Case Studies
Feb 21, 2018

Improving Streamflow Prediction Using Uncertainty Analysis and Bayesian Model Averaging

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 23, Issue 5

Abstract

Hydrological modeling has been used worldwide as an important tool to evaluate the consequences of land cover and land use change on hydrological processes. However, the lack of spatial-temporal rainfall and runoff data have compromised the reliability of the results in several regions of Brazil. In this study, the authors investigated the use of uncertainty analysis and Bayesian model averaging (BMA) as a tool for improving streamflow estimates in the Ribeirão da Onça Basin (ROB), located in southeastern Brazil. They used a set of two precipitation data sources (ground and remote sensing data) and different spatial interpolation schemes as input data for the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model, resulting in five model configurations. These models were submitted to automatic calibration and uncertainty analysis through the sequential uncertainty fitting ver-2 (SUFI-2) method. Then, the BMA method was used to merge those different model configuration results into a single probabilistic prediction, thereafter compared among themselves. An analysis of the accuracy and precision of all simulations produced by the precipitation ensemble members against the BMA simulation supports the use of the latter as a suitable framework for streamflow simulations at the ROB. Furthermore, the approaches evaluated in this study may be used to improve streamflow predictions in ungauged or data-scarce basins.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abbaspour, K. C., et al. (2007). “Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT.” J. Hydrol., 333(2–4), 413–430.
Ajami, N. K., Duan, Q., and Sorooshian, S. (2007). “An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multimodel combination framework: Confronting input, parameter, and model structural uncertainty in hydrologic prediction.” Water Resour. Res., 43(1), W01403.
Arnold, J. G., Allen, P. M., and Bernhardt, G. (1993). “A comprehensive surface-groundwater flow model.” J. Hydrol., 142(1–4), 47–69.
Arnold, J. G., Srinisvan, R., Muttiah, R. S., and Williams, J. R. (1998). “Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. Part I: Model development.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 34(1), 73–89.
Arnold, J. J., Kiniry, J., Srinivasan, R., Williams, J. R. R., Haney, E. B. B., and Neitsch, S. L. L. (2011). Soil and water assessment tool: Input/output file documentation version 2009, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX.
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., and Rubin, D. B. (1977). “Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol., 39(1), 1–38.
Duan, Q., Ajami, N. K., Gao, X., and Sorooshian, S. (2007). “Multi-model ensemble hydrologic prediction using Bayesian model averaging.” Adv. Water Resour., 30(5), 1371–1386.
Duncan, M. R., Austin, B., Fabry, F., and Austin, G. L. (1993). “The effect of gauge sampling density on the accuracy of streamflow prediction for rural catchments.” J. Hydrol., 142(1–4), 445–476.
Faurès, J. M., Goodrich, D. C., Woolhiser, D. A., and Sorooshian, S. (1995). “Impact of small-scale spatial rainfall variability on runoff modeling.” J. Hydrol., 173(1–4), 309–326.
Georgakakos, K. P., Seo, D. J., Gupta, H., Schaake, J., and Butts, M. B. (2004). “Towards the characterization of streamflow simulation uncertainty through multimodel ensembles.” J. Hydrol., 298(1–4), 222–241.
Goodrich, D. C., Faurés, J. M., Woolhiser, D. A., Lane, L. J., and Sorooshian, S. (1995). “Measurement and analysis of small scale convective storm rainfall variability.” J. Hydrol., 173(1–4), 283–308.
Gupta, H. V., Beven, K. J., and Wagener, T. (2006). “Model calibration and uncertainty estimation.” Encyclopedia of hydrological sciences, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Hrachowitz, M., et al. (2013). “A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)—A review.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 58(6), 1198–1255.
Jiang, S., et al. (2012). “Comprehensive evaluation of multi-satellite precipitation products with a dense rain gauge network and optimally merging their simulated hydrological flows using the Bayesian model averaging method.” J. Hydrol., 452(7), 213–225.
Lucas, M., Oliveira, P. T. S., Melo, D. C. D., and Wendland, E. (2015). “Evaluation of remotely sensed data for estimating recharge to an outcrop zone of the Guarani Aquifer System (South America).” Hydrogeol. J., 23(5), 961–969.
Lucas, M., and Wendland, E. (2015). “Recharge estimates for various land uses in the Guarani Aquifer System outcrop area.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 61(7), 1253–1262.
Machado, A. R., Wendland, E., and Krause, P. (2016). “Hydrologic simulation for water balance improvement in an outcrop area of the Guarani Aquifer System.” Environ. Processes, 3(1), 19–38.
McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., and Conover, W. J. (1979). “Comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code.” Technometrics, 21(2), 239–245.
McLachlan, G. J., and Krishnan, T. (1997). The EM algorithm and extensions, Wiley, New York.
Melo, D. C. D., et al. (2015). “Performance evaluation of rainfall estimates by TRMM multi-satellite precipitation analysis 3B42V6 and V7 over Brazil.” J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 120(18), 9426–9436.
Montanari, A., Shoemaker, C. A., and Van de Giesen, N. (2009). “Introduction to special section on uncertainty assessment in surface and subsurface hydrology: An overview of issues and challenges.” Water Resour. Res., 45(12), 1–4.
Moradkhani, H., and Sorooshian, S. (2008). “General review of rainfall-runoff modeling: Model calibration, data assimilation, and uncertainty analysis.” Hydrological modelling and the water cycle, S. Sorooshian, et al., eds., Vol. 63, Springer, Berlin, 1–24.
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., and Veith, T. L. (2007). “Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations.” Trans. ASABE, 50(3), 885–900.
Najafi, M. R., Moradkhani, H., and Jung, I. W. (2011). “Assessing the uncertainties of hydrologic model selection in climate change impact studies.” Hydrol. Processes, 25(18), 2814–2826.
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models. I: A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol., 10(3), 282–290.
Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., and Williams, J. R. (2005). Soil and water assessment tool: Theoretical documentation—version 2005, Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX, 494.
Oliveira, P. T. S., et al. (2016). “Curve number estimation from Brazilian Cerrado rainfall and runoff data.” J. Soil Water Conserv., 71(5), 420–429.
Oliveira, P. T. S., Nearing, M. A., Moran, M. S., Goodrich, D. C., Wendland, E., and Gupta, H. V. (2014). “Trends in water balance components across the Brazilian Cerrado.” Water Resour. Res., 50(9), 7100–7114.
Oliveira, P. T. S., Wendland, E., Nearing, M. A., Scott, R. L., Rosolem, R., and Rocha, H. R. (2015). “The water balance components of undisturbed tropical woodlands in the Brazilian cerrado.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19(6), 2899–2910.
Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A., and Vetterling, W. T. (1992). Numerical recipe, the art of scientific computation, 2nd Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Raftery, A. E., Gneiting, T., Balabdaoui, F., and Polakowski, M. (2005). “Using Bayesian model averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles.” Mon. Weather Rev., 133(5), 1155–1174.
Rodrigues, D. B. B., Gupta, H. V., Mendiondo, E., and Oliveira, P. T. S. (2015). “Assessing uncertainties in surface water security: An empirical multimodel approach.” Water Resour. Res., 51(11), 9013–9028.
Saxton, K. E., and Rawls, W. J. (2006). “Soil water characteristic estimates by texture and organic matter for hydrologic solutions.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 70(5), 1569–1578.
Sivapalan, M., et al. (2003). “IAHS decade on predictions in ungauged basins (PUB), 2003–2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 48(6), 857–880.
Solomatine, D. P., and Wagener, T. (2011). “Hydrological modeling.” Treatise on water science, W. Peter, ed., Elsevier, Oxford, U.K., 435–457.
Strauch, M., Bernhofer, C., Koide, S., Volk, M., Lorz, C., and Makeschin, F. (2012). “Using precipitation data ensemble for uncertainty analysis in SWAT streamflow simulation.” J. Hydrol., 414–415(1), 413–424.
Tuo, Y., Duan, Z., Disse, M., and Chiogna, G. (2016). “Evaluation of precipitation input for SWAT modeling in alpine catchment: A case study in the Adige river basin (Italy).” Sci. Total Environ., 573(12), 66–82.
USDA NRCS (United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service). (2004). “Estimation of direct runoff from storm rainfall.” Chapter 10, National engineering handbook, USDA, Washington, DC.
Vrugt, J. A., Clark, M. P., Diks, C. G. H., Duan, Q., and Robinson, B. A. (2006). “Multi-objective calibration of forecast ensembles using Bayesian model averaging.” Geophys. Res. Lett., 33(19), 2–7.
Vrugt, J. A., Diks, C. H., and Clark, M. (2008). “Ensemble Bayesian model averaging using Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling.” Environ. Fluid Mech., 8(5–6), 579–595.
Zhang, X., Srinivasan, R., and Bosch, D. (2009). “Calibration and uncertainty analysis of the SWAT model using genetic algorithms and Bayesian model averaging.” J. Hydrol., 374(3–4), 307–317.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 23Issue 5May 2018

History

Received: Mar 20, 2017
Accepted: Oct 13, 2017
Published online: Feb 21, 2018
Published in print: May 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Jul 21, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Antonio A. Meira Neto [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719. E-mail: [email protected]
Professor, Faculty of Engineering, Architecture and Urbanism and Geography, Federal Univ. of Mato Grosso do Sul, CxP. 549, Campo Grande, MS 79070-900, Brazil (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2806-0083. E-mail: [email protected]
Dulce B. B. Rodrigues [email protected]
Professor, Faculty of Engineering, Architecture and Urbanism and Geography, Federal Univ. of Mato Grosso do Sul, CxP. 549, Campo Grande, MS 79070-900, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected]
Edson Wendland [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Hydraulics and Sanitary Engineering, Univ. of São Paulo, 400 Trabalhador Saocarlense Ave. 400, São Carlos, SP 13566-590, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share