Technical Papers
Oct 6, 2014

Identification of Critical Erosion Watersheds for Control Management in Data Scarce Condition Using the SWAT Model

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 20, Issue 6

Abstract

Identification of critical watersheds prone to soil erosion has been performed by using a hydrological model in data scarce Damodar River catchment, located in Jharkhand state of India. Model is calibrated and validated for two watersheds, i.e., (1) Nagwan, 94.43km2; and (2) Banikdih, 80.06km2, nested within the catchment. The achieved R2 values of predicted monthly runoff and sediment yield varies, respectively, 0.65–0.89 and 0.78–0.84, for both the watersheds during calibration and validation period. Calibration and validation results revealed that model is predicting monthly runoff and sediment yield satisfactory for the two watersheds of the Damodar River catchment. The validated model parameters were then up-scaled to the whole catchment and model was run from 1993–2001 to identify the critical watersheds. Model was successfully used for prioritization of 406 watersheds delineated using the computer software model within the catchment. In delineation process, the boundaries of 175 watersheds matched exactly with the watersheds delineated manually by Damodar Valley Corporation. Out of these 175 watersheds, erosion classes of 157 exactly matched with the manually described erosion class. For remaining 18 watersheds, priority of 10 watersheds was either one class higher or lower, whereas eight watersheds showed complete mismatch. Overall results showed that the hydrological model used in this paper may be helpful in prioritization of management strategies to manage the resources where availability of data is a big concern. Such approach for managing resources is particularly needed in developing countries for better utilization of limited resources.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Arnold, J. G., and Allen, P. M. (1996). “Estimating hydrologic budgets for three Illinois watersheds.” J. Hydrol., 176(1–4), 57–77.
Arnold, J. G., and Fohrer, N. (2005). “SWAT 2000: Current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modeling.” Hydrol. Process., 19(3), 563–572.
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., and Williams, J. R. (1998). “Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. Part I: Model development.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 34(1), 73–89.
ASCE Task Committee on Definition of Criteria for Evaluation of Watershed Models of the Watershed Management Committee, Irrigation and Drainage Division. (1993). “Criteria for evaluation of watershed models.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 429–442.
Betrie, G. D., Mohamed, Y. A., Van Griensven, A., and Srinivasan, R. (2011). “Sediment management modeling in the Blue Nile basin using SWAT model.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15(3), 807–818.
Damodar Valley Corporation (DVC). (2007). “Land use report.” Soil Conservation Dept., Hazaribagh, India.
Fischer, G., Tubiello, F. N., Velthuizen, H. V., and Wiberg, D. A. (2007). “Climate change impacts on irrigation water requirements: Effects of mitigation, 1990–2080.” Technol. Forecast. Social Change, 74(7), 1083–1107.
Gassman, P. W., Reyes, M. R., Green, C. H., and Arnold, J. G. (2007). “The soil and water assessment tool: Historical development, applications and future research directions.” Trans. ASABE, 50(4), 1211–1250.
Getirana, A. C. V., Bonnet, M. P., Calmant, S., Roux, E., Filho, O. C. R., and Mansur, W. J. (2009). “Hydrological monitoring of poorly gauged basins based on rainfall-runoff modeling and spatial altimetry.” J. Hydrol., 379(3–4), 205–219.
Jha, M., Gassman, P. W., Secchi, S., Gu, R., and Arnold, J. G. (2004). “Effect of watershed subdivision on SWAT flow, sediment, and nutrient predictions.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 40(3), 811–825.
Kannan, N., White, S. M., Worrall, F., and Whelan, M. J. (2007). “Sensitivity analysis and identification of the best evapotranspiration and runoff options for hydrological modelling in SWAT-2000.” J. Hydrol., 332(3–4), 456–466.
Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Xia, D., You, J., Rong, Y., and Bakir, M. (2013). “Impacts of land-use and climate changes on hydrologic processes in the Qingyi River watershed, China.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 1495–1512.
Ma, H., Yang, D., Tan, S. K., Gao, B., and Hu, Q. (2010). “Impact of climate variability and human activity on streamflow decrease in the Miyun Reservoir catchment.” J. Hydrol., 389(3–4), 317–324.
Mishra, A., Froebrich, J., and Gassman, P. W. (2007). “Evaluation of the SWAT model for assessing sediment control structures in a small watershed in India.” Trans. ASABE, 50(2), 469–477.
Mishra, A., and Kar, S. (2012). “Modeling hydrologic processes and NPS pollution in a small watershed in sub-humid subtropics using SWAT.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 445–454.
Mishra, A., Kar, S., and Raghuwanshi, N. S. (2009). “Modeling non-point source pollutant losses from a small watershed using HSPF model.” J. Environ. Eng., 92–100.
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., and Veith, T. L. (2007). “Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulation.” Trans. ASABE, 50(3), 885–900.
Ndomba, P., Mtalo, F., and Killingtveit, A. (2008). “SWAT model application in a data scarce tropical complex catchment in Tanzania.” Phys. Chem. Earth., 33(8–13), 626–632.
Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., and Williams, J. R. (2005). SWAT theoretical documentation version 2005, Grassland, Soil, and Water Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, Temple, 〈http://swat.tamu.edu/media/1292/SWAT2005theory.pdf〉.
Pandey, A., Chowdary, V. M., and Mal, B. C. (2007). “Identification of critical erosion prone areas in the small agricultural watershed using USLE, GIS and remote sensing.” Water Resour. Manage., 21(4), 729–746.
Refsgaard, J. C., and Storm, B. (1995). “MIKE SHE.” Computer models in watershed hydrology, V. P. Singh, ed., Water Resources Publications, Highland Ranch, CO, 809–846.
Rosenzweig, C., et al. (2004). “Water resources for agriculture in a changing climate: International case studies.” Global Environ. Change, 14(4), 345–360.
Sardar, B., Singh, A. K., Raguwanshi, N. S., and Chatterjee, C. (2014). “Hydrological modeling to identify and manage critical erosion prone areas for improving reservoir life: A case study of Barakar basin.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 196–204.
Schaldach, R., Koch, J., Beek, T. A., Eynast, E., and Florke, M. (2012). “Current and future irrigation water requirements in pan-Europe: An integrated analysis of socio-economic and climate scenarios.” Global Planet. Change., 94–95, 33–45.
Shi, Z. H., Ai, L., Li, X., Huang, X. D., Wu, G. L., and Liao, W. (2013). “Partial least-squares regression for linking land-cover patterns to soil erosion and sediment yield in watersheds.” J. Hydrol., 498, 165–176.
Singh, G., Babu, R., Pratap, N., Bhushan, L. S., and Abrol, I. P. (1992). “Soil erosion rate in India.” J. Soil Water Conserv., 47(1), 97–99.
Singh, R., Tiwari, K. N., and Mal, B. C. (2006). “Hydrological studies for small watershed in India using the ANSWERS model.” J. Hydrol., 318(1–4), 184–199.
Srinivasan, M. S., Gerard, M. P., Veith, T. L., Gburek, W. J., and Steenhuis, T. S. (2005). “Watershed scale modeling of critical source areas of runoff generation and phosphorus transport.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 41(2), 361–377.
Tripathi, M. P., Panda, R. K., and Raghuwanshi, N. S. (2003). “Identification and prioritization of critical sub-watersheds for soil conservation management using SWAT model.” Biosyst. Eng., 85(3), 365–379.
Tripathi, M. P., Panda, R. K., and Raghuwanshi, N. S. (2005). “Development of effective management plan for critical sub-watersheds using SWAT model.” Hydrol. Processes, 19(3), 809–826.
Van Griensven, A., Meixner, T., Grunwald, S., Bishop, T., Diluzio, M., and Srinivasan, R. (2006). “A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models.” J. Hydrol., 324(1–4), 10–23.
van Roosmalen, L., Sonnenborg, T. O., and Jensen, K. H. (2009). “Impact of climate and land use change on the hydrology of a large-scale agricultural catchment.” Water Resour. Res., 45(7), W00A15.
Verstraeten, G. (2006). “Regional scale modelling of hillslope sediment delivery with SRTM elevation data.” Geomorphology, 81(1–2), 128–140.
Yan, B., Fang, N. F., Zhang, P. C., and Shi, Z. H. (2013). “Impacts of land use change on watershed streamflow and sediment yield: An assessment using hydrologic modelling and partial least squares regression.” J. Hydrol., 484, 26–37.
Yan, H., and Edwards, F. (2012). “Effects of land use change on hydrologic response at a watershed scale, Arkansas.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 1779–1785.
Young, R. A., Onstad, C. A., Bosch, D. D., and Anderson, W. P. (1989). “AGNPS: A nonpoint source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds.” J. Soil Water Conserv. 44(2), 168–173.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 20Issue 6June 2015

History

Received: Nov 24, 2013
Accepted: Aug 27, 2014
Published online: Oct 6, 2014
Discussion open until: Mar 6, 2015
Published in print: Jun 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sanjeet Kumar [email protected]
Research Scholar, Dept. of Agricultural and Food Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721302, India. E-mail: [email protected]
Ashok Mishra [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Agricultural and Food Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721302, India (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Narendra Singh Raghuwanshi [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Agricultural and Food Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721302, India. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share