Workshop on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modeling, 21–26. Santa Barbara, CA: National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis.
Hutchinson, M. 2000. “Optimising the degree of data smoothing for locally adaptive finite element bivariate smoothing splines.” ANZIAM J. 42 (Dec): 774–796. https://doi.org/10.21914/anziamj.v42i0.621.
Hutchinson, M. 2011. ANUDEM version 5.3. Canberra: Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National Univ.
Izady, A., O. Abdalla, T. Ahmadi, and M. Chen. 2017. “An efficient methodology to design optimal groundwater level monitoring network in Al-Buraimi region, Oman.” Arabian J. Geosci. 10 (2): 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2802-2.
Jie, C., Z. Hanting, Q. Hui, W. Jianhua, and Z. Xuedi. 2013. “Selecting proper method for groundwater interpolation based on spatial correlation.” In Proc., 2013 4th Int. Conf. on Digital Manufacturing and Automation (ICDMA), 1192–1195. New York: IEEE.
Johnston, K., J. M. Ver Hoef, K. Krivoruchko, and N. Lucas. 2001. Using ArcGIS geostatistical analyst. Redlands, CA: ESRI.
Journel, A. G., and C. J. Huijbregts. 1978. Mining geostatistics. London: Academic Press.
Kamińska, A., and A. Grzywna. 2014. “Comparison of deteministic interpolation methods for the estimation of groundwater level.” J. Ecol. Eng. 15 (4): 55–60.
Kis, I. M. 2016. “Comparison of ordinary and universal kriging interpolation techniques on a depth variable (a case of linear spatial trend), case study of the Sandrovac field.” Rudarsko-Geolosko-Naftni Zbornik 31 (2): 41.
Krivoruchko, K. 2012. “Empirical Bayesian kriging.” ArcUser, Fall, 2012.
Kumar, V. 2007. “Optimal contour mapping of groundwater levels using universal kriging—A case study.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 52 (5): 1038–1050. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.52.5.1038.
Lam, N. S.-N. 1983. “Spatial interpolation methods: A review.” Am. Cartographer 10 (2): 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1559/152304083783914958.
Ledoux, H., and C. Gold. 2005. “An efficient natural neighbour interpolation algorithm for geoscientific modelling.” In Developments in spatial data handling, 97–108. New York: Springer.
Li, J., and A. D. Heap. 2008. A review of spatial interpolation methods for environmental scientists. Canberra, Australia: Geoscience Australia.
Li, J., and A. D. Heap. 2011. “A review of comparative studies of spatial interpolation methods in environmental sciences: Performance and impact factors.” Ecol. Inf. 6 (3–4): 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2010.12.003.
Li, J., and A. D. Heap. 2014. “Spatial interpolation methods applied in the environmental sciences: A review.” Environ. Modell. Software 53 (Mar): 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.12.008.
Liang, L., and D. Hale. 2010. A stable and fast implementation of natural neighbor interpolation. Golden, CO: Colorado School of Mines.
Ly, S., C. Charles, and A. Degré. 2013. “Different methods for spatial interpolation of rainfall data for operational hydrology and hydrological modeling at watershed scale: A review.” Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement 17 (2): 392–406.
Mair, A., and A. Fares. 2010. “Comparison of rainfall interpolation methods in a mountainous region of a tropical island.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 16 (4): 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000330.
Mirzaei, R., and M. Sakizadeh. 2016. “Comparison of interpolation methods for the estimation of groundwater contamination in Andimeshk-Shush Plain, Southwest of Iran.” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23 (3): 2758–2769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5507-2.
Nikroo, L., M. Kompani-Zare, A. R. Sepaskhah, and S. R. F. Shamsi. 2010. “Groundwater depth and elevation interpolation by kriging methods in Mohr Basin of Fars province in Iran.” Environ. Monit. Assess. 166 (1–4): 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1010-x.
Njeban, H. S. 2018. “Comparison and evaluation of GIS-based spatial interpolation methods for estimation groundwater level in AL-Salman District—Southwest Iraq.” J. Geogr. Inf. Syst. 10 (04): 362. https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2018.104019.
Ohmer, M., T. Liesch, N. Goeppert, and N. Goldscheider. 2017. “On the optimal selection of interpolation methods for groundwater contouring: An example of propagation of uncertainty regarding inter-aquifer exchange.” Adv. Water Resour. 109 (Nov): 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.08.016.
Peralvo, M., and D. Maidment. 2004. “Influence of DEM interpolation methods in drainage analysis.” In Vol. 4 of GIS Hydro. Austin, TX: Univ. Texas Austin.
Pilz, J., and G. Spöck. 2008. “Why do we need and how should we implement Bayesian kriging methods.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 22 (5): 621–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-007-0165-7.
Rusu, C., and V. Rusu. 2006. “Radial basis functions versus geostatistics in spatial interpolations.” In Proc., IFIP Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence in Theory and Practice, 119–128. New York: Springer.
Salekin, S., J. Burgess, J. Morgenroth, E. Mason, and D. Meason. 2018. “A comparative study of three non-geostatistical methods for optimising digital elevation model interpolation.” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 7 (8): 300. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7080300.
Sambridge, M., J. Braun, and H. McQueen. 1995. “Geophysical parametrization and interpolation of irregular data using natural neighbours.” Geophys. J. Int. 122 (3): 837–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1995.tb06841.x.
Šiljeg, A., S. Lozić, and D. Radoš. 2015. “The effect of interpolation methods on the quality of a digital terrain model for geomorphometric analyses.” Tehnicki vjesnik/Technical Gazette 22 (5): 1149–1157.
Simpson, G., and Y. H. Wu. 2014. “Accuracy and effort of interpolation and sampling: Can GIS help lower field costs?” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 3 (4): 1317–1333. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi3041317.
Sun, Y., S. Kang, F. Li, and L. Zhang. 2009. “Comparison of interpolation methods for depth to groundwater and its temporal and spatial variations in the Minqin oasis of northwest China.” Environ. Modell. Software 24 (10): 1163–1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.03.009.
Szypuła, B. 2016. “Geomorphometric comparison of DEMs built by different interpolation methods.” Landforms Analysis 32: 45–58. https://doi.org/10.12657/landfana.032.004.
Theodossiou, N., and P. Latinopoulos. 2006. “Evaluation and optimisation of groundwater observation networks using the Kriging methodology.” Environ. Modell. Software 21 (7): 991–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.05.001.
Varouchakis, E., D. Hristopulos, and G. Karatzas. 2012. “Improving kriging of groundwater level data using nonlinear normalizing transformations—A field application.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 57 (7): 1404–1419. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2012.717174.
Varouchakis, E. A., and D. Hristopulos. 2013a. “Comparison of stochastic and deterministic methods for mapping groundwater level spatial variability in sparsely monitored basins.” Environ. Monit. Assess. 185 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-012-2527-y.
Varouchakis, E. A., and D. T. Hristopulos. 2013b. “Improvement of groundwater level prediction in sparsely gauged basins using physical laws and local geographic features as auxiliary variables.” Adv. Water Resour. 52 (Feb): 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.08.002.
Wijeratne, V., and L. Manawadu. 2016. Validation of spatial interpolation techniques in GIS. Colombo: Univ. of Colombo.
Wilcoxon, F. 1945. “Individual comparisons by ranking methods.” Biometrics Bull. 1 (6): 80–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001968.
Xie, Y., T.-B. Chen, M. Lei, J. Yang, Q.-J. Guo, B. Song, and X.-Y. Zhou. 2011. “Spatial distribution of soil heavy metal pollution estimated by different interpolation methods: Accuracy and uncertainty analysis.” Chemosphere 82 (3): 468–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.09.053.
Yao, L., Z. Huo, S. Feng, X. Mao, S. Kang, J. Chen, J. Xu, and T. S. Steenhuis. 2014. “Evaluation of spatial interpolation methods for groundwater level in an arid inland oasis, northwest China.” Environ. Earth Sci. 71 (4): 1911–1924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2595-5.
Zirakbash, T., A. Boronina, M. Anda, and P. A. Bahri. 2018. “Maximum groundwater level for urban development: Evaluation of different calculation methods in Western Australia.” In Computer aided chemical engineering, 2533–2538. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Zou, L., J. Kent, N. S.-N. Lam, H. Cai, Y. Qiang, and K. Li. 2016. “Evaluating land subsidence rates and their implications for land loss in the Lower Mississippi River Basin.” Water 8 (1): 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8010010.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 25 • Issue 9 • September 2020
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 14, 2019
Accepted: Apr 27, 2020
Published online: Jul 7, 2020
Published in print: Sep 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Dec 7, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.