Case Studies
Mar 26, 2019

Diagnostic Evaluation of Hydrologic Models Employing Flow Duration Curve

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 24, Issue 6

Abstract

The assessment of water availability using hydrological models is subject to modeling uncertainties. Model performance evaluation based on conventional likelihood measures on an overall time-series simulation has shortcomings. To overcome this, a model diagnostic evaluation is carried out. The main objectives of the study are to (a) demonstrate the strength of the model diagnostic assessment, (b) formulate an improved likelihood measure through a flow duration curve (FDC)–based flow portioning to enhance model performance, and (c) correlate the model simulation to basin hydroclimatic features. The objectives are achieved through the use of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model within a generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) framework applied on 17 basins in the Southeastern United States. The results indicate that the diagnostic assessment is crucial in model evaluation. The two-phase model assessment helped to improve model performance by 6% in terms of Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency for overall flow time series, 32% in terms of average volume efficiency, and 24% in terms of the ratio of the root-mean square error to the standard deviation of observation for the low flows.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada through a Discovery grant to the senior authors. The first author was supported through an Ontario Graduate Scholarship.

References

Abbaspour, K. C., E. Rouholahnejad, S. Vaghefi, R. Srinivasan, H. Yang, and B. Kløve. 2015. “A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: Calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model.” J. Hydrol. 524: 733–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.027.
Alazzy, A. A., H. Lü, and Y. Zhu. 2015. “Assessing the uncertainty of the Xinanjiang rainfall-runoff model: Effect of the likelihood function choice on the GLUE method.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 20 (10): 04015016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001174.
Andréassian, V., N. Le Moine, C. Perrin, M.-H. Ramos, L. Oudin, T. Mathevet, J. Lerat, and L. Berthet. 2012. “All that glitters is not gold: The case of calibrating hydrological models: Invited commentary.” Hydrol. Processes 26 (14): 2206–2210.
Andréassian, V., C. Perrin, L. Berthet, N. L. Moine, and J. Lerat. 2009. “Crash tests for a standardized evaluation of hydrological models.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 13 (10): 1757–1764. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-1757-2009.
Arnold, J. G., et al. 2012. “SWAT: Model use, calibration, and validation.” Trans. ASABE 55 (4): 1491–1508. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.42256.
Athira, P., and K. P. Sudheer. 2015. “A method to reduce the computational requirement while assessing uncertainty of complex hydrological models.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 29 (3): 847–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-014-0958-4.
Beven, K., and A. Binley. 1992. “The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction.” Hydrol. Processes 6 (3): 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360060305.
Beven, K., and J. Freer. 2001. “Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology.” J. Hydrol. 249 (1): 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00421-8.
Boscarello, L., G. Ravazzani, A. Cislaghi, and M. Mancini. 2015. “Regionalization of flow-duration curves through catchment classification with streamflow signatures and physiographic—Climate indices.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 21 (3): 05015027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001307.
Boyle, D. P. 2001. “Multicriteria calibration of hydrologic models.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Hydrology and Water Resources, Univ. of Arizona.
Chilkoti, V., T. Bolisetti, and R. Balachandar. 2017. “Climate change impact assessment on hydropower generation using multi-model climate ensemble.” Renewable Energy 109: 510–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.02.041.
Cibin, R., P. Athira, K. P. Sudheer, and I. Chaubey. 2014. “Application of distributed hydrological models for predictions in ungauged basins: A method to quantify predictive uncertainty.” Hydrol. Processes 28 (4): 2033–2045. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9721.
Coopersmith, E., M. A. Yaeger, S. Ye, L. Cheng, and M. Sivapalan. 2012. “Exploring the physical controls of regional patterns of flow duration curves. Part 3: A catchment classification system based on regime curve indicators.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 16 (11): 4467–4482. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4467-2012.
Coxon, G., J. Freer, T. Wagener, N. A. Odoni, and M. Clark. 2014. “Diagnostic evaluation of multiple hypotheses of hydrological behaviour in a limits-of-acceptability framework for 24 UK catchments.” Hydrol. Processes 28 (25): 6135–6150. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10096.
Criss, R. E., and W. E. Winston. 2008. “Do Nash values have value? Discussion and alternate proposals.” Hydrol. Processes 22 (14): 2723–2725. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7072.
Datta, A. R., and T. Bolisetti. 2016. “Uncertainty analysis of a spatially-distributed hydrological model with rainfall multipliers.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 43 (12): 1062–1074. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2015-0413.
Demirel, M. C., M. J. Booij, and A. Y. Hoekstra. 2013. “Effect of different uncertainty sources on the skill of 10 day ensemble low flow forecasts for two hydrological models: Effect of three uncertainty sources on low flow forecasts.” Water Resour. Res. 49 (7): 4035–4053. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20294.
Duan, Q., et al. 2006. “Model Parameter Estimation Experiment (MOPEX): An overview of science strategy and major results from the second and third workshops.” J. Hydrol. 320 (1–2): 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.031.
Efstratiadis, A., and D. Koutsoyiannis. 2010. “One decade of multi-objective calibration approaches in hydrological modelling: A review.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 55 (1): 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626660903526292.
Formetta, G., R. Mantilla, S. Franceschi, A. Antonello, and R. Rigon. 2011. “The JGrass-NewAge system for forecasting and managing the hydrological budgets at the basin scale: Models of flow generation and propagation/routing.” Geosci. Model Dev. 4 (4): 943–955. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-943-2011.
Fowler, K., M. Peel, A. Western, and L. Zhang. 2018. “Improved rainfall-runoff calibration for drying climate: Choice of objective function.” Water Resour. Res. 54 (5): 3392–3408. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR022466.
Fraga, I., L. Cea, J. Puertas, J. Suárez, V. Jiménez, and A. Jácome. 2016. “Global sensitivity and GLUE-based uncertainty analysis of a 2D-1D dual urban drainage model.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 21 (5): 04016004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001335.
Gharari, S., M. Hrachowitz, F. Fenicia, and H. H. G. Savenije. 2013. “An approach to identify time consistent model parameters: Sub-period calibration.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17 (1): 149–161. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-149-2013.
Gupta, H. V., H. Kling, K. K. Yilmaz, and G. F. Martinez. 2009. “Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling.” J. Hydrol. 377 (1–2): 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003.
Gupta, H. V., T. Wagener, and Y. Liu. 2008. “Reconciling theory with observations: Elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation.” Hydrol. Processes 22 (18): 3802–3813. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6989.
Haas, M. B., B. Guse, M. Pfannerstill, and N. Fohrer. 2016. “A joined multi-metric calibration of river discharge and nitrate loads with different performance measures.” J. Hydrol. 536: 534–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.001.
Hrachowitz, M., O. Fovet, L. Ruiz, T. Euser, S. Gharari, R. Nijzink, J. Freer, H. H. G. Savenije, and C. Gascuel-Odoux. 2014. “Process consistency in models: The importance of system signatures, expert knowledge, and process complexity.” Water Resour. Res. 50 (9): 7445–7469. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015484.
Jin, X., C.-Y. Xu, Q. Zhang, and V. P. Singh. 2010. “Parameter and modeling uncertainty simulated by GLUE and a formal Bayesian method for a conceptual hydrological model.” J. Hydrol. 383 (3–4): 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.12.028.
Kavetski, D., F. Fenicia, and M. P. Clark. 2011. “Impact of temporal data resolution on parameter inference and model identification in conceptual hydrological modeling: Insights from an experimental catchment.” Water Resour. Res. 47 (5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009525.
Krause, P., D. P. Boyle, and F. Bäse. 2005. “Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment.” Adv. Geosci. 5: 89–97. https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-5-89-2005.
Kumarasamy, K., and P. Belmont. 2018. “Calibration parameter selection and watershed hydrology model evaluation in time and frequency domains.” Water 10 (6): 710. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10060710.
Kundu, D., F. F. van Ogtrop, and R. W. Vervoort. 2016. “Identifying model consistency through stepwise calibration to capture streamflow variability.” Environ. Modell. Software 84: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.06.013.
Legates, D., and G. J. McCabe. 1999. “Evaluating the use of ‘goodness-of-fit’ measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation.” Water Resour. Res. 35 (1): 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900018.
Ley, R., H. Hellebrand, M. C. Casper, and F. Fenicia. 2015. “Comparing classical performance measures with signature indices derived from flow duration curves to assess model structures as tools for catchment classification.” Hydrol. Res. 47 (1): 1–14.
Montanari, A. 2005. “Large sample behaviors of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) in assessing the uncertainty of rainfall-runoff simulations.” Water Resour. Res. 41 (8). https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003826.
Moore, R. J. 1985. “The probability-distributed principle and runoff production at point and basin scales.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 30 (2): 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626668509490989.
Moriasi, D. N., J. G. Arnold, M. W. Van Liew, R. L. Bingner, R. D. Harmel, and T. L. Veith. 2007. “Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations.” Trans. ASABE 50 (3): 885–900. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153.
Nash, J. E., and J. V. Sutcliffe. 1970. “River flow forecasting through conceptual models Part-1: A discussion of Principles.” J. Hydrol. 10: 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6.
Pfannerstill, M., B. Guse, and N. Fohrer. 2014a. “A multi-storage groundwater concept for the SWAT model to emphasize nonlinear groundwater dynamics in lowland catchments.” Hydrol. Processes 28 (22): 5599–5612. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10062.
Pfannerstill, M., B. Guse, and N. Fohrer. 2014b. “Smart low flow signature metrics for an improved overall performance evaluation of hydrological models.” J. Hydrol. 510: 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.044.
Pokhrel, P., K. K. Yilmaz, and H. V. Gupta. 2012. “Multiple-criteria calibration of a distributed watershed model using spatial regularization and response signatures.” J. Hydrol. 418–419: 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.12.004.
Reed, P. M., D. Hadka, J. D. Herman, J. R. Kasprzyk, and J. B. Kollat. 2013. “Evolutionary multiobjective optimization in water resources: The past, present, and future.” Adv. Water Resour. 51: 438–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.01.005.
Saltelli, A., K. Chan, E. M. Scott, and S. Marian. 2000. Sensitivity analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Sawicz, K., T. Wagener, M. Sivapalan, P. A. Troch, and G. Carrillo. 2011. “Catchment classification: Empirical analysis of hydrologic similarity based on catchment function in the eastern USA.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15 (9): 2895–2911. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2895-2011.
Schaefli, B., and H. V. Gupta. 2007. “Do Nash values have value?” Hydrol. Processes 21 (15): 2075–2080. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6825.
Seibert, J., and J. J. McDonnell. 2002. “On the dialog between experimentalist and modeler in catchment hydrology: Use of soft data for multicriteria model calibration.” Water Resour. Res. 38 (11): 23-1–23–14. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000978.
Shafii, M., and B. A. Tolson. 2015. “Optimizing hydrological consistency by incorporating hydrological signatures into model calibration objectives.” Water Resour. Res. 51 (5): 3796–3814. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016520.
Sikorska, A. E., A. Montanari, and D. Koutsoyiannis. 2014. “Estimating the uncertainty of hydrological predictions through data-driven resampling techniques.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 20 (1): A4014009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000926.
Singh, R., S. A. Archfield, and T. Wagener. 2014. “Identifying dominant controls on hydrologic parameter transfer from gauged to ungauged catchments: A comparative hydrology approach.” J. Hydrol. 517: 985–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.06.030.
Van Werkhoven, K., T. Wagener, P. Reed, and Y. Tang. 2009. “Sensitivity-guided reduction of parametric dimensionality for multi-objective calibration of watershed models.” Adv. Water Resour. 32 (8): 1154–1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.03.002.
Vogel, R. M., and N. M. Fennessey. 1994. “Flow-duration curves. I: New interpretation and confidence intervals.” J. Water Res. Plann. 120 (4): 485–504. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1994)120:4(485).
Vrugt, J. A., and M. Sadegh. 2013. “Toward diagnostic model calibration and evaluation: Approximate Bayesian computation: Approximate Bayesian computation.” Water Resour. Res. 49 (7): 4335–4345. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20354.
Wagener, T. 2003. “Evaluation of catchment models.” Hydrol. Processes 17 (16): 3375–3378. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5158.
Wagener, T., D. P. Boyle, M. J. Lees, H. S. Wheater, H. V. Gupta, and S. Sorooshian. 2001. “A framework for development and application of hydrological models.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 5 (1): 13–26. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-5-13-2001.
Westerberg, I. K., J.-L. Guerrero, P. M. Younger, K. J. Beven, J. Seibert, S. Halldin, J. E. Freer, and C.-Y. Xu. 2011. “Calibration of hydrological models using flow-duration curves.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15 (7): 2205–2227. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2205-2011.
Xiong, L., and K. M. O’Connor. 2008. “An empirical method to improve the prediction limits of the GLUE methodology in rainfall–runoff modeling.” J. Hydrol. 349 (1–2): 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.10.029.
Yilmaz, K. K., V. Gupta Hoshin, and T. Wagener. 2008. “A process-based diagnostic approach to model evaluation: Application to the NWS distributed hydrologic model.” Water Resour. Res. 44 (9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006716.
Yokoo, Y., and M. Sivapalan. 2011. “Towards reconstruction of the flow duration curve: Development of a conceptual framework with a physical basis.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15 (9): 2805–2819. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2805-2011.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 24Issue 6June 2019

History

Received: Nov 29, 2017
Accepted: Nov 27, 2018
Published online: Mar 26, 2019
Published in print: Jun 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Aug 26, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Vinod Chilkoti [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Windsor, 401 Sunset Ave., Windsor, ON, Canada N9B 3P4. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Windsor, 401 Sunset Ave., Windsor, ON, Canada N9B 3P4 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1164-9684. Email: [email protected]
Ram Balachandar [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Windsor, 401 Sunset Ave., Windsor, ON, Canada N9B 3P4. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share