Technical Papers
Jul 3, 2015

Performance Comparison of SAS-Multilayer Perceptron and Wavelet-Multilayer Perceptron Models in Terms of Daily Streamflow Prediction

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 21, Issue 1

Abstract

Accurate streamflow prediction is required in sustainable water resources management. Direct use of observed data in developing prediction models has resulted in inaccuracies. Discrete wavelet transform (DWT) is widely used to decompose observed data (raw data) into spectral bands and eliminate trends and periodicity to improve the accuracy of the models. However, DWT is known to have serious drawbacks, and predictions of daily streamflow have been with short lead times. In this study, a simple method called the SEASON algorithm was used to decompose the observed data into components with the objective of overcoming the drawbacks of DWT so that daily streamflow can be predicted with better accuracy and longer lead times. Data decomposed by SEASON and DWT were used as input into multilayer perceptron (MP) approaches to develop new approaches for predicting daily streamflow for lead times up to 7 days, and termed as seasonally adjusted series-multilayer perceptron (SAS-MP) and wavelet-multilayer perceptron (W-MP), respectively. Twelve years of approved daily streamflow data were obtained from Station 02231000 (located in the St. Marys River watershed) and Station 07288280 (located in the Big Sunflower River watershed), USA. Seven years of data were used for calibration (training) and the remaining 5 years of data were used for prediction (testing). The new approaches were compared with the stand-alone MP model by taking root mean squared error, coefficient of efficiency, and skill score into consideration. The results showed that the SAS-MP and W-MP models performed better than the stand-alone MP model, and the prediction accuracy increased with the use of decomposed signals. However, for all lead times, the SAS-MP model outperformed the W-MP model, which performed less after a lead time of 4 days. This indicates that the SEASON algorithm has the capability to capture periodicity better than DWT and can be used to extend lead time with better prediction reliability.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Adamowski, J. (2008). “Development of a short-term river flood forecasting method for snowmelt driven floods based on wavelet and cross-wavelet analysis.” J Hydrol., 353(3–4), 247–266.
Adamowski, J., and Sun, K. (2010). “Development of a coupled wavelet transform and neural network method for flow forecasting of non-perennial rivers in semi-arid watersheds.” J. Hydrol., 390(1–2), 85–91.
Agudelo, J. I. (2001). “The economic valuation of water: Principles and methods.” 〈http://www.google.com.tr/#sclient=psy-ab&q=Agudelo〉 (Jul. 2, 2013).
Altunkaynak, A. (2007). “Forecasting surface water level fluctuations of Lake Van by artificial neural networks.” Wat. Res. Manage., 21(2), 399–408.
Altunkaynak, A. (2009). “Streamflow estimation using optimal regional dependency function.” Hydrol. Processes, 23(25), 3525–3533.
Altunkaynak, A. (2010). “A predictive model for well loss using fuzzy logic approach.” Hydrol. Processes, 24(17), 2400–2404.
Altunkaynak, A. (2013). “Prediction of significant wave height using geno-multilayer perceptron.” Ocean. Eng., 58, 144–153.
Altunkaynak, A. (2014). “Predicting water level fluctuations in Lake Michigan-Huron using wavelet-expert system methods.” Water Res. Manage., 28(8), 2293–2314.
Altunkaynak, A., and Aydin, A. (2012). “Prediction of temperature variation within a snowpack in open areas and under different canopy covers.” Hydrol. Processes, 26(26), 4015–4028.
Altunkaynak, A., and Strom, K. B. (2009). “A predictive model for reach morphology classification in mountain streams using multilayer perceptron methods.” 〈http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2009WR008055〉 (Jul. 2, 2013).
Anmala, J., Zhang, B., and Govindaraju, R. S. (2000). “Comparison of neural network models with other approaches for rainfall-runoff modeling of watersheds.” J. Water Res. Plann. Manage., 156–166.
Anmala, J., Zhang, B., and Govindaraju, R. S. (2002). “Closure to discussion on comparison of ANNs and other empirical approaches for modeling runoff by V.K. Minocha and M.B. Sonnen.” J. Water Res. Plann. Manage., 381–382.
Bravo, J. M., Paz, A. R., Collischonn, W., Uvo, C. B., Pedrollo, O. C., and Chou, S. C. (2009). “Incorporating forecasts of rainfall in two hydrologic models used for medium-range streamflow forecasting.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 435–445.
Cannas, B., Fanni, A., Sias, G., Tronei, S., and Zedda, M. K. (2006). “River flow forecasting using neural networks and wavelet analysis.” Proc., European Geosciences Union. EUG, 2005, Copernicus Publications, Gottingen, Germany, Vol. 7, 24–29.
Cheng, C. T., Chau, K. W., Sun, Y. G., and Lin, J. Y. (2005). “Long-term prediction of discharges in Manwan Reservoir using artificial neural network models.” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 3498, 1040–1045.
Cobaner, M. (2013). “Reference evapotranspiration based on Class A pan evaporation via wavelet regression technique.” Irrig. Sci., 31(2), 119–134.
Cobaner, M., Haktanir, T., and Kisi, O. (2008). “Prediction of hydropower energy using ANN for the feasibility of hydropower plant installation to an existing irrigation dam.” Water Res. Manage., 22(6), 757–774.
Dabhi, V. K., and Chaudhary, S. (2014). “Hybrid wavelet-postfix-GP model for rainfall prediction of Anand region of India.” Adv. Artif. Intell., 2014, 1–11.
Daubechies, I. (1990). “The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis.” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theor., 36(5), 961–1005.
Dawson, C. W., and Wilby, R. L. (2001). “Hydrological modelling using artificial neural networks.” Prog. Phys. Geog., 25(1), 80–108.
Donigan, A. S., and Love, J. T. (2003). “Sediment calibration procedures and guidelines for watershed modeling.” WEF TMDL 2003 Specialty Conf. Proc., CDROM, Aqua Terra Consultants, Mountain View, CA.
Dutta, D., Welsh, W., Vaze, J., Kim, S., and Nicholls, D. (2011). “Improvement in short-term streamflow forecasting using an integrated modelling framework.” Proc., 19th Int. Congress on Modelling and Simulation, CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, VIC.
Fernandes, F. (2001). “Directional, shift-insensitive, complex wavelet transforms with controllable redundancy.” 〈http://dsp.rice.edu/publications/directional-shift-insensitive-complex-wavelet-transforms-controllable-redundancy〉 (Oct. 9, 2013).
Gámiz-Frotis, S. R., Pozo-Vázquez, D., Esteban-Parra, M. J., and Castro-Díez, Y. (2002). “Spectral characteristics and predictability of the NAO assessed through singular spectral analysis.” J. Geophys. Res., 107(D23), 4685.
George, B. A., Adams, R., Ryu, D., Western, A. W., Simon, P., and Nawarathna, B. (2011). “An assessment of potential operational benefits of short-term stream flow forecasting in the broken catchment, Victoria.” Proc., 34th World Congress of the Int. Association for Hydro-Environment Research and Engineering, Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY.
Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., and Yapo, P. O. (1999). “Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: Comparison with multilevel expert calibration.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 135–143.
Jeong, D. I., and Kim, Y. O. (2005). “Rainfall-runoff models using artificial neural networks for ensemble streamflow prediction.” Hydrol. Processes, 19(19), 3819–3835.
Kim, T., and Valdes, J. B. (2003). “Nonlinear model for drought forecasting based on a conjunction of wavelet transforms and neural networks.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 319–328.
Kisi, O. (2005). “Daily river flow forecasting using artificial neural networks and auto-regressive models.” Turk. J. Eng. Environ. Sci., 29, 9–20.
Kucuk, M., Kahya, E., Cengiz, T. M., and Karaca, M. (2009). “North Atlantic oscillation influences on Turkish lake levels.” Hydrol. Processes, 23(6), 893–906.
Labat, D., Ababou, R., and Mangin, A. (2000). “Rainfall-runoff relationships for karstic springs. Part II: Continuous wavelet and discrete orthogonal multi-resolution analyses.” J. Hydrol., 238(3–4), 149–178.
Misiti, M., Misiti, Y., Oppenheim, G., and Poggi, J. M. (2000). “Wavelet toolbox user’s guide, the Mathworks.” 〈http://mathworks.com/help/pdf_doc/wavelet/wavelet_ug.pdf〉 (Sep. 28, 2013).
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., and Veith, T. L. (2007). “Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations.” Trans. ASABE, 50(3), 885–900.
Muller, B., and Reinhardt, J. (1991). Neural networks: An introduction, 〈http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=EFUzMYjOXk8C&printsec=frontcover&hl=tr&source=gbsgesummaryr&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false〉 (Jun. 30, 2013).
Mutlu, E., Chaubey, I., and Hexmoor, H. (2008). “Comparison of artificial neural network models for hydrologic predictions at multiple gauging stations in an agricultural watershed.” Hydrol. Processes, 22(26), 5097–5106.
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1: A discussion of principle.” J. Hydrol., 10(3), 282–290.
Negnevitsky, M. (2005). Artificial intelligence: A guide to intelligent systems, 2nd Ed., Addison-Wesley, Essex, England.
Nourani, V., Komasi, M., and Mano, A. (2009). “A multivariate ANN-wavelet approach for rainfall–runoff modeling.” Water Res. Manage., 23(14), 2877–2894.
Ozger, M. (2010). “Significant wave height forecasting using wavelet-fuzzy logic approach.” Ocean Eng., 37(16), 1443–1451.
Parker, R., et al. (2007). “Evaluation of three watershed-scale pesticide fate and transport models.” J. Am. Water Res. Assoc., 43(6), 1424–1443.
Pereira-Filho, A. J., and dos Santos, C. C. (2006). “Modelling a densely urbanized watershed with an artificial neural network, weather radar and telemetric data.” J. Hydrol., 317(1–2), 31–48.
Rosenblatt, F. (1958). “The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain.” Psychol. Rev., 65(6), 386–408.
Rosso, O. A., Figliola, A., Blanco, S., and Jacovkis, P. M. (2004). “Signal separation with almost periodic components: A wavelets based method.” Revista Mexicana de Fisica, 50(2), 179–186.
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., and Williams, R. J. (1986). “Learning representations by back-propagating errors.” Nature, 323(6088), 533–536.
Seckin, G., Akoz, M. S., Cobaner, M., and Haktanir, T. (2009). “Application of ANN techniques for estimating backwater through bridge constrictions in Mississippi River basin.” Adv. Eng. Software, 40(10), 1039–1046.
Seckin, N., Cobaner, M., Yurtal, R., and Haktanir, T. (2013). “Flood flow at ungauged sites: The case of East Mediterranean River basin, Turkey.” Water Res. Manage., 27(7), 2103–2124.
Shalamu, A. J., King, P. E., and Thomas, C. P. (2010). “Application of partial least-squares regression in seasonal streamflow forecasting.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 612–623.
Shiskin, J., Young, A. H., and Musgrave, J. C. (1967). “The X-11 variant of the census method II seasonal adjustment program.”, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC.
Solomatine, D. P., and Dulal, K. N. (2003). “Model trees as an alternative to neural networks in rainfall– runoff modeling.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 48(3), 399–411.
Tiwari, M. K., and Chatterjee, C. (2010). “Development of an accurate and reliable hourly flood forecasting model using wavelet-bootstrap–ANN (WBANN) hybrid approach.” J. Hydrol., 394(3–4), 458–470.
USGS (United States Geological Survey). 〈http://waterdata.usgs.gov〉. (Jun. 21, 2013).
Viola, F., Pumo, D., and Noto, L. V. (2014). “EHSM: A conceptual ecohydrological model for daily streamflow simulation.” Hydrol. Processes., 28(9), 3361–3372.
Wang, W., van Gelder, P. H. A. J. M., Vrijling, J. K., and Ma, J. (2006). “Forecasting daily streamflow using hybrid ANN models.” J. Hydrol., 324(1–4), 383–399.
Wang, X., and Melesse, A. M. (2005). “Evaluation of the SWAT model’s snowmelt hydrology in a northwestern Minnesota watershed.” Trans. ASAE., 48(4), 1359–1376.
Webster, P. J., and Hoyos, C. (2004). “Prediction of monsoon rainfall and river discharge on 15–30-day time scales.” 〈https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-85-11-1745〉 (Sep. 24, 2013).
Willmott, C. J. (1981). “On the validation of models.” Phys. Geog., 2(2), 184–194.
Wu, C. L., Chau, K. W., and Fan, C. (2010). “Prediction of rainfall time series using modular artificial neural networks coupled with data pre-processing techniques.” J. Hydrol., 389(1–2), 146–167.
Wu, C. L., Chau, K. W., and Li, Y. S. (2009). “Predicting monthly streamflow using data-driven models coupled with data pre-processing techniques.” Water Resour. Res., 45(8), 1–22.
Xu, J., Zhu, X., Zhang, W., Xu, X., and Xian, J. (2009). “Daily streamflow forecasting by artificial neural network in a large-scale basin.” 〈http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=5382453&tag=1〉 (Jul. 3, 2013).
Zealand, C. M., Burn, D. H., and Simonovic, S. P. (1999). “Short term streamflow forecasting using artificial neural networks.” J. Hydrol., 214(1–4), 32–48.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 21Issue 1January 2016

History

Received: Sep 23, 2014
Accepted: May 13, 2015
Published online: Jul 3, 2015
Discussion open until: Dec 3, 2015
Published in print: Jan 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Abdusselam Altunkaynak, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Hydraulics Division, Istanbul Technical Univ., Maslak, Istanbul 34469, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected]
Tewodros Assefa Nigussie [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Hydraulics Division, Istanbul Technical Univ., Maslak, Istanbul 34469, Turkey (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share