Technical Papers
Feb 13, 2020

Evaluation of Multi- and Many-Objective Optimization Techniques to Improve the Performance of a Hydrologic Model Using Evapotranspiration Remote-Sensing Data

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 25, Issue 4

Abstract

In this study, we explore the use of different multi- and many-objective calibration approaches in hydrological modeling when considering both observed streamflow and remotely sensed actual evapotranspiration (ETa). Eight remotely sensed ETa and an Ensemble products were used in a watershed in Michigan. Regarding the calibration process, the Unified-Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm III was integrated with the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT). The first nine calibrations used a multi-objective approach with two variables, one being streamflow and the other being a remotely sensed ETa products/Ensemble. The tenth calibration was a many-objective calibration with nine objective functions that represented observed streamflow and all eight of the remotely sensed evapotranspiration datasets. Results showed that the multi-objective calibrations were able to successfully calibrate both streamflow and ETa. However, the highest model performances were achieved using the Ensemble ETa product. Meanwhile, the required computational time for the many-objective calibration is significantly higher than the multi-objective calibration. In addition, the overall performance of many-objective method can be improved by considering weighting factors and constraining the search space.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. This includes the generated data by SWAT models and the ones used to develop the SWAT model.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Martha C. Anderson from USDA-ARS Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory in Beltsville, MD, and Dr. Christopher R. Hain from NASA Marshall Space Flight Center at Huntsville, AL, for their help in providing the ALEXI data. This work is supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch project MICL02359.

References

Abatzoglou, J. T., S. Z. Dobrowski, S. A. Parks, and K. C. Hegewisch. 2018. “TerraClimate, a high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958–2015.” Sci. Data 5 (Jan). 170191. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.191.
AmeriFlux. 2018. “AmeriFlux.” Accessed September 22, 2018. http://ameriflux.lbl.gov/.
Anderson, M. C., J. M. Norman, J. R. Mecikalski, J. A. Otkin, and W. P. Kustas. 2007. “A climatological study of evapotranspiration and moisture stress across the continental United States based on thermal remote sensing: 1. Model formulation.” J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 112 (D10): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007506.
Arnold, J. G., et al. 2012. “SWAT: Model use, calibration, and validation.” Trans. ASABE 55 (4): 1491–1508. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.42256.
Cammalleri, C., M. C. Anderson, F. Gao, C. R. Hain, and W. P. Kustas. 2014. “Mapping daily evapotranspiration at field scales over rainfed and irrigated agricultural areas using remote sensing data fusion.” Agric. For. Meteorol. 186 (Mar): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.11.001.
Climatology Lab. 2018. “Terraclimate.” Accessed August 15, 2019. http://www.climatologylab.org/terraclimate.html.
Crow, W. T., E. F. Wood, and M. Pan. 2003. “Multiobjective calibration of land surface model evapotranspiration predictions using streamflow observations and spaceborne surface radiometric temperature retrievals.” J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 108 (D23): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003292.
Das, I., and J. E. Dennis. 1998. “Normal-boundary intersection: A new method for generating the Pareto surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems.” SIAM J. Optim. 8 (3): 631–657. https://doi.org/10.1137/S1052623496307510.
Deb, K., and H. Jain. 2014. “An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach, part I: Solving problems with box constraints.” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 18 (4): 577–601. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2013.2281535.
Dietterich, T. G. 2000. “Ensemble methods in machine learning.” In Proc., Int. Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems. Berlin: Springer.
Duan, Q., N. K. Ajami, X. Gao, and S. Sorooshian. 2007. “Multi-model ensemble hydrologic prediction using Bayesian model averaging.” Adv. Water Resour. 30 (5): 1371–1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2006.11.014.
Einheuser, M. D., A. P. Nejadhashemi, and S. A. Woznicki. 2013. “Simulating stream health sensitivity to landscape changes due to bioenergy crops expansion.” Biomass Bioenergy 58 (Nov): 198–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.08.025.
Gassman, P. W., M. R. Reyes, C. H. Green, and J. G. Arnold. 2007. “The soil and water assessment tool: Historical development, applications, and future research directions.” Trans. ASABE 50 (4): 1211–1250. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23637.
Gleick, P. H. 1993. Water in crisis, 473. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google. 2018. “EEFlux.” Accessed June 11, 2019. https://eeflux-level1.appspot.com/.
Graham, S. 1999. “Remote sensing: Feature articles.” Accessed June 11, 2019. https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/RemoteSensing/.
Gupta, H. V., S. Sorooshian, and P. O. Yapo. 1999. “Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: Comparison with multilevel expert calibration.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 4 (2): 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)4:2(135).
Haddeland, I., et al. 2014. “Global water resources affected by human interventions and climate change.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111 (9): 3251–3256. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222475110.
Hain, C. R., W. T. Crow, M. C. Anderson, and M. T. Yilmaz. 2015. “Diagnosing neglected soil moisture source–sink processes via a thermal infrared–based two-source energy balance model.” J. Hydrometeorol. 16 (3): 1070–1086. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-14-0017.1.
Herman, M. R., A. P. Nejadhashemi, M. Abouali, J. S. Hernandez-Suarez, F. Daneshvar, Z. Zhang, M. C. Anderson, A. M. Sadeghi, C. R. Hain, and A. Sharifi. 2018. “Evaluating the role of evapotranspiration remote sensing data in improving hydrological modeling predictability.” J. Hydrol. 556 (Jan): 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.11.009.
Kim, J., B. P. Mohanty, and Y. Shin. 2015. “Effective soil moisture estimate and its uncertainty using multimodel simulation based on Bayesian model averaging.” J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 120 (16): 8023–8042. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022905.
Kusre, B. C., D. C. Baruah, P. K. Bordoloi, and S. C. Patra. 2010. “Assessment of hydropower potential using GIS and hydrological modeling technique in Kopili River basin in Assam (India).” Appl. Energy 87 (1): 298–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.07.019.
Lee, H. S., Y. Liu, J. Ward, J. Brown, A. Maestre, H. Herr, M. A. Fresch, E. Wells, S. M. Reed, and E. Jones. 2017. “Nationwide validation of ensemble streamflow forecasts from the hydrologic ensemble forecast service (HEFS) of the US national weather service.” In Proc., AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.
Legates, D. R., and G. McCabe. 1999. “Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation.” Water Resour. Res. 35 (1): 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900018.
Long, D., L. Longuevergne, and B. R. Scanlon. 2014. “Uncertainty in evapotranspiration from land surface modeling, remote sensing, and GRACE satellites.” Water Resour. Res. 50 (2): 1131–1151. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014581.
Love, B., and A. P. Nejadhashemi. 2011. “Environmental impact analysis of biofuel crops expansion in the Saginaw River watershed.” J. Biobased Mater. Bioenergy 5 (1): 30–54. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbmb.2011.1119.
Ma, Y., Y. Hong, Y. Chen, Y. Yang, G. Tang, Y. Yao, D. Long, C. Li, Z. Han, and R. Liu. 2018. “Performance of optimally merged multisatellite precipitation products using the dynamic Bayesian model averaging scheme over the Tibetan Plateau.” J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 123 (2): 814–834. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026648.
Moriasi, D. N., J. G. Arnold, M. W. Van Liew, R. L. Bingner, R. D. Harmel, and T. L. Veith. 2007. “Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations.” Trans. ASABE 50 (3): 885–900. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153.
Mu, Q., M. Zhao, and S. W. Running. 2011. “Improvements to a MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm.” Remote Sens. Environ. 115 (8): 1781–1800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.019.
NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 2014. “MOD16A2 v006.” Accessed June 11, 2019. https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/products/mod16a2v006/.
NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 2018a. “MOD 16—Evapotranspiration.” Accessed June 11, 2019. https://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/dataprod/dataproducts.php?MOD_NUMBER=16.
NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 2018b. “MOD16A2—MODIS/Terra evapotranspiration 8-day level-4 global 500 m SIN grid.” Accessed June 11, 2019. https://ladsweb.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/missions-and-measurements/products/evapotranspiration/MOD16A2/.
NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 2018c. “NLDAS concept/goals.” Accessed June 11, 2019. https://ldas.gsfc.nasa.gov/nldas/NLDASgoals.php.
Nash, J. E., and J. V. Sutcliffe. 1970. “River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol. 10 (3): 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6.
NASS (United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service). 2012. “CropScape—Cropland data layer.” Accessed June 11, 2019. https://nassgeodata.gmu.edu/CropScape/.
NCDC (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Climatic Data Center). 2018. “Data tools: Local climatological data (LCD).” Accessed June 11, 2019. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/datatools/lcd.
NED (National Elevation Dataset). 2014. “The national map: Elevation.” Accessed June 11, 2019. https://nationalmap.gov/elevation.html.
Neitsch, S. L., J. G. Arnold, J. R. Kiniry, and J. R. Williams. 2011. Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation, version 2009. Temple, TX: USDA-ARS Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory.
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2014. “Web soil survey.” Accessed April 26, 2017. https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx.
NTSG (University of Montana Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group). 2018. “MODIS global evapotranspiration project (MOD16).” Accessed June 11, 2019. http://www.ntsg.umt.edu/project/modis/mod16.php.
Pan, S., H. Tian, S. R. Dangal, Q. Yang, J. Yang, C. Lu, B. Tao, W. Ren, and Z. Ouyang. 2015. “Responses of global terrestrial evapotranspiration to climate change and increasing atmospheric CO2 in the 21st century.” Earth’s Future 3 (1): 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014EF000263.
Rajib, A., G. R. Evenson, H. E. Golden, and C. R. Lane. 2018. “Hydrologic model predictability improves with spatially explicit calibration using remotely sensed evapotranspiration and biophysical parameters.” J. Hydrol. 567 (Dec): 668–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.024.
Rajib, M. A., V. Merwade, and Z. Yu. 2016. “Multi-objective calibration of a hydrologic model using spatially distributed remotely sensed/in-situ soil moisture.” J. Hydrol. 536 (May): 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.037.
Rientjes, T. H. M., L. P. Muthuwatta, M. G. Bos, M. J. Booij, and H. A. Bhatti. 2013. “Multi-variable calibration of a semi-distributed hydrological model using streamflow data and satellite-based evapotranspiration.” J. Hydrol. 505 (Nov): 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.10.006.
Running, S. V., Q. Mu, M. Zhao, and A. Moreno. 2018. “User’s guide MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration (ET) product (MOD16A2/A3 and year-end gap-filled MOD16A2GF/A3GF) NASA earth observing system MODIS land algorithm (for collection 6).” Accessed August 10, 2019. https://modis-land.gsfc.nasa.gov/pdf/MOD16UsersGuideV2.022019.pdf.
Seada, H., and K. Deb. 2016. “A unified evolutionary optimization procedure for single, multiple, and many objectives.” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 20 (3): 358–369. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2015.2459718.
Senay, G. B., S. Bohms, R. K. Singh, P. H. Gowda, N. M. Velpuri, H. Alemu, and J. P. Verdin. 2013. “Operational evapotranspiration mapping using remote sensing and weather datasets: A new parameterization for the SSEB approach.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 49 (3): 577–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12057.
Sharpley, A. N., and J. R. Williams. 1990. EPIC, erosion/productivity impact calculator. Washington, DC: USDA.
Singh, J., H. V. Knapp, J. G. Arnold, and M. Demissie. 2005. “Hydrological modeling of the Iroquois river watershed using HSPF and SWAT.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 41 (2): 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03740.x.
Singh, R. K., and G. B. Senay. 2016. “Comparison of four different energy balance models for estimating evapotranspiration in the Midwestern United States.” Water 8 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8010009.
Srinivasan, V., M. Konar, and M. Sivapalan. 2017. “A dynamic framework for water security.” Water Secur. 1 (Jul): 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2017.03.001.
Stefan, V. G., O. Merlin, S. Er-Raki, M. J. Escorihuela, and S. Khabba. 2015. “Consistency between In Situ, model-derived and high-resolution-image-based soil temperature endmembers: Towards a robust data-based model for multi-resolution monitoring of crop evapotranspiration.” Remote Sens. 7 (8): 10444–10479. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70810444.
Tebaldi, C., and R. Knutti. 2007. “The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections.” Philos. Trans. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 365 (1857): 2053–2075. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2007.2076.
Texas A&M University. 2017. “SWAT: Soil and water assessment tool.” Accessed June 11, 2019. http://swat.tamu.edu/.
Tian, D., and H. Medina. 2017. “Comparative assessment of several post-processing methods for correcting evapotranspiration forecasts derived from TIGGE datasets.” In Proc., AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.
Tobin, K. J., and M. E. Bennett. 2017. “Constraining SWAT calibration with remotely sensed evapotranspiration data.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 53 (3): 593–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12516.
USGS. 2016a. “Evapotranspiration—The water cycle.” Accessed June 11, 2019. https://water.usgs.gov/edu/watercycleevapotranspiration.html.
USGS. 2016b. “USGS current conditions for USGS 04155500 Pine river near Midland, MI.” Accessed June 11, 2019. https://waterdata.usgs.gov/mi/nwis/dv?referred_module=sw&site_no=04155500.
USGS. 2018. “National water information system: Web interface.” Accessed June 11, 2019. https://waterdata.usgs.gov/usa/nwis/sw.
Velpuri, N. M., G. B. Senay, R. K. Singh, S. Bohms, and J. P. Verdin. 2013. “A comprehensive evaluation of two MODIS evapotranspiration products over the conterminous United States: Using point and gridded FLUXNET and water balance ET.” Remote Sens. Environ. 139 (Dec): 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.07.013.
Vervoort, R. W., S. F. Miechels, F. F. van Ogtrop, and J. H. Guillaume. 2014. “Remotely sensed evapotranspiration to calibrate a lumped conceptual model: Pitfalls and opportunities.” J. Hydrol. 519 (Nov): 3223–3236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.10.034.
Wallis, T. W., and J. F. Griffiths. 1995. “An assessment of the weather generator (WXGEN) used in the erosion/productivity impact calculator (EPIC).” Agric. For. Meteorol. 73 (1–2): 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(94)02172-G.
Wambura, F. J., O. Dietrich, and G. Lischeid. 2018. “Improving a distributed hydrological model using evapotranspiration-related boundary conditions as additional constraints in a data-scarce river basin.” Hydrol. Processes 32 (6): 759–775. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11453.
Wanders, N., M. F. Bierkens, S. M. de Jong, A. de Roo, and D. Karssenberg. 2014. “The benefits of using remotely sensed soil moisture in parameter identification of large-scale hydrological models.” Water Resour. Res. 50 (8): 6874–6891. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014639.
Wang, S., B. C. Ancell, G. H. Huang, and B. W. Baetz. 2018. “Improving robustness of hydrologic ensemble predictions through probabilistic pre-and post-processing in sequential data assimilation.” Water Resour. Res. 54 (3): 2129–2151. https://doi.org/10.1002/2018WR022546.
Woznicki, S. A., and A. P. Nejadhashemi. 2012. “Sensitivity analysis of best management practices under climate change scenarios.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 48 (1): 90–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00598.x.
Xia, Y., M. T. Hobbins, Q. Mu, and M. B. Ek. 2015. “Evaluation of NLDAS-2 evapotranspiration against tower flux site observations.” Hydrol. Processes 29 (7): 1757–1771. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10299.
Yao, Y., et al. 2017. “Improving global terrestrial evapotranspiration estimation using support vector machine by integrating three process-based algorithms.” Agric. For. Meteorol. 242 (Aug): 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.04.011.
Zeleny, M., and J. L. Cochrane. 1973. Multiple criteria decision making. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
Zhang, Y., F. H. S. Chiew, L. Zhang, and H. Li. 2009. “Use of remotely sensed actual evapotranspiration to improve rainfall–runoff modeling in Southeast Australia.” J. Hydrometeorol. 10 (4): 969–980. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JHM1061.1.
Zhao, Y., L. Zhixiang, and W. Yongping. 2019. “An assessment of global precipitation and evapotranspiration products for regional applications.” Remote Sens. 11 (9): 1077. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11091077.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 25Issue 4April 2020

History

Received: Jun 11, 2019
Accepted: Oct 11, 2019
Published online: Feb 13, 2020
Published in print: Apr 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jul 13, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Matthew R. Herman
Graduate Student, Dept. of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824.
J. Sebastian Hernandez-Suarez https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7155-9520
Graduate Student, Dept. of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7155-9520
A. Pouyan Nejadhashemi [email protected]
Michigan State University Foundation Professor, Dept. of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3779-2801
Ali M. Sadeghi
Retired, 11800 Sweet Land Way, Columbia, MD 21044; formerly, Research Physicist, Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory, US Dept. of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD 20705.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share