Developing Probability-Based IDF Curves Using Kernel Density Estimator
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 20, Issue 9
Abstract
Many hydraulic structures are designed based on intensity-duration-frequency (IDF) curves. A design based on an inaccurate design storm can cause problems, such as malfunction of the infrastructure, excessive cost, or loss of life. In previous studies the authors developed IDF curves under future climate scenarios for Alabama using six different North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP)-based projections. Results demonstrated that these models do not project identical results, and there is uncertainty regarding future rainfall intensities projected by these six climate models. Understanding the uncertainties associated with climate model outputs can help decision makers to explain the impacts of climate change with more confidence. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop probability-based IDF curves incorporating climate projections from six different climate models using a kernel density estimator. IDF curves were previously created using two different temporal disaggregation methods: a stochastic method and an artificial neural network (ANN) model. A kernel density estimator was applied to the resulting estimated rainfall intensities from both methods and probability-based IDFs were developed. In addition to the probability-based IDFs, typical IDF curves as a resultant of incorporating all models were also developed. A comparison of the results with the current (historical) IDF curves for the city of Auburn, Alabama, indicated that, when the stochastic method was used for rainfall disaggregation, future rainfall intensities are expected to decrease by 29 to 39% for durations less than 6 to 8 h, and to increase by 14 to 19% for longer durations. Analysis of the results of the ANN model for durations of less than 2 h indicates that the precipitation pattern for Alabama veers toward less intense rainfalls for the investigated durations and for all the return periods. This decrease is expected to be between 48 and 52% for the city of Auburn.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Adamowski, K. (1985). “Nonparametric kernel estimation of flood frequencies.” Water Resour. Res., 21(11), 1585–1590.
Bowden, G. J., Dandy, G. C., and Maier, H. R. (2005). “Input determination for neural network models in water resources applications. Part 1: Background and methodology.” J. Hydrol., 301(1), 75–92.
Bowman, A. W. (1984). “An alternative method of cross-validation for the smoothing of density estimates.” Biometrika, 71(2), 353–360.
Burian, S. J., Durrans, S. R., Nix, S. J., and Pitt, R. E. (2001). “Training artificial neural networks to perform rainfall disaggregation.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 6(1), 43–51.
Colglazier, E. W. (1991). “Scientific uncertainties, public policy, and global warming: How sure is sure enough?” Policy Stud. J., 19(2), 61–72.
Dawson, C. W., and Wilby, R. L. (2001). “Hydrologic modeling using artificial neural networks.” Prog. Phys. Geog., 25(1), 80–108.
Giorgi, F., and Mearns, L. O. (2003). “Probability of regional climate change based on the reliability ensemble averaging (REA) method.” Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(12).
Hall, P., Marron, J. S., and Park, B. U. (1992). “Smoothed cross-validation.” Probab. Theory Relat. Fields, 92(1), 1–20.
Lall, U. (1995). “Nonparametric function estimation: Recent hydrologic contributions.” Rev. Geophys., 33(S2), 1093–1102.
Lall, U., Rajagopalan, B., and Tarboton, D. G. (1996). “A nonparametric wet/dry spell model for resampling daily precipitation.” Water Resour. Res., 32(9), 2803–2823.
Maier, H. R., and Dandy, G. C. (2000). “Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: A review of modeling issues and applications.” Environ. Modell. Softw., 15(1), 101–124.
Marron, J. S., and Padgett, W. J. (1987). “Asymptotically optimal bandwidth selection for kernel density estimators from randomly right-censored samples.” Ann. Stat., 15(4), 1520–1535.
MATLAB [Computer software]. Natick, MA, MathWorks.
McCuen, R. H. (1989). Hydrologic analysis and design, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Mirhosseini, G., Srivastava, P., and Fang, X. (2014). “Developing rainfall intensity-duration-frequency curves for Alabama under future climate scenarios using artificial neural networks.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 04014022.
Mirhosseini, G., Srivastava, P., and Stefanova, L. (2013). “The impact of climate change on rainfall intensity-duration-frequency (IDF) curves in Alabama.” Reg. Environ. Change, 13(S1), 25–33.
New, M., and Hulme, M. (2000). “Representing uncertainty in climate change scenarios: A Monte-Carlo approach.” Integr. Assess., 1(3), 203–213.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). NCDC online climate data directory. (2012). NOAA National Climatic Data Center.
Parzen, E. (1962). “On estimation of a probability density function and mode.” Ann. Math. Stat., 33(3), 1065–1076.
Polansky, A. M., and Baker, E. R. (2000). “Multistage plug—In bandwidth selection for kernel distribution function estimates.” J. Stat. Comput. Simul., 65(1–4), 63–80.
Prodanovic, P., and Simonovic, S. P. (2007). Development of rainfall intensity duration frequency curves for the city of London under the changing climate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Western Ontario, ON, Canada.
Raisanen, J., and Palmer, T. N. (2001). “A probability and decision-model analysis of a multimodel ensemble of climate change simulations.” J. Clim., 14(15), 3212–3226.
Richard, J., Wilfran, M. O., and Simon, T. (2007). The North American regional climate change assessment program dataset, National Center for Atmospheric Research Earth System Grid data portal, Boulder, CO.
Rosenblatt, M. (1956). “Remarks on some nonparametric estimates of a density function.” Ann. Math. Stat., 27(3), 832–837.
Rudemo, M. (1982). “Empirical choice of histograms and kernel density estimators.” Scand. J. Stat., 9(2), 65–78.
Scott, D. W. (2009). Multivariate density estimation: Theory, practice, and visualization, Vol. 383, Wiley.
Sebastien, B., Daniel, C., and René, L. (2007). The North American regional climate change assessment program dataset, National Center for Atmospheric Research Earth System Grid data portal, Boulder, CO.
Sharma, A. (2000a). “Seasonal to interannual rainfall probabilistic forecasts for improved water supply management: Part 1—A strategy for system predictor identification.” J. Hydrol., 239(1), 232–239.
Sharma, A. (2000b). “Seasonal to interannual rainfall probabilistic forecasts for improved water supply management: Part 3—A nonparametric probabilistic forecast model.” J. Hydrol., 239(1), 249–258.
Sharma, A., Tarboton, D. G., and Lall, U. (1997). “Streamflow simulation: A nonparametric approach.” Water Resour. Res., 33(2), 291–308.
Sheather, S. (1983). “A data-based algorithm for choosing the window width when estimating the density at a point.” Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 1, 229–238.
Sheather, S. J. (1986). “An improved data-based algorithm for choosing the window width when estimating the density at a point.” Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 4(1), 61–65.
Sheather, S. J., and Jones, M. C. (1991). “A reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for kernel density estimation.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.), 53(3), 683–690.
Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis, Vol. 26, Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Socolofsky, S., Adams, E. E., and Entekhabi, D. (2001). “Disaggregation of daily rainfall for continuous watershed modeling.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 300–309.
Solaiman, T. A. (2011). Uncertainty estimation of extreme precipitations under climate change: A non-parametric approach, dissertation, Univ. of Western Ontario, ON, Canada.
Solaiman, T. A., and Simonovic, S. P. (2011). Development of probability based intensity-duration-frequency curves under climate change, Univ. of Western Ontario, ON, Canada.
Tarboton, D. G., Ashish, S., and Lall, U. (1998). “Disaggregation procedures for stochastic hydrology based on nonparametric density estimation.” Water Resour. Res., 34(1), 107–119.
Tebaldi, C., and Smith, R. L. (2009). “Characterizing the uncertainty of climate change projections using hierarchical models.” The handbook of applied Bayesian analysis, Oxford University Press.
Wang, B., and Wang, X. (2007). “Bandwidth selection for weighted kernel density estimation.” arXiv.
Zucchini, W. (2003). Applied smoothing techniques, part 1 kernel density estimation, 〈〉.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 20 • Issue 9 • September 2015
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 24, 2014
Accepted: Nov 29, 2014
Published online: Jan 19, 2015
Discussion open until: Jun 19, 2015
Published in print: Sep 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.