Technical Papers
Dec 10, 2018

Solution of Unsteady Flow in a Confined Aquifer Interacting with a Stream with Exponentially Decreasing Stream Stage

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 24, Issue 2

Abstract

The solution of interactions between groundwater and surface water provides good insight into the mechanism of these water resources. Considering groundwater as a significant source of irrigation and a main freshwater supply for agricultural purposes, a stream–aquifer system is studied to investigate the groundwater level and flow direction. The solution is obtained and applicable for streams fully penetrating the aquifer. The system is solved and a set of expressions for computing level and exchange in the aquifer are derived by means of the Laplace transformation technique, wherein the right end of the aquifer is a constant head boundary and the stream stage at the left boundary decreases exponentially with time. A broad range of sensitivity analysis is carried out to investigate the effects of variations in aquifer parameters on groundwater head. Aquifer response for exponential and sudden drops in stream stage is investigated. A useful expression describing the relation of stream stage variation rate and volumetric exchange is found, which clarifies whether the final volumetric exchange is negative, zero, or positive. For a sudden drop in stream stage, a water divide takes place in the aquifer and therefore flow reversal occurs at the water divide position. It is shown that how and how much the position of the water divide changes depends on changes in aquifer parameters. In addition, it is observed that groundwater level stabilization occurs relatively faster in aquifers with a greater hydraulic conductivity, smaller specific storage, or smaller length.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their appreciations to the anonymous reviewers and editors for their valuable comments and suggested revisions to improve the quality of this paper.

References

Akylas, E., and A. D. Koussis. 2007. “Response of sloping unconfined aquifer to stage changes in adjacent stream. I: Theoretical analysis and derivation of system response functions.” J. Hydrol. 338 (1–2): 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.02.021.
Bansal, R., and S. Das. 2009. “Analytical solution for transient hydraulic head, flow rate and volumetric exchange in an aquifer under recharge condition.” J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 57 (2): 113–120. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10098-009-0010-4.
Barlow, P. M., L. A. DeSimone, and A. F. Moench. 2000. “Aquifer response to stream-stage and recharge variations. II: Convolution method and application.” J. Hydrol. 230 (3–4): 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00176-1.
Boufadel, M. C., and V. Peridier. 2002. “Exact analytical expressions for the piezometric profile and water exchange between stream and groundwater during and after a uniform rise of the stream level.” Water Resour. Res. 38 (7): 27-1–27-6. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000780.
Chuang, M. H., and H. D. Yeh. 2008. “Analytical solution for tidal propagation in a leaky aquifer extending finite distance under the sea.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 134 (4): 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:4(447).
Cooper, H. H., and M. I. Rorabaugh. 1963. Ground-water movements and bank storage due to flood stages in surface streams: US Geol. Survey Water-Supply Paper 1536—J, 343–366. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Interior.
Dever, R. J., and R. W. Cleary. 1979. “Unsteady-state, two-dimensional response of leaky aquifers to stream stage fluctuations.” Adv. Water Resour. 2 (1): 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1708(79)90002-2.
Gordon, N. D., B. L. Finlayson, and T. A. McMahon. 2004. Stream hydrology: An introduction for ecologists, 68. 2th ed. New York: Wiley.
Gupta, R. S. 2001. Hydrology and hydraulic systems, 344. 4th ed. Long Grove, IL: Waveland.
Hantush, M. M. 2005. “Modeling stream-aquifer interactions with linear response functions.” J. Hydrol. 311 (1–4): 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.01.007.
Huang, Y. C., and H. D. Yeh. 2007. “The use of sensitivity analysis in on-line aquifer parameter estimation.” J. Hydrol. 335 (3–4): 406–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.12.007.
Kabala, Z. J. 2001. “Sensitivity analysis of a pumping test on a well with wellbore storage and skin.” Adv. Water Resour. 24 (5): 483–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(00)00051-8.
Kaleris, V. 1998. “Quantifying the exchange rate between groundwater and small streams.” J. Hydraul. Res. 36 (6): 913–932. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221689809498593.
Knight, J. H., and D. W. Rassam. 2007. “Groundwater head responses due to random stream stage fluctuations using basis splines.” Water Resour. Res. 43 (6): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005155.
Leavesley, G. H., R. W. Lichty, B. M. Troutman, and L. G. Saindon. 1983. Precipitation-runoff modeling system: User’s manual. Denver: US Dept. of the Interior and Geological Survey.
Linsley, R. K., M. A. Kohler, and J. L. H. Paulhus. 1975. Hydrology for engineers. 2th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nathan, R. J., and T. A. McMahon. 1990. “Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analyses.” Water Resour. Res. 26 (7): 1465–1473. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR026i007p01465.
Perkins, S. P., and A. D. Koussis. 1996. “Stream-aquifer interaction model with diffusive wave routing.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 122 (4): 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1996)122:4(210).
Rassam, D. W. 2011. “A conceptual framework for incorporating surface–groundwater interactions into a river operation–planning model.” Environ. Model. Software. 26 (12): 1554–1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.07.019.
Rassam, D. W., C. S. Fellows, R. De Hayr, H. Hunter, and P. Bloesch. 2006. “The hydrology of riparian buffer zones; two case studies in an ephemeral and a perennial stream.” J. Hydrol. 325 (1–4): 308–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.10.023.
Rassam, D. W., L. Peeters, T. Pickett, I. Jolly, and L. Holz. 2013. “Accounting for surface-groundwater interactions and their uncertainty in river and groundwater models: A case study in the Namoi River, Australia.” Environ. Model. Software. 50: 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.004.
Rezaeianzadeh, M., L. Kalin, and C. Anderson. 2015. “Wetland water-level prediction using ANN in conjunction with base-flow recession analysis.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 22 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001276.
Saeedpanah, I., and R. Golmohamadi Azar. 2017a. “New analytical expressions for two-dimensional aquifer adjoining with streams of varying water level.” Water Resour. Manage. 31 (1): 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1533-1.
Saeedpanah, I., and R. Golmohamadi Azar. 2017b. “New analytical solutions for unsteady flow in a leaky aquifer between two parallel streams.” Water Resour. Manage. 31 (7): 2315–2332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1651-4.
Saleh, F., N. Flipo, F. Habets, A. Ducharne, L. Oudin, P. Viennot, and E. Ledoux. 2011. “Modeling the impact of in-stream water level fluctuations on stream-aquifer interactions at the regional scale.” J. Hydrol. 400 (3): 490–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.02.001.
Shuster, W. D., Y. Zhang, A. H. Roy, F. B. Daniel, and M. Troyer. 2008. “Characterizing storm hydrograph rise and fall dynamics with stream stage data.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 44 (6): 1431–1440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2008.00249.x.
Singh, S. K. 1994. Semi-pervious stream and aquifer interaction. Roorkee, India: National Institute of Hydrology.
Singh, S. K. 2004a. “Aquifer response to sinusoidal or arbitrary stage of semipervious stream.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 130 (11): 1108–1118. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2004)130:11(1108).
Singh, S. K. 2004b. “Ramp kernels for aquifer responses to arbitrary stream stage.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 130 (6): 460–467. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2004)130:6(460).
Srivastava, R. 2003. “Aquifer response to linearly varying stream stage.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 8 (6): 361–364. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2003)8:6(361).
Swamee, P. K., and S. K. Singh. 2003. “Estimation of aquifer diffusivity from stream stage variation.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 8 (1): 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2003)8:1(20).
Upadhyaya, A., and H. S. Chauhan. 2001. “Interaction of stream and sloping aquifer receiving constant recharge.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 127 (5): 295–301. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2001)127:5(295).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 24Issue 2February 2019

History

Received: Mar 24, 2018
Accepted: Sep 26, 2018
Published online: Dec 10, 2018
Published in print: Feb 1, 2019
Discussion open until: May 10, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Iraj Saeedpanah [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Univ. of Zanjan, University Blvd., Zanjan 45371-38791, Iran (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Ramin Golmohamadi Azar [email protected]
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Univ. of Zanjan, University Blvd., Zanjan 45371-38791, Iran. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share