Technical Notes
Jul 23, 2015

Pragmatic Approach to Calibrating Distributed Parameter Groundwater Models from Pumping Test Data Using Adaptive Delayed Acceptance MCMC

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 21, Issue 2

Abstract

Calibration of distributed parameter groundwater models in the Bayesian framework using Markov-chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) random sampling is often hampered by the large number of simulations required to make reliable uncertainty estimates. In particular, naive application of the ubiquitous random walk metropolis Hastings (MH) algorithm can take an unsatisfactorily long time to draw samples from the posterior distribution and hence make the required uncertainty estimates. This note addresses the issue of obtaining feasible uncertainty estimates using accelerated MCMC. A pragmatic approach is investigated, based on the adaptive delayed acceptance MH algorithms of Cui et al. First, adoption of an appropriate prior model over the parameters indicates that the number of estimated parameters can be reduced from a over a thousand parameters to several tens without essential loss of information. Secondly, the algorithm is initialized by a least squares [maximum a posteriori (MAP)] estimate and the covariance of the parameters approximated by the Hessian of the objective function, which is then taken to be an initial proposal distribution for the MH algorithm. The method is evaluated with a numerical simulation, in which the calibration time is reduced five fold compared with previous results of the authors.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Nick Dudley Ward was partially supported by the New Zealand Ministry of Science and Innovation and by the Väisälä-foundation. Timo Lähivaara has been supported by the Academy of Finland (projects 250215 and 257372).

References

Boyce, S. E., and Yeh, W. W.-G. (2014). “Parameter-independent model reduction of transient groundwater flow models: Application to inverse problems.” Adv. Water Resour., 69, 168–180.
Bui-Thanh, T., Burstedde, C., Ghattas, O., Martin, J., Stadler, G., and Wilcox, L. C. (2012). “Extreme-scale UQ for Bayesian inverse problems governed by PDEs.” Proc., Int. Conf. on High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA.
Calvetti, D., Kaipio, J. P., and Somersalo, E. (2006). “Aristotelian prior boundary conditions.” Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci., 1, 63–81.
Christen, J. A., and Fox, C. (2005). “MCMC using an approximation.” J. Comput. Graph. Stat., 14(4), 795–810.
Cui, T., and Dudley Ward, N. (2012). “Uncertainty quantification for stream depletion tests.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 1581–1590.
Cui, T., Dudley Ward, N., and Kaipio, J. P. (2014a). “Characterisation of parameters for a spatially heterogenous aquifer from pumping test data.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 1203–1213.
Cui, T., Fox, C., and O’sullivan, M. J. (2011). “Bayesian calibration of a large scale geothermal reservoir model by a new adaptive delayed acceptance Metropolis Hastings algorithm.” Water Resour. Res., 47(10).
Cui, T., Martin, J., Marzouk, Y. M., Solonen, A., and Spantini, A. (2014b). “Likelihood-informed dimension reduction for nonlinear inverse problems.” Inverse Prob., 30(11), 114015.
Cui, T., Marzouk, Y. M., and Willcox, K. E. (2014c). “Data-driven model reduction for the Bayesian solution of inverse problems.” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 102(5), 966–990.
Dudley Ward, N., and Fox, C. (2012). “Identification of aquifer parameters from pumping test data with regard for uncertainty.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 769–781.
Dudley Ward, N., and Kaipio, J. (2014). “Uncertainty, decision and control: Issues and solutions.” N. Z. J. Hydrol., 53(1), 53–91.
Haario, H., Saksman, E., and Tamminen, J. (2001). “An adaptive Metropolis algorithm.” Bernoulli, 7(2), 223–242.
Hastings, W. (1970). “Monte Carlo sampling using Markov chains and their applications.” Biometrika, 57(1), 97–109.
Kaipio, J., and Somersalo, E. (2005). Statistical and computational inverse problems, Springer, New York.
Keating, E. H., Doherty, J., Vrugt, J. A., and Kang, Q. (2010). “Optimization and uncertainty assessment of strongly nonlinear groundwater models with high parameter dimensionality.” Water Resour. Res., 46(10), W10517.
Ketelsen, C., Scheichl, R., and Teckentrup, A. L. (2013). “A hierarchical multilevel Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm with applications to uncertainty quantification in subsurface flow”.
Lähivaara, T., Dudley Ward, N., Huttunen, T., Koponen, J., and Kaipio, J. P. (2014). “Estimation of aquifer dimensions from passive seismic signals with approximate wave propagation models.” Inverse Prob., 30(1), 015003.
Lähivaara, T., Dudley Ward, N., Huttunen, T., Rawlinson, Z., and Kaipio, J. P. (2015). “Estimation of aquifer dimensions from passive seismic signals in the presence of material and source uncertainties.” Geophys. J. Int., 200(3), 1662–1675.
Laloy, E., Rogiers, B., Vrugt, J. A., Mallants, D., and Jacques, D. (2013). “Efficient posterior exploration of a high-dimensional groundwater model from two-stage Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation and polynomial chaos expansion.” Water Resour. Res., 49(5), 2664–2682.
Lieberman, C., Willcox, K. E., and Ghattas, O. (2010). “Parameter and state model reduction for large-scale statistical inverse problems.” SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 32(5), 2523–2542.
Lipponen, A., Seppänen, A., and Kaipio, J. P. (2013). “Electrical impedance tomography imaging with reduced-order model based on proper orthogonal decomposition.” J. Electron. Imaging, 22(2), 023008.
Liu, J. S. (2001). Monte Carlo strategies in scientific computing, Springer, New York.
Martin, J., Wilcox, L. C., Burstedde, C., and Ghattas, O. (2012). “A stochastic Newton MCMC method for large-scale statistical inverse problems with application to seismic inversion.” SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 34(3), A1460–A1487.
Marzouk, Y. M., and Najm, H. M. (2009). “Dimensionality reduction and polynomial chaos acceleration of Bayesian inference in inverse problems.” J. Comput. Phys., 228(6), 1862–1902.
Marzouk, Y. M., and Xiu, D. B. (2009). “A stochastic collocation approach to Bayesian inferene in inverse problems.” Commun. Comput. Phys., 6(4), 826–847.
MATLAB [Computer software]. Natick, MA, MathWorks.
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., and Teller, E. (1953). “Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines.” J. Chem. Phys., 21(6), 1087–1092.
Mondal, A., Efendiev, Y., Mallick, B., and Datta-Gupta, A. (2010). “Bayesian uncertainty quantification for flows in heterogeneous porous media using reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo methods.” Adv. Water Resour., 33(3), 241–256.
Nocedal, J., and Wright, S. J. (2005). Numerical optimisation, Springer, New York.
Persson, P.-O., and Strang, G. (2004). “A simple mesh generator in MATLAB.” SIAM Rev., 46(2), 329–345.
Petra, N., and Stadler, G. (2011). “Model variational inverse problems governed by partial differential equations.”.
Petra, N., Zhu, H., Stadler, G., Hughes, T. J., and Ghattas, O. (2012). “An inexact Gauss-Newton method for inversion of basal sliding and rheology parameters in a nonlinear Stokes ice sheet model.” J. Glaciol., 58(211), 889–903.
Roberts, G. O., and Rosenthal, J. S. (2009). “Examples of adaptive MCMC.” J. Comput. Graphical Stat., 18(2), 349–367.
Rubin, Y. (2003). Applied stochastic hydrogeology, Oxford Univ., Oxford.
Rue, H., and Held, L. (2005). Gaussian Markov random fields, Chapman and Hall, FL.
Spantini, A., Solonen, A., Cui, T., Martin, J., Tenorio, L., and Marzouk, Y. (2014). “Optimal low-rank approximations of Bayesian linear inverse problems”.
Stark, P. B., and Tenorio, L. (2010). “A primer of frequentist and Bayesian inference in inverse problems.” Large-scale inverse problems and quantification of uncertainty, Wiley, New York.
Tarantola, A. (2005). Inverse problem theory, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.
Tonkin, M., and Doherty, J. (2009). “Calibration-constrained Monte Carlo analysis of highly parameterized models using subspace techniques.” Water Resour. Res., 45(12).
Tonkin, M. J., and Doherty, J. (2005). “A hybrid regularized inversion methodology for highly parameterized environmental models.” Water Resour. Res., 41(10).
Yoon, H., Hart, D. B., and McKenna, S. A. (2013). “Parameter estimation and predictive uncertainty in stochastic inverse modeling of groundwater flow: Comparing null-space Monte Carlo and multiple starting point methods.” Water Resour. Res., 49(1), 536–553.
Zienkiewicz, O. C., and Taylor, R. L. (2005). The finite element method, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, U.K.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 21Issue 2February 2016

History

Received: Aug 11, 2014
Accepted: May 19, 2015
Published online: Jul 23, 2015
Discussion open until: Dec 23, 2015
Published in print: Feb 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Tiangang Cui [email protected]
Postdoctoral Associate, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139. E-mail: [email protected]
Nicholas Dudley Ward [email protected]
Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, Univ. of Canterbury, 8140, New Zealand; and Dept. of Applied Physics, Univ. of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Simon Eveson [email protected]
Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Mathematics, Univ. of York, York YO1 5DD, U.K. E-mail: [email protected]
Timo Lähivaara [email protected]
Dept. of Applied Physics, Univ. of Eastern Finland, Kuopio 70211, Finland. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share