Technical Papers
Aug 14, 2019

System Identification and Discharge Hydrograph Estimation Based on Water Level Data Alone under Unsteady Flow Condition

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 24, Issue 10

Abstract

Estimation of a discharge hydrograph is considered to be a fundamental research inquiry in both computational hydrology and hydraulics. As a tradition, in hydrometric stations, continuous monitoring of the stage is combined with sporadic measurement of discharge to develop the rating curve. To address the drawback in rating curve development, a coupled simulation-optimization methodology for system identification and subsequent discharge hydrograph estimation based on water level hydrograph alone is presented and validated for various synthetic and real case scenarios. For this purpose, a few experiments were designed to explore the extent to which measurement of the velocity field can be eliminated in discharge estimation. In the first numerical experiment, it was assumed that the river corridor was equipped with three hydrometric stations, while in the second one kinematic wave condition was replaced with the downstream hydrometric station. In the third experiment, the synthetic data were replaced by field data (i.e., Tiber River in Italy). The results for the first case show that the proposed methodology is very accurate for identifying the system and subsequently predicting discharge hydrograph. Goodness-of-fit criteria related to the second case are still remarkable but lower than the first case. As for the Tiber River data, the proposed approach managed to reproduce the timing of the discharge hydrograph both in the rising and falling limbs of the hydrograph quite well, but not the peak flow. The study also touches on the variability of channel roughness structure for discharge estimation giving more flexibility to model development. In light of this, a proposal is made to dismiss the traditional calibration and try to go for dynamic calibration as a by-product of discharge estimation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Dr. Perumal and the Department of Environment, Planning and Infrastructure, Umbria Region and Istituto di Ricerca per la Protezione Idrogeologica (IRPI), Perugia, Italy for providing the Tiber River data used in this study.

References

Abedini, M. J., M. Nasseri, and D. H. Burn. 2012. “The use of a genetic algorithm-based search strategy in geostatistics: Application to a set of anisotropic piezometric head data.” Comput. Geosci. 41 (Apr): 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.08.024.
Akan, A. O. 2006. Open channel hydraulics. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Arico, C., G. Corato, T. Tucciarelli, M. Ben Meftah, A. F. Petrillo, and M. Mossa. 2010. “Discharge estimation in open channels by means of water level hydrograph analysis.” J. Hydraul. Res. 48 (5): 612–619.
Arico, C., C. Nasello, and T. Tucciarelli. 2009. “Using unsteady-state water level data to estimate channel roughness and discharge hydrograph.” Adv. Water Resour. 32 (8): 1223–1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.05.001.
Ayvaz, M. T. 2013. “A linked simulation-optimization model for simultaneously estimating the Manning’s surface roughness values and their parameter structures in shallow water flows.” J. Hydrol. 500 (Sep): 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.07.019.
Balouchi, B., M. J. Abedini, and M. Manhart. 2018. “A simulation-optimization technique to estimate discharge in open channels based on water level data alone: Gradually varied flow condition.” Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civ. Eng. 43 (2): 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-018-0149-5.
Balouchi, B., and G. R. Rakhshanderoo. 2018. “Using physical and soft computing models to evaluate discharge coefficient for combined weir gate structures under free flow conditions.” Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civ. Eng. 42 (4): 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-018-0117-0.
Barbetta, S., T. Moramarco, M. Franchini, F. Melone, L. Brocca, and V. P. Singh. 2011. “Case study: Improving real-time stage forecasting Muskingum model by incorporating the rating curve model.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 16 (6): 540–557. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000345.
Birkinshaw, S. J., P. Moore, C. G. Kilsby, G. M. O’Donnell, A. J. Hardy, and P. A. M. Berry. 2012. “Daily discharge estimation at ungauged river sites using remote sensing.” Hydrol. Processes 28 (3): 1043–1054. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9647.
Blöschl, G., and M. Sivapalan. 1995. “Scale issues in hydrological modelling: A review.” Hydrol. Processes 9 (3–4): 251–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360090305.
Corato, G., T. Moramarco, and T. Tucciarelli. 2011. “Discharge estimation combining flow routing and occasional measurements of velocity.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15 (9): 2979–2994. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2979-2011.
Damangir, H. 2015. “Estimation of flow discharge in open channels based on level data alone.” [In Persian.] Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Shiraz Univ.
Damangir, H., and M. J. Abedini. 2014. “System identification and subsequent discharge estimation based on level data alone—Gradually varied flow condition.” Flow Meas. Instrum. 36 (Apr): 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2014.01.002.
Dottori, F., M. L. V. Martina, and E. Todini. 2009. “A dynamic rating curve approach to indirect discharge measurement.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 13 (6): 847–863. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-847-2009.
Fenton, J. D., and R. J. Keller. 2001. The calculation of stream flow from measurements of stage. Canberra, Australia: Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology.
Franchini, M., A. Bernini, S. Barbeta, and T. Moramarco. 2011. “Forecasting discharges at the downstream end of a river reach through two simple Muskingum based procedures.” J. Hydrol. 399 (3–4): 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.01.009.
Gemici, Z., A. Koca, and K. Kaya. 2017. “Predicting the numerical and experimental open-channel flow resistance of corrugated steep circular drainage pipes.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 8 (3): 04017004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000265.
Hasanvand, K., M. R. Hashemi, and M. J. Abedini. 2013. “Development of an accurate time integration technique for the assessment of Q-based versus h-based formulations of the diffusion wave equation for flow routing.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 139 (10): 1079–1088. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000773.
Holland, R. C. 1992. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Homayoon, L., M. J. Abedini, and S. M. R. Hashemi. 2013. “RBF-DQ solution for shallow water equations.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 139 (1): 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000169.
Kiang, J. E., et al. 2018. “A comparison of methods for streamflow uncertainty estimation.” Water Resour. Res. 54 (10): 7149–7176. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022708.
Lai, C. 1986. “Numerical modeling of unsteady open-channel flow.” In Vol. 14 of Advances in Hydroscience, edited by V. T. Chow, 162–323. New York: Academic.
Moramarco, T., S. Barbetta, and A. Tarpanelli. 2017. “From surface flow velocity measurements to discharge assessment by the entropy theory.” Water 9 (2): 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9020120.
Perumal, M. 1994. “Hydrodynamic derivation of a variable parameter Muskingum method: 2. Verification.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 39 (5): 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626669409492767.
Perumal, M., T. Moramarco, B. Sahoo, and S. Barbetta. 2007. “A methodology for discharge estimation and rating curve development at ungauged river sites.” Water Resour. Res. 43 (2): W02412. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004609.
Perumal, M., T. Moramarco, B. Sahoo, and S. Barbetta. 2010. “On the practical applicability of the VPMS routing method for rating curve development at ungauge driver sites.” Water Resour. Res. 46 (3): W03522. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008103.
Perumal, M., and K. G. Ranga Raju. 1998a. “Variable-parameter stage-hydrograph routing method. I: Theory.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 3 (2): 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1998)3:2(109).
Perumal, M., and K. G. Ranga Raju. 1998b. “Variable-parameter stage-hydrograph routing method. II: Evaluation.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 3 (2): 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1998)3:2(115).
Perumal, M., K. B. Shrestha, and U. C. Chaube. 2004. “Reproduction of hysteresis in rating curves.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 130 (9): 870–878. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2004)130:9(870).
Perumal, M., G. Tayfur, C. M. Rao, and G. Gurarslan. 2017. “Evaluation of a physically based quasi-linear and a conceptually based nonlinear Muskingum methods.” J. Hydrol. 546 (Mar): 437–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.01.025.
Petersen-Øverleir, A. 2006. “Modelling stage-discharge relationships affected by hysteresis using the Jones formula and nonlinear regression.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 51 (3): 365–388. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.51.3.365.
Rai, R. K., A. Upadhyay, and V. P. Singh. 2010. “Effect of variable roughness on runoff.” J. Hydrol. 382 (1–4): 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.12.022.
Saddagh, M. H., and M. J. Abedini. 2012. “Enhancing MIKE11 updating kernel and evaluating its performance using numerical experiments.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 17 (2): 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000427.
Sahoo, B., M. Perumal, T. Moramarco, and S. Barbeta. 2014. “Rating curve development at ungauged river sites using variable parameter Muskingum discharge routing method.” Water Resour. Manage. 28 (11): 3783–3800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0709-9.
Singh, V. P., H. Cui, and A. R. Byrd. 2014. “Derivation of rating curve by the Tsallis entropy.” J. Hydrol. 513 (May): 342–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.061.
Spada, E., M. Sinagra, T. Tucciarelli, S. Barbetta, T. Moramarco, and G. Corato. 2017. “Assessment of river flow with significant lateral inflow through reverse routing modeling.” Hydrol. Processes 31 (7): 1539–1557. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11125.
Ward, D. P., A. Petty, S. A. Setterfield, M. M. Douglas, K. Ferdinands, S. K. Hamilton, and S. Phinne. 2014. “Floodplain inundation and vegetation dynamics in the Alligator Rivers region (Kakadu) of northern Australia assessed using optical and radar remote sensing.” Remote Sens. Environ. 147 (May): 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.02.009.
Welber, M., J. Le Coz, J. B. Laronne, G. Zolezzi, D. Zamler, G. Dramais, A. Hauet, and M. Salvaro. 2016. “Field assessment of noncontact stream gauging using portable surface velocity radars (SVR).” Water Resour. Res. 52 (2): 1108–1126. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017906.
Xu, T., and Y.-C. Jin. 2017. “Numerical study of the flow over broad-crested weirs by a mesh-free method.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 143 (9): 04017034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001211.
Yang, T. H., J. Y. Ho, G. D. Hwang, and G. F. Lin. 2014. “An indirect approach for discharge estimation: A combination among micro- genetic algorithm, hydraulic model, and in situ measurement.” Flow Meas. Instrum. 39 (Oct): 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2014.07.003.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 24Issue 10October 2019

History

Received: Dec 28, 2018
Accepted: May 31, 2019
Published online: Aug 14, 2019
Published in print: Oct 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Jan 14, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Behnam Balouchi, Ph.D. [email protected]
Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Shiraz Univ., Shiraz 71348-51156, Iran. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Shiraz Univ., Shiraz 71348-51156, Iran (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0756-3872. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share