Technical Papers
Aug 25, 2014

Statistical Modeling of Daily Water Temperature Attributes on the Sacramento River

This article has been corrected.
VIEW CORRECTION
This article is a reply.
VIEW THE ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 20, Issue 5

Abstract

The Sacramento River is the largest river in California, and an important source of water for agricultural, municipal, and industrial users. Input to the Sacramento River comes from Shasta Lake and is controlled by operators of Shasta Dam, who are challenged with meeting the competing needs of these users while also maintaining a cold water habitat for Endangered Species Act (ESA) listed winter-run Chinook salmon. The cold water habitat goals are constrained by the volume of cold water storage in the lake, which operators attempt to selectively deploy throughout the critical late summer/fall window. To make informed decisions about the release of this limited cold water resource, skillful forecasts of downstream water temperature attributes at the seasonal time scale are crucial. To this end, we offer a generalized linear modeling (GLM) framework with a local polynomial method for function estimation, to provide predictions of a range of daily water temperature attributes (maximum daily water temperature, daily temperature range, number of hours of threshold exceedance, and probability of threshold exceedance/nonexceedance). These attributes are varied in nature (i.e., discrete, continuous, categorical, etc.), and the GLM provides a general framework to modeling all of them. A suite of predictors that impact water temperatures are considered, including current and prior day flow, water temperature of upstream releases, air temperature, and precipitation. A two-step model selection is proposed. First, an objective method based on Bayesian Information Criteria (BIC) is used in a global model to select the best set of predictors for each attribute; then the parameters of the local polynomial method for the selected best set of predictors are obtained using generalized cross validation (GCV). Daily weather ensembles from stochastic weather generators are coupled to the GLM models to provide ensembles of water temperature attributes and consequently, the probability distributions to obtain risk estimates. We demonstrate the utility of this approach by modeling water temperature attributes for a temperature compliance point on the Sacramento River below Shasta Dam. Regulations on the dam depress the water temperature forecasting skill; to show this, we present skillful results from applying the approach to an unregulated location in the Pacific Northwest. The proposed method is general, can be ported across sites, and can be used in climate change studies.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research is funded by the National Aeronautics and Science Administration’s Earth-Sum Science Applied Sciences Program, Grant # NNX08AK72G. Andrew Pike NMFS (Southwest Fisheries Science Center) and Russ Yaworsky (U.S. Bureau of Reclamation) provided helpful guidance on thermal criteria and reservoir operations, respectively. We thank the three anonymous reviewers, editor and associate editor for their valuable comments and suggestions which helped improve the manuscript.

References

Apipattanavis, S., Podestá, G., Rajagopalan, B., and Katz, R. W. (2007). “A semiparametric multivariate and multisite weather generator.” Water Resour. Res., 43(11), W11401.
Apipattanavis, S., Rajagopalan, B., and Lall, U. (2010). “Local polynomial–based flood frequency estimator for mixed population.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 680–691.
Benyahya, L., Caissie, D., St-Hilaire, A., Ouarda, T. B. M. J., and Bobee, B. (2007). “A review of statistical water temperature models.” Can. Water Resour. J., 32(3), 179–192.
Bettelheim, M. (2001). Temperature and flow regulation in the Sacramento River and its effect on the Sacramento pikeminnow: A literature review, State of Colorado, Dept. of Fish and Game.
Bogan, T., Othmer, J., Mohseni, O., and Stefan, H. (2006). “Estimating extreme stream temperatures by the standard deviate method.” J. Hydrol., 317(3–4), 173–189.
Bracken, C., Rajagopalan, B., and Prairie, J. (2010). “A multisite seasonal ensemble streamflow forecasting technique.” Water Resour. Res., 46(3), W03532.
Brock, J. T., and Caupp, C. L. (1996). “Application of a DSSAMt water quality model—Truckee River, Nevada for Truckee River Operating Agreement (TROA) DEIS/DEIR: Simulated river temperatures for TROA.”, Rapid Creek Research, Boise, ID.
Caissie, D., El-Jabi, N., and Satish, M. G. (2001). “Modeling of maximum daily water temperatures in a small stream using air temperatures.” J. Hydrol., 251(1–2), 14–28.
Caldwell, R. J. (2013). “An integrated framework for modeling and mitigating water temperature impacts in the Sacramento River.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 208.
Caldwell, R. J., Gangopadhyay, S., Bountry, J., Lai, Y., and Elsner, M. M. (2013). “Statistical modeling of daily and subdaily stream temperatures: Application to the Methow River basin, Washington.” Water Resour. Res., 49(7), 4346–4361.
California Data Exchange Center (CDEC). (2011). Hydrologic data download, California Dept. of Water Resources, 〈http://cdec.water.ca.gov/〉 (Jan. 9, 2011).
Caraway, N. M., McCreight, J. L., and Rajagopalan, B. (2014). “Multisite stochastic weather generation using cluster analysis and k-nearest neighbor time series resampling.” J. Hydrol., 508, 197–213.
Carron, J. C., and Rajaram, H. (2001). “Impact of variable reservoir releases on management of downstream water temperatures.” Water Resour. Res., 37(6), 1733–1743.
Chandler, R. E. (2005). “On the use of generalized linear models for interpreting climate variability.” Environmetrics, 16(7), 699–715.
Chandler, R. E., and Wheater, H. S. (2002). “Analysis of rainfall variability using generalized linear models: A case study from the west of Ireland.” Water Resour. Res., 38(10), 1–11.
Chenard, J.-F., and Caissie, D. (2008). “Stream temperature modelling using artificial neural networks: Application on Catamaran Brook, New Brunswick, Canada.” Hydrol. Processes, 22(17), 3361–3372.
Danner, E. M., et al. (2012). “River temperature forecasting: A coupled-modeling framework for management of river habitat.” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens., 5(6), 1752–1760.
Dunham, J. B., Chandler, G., Rieman, B. E., and Martin, D. (2005). “Measuring stream temperature with digital dataloggers: A user’s guide.” GTR-RMRS-150, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO.
Furrer, E. M., and Katz, R. W. (2007). “Generalized linear modeling approach to stochastic weather generators.” Clim. Res., 34, 129–144.
Furrer, E. M., and Katz, R. W. (2008). “Improving the simulation of extreme precipitation events by stochastic weather generators.” Water Resour. Res., 44(12), W12439.
Grantz, K., Rajagopalan, B., Clark, M., and Zagona, E. (2005). “A technique for incorporating large-scale climate information in basin-scale ensemble streamflow forecasts.” Water Resour. Res., 41, W10410.
Hallock, R. J., and Fisher, F. W. (1985). Status of winter-run Chinook salmon in the Sacramento River, Anadromous Fisheries Branch, California Dept. of Fish and Game, 28.
Isaak, D. J. (2011). “Stream temperature monitoring and modeling: Recent advances and new tools for managers.” Stream notes, Stream Systems Technology Center, Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA, Fort Collins, CO, 1–7.
Lall, U., Rajagopalan, B., and Tarboton, D. G. (1996). “A Nonparametric wet/dry spell model for daily precipitation.” Water Resour. Res., 32(9), 2803–2823.
Lall, U., and Sharma, A. (1996). “A nearest neighbor bootstrap for time series resampling.” Water Resour. Res., 32(3), 679–693.
Loader, C. (1999). Local regression and likelihood, statistics and computing, Springer, New York, 290.
May, J. T., and Brown, L. R. (2002). “Fish communities of the Sacramento River basin: Implications for conservation of native fishes in the Central Valley, California.” Environ. Biol. Fishes, 63(4), 373–388.
McCullagh, P., and Nelder, J. A. (1989). Generalized linear models, Chapman and Hall, London.
Mohseni, O., Stefan, H. G., and Erickson, T. R. (1998). “A nonlinear regression model for weekly stream temperatures.” Water Resour. Res. 34(10), 2685–2692.
Myrick, C. A., and Cech, J. J., Jr. (2000). “Swimming performances of four California stream fishes: Temperature effects.” Environ. Biol. Fishes, 58(3), 289–295.
Neumann, D. W., Rajagopalan, B., and Zagona, E. A. (2003). “Regression model for daily maximum stream temperature.” J. Environ. Eng., 667–674.
Neumann, D. W., Zagona, E. A., and Rajagopalan, B. (2006). “A decision support system to manage summer stream temperatures.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 42(5), 1275–1284.
Pike, A., et al. (2013). “River temperature prediction: Revisiting a stochastic dynamics approach.” Water Resour. Res., 49(9), 5168–5182.
Podesta, G., et al. (2009). “Decadal climate variability in the Argentine Pampas: Regional impacts of plausible climate scenarios on agricultural systems.” Clim. Res., 40, 199–210.
Rajagopalan, B., and Lall, U. (1999). “A k-nearest neighbor simulator for daily precipitation and other weather variables.” Water Resour. Res., 35(10), 3089–3101.
Regonda, S. K., Rajagopalan, B., Clark, M., and Pitlick, J. (2005). “Seasonal cycle shifts in hydroclimatology over the western United States.” J. Clim., 18(2), 372–384.
Regonda, S. K., Rajagopalan, B., Clark, M., and Zagona, E. (2006). “A multimodel ensemble forecast framework: Application to spring seasonal flows in the Gunnison River basin.” Water Resour. Res., 42(9), W09404.
San Francisco Estuary Project (SFEP). (1992). State of the estuary: A report on conditions and problems in the San Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary, SFEP, Oakland, CA.
Taylor, R. L. (1998). “Simulation of hourly stream temperature and daily dissolved solids for the Truckee River, California and Nevada.” Water Resources Investigations Rep. No. WRI 98-4064, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.
Towler, E., Rajagopalan, B., Gilleland, E., Summers, R. S., Yates, D., and Katz, R. W. (2010a). “Modeling hydrologic and water quality extremes in a changing climate: A statistical approach based on extreme value theory.” Water Resour. Res., 46(11), W11504.
Towler, E., Rajagopalan, B., and Summers, R. S. (2009). “Using parametric and nonparametric methods to model total organic carbon, alkalinity, and pH after conventional surface water treatment.” Environ. Eng. Sci., 26(8), 1299–1308.
Towler, E., Rajagopalan, B., Summers, R. S., and Yates, D. (2010b). “An approach for probabilistic forecasting of seasonal turbidity threshold exceedance.” Water Resour. Res., 46(6), W06511.
United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR). (2004). Long-term central valley project operations criteria and plan, U.S. Dept. of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Mid-Pacific Region, Sacramento, CA, 238.
Van Vleck, G. K., Deukmejian, G., and Kennedy, D. N. (1988). Water temperature effects on Chinook salmon with emphasis on the Sacramento River—A literature review, Dept. of Water Resources, Northern District, CA. http://www.water.ca.gov/pubs/environment/fish/water_temperature_effects_on_chinook_salmon-emphasis_on_the_sacramento_river__a_literature_review/watertempeffecchinooksalmon.pdf.
Venables, W. N., and Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S, Springer, New York.
Webb, B. W., Hannah, D. M., Moore, R. D., Brown, L. E., and Nobilis, F. (2008). “Recent advances in stream and river temperature research.” Hydrol. Processes, 22(7), 902–918.
Weirich, S. R., Silverstein, J., and Rajagopalan, B. (2011). “Effect of average flow and capacity utilization on effluent water quality from US municipal wastewater treatment facilities.” Water Res., 45(14), 4279–4286.
Yates, D., et al. (2008). “Climate warming, water storage, and Chinook salmon in California’s Sacramento Valley.” Clim. Change, 91(3–4), 335–350.
Yates, D., Gangopadhyay, S., Rajagopalan, B., and Strzepek, K. (2003). “A technique for generating regional climate scenarios using a nearest neighbor algorithm.” Water Resour. Res., 39(7), 1199.
Zachman, B., Rajagopalan, B., and Summers, R. S. (2007). “Modeling NOM breakthrough GAC adsorbers using nonprametric regression techniques.” Environ. Eng. Sci., 24(9), 1280–1296.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 20Issue 5May 2015

History

Received: Jun 4, 2013
Accepted: May 6, 2014
Published online: Aug 25, 2014
Discussion open until: Jan 25, 2015
Published in print: May 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jason Caldwell
Civil Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309.
Balaji Rajagopalan, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Senior Project Engineer, Leonard Rice Engineers, Inc., 1221 Auraria Parkway, Denver, CO 80204; formerly, Civil Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Eric Danner
Research Ecologist, Fisheries Ecology Division, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, 110 Shaffer Rd., Santa Cruz, CA 95060.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share