Technical Papers
Jan 5, 2015

Improving the Confidence in Hydrologic Model Calibration and Prediction by Transformation of Model Residuals

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 20, Issue 9

Abstract

Calibration of a distributed hydrologic model (WetSpa) for modeling river flows is performed using automatic parameter optimization. The main purpose of this research is to provide more confidence in the uncertainty analysis of the model parameters and predictions. A Box-Cox transformation and an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) time series model are used to transform the correlated and nonstationary model residuals to white noise disturbances, which can be minimized by ordinary least squares optimization. The WetSpa model is applied to the Illinois River basin, with a spatial resolution of 30 m and 1 h time step for a 10-year simulation period (1996–2006). The model is calibrated using river flow records (1996–2002) and validated using the remaining flow data (2002–2006). The results show that simple calibration of the model is inaccurate, as the residuals exhibit heteroscedasticity, which results in inaccurate estimates of the model parameters and large prediction uncertainty. The model calibration is improved when the calibration is combined with a Box-Cox transformation of the discharge and ARIMA modeling of the residuals, which considerably enhances the confidence of the model parameter estimates and of the model predictions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abbaspour, K. C., Schulin, R., and van Genuchten, M. T. (2001). “Estimating unsaturated soil hydraulic parameters using ant colony optimization.” Adv. Water Resour., 24(8), 827–841.
Abrahart, R., and See, L. (2000). “Comparing neural network and autoregressive moving average techniques for the provision of continuous river flow forecasts in two contrasting catchments.” Hydrol. Processes, 14(11–12), 2157–2172.
Ajami, N. K., Gupta, H., Wagener, T., and Sorooshian, S. (2004). “Calibration of a semi-distributed hydrologic model for streamflow estimation along a river system.” J. Hydrol., 298(1–4), 112–135.
Al-Abed, N. A., and Whiteley, H. R. (2002). “Calibration of the hydrological simulation program FORTRAN (HSPF) model using automatic calibration and geographical information systems.” Hydrol. Processes, 16(16), 3169–3188.
Bahremand, A. (2006). “Simulating the effects of reforestation on floods using spatially distributed hydrologic modeling and GIS.” Ph.D. thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Bahremand, A., and De Smedt, F. (2006). “Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of a GIS-based flood simulation model using PEST.” J. WSEAS Trans. Environ. Dev., 2(1), 29–37.
Bahremand, A., and De Smedt, F. (2008). “Distributed hydrological modeling and sensitivity analysis in Torysa watershed, Slovakia.” Water Resour. Manage., 22(3), 393–408.
Bahremand, A., De Smedt, F., Corluy, J., and Liu, Y. B. (2006). “Application of WetSpa model for assessing land use impacts on floods in the Margecany-Hornad watershed, Slovakia.” J. Water Sci. Technol., 53(10), 37–45.
Bandaragoda, C., Tarboton, D. G., and Woods, R. (2004). “Application of TOPNET in the distributed model intercomparison project.” J. Hydrol., 298(1–4), 178–201.
Beven, K. (1989). “Changing ideas in hydrology—The case of physically-based models.” J. Hydrol., 105(1–2), 157–172.
Beven, K. (2006). “A manifesto for the equifinality thesis.” J. Hydrol., 320(1–2), 18–36.
Beven, K., and Freer, J. (2001). “Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology.” J. Hydrol., 249(1–4), 11–29.
Box, G. E. P., and Cox, D. R. (1964). “An analysis of transformations.” J. Royal Stat. Soc. Series B, 26, 211–252.
Box, G. E. P., and Jenkins, G. M. (1976). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control, Holden-Day, San Francisco.
Brooks, R. H., and Corey, A. T. (1964). “Hydraulic properties of porous media.”, Colorado State Univ., Ft. Collins, CO, 27.
Butts, M., et al. (2005). “Flexible process-based hydrological modelling framework for flood forecasting-MIKE SHE.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Innovation, Advances and Implementation of Flood Forecasting Technology, HR Wallingford, U.K., 10.
Carpenter, T. M., and Georgakakos, K. P. (2004). “Continuous streamflow simulation with the HRCDHM distributed hydrologic model.” J. Hydrol., 298(1–4), 61–79.
Chapman, T. (1991). “Comment on “Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analyses” by R. J. Nathan and T. A. McMahon.” Water Resour. Res., 27(7), 1783–1784.
Chenoweth, T., Hubata, R., and St. Louis, R. D. (2000). “Automatic ARMA identification using neural networks and the extended sample autocorrelation function: A reevaluation.” Dec. Support Syst., 29(1), 21–30.
Chiew, F., Stewardson, M., and McMahon, T. (1993). “Comparison of six rainfall-runoff modelling approaches.” J. Hydrol., 147(1–4), 1–36.
De Smedt, F., Liu, Y., and Gebremeskel, S. (2000). “Hydrological modeling on a watershed scale using GIS and remote sensed land use information.” Risk analyses, Vol. II, WIT Press, Southampton, Boston, 10.
DMIP2 (Distributed Hydrologic Model Intercomparison Project-Phase 2). (2007). 〈http://www.weather.gov/oh/hrl/d-mip/2/index.html〉 (Jun. 18, 2007).
Doherty, J. (2004). PEST, model independent parameter estimation, user manual, 5th Ed., Watermark Numerical Computing, Brisbane, Australia.
Doherty, J. (2008). PEST surface water utilities user’s manual. Watermark numerical computing, Univ. of Idaho, Idaho Falls, ID.
Doherty, J., and Johnston, J. M. (2003). “Methodologies for calibration and predictive analysis of a watershed model.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 39(2), 251–265.
Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V. K. (1992). “Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models.” Water Resour. Res., 28(4), 1015–1031.
Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V. K. (1994). “Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models.” J. Hydrol., 158(3–4), 265–284.
Durbin, J., and Watson, G. S. (1971). “Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression. III.” Biometrika, 58(1), 1–19.
Gallagher, M., and Doherty, J. (2007). “Parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis for a watershed model.” Environ. Model. Softw., 22(7), 1000–1020.
Getachew, A. M. (2009). “Modeling groundwater-surface water interaction and development of an inverse groundwater modeling methodology.” Ph.D. thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Goderniaux, P., et al. (2009). “Large scale surface-subsurface hydrological model to assess climate change impacts on groundwater reserves.” J. Hydrol., 373(1–2), 122–138.
Goegebeur, M., and Pauwels, V. R. (2007). “Improvement of the PEST parameter estimation algorithm through extended Kalman filtering.” J. Hydrol., 337(3–4), 436–451.
Greene, D. R., and Hudlow, M. D. (1982). “Hydrometeorological grid mapping procedures.” Proc., AWRA. Int. Symp. on Hydrometeorology, American Water Resources Associations, Denver, CO.
Gupta, H. V., and Kling, H. (2011). “On typical range, sensitivity, and normalization of mean squared error and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency type metrics.” Water Resour. Res, 47(10), W10601.
Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., and Martinez, G. F. (2009). “Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling.” J. Hydrol., 377(1–2), 80–91.
Hamed, K. (2009). “Enhancing the effectiveness of prewhitening in trend analysis of hydrologic data.” J. Hydrol., 368(1–4), 143–155.
Hill, M. C. (1998). “Methods and guidelines for effective model calibration.”, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, DC.
Ivanov, V. Y., Vivoni, E. R., Bras, R. L., and Entekhabi, D. (2004). “Preserving high-resolution surface and rainfall data in operational-scale basin hydrology: A fully-distributed physically-based approach.” J. Hydrol., 298(1–4), 80–111.
Kember, G., Flower, A., and Holubeshen, J. (1993). “Forecasting river flow using nonlinear dynamics.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 7, 205–212.
Klemes, V. (1986). “Operational testing of hydrological simulation models.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 31(1), 13–24.
Kollet, S. J., et al. (2010). “Proof of concept of regional scale hydrologic simulations at hydrologic resolution utilizing massively parallel computer resources.” Water Resour. Res., 46(4), W04201.
Koutroumanidis, T., Sylaios, G., Zafeirioua, E., and Tsihrintzis, V. A. (2009). “Genetic modeling for the optimal forecasting of hydrologic time series: Application in Nestos River.” J. Hydrol., 368(1–4), 156–164.
Kuczera, G. (1983). “Improved parameter inference in catchment models: 1. Evaluating parameter uncertainty.” Water Resour. Res., 19(5), 1151–1162.
Liu, Y. (2004). “Development and application of a GIS-based hydrological model for flood prediction and watershed management.” Ph.D. thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Liu, Y., Gebremeskel, S., De Smedt, F., Hoffmann, L., and Pfister, L. (2003). “A diffusive transport approach for flow routing in GIS-based flood modeling.” J. Hydrol., 283(1–4), 91–106.
Liu, Y. B., Batelaan, O., De Smedt, F., Poorova, J., and Velcicka, L. (2005). “Automated calibration applied to a GIS-based flood simulation model using PEST.” Floods, from defence to management, J. van Alphen, E. van Beek, and M. Taal, eds., Taylor- Francis Group, London, 11.
Mai, D. T. (2009). “Development of flood prediction models for the Huong and Vu Gia-Thu Bon River basins in central Vietnam.” Ph.D. thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
McCuen, R. H., and Snyder, W. M. (1975). “A proposed index for comparing hydrographs.” Water Resour. Res., 11(6), 1021–1024.
Mohammadi, K., Eslami, H., and Kahawita, R. (2006). “Parameter estimation of an ARMA model for river flow forecasting using goal programming.” J. Hydrol., 331(1–2), 293–299.
Montanari, A., and Koutsoyiannis, D. (2012). “A blueprint for process-based modeling of uncertain hydrological systems.” Water Resour. Res., 48(9), 1–15.
Muleta, M. K., and Nicklow, J. W. (2005). “Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis coupled with automatic calibration for a distributed watershed model.” J. Hydrol., 306(1–4), 127–145.
Nash, J., and Sutcliffe, J. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1. A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol., 10(3), 282–290.
Reed, S., Koren, V., Smith, M. B., Zhang, Z., Moreda, F., Seo, D.-J., and DMIP participants. (2004). “Overall distributed model intercomparison project results.” J. Hydrol., 298(1–4), 27–60.
Reed, S., Schaake, J., and Zhang, Z. (2007). “A distributed hydrologic model and threshold frequency-based method for flash flood forecasting at ungauged locations.” J. Hydrol., 337(3–4), 402–420.
Rigon, R., Bertoldi, G., and Over, T. M. (2006). “GEOtop: A distributed hydrological model with coupled water and energy budgets.” J. Hydrometeorol., 7(3), 371–388.
Safari, A. (2012). “Study and development of a distributed hydrologic model, WetSpa, applied to the DMIP2 basins in Oklahoma, USA.” Ph.D. thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Safari, A., De Smedt, F., and Moreda, F. (2012). “WetSpa model application in the distributed model intercomparison project (DMIP2).” J. Hydrol., 418–419, 78–89.
Schoups, G., and Vrugt, J. A. (2010). “A formal likelihood function for parameter and predictive inference of hydrologic models with correlated, heteroscedastic, and non-Gaussian errors.” Water Resour. Res., 46(10), W10531.
Shen, C., Niu, J., and Phanikumar, M. S. (2013). “Evaluating controls on coupled hydrologic and vegetation dynamics in a humid continental climate watershed using a subsurface-land surface processes model.” Water Resour. Res., 49(5), 2552–2572.
Skahill, B. E. (2004). “Use of the hydrological simulation program—FORTRAN (HSPF) model for watershed studies.”, Engineer Research And Development Center, Vicksburg, MS.
Skahill, B. E., Baggett, J. S., Frankenstein, S., and Downer, C. W. (2009). “More efficient PEST compatible model independent model calibration.” Environ. Model. Softw., 24(4), 517–529.
Skahill, B. E., and Doherty, J. (2006). “Efficient accommodation of local minima in watershed model calibration.” J. Hydrol., 329(1–2), 122–139.
Smith, M. B. (2002). “Distributed model intercomparison project (DMIP).” 〈http://www.nws.noaa.gov/oh/hrl/dmip/〉 (Oct. 2002).
Smith, M. B. (2004). “The distributed model intercomparison project (DMIP).” J. Hydrol., 298(1–4), 1–3.
Smith, M. B., et al. (2004). “The distributed model intercomparison project (DMIP): Motivation and experiment design.” J. Hydrol., 298(1–4), 4–26.
Sorooshian, S., and Darcup, J. A. (1980). “Stochastic parameter estimation procedures for hydrologic rainfall-runoff models: Correlated and heteroscedastic error cases.” Water Resour. Res., 16(2), 430–442.
Sorooshian, S., Gupta, V. K., and Fulton, J. L. (1983). “Evaluation of maximum likelihood parameter estimation techniques for conceptual rainfall-runoff models: Influence of calibration data variability and length on model credibility.” Water Resour. Res., 19(1), 251–259.
Thejll, P., and Schmith, T. (2005). “Limitations on regression analysis due to serially correlated residuals: Application to climate reconstruction from proxies.” J. Geophys. Res., 110, D18103.
Thornthwaite, C., and Mather, J. (1955). The water balance: Publications in climatology, 8th Ed., Laboratory of Climatology, Centerton, NJ.
Wang, X., and Melesse, A. M. (2005). “Evaluation of the SWAT model’s snowmelt hydrology in a northwestern Minnesota watershed.” J. Am. Soc. Agric. Biol. Eng., 48(4), 1359–1376.
Willems, P. (2009). “A time series tool to support the multi-criteria performance evaluation of rainfall-runoff models.” Environ. Model. Softw., 24(3), 311–321.
Xu, C.-Y. (2001). “Statistical analysis of parameters and residuals of a conceptual water balance model-methodology and case study.” Water Resour. Manage., 15(2), 75–92.
Yadav, M., Wagener, T., and Gupta, H. (2007). “Regionalization of constraints on expected watershed response behavior for improved predictions in ungauged basins.” Adv. Water Resour., 30(8), 1756–1774.
Yang, J., Reichert, P., Abbaspour, K. C., and Yang, H. (2007). “Hydrological modelling of the Chaohe basin in China: Statistical model formulation and Bayesian inference.” J. Hydrol., 340(3–4), 167–182.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 20Issue 9September 2015

History

Received: Jul 9, 2012
Accepted: Nov 5, 2014
Published online: Jan 5, 2015
Discussion open until: Jun 5, 2015
Published in print: Sep 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Alireza Safari [email protected]
Dept. of Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussel, Belgium (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Florimond De Smedt
Professor, Dept. of Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussel, Belgium.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share