Stratification of NWP Forecasts for Medium-Range Ensemble Streamflow Forecasting
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 20, Issue 7
Abstract
Improving river flow forecasts for longer lead times by incorporating numerical weather predictions (NWP) into streamflow forecasting systems has attracted hydrologists in recent years. The process turns considerably complex and resource hungry when ensembles of NWP forecasts instead of any single NWP output are used to feed the flow forecasting models in order to capture the uncertainties in hydrological forecasting. This paper presents, for the first time, a comparison of three statistical stratification techniques for simplifying the input precipitation ensemble forecasts driving a river flow forecasting system. A data-driven flow forecasting model developed for the Waikato River in New Zealand using genetic expression programming (GEP) was forced by the 10-days-ahead ensemble precipitation forecasts issued by three meteorological .centers in different parts of the world including the United Kingdom, Canada, and China. The three precipitation ensembles, comprising 51, 21, and 15 members respectively, were reduced to a smaller ensemble consisting of only 5 members by static, dynamic, and cluster stratification. The 10-days-ahead river flow forecasts resulting from the full and reduced precipitation ensembles were compared against the corresponding flows observed during the whole year 2012. The three stratification mechanisms vary in complexity, and two of them are novel in their application to streamflow forecasting. The forecasts were compared for four different attributes including accuracy, reliability, resolution skill, and the maximum flow limit, each targeting a different aspect of the forecast performance. The results indicate that, in general, the flow forecasts driven by all three smaller ensembles were comparable with their full counterpart for all three forecasting centers. The cluster-stratified approach outperformed all others for most of the tested forecast attributes. The performance of static-stratified ensembles was not too far from the cluster-stratified ensembles despite it being significantly simple compared to the latter. The dynamic-stratified ensembles were least in competing with the full ensembles except for the maximum flow limit.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Addor, N., Jaun, S., Fundel, F., and Zappa, M. (2011). “An operational hydrological ensemble prediction system for the city of Zurich (Switzerland): Skill, case studies and scenarios.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15(7), 2327–2347.
Atger, F. (1999). “Verification of intense precipitation forecasts from single models and ensemble prediction systems.” Nonlinear Processes Geophys., 8(6), 401–417.
Azamathulla, H. M., Ghani, A., Leow, C. S., and Chang, C. K. (2011). “Gene-expression programming for the development of a stage-discharge curve of the Pahang river.” Water Resour. Manage., 25(11), 2901–2916.
Bao, H., and Zhao, L. (2012). “Development and application of an atmospheric-hydrological-hydraulic flood forecasting model driven by TIGGE ensemble forecasts.” Acta Meteorol. Sin., 26(1), 93–102.
Bogner, K., Cloke, H. L., Pappenberger, F., De Roo, A., and Thielen, J. (2011). “Improving the evaluation of hydrological multi-model forecast performance in the Upper Danube Catchment.” Int. J. River Basin Manage., 10(1), 1–12.
Bougeault, P., et al. (2010). “The THORPEX interactive grand global ensemble.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91(8), 1059–1072.
Buizza, R., and Palmer, T. N. (1998). “Impact of ensemble size on ensemble prediction.” Mon. Weather Rev., 126(9), 2503–2518.
Buizza, R., Milleer, M., and Palmer, T. N. (1999). “Stochastic representation of model uncertainties in the ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System.” Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 125(560), 2887–2908.
Clark, A. J., Kain, J. S., Stensrud, D. J., Xue, M., and Du, J. (2011). “Probabilistic precipitation forecast skill as a function of ensemble size and spatial scale in a convection-allowing ensemble.” Mon. Weather Rev., 139(5), 1410–1418.
Cloke, H. L., and Pappenberger, F. (2009). “Ensemble flood forecasting: A review.” J. Hydrol., 375(3–4), 613–626.
Duan, Q., Ajami, N. K., Gao, X., and Sorooshian, S. (2007). “Multi-model ensemble hydrologic prediction using Bayesian model averaging.” Adv. Water Resour., 30(5), 1371–1386.
Ebert, C., Bardossy, A., and Bliefernicht, J. (2007). “Selecting members of an EPS for flood forecasting systems by using atmospheric circulation patterns.” Geophys. Res. Abstr., 9, 08177h.
Fernando, A., Shamseldin, A., and Abrahart, R. (2011). “Comparison of two data-driven approaches for daily river flow forecasting.” MODSIM2011, 19th Int. Congress on Modelling and Simulation, F. Chan, D. Marinova, and R. S. Anderssen, eds., Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, 1077–1083.
Ferreira, C. (2001). “Gene expression programming: A new adaptive algorithm for solving problems.” Complex Syst., 13(2), 87–129.
Ferreira, C. (2006). Gene expression programming: Mathematical modeling by an artificial intelligence, 2nd Ed., Springer, Germany.
Guven, A., and Aytek, A. (2009). “A new approach for stage-discharge relationship: Gene-expression programming.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 812–820.
Hartmann, H. C., Pagano, T. C., Sorooshiam, S., and Bales, R. (2002). “Evaluating seasonal climate forecasts from user perspectives.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83(5), 683–698.
He, Y., et al. (2009). “Tracking the uncertainty in flood alerts driven by grand ensemble weather predictions.” Meteorol. Appl., 16(1), 91–101.
Hopson, T. M., and Webster, P. J. (2010). “A 1–10 day ensemble forecasting scheme for the major river basins of Bangladesh: Forecasting severe floods of 2003–07.” J. Hydrometeorol., 11(3), 618–641.
Khan, M. M., Shamseldin, A. Y., and Melville, B. W. (2014). “Impact of ensemble size on forecasting occurrence of rainfall using TIGGE precipitation forecasts.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 732–738.
Kisi, O., Shiri, J., and Nikoofar, B. (2012). “Forecasting daily lake levels using artificial intelligence approaches.” Comput. Geosci., 41, 169–180.
Makridakis, S., Wheelwright, S. C., and Hyndman, R. J. (1998). Forecasting methods and applications, 3rd Ed., Wiley, New York.
Mason, I. (1982). “A model for assessment of weather forecasts.” Aust. Meteorol. Mag., 30(4), 291–303.
Molteni, F., Buizza, R., Marsigli, C., and Paccagnella, T. (2001). “A strategy for high-resolution ensemble prediction. I: Definition of representative members and global-model experiments.” Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 127(576), 2069–2094.
O’Connor, K. M., Goswami, M., Bhattarai, K. P., and Shamseldin, A. Y. (2003). “A comparison of the lead-time discharge forecasts of the ‘Perfect’ and ‘Naïve-AR’ quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) input scenarios, to asses the value of having good QPFs.” Workshop Paper presented by K.M. O’Connor at the ESF LESC Exploratory Workshop held at Bologna, Italy.
Pappenberger, F., Bartholmes, J., Thielen, J., Cloke, H. L., Buizza, R., and de Roo, A. (2008). “New dimensions in early flood warning across the globe using grand-ensemble weather predictions.” Geophys. Res. Lett., 35(10), L10404.
Pappenberger, F., Thielen, J., and Medico, M. D. (2011). “The impact of weather forecast improvements on large scale hydrology: Analysing a decade of forecasts of the European flood alert system.” Hydrol. Processes, 25(7), 1091–1113.
R Development Core Team. (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria.
Siccardi, F., Boni, G., Ferraris, L., and Rudari, R. (2005). “A hydrometeorological approach for probabilistic flood forecast.” J. Geophys. Res. D: Atmos., 110(5), 1–9.
Verbunt, M., Walser, A., Gurtz, J., Montani, A., and Schär, C. (2007). “Probabilistic flood forecasting with a limited-area ensemble prediction system: Selected case studies.” J. Hydrometeorol., 8(4), 897–909.
Viviroli, D., Gurtz, J., and Zappa, M. (2007). The hydrological modelling system PREVAH, Univ. of Berne, Institute of Geographiy, Switzerland.
Wang, H., and Song, M. (2011). “Ckmeans. 1d. dp: Optimal k-means clustering in one dimension by dynamic programming.” R J., 3(2), 29–33.
Wilks, D. S. (1995). Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences: An introduction, Vol. 59, Academic Press, MA, 233–283.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 20 • Issue 7 • July 2015
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 27, 2013
Accepted: Jul 22, 2014
Published online: Oct 10, 2014
Discussion open until: Mar 10, 2015
Published in print: Jul 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.