Technical Papers
Oct 27, 2018

Comparison of Measured and Simulated Urban Soil Hydrologic Properties

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 24, Issue 1

Abstract

Urban communities use hydrologic models to plan for and assess the effectiveness of stormwater control measures. Although emphasis is placed on soils as permeable surfaces that regulate the rainfall-runoff process, representative soil hydrologic parameters for urban areas are rare. The extent to which measured and commonly simulated hydrologic data may differ is also largely uncharacterized. As part of the US EPA urban soil assessment, infiltration and drainage rates were measured in 12 cities, and the authors compared these measured data to estimates generated from the EPA National Stormwater Calculator (NSWC), United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO), and USDA Rosetta. The analysis highlights the overall lack of soil hydrologic data for many cities in the NSWC and SSURGO and show that common prediction algorithms for infiltration and drainage poorly represent urban soil hydraulics. Paired comparison of field-measured values and model-estimated values resulted in root-mean-square errors ranging from 23 to 173  mm/h. These findings are presented in the context of planning for effective stormwater and wastewater management practices, and the need for confirming simulation results with site-specific field data.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Mention of trade names, products, or services does not convey, and should not be interpreted as conveying, official EPA approval, endorsement, or recommendation. This research was performed while LAS held an NRC research associateship appointment at the National Risk Management Research Laboratory within the Office of Research and Development of the US Environmental Protection Agency. We thank Barbara Butler and Robert Ford as well as two anonymous reviewers for taking the time to review this manuscript.

References

Alvarez-Acosta, C., R. J. Lascano, and L. Stroosnijder. 2012. “Test of the Rosetta pedotransfer function for saturated hydraulic conductivity.” Open J. Soil Sci. 2 (3): 203–212. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2012.23025.
Alyamani, M. S., and Z. Şen. 1993. “Determination of hydraulic conductivity from complete grain-size distribution curves.” Ground Water 31 (4): 551–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1993.tb00587.x.
Amoozegar, A. 1989. “A compact constant-head permeameter for measuring saturated hydraulic conductivity of the vadose zone.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53 (5): 1356–1361. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1989.03615995005300050009x.
Anderson, R. M., V. I. Koren, and S. M. Reed. 2006. “Using SSURGO data to improve Sacramento Model a priori parameter estimates.” J. Hydrol. 320 (1–2): 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.020.
Barbu, I. A., and T. P. Ballestero. 2014. “Unsaturated flow functions for filter media used in low-impact development—Stormwater management systems.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 141 (1): 04014041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000766.
Cronican, A. E., and M. M. Gribb. 2004. “Hydraulic conductivity prediction for sandy soils.” Ground Water 42 (3): 459–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2004.tb02694.x.
Di Luzio, M., J. G. Arnold, and R. Srinivasan. 2004. “Integration of SSURGO maps and soil parameters within a geographic information system and nonpoint source pollution model system.” J. Soil Water Conserv. Soc. 59 (4): 123–133.
Dohnal, M., J. Dusek, and T. Vogel. 2010. “Improving hydraulic conductivity estimates from minidisk infiltrometer measurements for soils with wide pore-size distributions.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 74 (3): 804–811. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2009.0099.
Fletcher, T. D., G. Vietz, and C. J. Walsh. 2014. “Protection of stream ecosystems from urban stormwater runoff the multiple benefits of an ecohydrological approach.” Prog. Phys. Geogr. 38 (5): 543–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133314537671.
Gee, G. W., J. W. Bauder, and A. Klute. 1986. “Particle-size analysis.” In Methods of soil analysis. 1. Physical and mineralogical methods, 383–411. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.
Grimaldi, S., A. Petroselli, and N. Romano. 2013. “Curve-number/Green-Ampt mixed procedure for streamflow predictions in ungauged basins: Parameter sensitivity analysis.” Hydrol. Process. 27 (8): 1265–1275. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9749.
Handreck, K. 1983. “Particle size and the physical properties of growing media for containers.” Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 14 (3): 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103628309367357.
Herrmann, D. L., L. A. Schifman, and W. D. Shuster. 2018. “Widespread loss of of intermediate soil horizons in urban landscapes.” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 115 (26): 6751–6755. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103628309367357.
Herrmann, D. L., W. D. Shuster, and A. S. Garmestani. 2017. “Vacant urban lot soils and their potential to support ecosystem services.” Plant Soil 413 (1–2): 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-2874-5.
Josse, J., and F. Husson. 2016. “missMDA: A package for handling missing values in multivariate data analysis.” J. Stat. Software 70 (1): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v070.i01.
Kassambara, A. 2015. “factoextra: Visualization of the outputs of a multivariate analysis.” R Package Version 1 (1): 1–75.
Lê, S., J. Josse, and F. Husson. 2008. “FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis.” J. Stat. Software 25 (1): 1–18.
Mednick, A. C. 2010. “Does soil data resolution matter? State soil geographic database versus Soil Survey Geographic Database in rainfall-runoff modeling across Wisconsin.” J. Soil Water Conserv. 65 (3): 190–199. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.65.3.190.
Mualem, Y. 1976. “A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media.” Water Resour. Res. 12 (3): 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i003p00513.
Nemes, A., and W. Rawls. 2004. “Soil texture and particle-size distribution as input to estimate soil hydraulic properties.” Dev. Soil Sci. 30: 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2481(04)30004-8.
Nemes, A., M. G. Schaap, and J. H. M. Wösten. 2003. “Functional evaluation of pedotransfer functions derived from different scales of data collection.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67 (4): 1093–1102. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2003.1093.
Nemes, A., D. Timlin, Y. A. Pachepsky, and W. Rawls. 2009. “Evaluation of the pedotransfer functions for their applicability at the US national scale.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 73 (5): 1638–1645. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2008.0298.
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2009. “Web soil survey.” Accessed October 29, 2009. http://www.websoilsurvey.ncsc.usda.gov/app/.
Peschel, J. M., P. K. Haan, and R. E. Lacey. 2003. “A SSURGO pre-processing extension for the arcview soil and water assessment tool.” In Proc., 2003 ASAE Annual Meeting, Paper 032123. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.
Petroselli, A., and S. Grimaldi. 2015. “Design hydrograph estimation in small and fully ungauged basins: A preliminary assessment of the EBA4SUB framework.” Supplement, J. Flood Risk Manage. 11 (S1): S197–S210. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12193.
Petroselli, A., S. Grimaldi, and N. Romano. 2013. “Curve-number/Green-Ampt mixed procedure for net rainfall estimation: A case study of the Mignone watershed, IT.” Proc. Environ. Sci. 19: 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2013.06.013.
Pouyat, R., P. Groffman, I. Yesilonis, and L. Hernandez. 2002. “Soil carbon pools and fluxes in urban ecosystems.” Supplement, Environ. Pollut. 116 (S1): S107–S118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00263-9.
Puckett, W., J. Dane, and B. Hajek. 1985. “Physical and mineralogical data to determine soil hydraulic properties.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 49 (4): 831–836. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1985.03615995004900040008x.
Raciti, S. M., L. R. Hutyra, and A. C. Finzi. 2012. “Depleted soil carbon and nitrogen pools beneath impervious surfaces.” Environ. Pollut. 164 (May): 248–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2012.01.046.
Rawls, W., D. Brakensiek, and K. Saxtonn. 1982. “Estimation of soil water properties.” Transact. ASAE 25 (5): 1316–1320. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.33720.
Rossman, L. A. 2013. National stormwater calculator user’s guide. Cincinnati: US Environmental Protection Agency.
Rubio, C. M. 2008. “Applicability of site-specific pedotransfer functions and Rosetta model for the estimation of dynamic soil hydraulic properties under different vegetation covers.” J. Soils Sediments 8 (2): 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1065/jss2008.03.281.
Schaap, M. G., and F. J. Leij. 1998. “Database-related accuracy and uncertainty of pedotransfer functions.” Soil Sci. 163 (10): 765–779. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-199810000-00001.
Schaap, M. G., F. J. Leij, and M. T. van Genuchten. 2001. “Rosetta: A computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions.” J. Hydrol. 251 (3): 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00466-8.
Schifman, L. A., M. E. Tryby, J. Berner, and W. D. Shuster. 2018. “Managing uncertainty in runoff estimation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency national stormwater calculator.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 54 (1): 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12599.
Schoeneberger, P., D. Wysocki, and E. Benham. 2012. Field book for describing and sampling soils. Lincoln, NE: National Soil Survey Center.
Shuster, W. D., S. Dadio, P. Drohan, R. Losco, and J. Shaffer. 2014. “Residential demolition and its impact on vacant lot hydrology: Implications for the management of stormwater and sewer system overflows.” Landscape Urban Plann. 125 (May): 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.003.
Shuster, W. D., S. D. Dadio, C. E. Burkman, S. R. Earl, and S. J. Hall. 2015. “Hydropedological assessments of parcel-level infiltration in an arid urban ecosystem.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 79 (2): 398–406. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2014.05.0200.
Shuster, W. D., R. A. Darner, W. D. Schifman, and D. L. Herrmann. 2017. “Factors contributing to the hydrologic effectiveness of a rain garden network (Cincinnati OH USA).” Infrastructures 2 (3): 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures2030011.
Skaggs, T., L. Arya, P. Shouse, and B. Mohanty. 2001. “Estimating particle-size distribution from limited soil texture data.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65 (4): 1038–1044. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2001.6541038x.
Thien, S. J. 1979. “A flow diagram for teaching texture-by-feel analysis.” J. Agron. Educ. 8 (2): 54–55.
Tietje, O., and V. Hennings. 1996. “Accuracy of the saturated hydraulic conductivity prediction by pedo-transfer functions compared to the variability within FAO textural classes.” Geoderma 69 (1–2): 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(95)00050-X.
van Genuchten, M. T. 1980. “A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44 (5): 892–898. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x.
Vienken, T., and P. Dietrich. 2011. “Field evaluation of methods for determining hydraulic conductivity from grain size data.” J. Hydrol. 400 (1): 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.01.022.
Wagner, B., V. R. Tarnawski, V. Hennings, U. Müller, G. Wessolek, and R. Plagge. 2001. “Evaluation of pedo-transfer functions for unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity using an independent data set.” Geoderma 102 (3): 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(01)00037-4.
Woolhiser, D., R. Smith, and J. V. Giraldez. 1996. “Effects of spatial variability of saturated hydraulic conductivity on Hortonian overland flow.” Water Resour. Res. 32 (3): 671–678. https://doi.org/10.1029/95WR03108.
Zhang, R. 1997. “Determination of soil sorptivity and hydraulic conductivity from the disk infiltrometer.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61 (4): 1024–1030. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100040005x.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 24Issue 1January 2019

History

Received: Oct 12, 2017
Accepted: Mar 13, 2018
Published online: Oct 27, 2018
Published in print: Jan 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Mar 27, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

L. A. Schifman, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE
National Research Council Postdoctoral Research Associate, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 26 West Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45268; Graduate Program Manager, Dept. of Biology, Boston Univ., Boston, MA 02215.
Research Hydrologist, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 26 West Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45268 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7688-0110. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share