Runoff Prediction for Dam Safety Evaluations Based on Variable Time of Concentration
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 21, Issue 10
Abstract
This paper describes a method for estimating runoff hydrographs for dam safety evaluations in which the time of concentration is considered dependent on the magnitude of the excess rainfall intensity. Current practice for hydrologic routing assumes the time of concentration to be invariant and a function of basin characteristics. The proposed method addresses the limitations arising from the assumed linearity in the unit hydrograph by showing that the time of concentration is dependent on the excess rainfall intensity through a power relationship. The proposed method uses a variable flow velocity approach to compute travel time and construct time-area curves for a range of excess rainfall intensities. From the derived relationships between time of concentration, flow, and excess rainfall intensity, an explicit nonlinear convolution is performed to compute runoff hydrographs. In its current implementation, the method assumes a uniform distribution of rainfall over the entire watershed. This method is applied to a gauged watershed in Northern California and computed hydrographs are compared with measured runoff hydrographs for six large storms. The proposed method is then compared with constant time of concentration predictions. It is shown that using the traditional invariant time of concentration would require different times of concentration for different storms to match measured discharges. By incorporating a variable flow velocity field and a variable time of concentration, surface hydrologic predictions would reproduce more closely measured discharge. The time of concentration is not a property of the physical characteristics of a watershed alone but a variable that depends also on the intensity and temporal distribution of precipitation. Because the method explicitly accounts for the nonlinear effects arising from variations in rainfall intensity, it is best suited for the evaluation of extreme events, which are characterized by large precipitation intensity pulses. It is shown that current hydrologic models based on a constant time of concentration may underestimate peak discharge associated with the extreme events used in dam safety evaluations.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Arora, V. K., and Boer, G. J. (1999). “A variable velocity flow routing algorithm for GCMs.” J. Geophys. Res., 104(D24), 30965–30979.
Askew, A. J. (1970). “Derivation of formulae for variable lag time.” J. Hydrol., 10(3), 225–242.
Boyd, M. J., Pilgrim, D. H., and Cordery, I. (1979). “A storage routing model based on catchment geomorphology.” J. Hydrol., 42(3-4), 209–230.
Bras, R. L., and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (1989). “A review of the search for a quantitative link between hydrologic response and fluvial geomorphology.” New Direction for Surface Water Modeling, Proc., Baltimore Symp., International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS), 149–163.
California Department of Water Resources. (1970). “Rare flood estimates for small ungaged watersheds in California, (including revision of 1976).” California Division of Safety of Dams, Sacramento, CA.
California Department of Water Resources. (1977). “Guidelines for the design and construction of small embankment dams, (reprinted in 1993).” California Division of Safety of Dams, Sacramento, CA.
Calzascia, E. R., and Fitzpatrick, J. A. (1989). “Hydrologic analysis within California’s Dam safety program.” ASDSO Western Regional Conf. and Dam Safety Workshop, Association of State Dam Safety Officials (ASDSO), Lexington, KY.
Chow, V. T. (1959). Open-channel hydraulics, McGraw Hill, New York.
Clark, C. O. (1945). “Storage and the unit hydrograph.” Trans. ASCE, 110, 1419–1446.
Downer, C. W., Ogden, F. L., Martin, W. D., and Harmon, R. S. (2002). “Theory, development, and applicability of the surface water hydrologic model CASC2D.” Hydrol. Processes, 16(2), 255–275.
Green, I. R. A., and Stephenson, D. (1986). “Criteria for comparison of single event models.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 31(3), 395–411.
Grimaldi, S., Petroselli, A., Tauro, F., and Porfiri, M. (2012). “Time of concentration: A paradox in modern hydrology.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 57(2), 217–228.
Gupta, R. S. (2008). Hydrology and hydraulic systems, 3rd Ed., Waveland Press, Long Grove, IL.
Haltas, I., and Kavvas, M. L. (2011). “Scale invariance and self-similarity in hydrologic processes in space and time.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 51–63.
Hydrologic Engineering Center. (1998). HEC-1, flood hydrograph package, user’s manual, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, CA.
Hydrologic Engineering Center. (2000). Hydrologic system HEC-HMS, technical reference manual, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, CA.
Kokkonen, T., Koivusalo, H., Karvonen, T., Croke, B., and Jakeman, A. (2004). “Exploring streamflow response to effective rainfall across event magnitude scale.” Hydrol. Processes, 18(8), 1467–1486.
Lee, G., and Kim, J. (2011). “Comparative analysis of geomorphologic characteristics of DEM-based drainage networks.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 137–147.
Maidment, D. R. (1993). “Developing a spatially distributed unit hydrograph by using GIS.” HydroGIS 93: Application of geographic information systems in hydrology and water resources, IAHS, 181–192.
Morgali, J. R., and Linsley, R. K. (1965). “Computer analysis of overland flow.” J. Hydraul. Div., 91(HY3), 81–100.
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., and Veith, T. L. (2007). “Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations.” Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Biol. Eng., 50(3), 885–900.
Muzik, I. (1996). “A GIS-derived distributed unit hydrograph.” HydroGIS 96: Application of geographic information systems in hydrology and water resources management, IAHS, 453–460.
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I—A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol., 10(3), 282–290.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). (1999). “Probable maximum precipitation for California.”, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, MD.
Pilgrim, D. H., and Cordery, I. (1992). “Flood runoff.” Handbook of hydrology, R. D. Maidment, ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., and Valdes, J. B. (1979). “The geomorphologic structure of hydrologic response.” Water Resour. Res., 15(6), 1409–1420.
Saghafian, B., and Julien, P. Y. (1995). “Time to equilibrium for spatially variable watersheds.” J. Hydrol., 172(1–4), 231–245.
Saghafian, B., Julien, P. Y., and Rajaie, H. (2002). “Runoff hydrograph simulation based on a time variable isochrone technique.” J. Hydrol., 261(1–4), 193–203.
Sushama, L., Laprise, R., Caya, D., Larocque, M., and Slivitzky, M. (2004). “On the variable-lag and variable-velocity cell-to-cell routing schemes for climate models.” Atmos.-Ocean, 42(4), 221–233.
Yoo, C., Lee, J., Park, C., and Jun, C. (2014). “Method for estimating concentration time and storage coefficient of the Clark model using rainfall-runoff- measurements.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 626–634.
Yu, B., Rose, C. W., Ciesiloka, C. C. A., and Cakurs, U. (2000). “The relationship between runoff rate and lag time and the effects of surface treatments and the plot scale.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 45(5), 709–726.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 21 • Issue 10 • October 2016
Copyright
© 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 24, 2015
Accepted: Mar 3, 2016
Published online: May 18, 2016
Published in print: Oct 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Oct 18, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.