Technical Papers
Mar 27, 2020

Evaluating Uncertainty in Fluvial Geomorphic Response to Dam Removal

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 25, Issue 6

Abstract

Dam removal tends to produce a series of changes in river morphology. Whereas decisions pertaining to dam removal are typically evaluated from a deterministic viewpoint, this study develops a stochastic framework for assessing the effects of hydrological variability on morphological changes in river channels resulting from dam removal. Our approach yields probability distributions for channel responses that can be used in decision-making. Application of the framework to the 25-m-tall Shihgang Dam on the Dajia River in central Taiwan reveals that the area most geomorphically sensitive to removal of the dam lies 1,200–3,600 m downstream of the dam site. We also investigate the influence of flow regime on geomorphic response using indicators of hydrologic alteration (IHA) and find that higher flows result in more pronounced channel evolution and greater thalweg migration.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support for this paper provided by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST-104-2625-M-009-001- and MOST-105-2625-M-002-013-).

References

Aksoy, H., and M. Bayazit. 2000a. “Daily intermittent streamflow simulator.” Turk. J. Eng. Environ. Sci. 24 (4): 265–276.
Aksoy, H., and M. Bayazit. 2000b. “A model for daily flows of intermittent streams.” Hydrol. Processes 14 (10): 1725–1744. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1085(200007)14:10%3C1725::AID-HYP108%3E3.0.CO;2-L.
Asquith, W. H., M. C. Roussel, and J. Vrabel. 2006. Statewide analysis of the drainage-area ratio method for 34 streamflow percentile ranges in Texas. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey.
Bountry, J., Y. Lai, and T. Randle. 2006. “Comparison of numerical hydraulic models applied to the removal of Savage Rapids Dam near Grants Pass, Oregon.” In Proc., 8th Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conf. Washington, DC: Agricultural Research Service.
Cannatelli, K. M., and J. C. Curran. 2012. “Importance of hydrology on channel evolution following dam removal: Case study and conceptual model.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 138 (5): 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000526.
Cantelli, A., M. Wong, G. Parker, and C. Paola. 2007. “Numerical model linking bed and bank evolution of incisional channel created by dam removal.” Water Resour. Res. 43 (7): W07436. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005621.
Chang, H. H. 2008. “Case study of fluvial modeling of river responses to dam removal.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 134 (3): 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:3(295).
Cui, Y., G. Parker, C. Braudrick, W. E. Dietrich, and B. Cluer. 2006. “Dam removal express assessment models (DREAM). Part I: Model development and validation.” J. Hydraul. Res. 44 (3): 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2006.9521683.
Cui, Y., and A. Wilcox. 2008. “Development and application of numerical models of sediment transport associated with dam removal.” Chap. 23 in Sedimentation engineering: Processes, measurements, modeling, and practice: ASCE manuals and reports on engineering practice No. 110, 995–1020. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Curran, J. C., and K. M. Cannatelli. 2014. “The impact of beaver dams on the morphology of a river in the eastern United States with implications for river restoration.” Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 39 (9): 1236–1244. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3576.
DHI (Danish Hydraulic Institute). 2002. Environment: MIKE 11: A modelling system for rivers and channels—User guide. Horsholm, Denmark: DHI.
Downs, P. W., Y. Cui, J. K. Wooster, S. R. Dusterhoff, D. B. Booth, W. E. Dietrich, and L. S. Sklar. 2009. “Managing reservoir sediment release in dam removal projects: An approach informed by physical and numerical modelling of non-cohesive sediment.” Int. J. River Basin Manage. 7 (4): 433–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2009.9635401.
East, A. E., et al. 2015. “Large-scale dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: River channel and floodplain geomorphic change.” Geomorphology 228 (Jan): 765–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.08.028.
Emerson, D. G., A. V. Vecchia, and A. L. Dahl. 2005. Evaluation of drainage-area ratio method used to estimate streamflow for the Red River of the North Basin, North Dakota and Minnesota, 1. Reston, VA: US Dept. of the Interior, US Geological Survey.
Foley, M. M., et al. 2017. “Dam removal—Listening in.” Water Resour. Res. 53 (7): 5229–5246. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020457.
Gartner, J. D., F. J. Magilligan, and C. E. Renshaw. 2015. “Predicting the type, location and magnitude of geomorphic responses to dam removal: Role of hydrologic and geomorphic constraints.” Geomorphology 251 (Dec): 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.02.023.
Grant, G. E., and S. L. Lewis. 2015. “The remains of the dam: What have we learned from 15 years of US dam removals?” In Vol. 3 of Engineering geology for society and territory, 31–35. New York: Springer.
Greimann, B. 2013. “Prediction of sediment erosion after dam removal using a one-dimensional model.” In Vol. 21 of Proc., Challenges of Dam Removal and River Restoration, 59–66. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America.
Greimann, B., and Y. Lai. 2013. Concurrent Sessions A: Dam removal II—Simulation of sediment transport upon dam removal. Amherst, MA: Univ. of Massachusetts Amherst.
Hovius, N., P. Meunier, C. W. Lin, H. Chen, Y. G. Chen, S. Dadson, M. J. Horng, and M. Lines. 2011. “Prolonged seismically induced erosion and the mass balance of a large earthquake.” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 304 (3): 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.02.005.
Kamanbedast, A. A., R. Nasrollahpour, and M. Mashal. 2013. “Estimation of sediment transport in rivers using CCHE2D model (case study: Karkheh River).” Indian J. Sci. Technol. 6 (2): 4112–4115.
Kung, C. S., W. P. Ni, and Y. J. Chiang. 2001. “Damage and rehabilitation work of Shih-Kang Dam.” In Proc., Workshop on Seismic Fault-Induced Failures, 33–48. Tokyo: Univ. of Tokyo.
Lague, D., N. Hovius, and P. Davy. 2005. “Discharge, discharge variability, and the bedrock channel profile.” J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 110 (F4): F04006. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JF000259.
Lai, Y. G. 2008. SRH-2D version 2: Theory and user’s manual. Sedimentation and river hydraulics—Two-dimensional river flow modeling. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation.
Lai, Y. G. 2009. “Watershed runoff and erosion modeling with a hybrid mesh model.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 14 (1): 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:1(15).
Lai, Y. G. 2010. “Two-dimensional depth-averaged flow modeling with an unstructured hybrid mesh.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 136 (1): 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000134.
Lai, Y. G. 2015. “Advances in geofluvial modeling: Methodologies and applications.” In Advances in water resources engineering, 407–470. Cham: Springer.
Lai, Y. G., and T. J. Randle. 2007. Bed evolution and bank erosion analysis of the Palo Verde Dam on the lower Colorado River. Denver: Technical Service Center, Bureau of Reclamation.
Lee, J. C., H. T. Chu, J. Angelier, Y. C. Chan, J. C. Hu, C. Y. Lu, and R. J. Rau. 2002. “Geometry and structure of northern surface ruptures of the 1999 Mw = 7.6 Chi-Chi Taiwan earthquake: Influence from inherited fold belt structures.” J. Struct. Geol. 24 (1): 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8141(01)00056-6.
Lin, C. W., S. H. Liu, S. Y. Lee, and C. C. Liu. 2006. “Impacts of the Chi-Chi earthquake on subsequent rainfall-induced landslides in central Taiwan.” Eng. Geol. 86 (2): 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.02.010.
Liu, S. H., W. S. Chang, and C. W. Lin. 2009. “Rainfall-induced landslides in Chenyulan River watershed, central Taiwan: An example illustrates the impact of Chi-Chi earthquake on subsequent rainfall induced landslide.” In Vol. 11 of Proc., EGU General Assembly Conf. Abstracts. Vienna, Austria. http://meetings.copernicus.org/egu2009.
Magnuszewski, A., S. Moran, and Y. Guoliang. 2010. Modelling lowland reservoir sedimentation conditions and the potential environmental consequences of dam removal: Wloclawek Reservoir, 345–352. Vistula River, Poland: IAHS-AISH Publication.
Major, J. J., et al. 2012. Geomorphic response of the Sandy River, Oregon, to removal of Marmot Dam. Reston, VA: US Dept. of the Interior, USGS.
Major, J. J., A. E. East, J. E. O’Connor, G. E. Grant, A. C. Wilcox, C. S. Magirl, M. J. Collins, and D. D. Tullos. 2017. “Geomorphic responses to dam removal in the United States—A two-decade perspective.” In Gravel-bed rivers: Processes and disasters, 355–383. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Morris, G. L. 2014. “Sediment management and sustainable use of reservoirs.” In Modern water resources engineering, 279–337. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.
Pearson, A. J., N. P. Snyder, and M. J. Collins. 2011. “Rates and processes of channel response to dam removal with a sand-filled impoundment.” Water Resour. Res. 47 (8). https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009733.
Pizzuto, J. 2002. “Effects of dam removal on river form and process: Although many well-established concepts of fluvial geomorphology are relevant for evaluating the effects of dam removal, geomorphologists remain unable to forecast stream channel changes caused by the removal of specific dams.” BioScience 52 (8): 683–691. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0683:EODROR]2.0.CO;2.
Pourbakhshian, S., and M. Pouraminian. 2015. “Stochastic modeling to prediction of river morphological changes.” Indian J. Sci. Technol. 8 (11): 1. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i11/71772.
Randle, T. J., J. A. Bountry, A. Ritchie, and K. Wille. 2015. “Large-scale dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: Erosion of reservoir sediment.” Geomorphology 246: 709–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.12.045.
Richard, G. A., P. Y. Julien, and D. C. Baird. 2005. “Statistical analysis of lateral migration of the Rio Grande, New Mexico.” Geomorphology 71 (1): 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.07.013.
Richter, B. D., J. V. Baumgartner, J. Powell, and D. P. Braun. 1996. “A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems.” Conserv. Biol. 10 (4): 1163–1174. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10041163.x.
Singer, M. B., and T. Dunne. 2004. “Modeling decadal bed material sediment flux based on stochastic hydrology.” Water Resour. Res. 40 (3): W03302. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002723.
Tolossa, H. G., J. Tuhtan, M. Schneider, and S. Wieprecht. 2009. “Comparison of 2D hydrodynamic models in river reaches of ecological importance: Hydro_AS-2D and SRH-W.” In Proc., 33rd IAHR World Congress, 604–611. Madrid: International Association for Hydro-Environment Engineering and Research.
Tsai, Z. X., G. J. Y. You, H. Y. Lee, and Y. J. Chiu. 2013. “Modeling the sediment yield from landslides in the Shihmen Reservoir watershed, Taiwan.” Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 38 (7): 661–674. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3309.
Tucker, G. E., and R. L. Bras. 2000. “A stochastic approach to modeling the role of rainfall variability in drainage basin evolution.” Water Resour. Res. 36 (7): 1953–1964. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900065.
Tuhtan, J. A., M. Noack, and S. Wieprecht. 2012. “Estimating stranding risk due to hydropeaking for juvenile European grayling considering river morphology.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 16 (2): 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-0002-5.
Wang, W. L., T. T. Wang, J. J. Su, C. H. Lin, C. R. Seng, and T. H. Huang. 2001. “Assessment of damage in mountain tunnels due to the Taiwan Chi-Chi earthquake.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 16 (3): 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00047-5.
Wells, R. R., E. J. Langendoen, and A. Simon. 2007. “Modeling pre-and post-dam removal sediment dynamics: The Kalamazoo River, Michigan.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 43 (3): 773–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00062.x.
WRA (Water Resources Agency). 2009. Hydrological yearbook of Taiwan. [In Chinese.] Taiwan: Water Resources Agency. Ministry of Economic Affairs.
WRA (Water Resources Agency). 2013. Hydrological yearbook of Taiwan. [In Chinese.] Taiwan: Water Resources Agency. Ministry of Economic Affairs.
Wu, W., and D. A. Vieira. 2002. One-dimensional channel network model CCHE1D version 3.0: Technical manual. Oxford: National Center for Computational Hydroscience and Engineering.
You, G. J. Y., B. H. Thum, and F. H. Lin. 2014. “The examination of reproducibility in hydro-ecological characteristics by daily synthetic flow models.” J. Hydrol. 511 (Apr): 904–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.02.047.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 25Issue 6June 2020

History

Received: Mar 23, 2018
Accepted: Dec 5, 2019
Published online: Mar 27, 2020
Published in print: Jun 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Aug 27, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yuan-Heng Wang
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721.
Chia-Chu Chu
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan Univ., Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan Univ., Taipei 10617, Taiwan (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6417-5817. Email: [email protected]
Hoshin V. Gupta
Regents’ Professor, Dept. of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721.
Peng-Hao Chiu
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan Univ., Taipei 10617, Taiwan.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share