Technical Papers
Mar 21, 2016

Impact of Forecasted Land Use Change on Design Peak Discharge at Watershed and Catchment Scales: Simple Equation to Predict Changes

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 21, Issue 7

Abstract

Common engineering methods for the computation of peak discharge are generally based on the assumption of a stationary watershed. This assumption can potentially lead to inaccurate estimates of peak discharge when considering the lifetime of engineering structures. Future land use change is one of the possible causes of non-stationarity in watershed runoff. This study focuses on a method to integrate the readily available integrated climate and land use scenarios (ICLUS) data sets from the environmental protection agency (EPA), with geographic information system (GIS) and hydrologic modeling. This framework is applied to evaluate the impact of the forecasted land use change on the design peak discharge in the rapidly urbanizing region in Northern Virginia (US) at the watershed (Anderson formula) and catchment [calibrated storm water management model (SWMM)] scales. The results show that the impervious area in the rapidly urbanizing Difficult Run watershed is expected to increase by 99.1% (2070) from the year 2010. This increase could cause the peak discharges to increase by 107.9% (SWMM) and 22.1% (Anderson formula) for the 2-year storm event. Simple and easy-to-use regression equation is presented to estimate the changes in design peak discharges based on drainage area and the change in percent of impervious area for the return periods of 2, 10, 25, 50, and 100 years. The results of this study, in addition to supporting local planning and managing of land development activities, also demonstrate a viable alternative to incorporate the impacts of future land use change on design peak discharge.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Anderson, D. G. (1970). “Effects of urban development on floods in northern Virginia.” U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply, Washington, DC.
Arnold, C. L., Jr., and Gibbons, C. J. (1996). “Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key environmental indicator.” J. Am. Plan. Assoc., 62(2), 243–258.
Beighley, R., and Moglen, G. (2002). “Trend assessment in rainfall-runoff behavior in urbanizing watersheds.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 27–34.
Beighley, R., and Moglen, G. (2003). “Adjusting measured peak discharges from an urbanizing watershed to reflect a stationary land use signal.” Water Resour. Res., 39(4), 1093–1103.
Butcher, J., Parker, A., Johnson, T., and Weaver, C. (2010). “Nationwide watershed modeling to evaluate potential impacts of climate and land use change on hydrology and water quality.” Watershed Management 2010, Environmental and Water Resources Institute of ASCE, Reston, VA, 1350–1361.
Casey, M., Stagge, J., Moglen, G., and McCuen, R. (2015). “Effects of watershed subdivision on peak discharge in rainfall-runoff modeling in the WinTR-20 model.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 04015020.
Chen, Y., Xu, Y. P., and Yin, Y. X. (2009). “Impacts of land use change scenarios on storm-runoff generation in Xitiaoxi basin, China.” Quat. Int., 208(1–2), 121–128.
Chow, V. T., Maidment, D. R., and Mays, L. W. (1988). Applied hydrology, McGraw-Hill, New York.
DeFries, R., and Eshleman, K. N. (2004). “Land-use change and hydrologic processes: A major focus for the future.” Hydrol. Process., 18(11), 2183–2186.
Dunne, T., and Leopold, L. B. (1978). Water in environmental planning, W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.
Estes, M. G., Jr., et al. (2015). “A modeling system to assess land cover land use change effects on SAV habitat in the mobile bay estuary.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 51(2), 513–536.
Fairfax County. (2013a). “Demographics and data.” 〈http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/government/about/data/〉 (Mar. 3, 2014).
Fairfax County. (2013b). “Difficult run watershed.” 〈http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/dpwes/watersheds/difficultrun.htm〉 (Mar. 3, 2014).
Fairfax County. (2013c). “Public facility manual.” 〈http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/dpwes/publications/pfm/〉 (Mar. 3, 2014).
Gyawali, R., Greb, S., and Block, P. (2015). “Temporal changes in streamflow and attribution of changes to climate and land use in Wisconsin watersheds.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 51(4), 1138–1152.
Han, J., Hayashi, Y., Cao, X., and Imura, H. (2009). “Evaluating land-use change in rapidly urbanizing China: Case study of Shanghai.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 166–171.
Johnson, T., et al. (2015). “Modeling streamflow and water quality sensitivity to climate change and urban development in 20 U.S. watersheds.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 51(5), 1321–1341.
Johnson, T., Butcher, J., Parker, A., and Weaver, C. (2012). “Investigating the sensitivity of U.S. streamflow and water quality to climate change: U.S. EPA global change research program’s 20 watersheds project.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 453–464.
Kim, Y., Engel, B., Lim, K., Larson, V., and Duncan, B. (2002). “Runoff impacts of land-use change in Indian river lagoon watershed.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 245–251.
Lee, J., and Heaney, J. (2003). “Estimation of urban imperviousness and its impacts on storm water systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 419–426.
Leopold, L. B. (1968). “Hydrology for urban land planning—A guidebook on the hydrologic effects of urban land use.” USGS Circular, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, DC.
Li, Q., Cai, T., Yu, M., Lu, G., Xie, W., and Bai, X. (2013). “Investigation into the impacts of land-use change on runoff generation characteristics in the Upper Huaihe River basin, China.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 1464–1470.
Mateus, C., Tullos, D. D., and Surfleet, C. G. (2015). “Hydrologic sensitivity to climate and land use changes in the Santiam River basin, Oregon.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 51(2), 400–420.
McCuen, R. (2012). “Hydrologic modeling in 2050: Knowledge requirements in a multi-nonstationary environment.” Toward a sustainable water future, ASCE, Reston, VA, 226–233.
McCuen, R. H. (2005). Hydrologic analysis and design, 3rd Ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Moglen, G. E. (2003). “Frequency analysis under nonstationary land use conditions.” Modeling hydrologic change—Statistical methods, R. H. McCuen, ed., Lewis, Boca Raton, FL.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). (2014). “NOAA Atlas 14-point precipitation frequency estimates: VA.” 〈http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_map_cont.html?bkmrk=va〉 (Mar. 8, 2014).
Potter, K. W. (1991). “Hydrological impacts of changing land management practices in a moderate-sized agricultural catchment.” Water Resour. Res., 27(5), 845–855.
Robinson, J. B., Hazell, W. F., and Young, W. S. (1998). “Effects of August 1995 and July 1997 storms in the city of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.” U.S. Geological Survey, Arden, NC.
Rossman, L. A. (2004). “Storm water management model user’s manual, version 5.0.”, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati.
Salas, J., and Obeysekera, J. (2014). “Revisiting the concepts of return period and risk for nonstationary hydrologic extreme events.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 554–568.
Salas, J. D. (1993). “Analysis and modeling of hydrologic time series.” Handbook of hydrology, McGraw-Hill, New York, 19.5–19.9.
U.S. EPA. (2009). “Land-use scenarios: National-scale housing-density scenarios consistent with climate change storylines.”, Washington, DC.
U.S. EPA. (2014). “Integrated climate and land use scenarios (ICLUS).” 〈http://www.epa.gov/ncea/global/iclus/〉 (Apr. 4, 2014).
USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). (2013). “Land-cover modeling at USGS earth resources observation and science (EROS) center.” 〈http://landcover-modeling.cr.usgs.gov〉 (May 15, 2015).
USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). (2014a). “National streamflow statistics program.” 〈http://water.usgs.gov/osw/programs/nss/pubs.html〉 (May 9, 2015).
USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). (2014b). “USGS surface-water data for Virginia.” 〈http://waterdata.usgs.gov/va/nwis/sw〉 (Feb. 21, 2014).
Wang, G. X., Liu, J. Q., Kubota, J. P., and Chen, L. (2007). “Effects of land-use changes on hydrological processes in the middle basin of the Heihe River, northwest China.” Hydrol. Process., 21(10), 1370–1382.
Yan, H., and Edwards, F. (2013). “Effects of land use change on hydrologic response at a watershed scale, Arkansas.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 1779–1785.
Zheng, J., Yu, X., Deng, W., Wang, H., and Wang, Y. (2013). “Sensitivity of land-use change to streamflow in Chaobai River basin.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 457–464.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 21Issue 7July 2016

History

Received: Jul 2, 2015
Accepted: Jan 11, 2016
Published online: Mar 21, 2016
Published in print: Jul 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Aug 21, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Daniel Habete, M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Infrastructure Engineering, George Mason Univ., Fairfax, VA 22030 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Celso M. Ferreira, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Infrastructure Engineering, George Mason Univ., Fairfax, VA 22030. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share