Case Studies
Oct 12, 2017

Assessing a Regression-Based Regionalization Approach to Ungauged Sites with Various Hydrologic Models in a Forested Catchment in the Northeastern United States

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 22, Issue 12

Abstract

Analysis of daily streamflow is of interest to river restoration and conservation efforts in many regions in the world. However, the paucity of stream-gauging stations presents significant challenges in making flow predictions. In this study, two process-based rainfall-runoff models that differ in complexity were used to estimate a reliable simulation of the daily streamflow hydrograph using 15 subbasins in the Deerfield River Basin, a major tributary to the Connecticut River Watershed. Catchment characteristics were employed across the study area, and regional regression equations were developed that correlate these physical and climate characteristics with the parameters of the rainfall-runoff models. The regression-based regionalization approach had a higher degree of accuracy when compared with simpler regionalization approaches, with an average normalized RMS error (NRMSE) value of 0.26 compared with 0.42 and 0.32 for a spatial proximity method and a naïve-mean method, respectively. In addition, the more complex rainfall-runoff model performed better than the less complex model with Kling-Gupta efficiency (KGE) values of 0.78 and 0.68, respectively, suggesting that model discretization may play a significant role in hydrologic model accuracy. These findings support a viable framework for addressing water resource management at a small-catchment level. In addition, this study may contribute to regionalization of rainfall-runoff model parameters for ungauged basins in the northeastern U.S. region.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Funding for this study was provided by the Department of Interior Northeast Climate Science Center. We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers and the associate editor of this paper as well as the proofing staff for their thoughtful insights, useful suggestions, and feedback.

References

Abdulla, F. A., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (1997). “Development of regional parameter estimation equations for a macroscale hydrologic model.” J. Hydrol., 197(1–4), 230–257.
Abebe, N. A., Ogden, F. L., and Pradhan, N. R. (2010). “Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of the conceptual HBV rainfall-runoff model: Implications for parameter estimation.” J. Hydrol., 389(3), 301–310.
Ahn, K.-H., and Merwade, V. (2016). “Role of watershed geomorphic characteristics on flooding in Indiana, United States.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 5015021.
Ahn, K. H., and Palmer, R. (2016). “Regional flood frequency analysis using spatial proximity and basin characteristics: Quantile regression vs. parameter regression technique.” J. Hydrol., 540, 515–526.
Ahn, K.-H., Palmer, R., and Steinschneider, S. (2017). “A hierarchical Bayesian model for regionalized seasonal forecasts: Application to low flows in the northeastern United States.” Water Resour. Res., 53(1), 503–521.
Archfield, S. A., Steeves, P. A., Guthrie, J. D., and Ries, K. G., III (2013). “Towards a publicly available, map-based regional software tool to estimate unregulated daily streamflow at ungauged rivers.” Geosci. Model Dev., 6(1), 101–115.
Baloch, M. A., Ames, D. P., and Tanik, A. (2011). “Application of BASINS/HSPF in the Koycegiz–Dalyan watershed in Turkey: A developing country case study in watershed modeling.” WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ., 146, 187–199.
Bárdossy, A. (2007). “Calibration of hydrological model parameters for ungauged catchments.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 11(2), 703–710.
Beck, M. B. (1987). “Water quality modeling: A review of the analysis of uncertainty.” Water Resour. Res., 23(8), 1393–1442.
Bergman, M. J., and Donnangelo, L. J. (2000). “Simulation of freshwater discharges from ungaged areas to the Sebastian River, Florida.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 36(5), 1121–1132.
Bergström, S. (1976). Development and application of a conceptual runoff model for Scandinavian catchments, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden.
Bergström, S. (2006). Large sample basin experiments for hydrological model parameterization: Results of the model parameter experiment—MOPEX, IAHS Publishers, Oxfordshire, U.K.
Bergström, S., Harlin, J., and Lindström, G. (1992). “Spillway design floods in Sweden. I: New guidelines.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 37(5), 505–519.
Bergström, S., and Lindström, G. (2015). “Interpretation of runoff processes in hydrological modelling—Experience from the HBV approach.” Hydrol. Process., 29(16), 3535–3545.
Bethlahmy, N. (1973). “Water yield, annual peaks and exposure in mountainous terrain.” J. Hydrol., 20(2), 155–169.
Beven, K. (1989). “Changing ideas in hydrology—The case of physically-based models.” J. Hydrol., 105(1–2), 157–172.
Beven, K. (2001). “How far can we go in distributed hydrological modelling?” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 5(1), 1–12.
Beven, K. (2002). “Towards a coherent philosophy for modelling the environment.” Proc. Roy. Soc. London A, 458(2026), 2465–2484.
Beven, K. J. (2011). Rainfall-runoff modelling: The primer, Wiley, New York.
Beven, K., Smith, P., Westerberg, I., and Freer, J. (2012). “Comment on “Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling” by P. Clark et al.” Water Resour. Res., 48(11), 1–5.
Bhatia, P. K., Bergström, S., and Persson, M. (1984). Application of the distributed HBV-6 model to the upper Narmada basin in India, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Norrköping, Sweden.
Bicknell, B. R. (2000). Basins technical note 6: Estimating hydrology and hydraulic parameters for HSPF, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Bicknell, B. R., Imhoff, J. C., Kittle, J. L., Jr., Donigian, A. S., Jr., and Johanson, R. C. (1996). Hydrological simulation program—FORTRAN: User’s manual for release 11, U.S. EPA, Athens, GA.
Blöschl G., ed. (2013). Runoff prediction in ungauged basins: Synthesis across processes, places and scales, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Blöschl, G., and Sivapalan, M. (1995). “Scale issues in hydrological modeling: A review.” Hydrol. Process., 9(3–4), 251–290.
Chang, M. (2006). Forest hydrology: An introduction to water and forests, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Clark, M. P., Kavetski, D., and Fenicia, F. (2011b). “Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling.” Water Resour. Res., 47(9), 1–16.
Clark, M. P., McMillan, H. K., Collins, D. B. G., Kavetski, D., and Woods, R. A. (2011a). “Hydrological field data from a modeller’s perspective. 2: Process-based evaluation of model hypotheses.” Hydrol. Process., 25(4), 523–543.
Crawford, N. H., and Linsley, R. K. (1966). Digital simulation in hydrology’ Stanford watershed model 4, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA.
Criss, R. E., and Winston, W. E. (2008). “Do Nash values have value? Discussion and alternate proposals.” Hydrol. Process., 22(14), 2723–2725.
Dingman, S. L. (2009). “Elevation: A major influence on the hydrology of New Hampshire and Vermont, USA/L’altitude exerce une influence importante sur l’hydrologie du New Hampshire et du Vermont, Etats-Unis.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 26(4), 399–413.
Doherty, J., and Johnston, J. M. (2003). “Methodologies for calibration and predictive analysis of a watershed model.” JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 39(2), 251–265.
Donigian, A. S., Jr., Imhoff, J. C., and Kittle, J. L. (1999). “HSPFParm—An interactive database of HSPF model parameters.”, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Duan, Q., et al. (2006). “Model Parameter Estimation Experiment (MOPEX): An overview of science strategy and major results from the second and third workshops.” J. Hydrol., 320(1), 3–17.
Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V. K. (1994). “Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models.” J. Hydrol., 158(3), 265–284.
Duda, P. B., Hummel, P. R., Donigian, A. S., Jr., and Imhoff, J. C. (2012). “BASINS/HSPF: Model use, calibration, and validation.” Trans. ASABE, 55(4), 1523–1547.
Falcone, J. A., Carlisle, D. M., Wolock, D. M., and Meador, M. R. (2010). “GAGES: A stream gage database for evaluating natural and altered flow conditions in the conterminous United States: Ecological archives E091-045.” Ecology, 91(2), 621.
Federer, C. A., Vörösmarty, C., and Fekete, B. (1996). “Intercomparison of methods for calculating potential evaporation in regional and global water balance models.” Water Resour. Res., 32(7), 2315–2321.
Fenneman, N. M. (1938). Physiography of eastern United States, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Filoso, S., Vallino, J., Hopkinson, C., Rastetter, E., and Claessens, L. (2004). “Modeling nitrogen transport in the Ipswich River Basin, Massachusetts, using a hydrological simulation program in FORTRAN (HSPF) 1.” JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 40(5), 1365–1384.
Friesz, P. J. (1996). Geohydrology of stratified drift and streamflow in the Deerfield River Basin, northwestern Massachusetts, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, USGS, Marlborough, MA.
Gan, T. Y., Dlamini, E. M., and Biftu, G. F. (1997). “Effects of model complexity and structure, data quality, and objective functions on hydrologic modeling.” J. Hydrol., 192(1), 81–103.
Gao, W., Guo, H. C., and Liu, Y. (2015). “Impact of calibration objective on hydrological model performance in ungauged watersheds.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 04014086.
Gay, F. B., Toler, L. G., and Hansen, B. P. (1974). Hydrology and water resources of the Deerfield River Basin, Massachusetts, USGS, Reston, VA.
Gesch, D., Oimoen, M., Greenlee, S., Nelson, C., Steuck, M., and Tyler, D. (2002). “The national elevation dataset.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 68(1), 5–32.
Goswami, M., O’connor, K. M., and Bhattarai, K. P. (2007). “Development of regionalisation procedures using a multi-model approach for flow simulation in an ungauged catchment.” J. Hydrol., 333(2), 517–531.
Grayson, R. B., Moore, I. D., and McMahon, T. A. (1992). “Physically based hydrologic modeling. 1: A terrain-based model for investigative purposes.” Water Resour. Res., 28(10), 2639–2658.
Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., and Martinez, G. F. (2009). “Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling.” J. Hydrol., 377(1), 80–91.
Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., and Yapo, P. O. (1998). “Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information.” Water Resour. Res., 34(4), 751–763.
Gutiérrez-Magness, A. L., and McCuen, R. H. (2005). “Effect of flow proportions on HSPF model calibration accuracy.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 343–352.
Hamon, W. R. (1963). Computation of direct runoff amounts from storm rainfall, Vol. 63, International Association of Scientific Hydrology Publication, 52–62.
Harlin, J., and Kung, C. S. (1992). “Parameter uncertainty and simulation of design floods in Sweden.” J. Hydrol., 137(1), 209–230.
Homer, C., et al. (2015). “Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States—Representing a decade of land cover change information.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 81(5), 345–354.
Hornberger, G. M., and Spear, R. C. (1981). “Approach to the preliminary analysis of environmental systems.” J. Environ. Manage., 12(1), 7–18.
Hrachowitz, M., et al. (2013). “A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)—A review.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 58(6), 1198–1255.
Hundecha, Y., and Bárdossy, A. (2004). “Modeling of the effect of land use changes on the runoff generation of a river basin through parameter regionalization of a watershed model.” J. Hydrol., 292(1), 281–295.
Iskra, I., and Droste, R. (2007). “Application of non-linear automatic optimization techniques for calibration of HSPF.” Water Environ. Res., 79(6), 647–659.
Johnson, M. S., et al. (2003). “Application of two hydrologic models with different runoff mechanisms to a hillslope dominated watershed in the northeastern US: A comparison of HSPF and SMR.” J. Hydrol., 284(1), 57–76.
Kay, A. L., Jones, D. A., Crooks, S. M., Kjeldsen, T. R., and Fung, C. F. (2007). “An investigation of site-similarity approaches to generalisation of a rainfall-runoff model.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 11(1), 500–515.
Kim, S. M., Benham, B. L., Brannan, K. M., Zeckoski, R. W., and Doherty, J. (2007). “Comparison of hydrologic calibration of HSPF using automatic and manual methods.” Water Resour. Res., 43(1), 1–12.
Kim, U., and Kaluarachchi, J. J. (2008). “Application of parameter estimation and regionalization methodologies to ungauged basins of the Upper Blue Nile River Basin, Ethiopia.” J. Hydrol., 362(1), 39–56.
Kirchner, J. W. (2006). “Getting the right answers for the right reasons: Linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology.” Water Resour. Res., 42(3), 1–5.
Kling, H., and Gupta, H. (2009). “On the development of regionalization relationships for lumped watershed models: The impact of ignoring sub-basin scale variability.” J. Hydrol., 373(3), 337–351.
Knox, C. E., and Nordenson, T. J. (1955). Average annual runoff and precipitation in the New England-New York area, USGS, Washington, DC.
Koren, V., Smith, M., and Duan, Q. (2003). “Use of a priori parameter estimates in the derivation of spatially consistent parameter sets of rainfall-runoff models.” Calibration of watershed models, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, 239–254.
Lindström, G., Rosberg, J., and Arheimer, B. (2005). “Parameter precision in the HBV-NP model and impacts on nitrogen scenario simulations in the Rönneå River, southern Sweden.” AMBIO: J. Human Environ., 34(7), 533–537.
Linhart, S. M., Nania, J. F., Christiansen, D. E., Hutchinson, K. J., Sanders, C. L., Jr., and Archfield, S. A. (2013). “Comparison between two statistically based methods, and two physically based models developed to compute daily mean streamflow at ungaged locations in the Cedar River Basin, Iowa.”, USGS, Reston, VA.
Lu, J., Sun, G., McNulty, S. G., and Amatya, D. M. (2005). “A comparison of six potential evapotranspiration methods for regional use in the southeastern United States.” JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 41(3), 621–633.
Madsen, H. (2003). “Parameter estimation in distributed hydrological catchment modelling using automatic calibration with multiple objectives.” Adv. Water Resour., 26(2), 205–216.
Marshall, E., and Randhir, T. (2008). “Effect of climate change on watershed system: A regional analysis.” Clim. Change, 89(3–4), 263–280.
McCabe, G. J., Hay, L. E., Bock, A., Markstrom, S. L., and Atkinson, R. D. (2015). “Inter-annual and spatial variability of Hamon potential evapotranspiration model coefficients.” J. Hydrol., 521, 389–394.
McDonnell, J. J., et al. (2007). “Moving beyond heterogeneity and process complexity: A new vision for watershed hydrology.” Water Resour. Res., 43(7), 1–6.
McIntyre, N., Lee, H., Wheater, H., Young, A., and Wagener, T. (2005). “Ensemble predictions of runoff in ungauged catchments.” Water Resour. Res., 41(12), 1–14.
Merz, R., and Blöschl, G. (2004). “Regionalisation of catchment model parameters.” J. Hydrol., 287(1), 95–123.
Mishra, A. K., and Coulibaly, P. (2009). “Development in hydrometric networks design: A review.” Rev. Geophys., 47(2), RG2001.
NHD (National Hydrography Dataset). (2013). “U.S. Geological Survey, National Hydrography Geodatabase: The National Map.” ⟨⟩ (Sep. 2014).
Orth, R., Staudinger, M., Seneviratne, S. I., Seibert, J., and Zappa, M. (2015). “Does model performance improve with complexity? A case study with three hydrological models.” J. Hydrol., 523, 147–159.
Oudin, L., Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., Michel, C., and Le Moine, N. (2008). “Spatial proximity, physical similarity, regression and ungaged catchments: A comparison of regionalization approaches based on 913 French catchments.” Water Resour. Res., 44(3), 1–15.
Parajka, J., Blöschl, G., and Merz, R. (2007). “Regional calibration of catchment models: Potential for ungauged catchments.” Water Resour. Res., 43(6), 1–16.
Parajka, J., Merz, R., and Blöschl, G. (2005). “A comparison of regionalisation methods for catchment model parameters.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 9(3), 157–171.
Parajka, J., and Viglione, A. (2012). “TUWmodel: Lumped hydrological model developed at the Vienna University of Technology for education purposes, R package version 0.1-2.” ⟨http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=TUWmodel⟩ (Jun. 21, 2014).
Parr, D., and Wang, G. (2014). “Hydrological changes in the US Northeast using the Connecticut River Basin as a case study. 1: Modeling and analysis of the past.” Global Planet. Change, 122, 208–222.
Parr, D., Wang, G., and Ahmed, K. F. (2015a). “Hydrological changes in the US Northeast using the Connecticut River Basin as a case study. 2: Projections of the future.” Global Planet. Change, 133, 167–175.
Parr, D., Wang, G., and Bjerklie, D. (2015b). “Integrating remote sensing data on evapotranspiration and leaf area index with hydrological modeling: Impacts on model performance and future predictions.” J. Hydrometeorol., 16(5), 2086–2100.
Perrin, C., Michel, C., and Andréassian, V. (2001). “Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments.” J. Hydrol., 242(3), 275–301.
PRISM Climate Group. (2004). “PRISM climate data.” ⟨http://prism.oregonstate.edu⟩ (Feb. 4, 2004).
Python version 3.4.3 [Computer software]. CPython, Wilmington, DE.
R version 3.2.1 [Computer software]. RStudio, Inc., Boston.
Razavi, T., and Coulibaly, P. (2013). “Streamflow prediction in ungauged basins: Review of regionalization methods.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 958–975.
Razavi, T., and Coulibaly, P. (2016). “Improving streamflow estimation in ungauged basins using multi-modelling approach.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 61(15), 2668–2679.
Refsgaard, J. C., and Knudsen, J. (1996). “Operational validation and intercomparison of different types of hydrological models.” Water Resour. Res., 32(7), 2189–2202.
Saleh, A., and Du, B. (2004). “Evaluation of SWAT and HSPF within BASINS program for the upper North Bosque River watershed in central Texas.” Trans. ASAE, 47(4), 1039–1049.
Samuel, J., Coulibaly, P., and Metcalfe, R. A. (2011). “Estimation of continuous streamflow in Ontario ungauged basins: Comparison of regionalization methods.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 447–459.
Schaefli, B., and Gupta, H. V. (2007). “Do Nash values have value?” Hydrol. Process., 21(15), 2075–2080.
Seibert, J. (1999). “Regionalisation of parameters for a conceptual rainfall-runoff model.” Agric. For. Meteorol., 98, 279–293.
Seibert, J., and Beven, K. J. (2009). “Gauging the ungauged basin: How many discharge measurements are needed?” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13(6), 883–892.
Seong, C., Her, Y., and Benham, B. L. (2015). “Automatic calibration tool for hydrologic simulation program—FORTRAN using a shuffled complex evolution algorithm.” Water, 7(2), 503–527.
Singh, R., Archfield, S. A., and Wagener, T. (2014). “Identifying dominant controls on hydrologic parameter transfer from gauged to ungauged catchments—A comparative hydrology approach.” J. Hydrol., 517, 985–996.
Singh, V. P., and Woolhiser, D. A. (2002). “Mathematical modeling of watershed hydrology.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 270–292.
Sivapalan, M. (2003). “Process complexity at hillslope scale, process simplicity at the watershed scale: Is there a connection?” Hydrol. Process., 17(5), 1037–1041.
Sivapalan, M. (2005). “Pattern, process and function: Elements of a unified theory of hydrology at the catchment scale.” Encyclopedia of hydrological sciences, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
Sivapalan, M., et al. (2003). “IAHS decade on predictions in ungauged basins (PUB), 2003-2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 48(6), 857–880.
Srinivasan, M. S., Hamlett, J. M., Day, R. L., Sams, J. I., and Petersen, G. W. (1998). “Hydrologic modeling of two glaciated watersheds in northeast Pennsylvania.” JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 34(4), 963–978.
SSURGO. (2014). “Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database.” ⟨⟩ (Sep. 2014).
Steinschneider, S., Yang, Y. C. E., and Brown, C. (2015). “Combining regression and spatial proximity for catchment model regionalization: A comparative study.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 60(6), 1026–1043.
Stoll, S., and Weiler, M. (2010). “Explicit simulations of stream networks to guide hydrological modelling in ungauged basins.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14(8), 1435–1448.
Taner, M. Ü., Carleton, J. N., and Wellman, M. (2011). “Integrated model projections of climate change impacts on a North American lake.” Ecol. Modell., 222(18), 3380–3393.
Vandewiele, G. L., and Elias, A. (1995). “Monthly water balance of ungauged catchments obtained by geographical regionalization.” J. Hydrol., 170(1), 277–291.
Vleeschouwer, N. D., and Pauwels, V. R. (2013). “Assessment of the indirect calibration of a rainfall-runoff model for ungauged catchments in Flanders.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17(5), 2001–2016.
Vörösmarty, C. J., Federer, C. A., and Schloss, A. L. (1998). “Potential evaporation functions compared on US watersheds: Possible implications for global-scale water balance and terrestrial ecosystem modeling.” J. Hydrol., 207(3), 147–169.
Wagener, T., and Wheater, H. S. (2006). “Parameter estimation and regionalization for continuous rainfall-runoff models including uncertainty.” J. Hydrol., 320(1), 132–154.
Ward, A. D., and Trimble, S. W. (2003). Environmental hydrology, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Wu, J., and Zhu, X. (2006). “Using the shuffled complex evolution global optimization method to solve groundwater management models.” Frontiers of WWW research and developmentAPWeb 2006, Springer Berlin, 986–995.
Young, A. R. (2006). “Streamflow simulation within UK ungauged catchments using a daily rainfall-runoff model.” J. Hydrol., 320(1–2), 155–172.
Young, P. (1983). “The validity and credibility of models for badly defined systems.” Uncertainty and forecasting of water quality, Springer, Berlin, 69–98.
Yu, P. S., and Yang, T. C. (2000). “Fuzzy multi-objective function for rainfall-runoff model calibration.” J. Hydrol., 238(1), 1–14.
Zhang, X., and Lindström, G. (1997). “Development of an automatic calibration scheme for the HBV hydrological model.” Hydrol. Process., 11(12), 1671–1682.
Zhang, Y., and Chiew, F. H. (2009). “Relative merits of different methods for runoff predictions in ungauged catchments.” Water Resour. Res., 45(7), W07412.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 22Issue 12December 2017

History

Received: Sep 29, 2016
Accepted: May 17, 2017
Published online: Oct 12, 2017
Published in print: Dec 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Mar 12, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Gordon E. Clark [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01002 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Kuk-Hyun Ahn [email protected]
Postdoctoral Researcher, Northeast Climate Science Center, Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01002. E-mail: [email protected]
Richard N. Palmer, Ph.D., P.E., D.WRE, Dist.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor and Department Head, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01002. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share