Variability in Canadian Seasonal Streamflow Information and Its Implication for Hydrometric Network Design
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 19, Issue 8
Abstract
Hydrologic extremes such as severe storms, floods, and droughts are inherently seasonal in nature and remain the main concern in designing hydrometric networks. In general, hydrometric networks have been designed without paying particular attention to the effect of seasonal streamflow information (SSI) at gauging stations on the efficiency of the hydrometric networks. This paper evaluates the effect of SSI on streamflow networks based on nonparametric implementation of entropy theory using the kernel density approach for estimating the mutual information between gauging stations on a seasonal basis. Overall, it is shown that the SSI of individual stations is season dependent and the efficiency of the streamflow network is also season dependent, therefore the effect of seasonality should be incorporated in future hydrometric network design. This methodology was applied at five river basins in Canada and its role for network design is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR) and the Alberta Environment. The authors are thankful to the editor, Ilias Pechlivanidis, and two anonymous reviewers for constructive suggestions, which significantly improved the quality of this manuscript. The authors acknowledge the student contribution of Francis Gagnon and David Stevenson in preparing the analysis data and maps.
References
Alberta Environment. (2008). 〈http://environment.alberta.ca/apps/basins/default.aspx〉.
Alfonso, L., Liyan, H., Lobbrecht, A., and Price, R. (2013). “Information theory applied to evaluate the discharge monitoring network of the Magdalena River.” J. Hydroinf., 15(1), 211–228.
Alfonso, L., Lobbrecht, A., and Price, R. (2010). “Information theory-based approach for location of monitoring water level gauges in polders.” Water Resour. Res., 46(3), W03528.
Benson, M. A. (1965). “Allocation of stream-gaging stations within a country.” Design of Hydrological Networks Symp. I, Publ. 67, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 222–228.
Bradley, A. A., Lidard, C. P., Nelson, B. R., Smith, J. A., and Young, C. B. (2002). “Raingage network design using NEXRAD precipitation estimates.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 38(5), 1393–1407.
Coulibaly, P., and Burn, D. H. (2005). “Spatial and temporal variability of Canadian seasonal streamflows.” J. Clim., 18(1), 191–210.
De Martino, G., Fontana, N., Marini, G., and Singh, V. (2013). “Variability and trend in seasonal precipitation in the continental United States.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 630–640.
Douglas, E., Vogel, R., and Kroll, C. (2002). “Impact of streamflow persistence on hydrologic design.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 220–227.
Environment Canada. (2004). HYDAT version 2.04 (CD-ROM), Gatineau, QC, Canada.
Garbrecht, J., Van Liew, M., and Brown, G. (2004). “Trends in precipitation, streamflow, and evapotranspiration in the great plains of the United States.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 360–367.
Khan, S., et al. (2006). “Nonlinear statistics reveals stronger ties between ENSO and the tropical hydrological cycle.” Geophys. Res. Lett., 33(24), L24402.
Koirala, S., Gentry, R., Perfect, E., Mulholland, P., and Schwartz, J. (2011). “Hurst analysis of hydrologic and water quality time series.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 717–724.
Kornelson, K. C., and Coulibaly, P. (2014). “Comparison of interpolation, statistical and data-driven methods for the imputation of missing values in distributed soil moisture datasets.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 26–43.
Krstanovic, P. F., and Singh, V. P. (1992a). “Evaluation of rainfall networks using entropy: I. Theoretical development.” Water Resour. Manage., 6, 279–293.
Kumar, S., Merwade, V., Kam, J., and Thurner, K. (2009). “Streamflow trends in Indiana: effects of long term persistence, precipitation and subsurface drains.” J. Hydrol., 374(1–2), 171–183.
Laize, C. L. R. (2004). “Integration of spatial data sets to support the review of hydrometric networks and the identification of representative catchment.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 8(6), 1103–1117.
Li, C., Singh, V. P., and Mishra, A. K. (2012). “Entropy theory-based criterion for hydrometric network evaluation and design: Maximum information minimum redundancy.” Water Resour. Res., 48(5), W05521.
Markus, M., Knapp, H. V., and Tasker, G. D. (2003). “Entropy and generalized least square methods in assessment of the regional value of streamgages.” J. Hydrol., 283(1–4), 107–121.
Mishra, A. K., and Coulibaly, P. (2009). “Development in hydrometric networks design: A review.” Rev. Geophys., 47(2), RG2001.
Mishra, A. K., and Coulibaly, P. (2010). “Hydrometric network evaluations for Canadian watersheds.” J. Hydrol., 380(3–4), 420–437.
Mishra, A. K., Mehmet, O., and Vijay, P. S. (2009). “Trend and persistence of precipitation under climate change scenarios for Kansabati basin, India.” Hydrol. Process., 23(16), 2345–2357.
Mishra, A. K., and Singh, V. P. (2010). “Changes in extreme precipitations in Texas.” J. Geophys. Res., 115(D14), D14106.
Mishra, A. K., Singh, V. P., and Özger, M. (2011). “Seasonal streamflow extremes in Texas river basins: Uncertainty, trends, and teleconnections.” J. Geophys. Res., 116(D8), D08108.
Moon, Y., Rajagopalan, B., and Lall, U. (1995). “Estimation of mutual information using kernel density estimators.” Phys. Rev. E, 52(3), 2318–2321.
Moss, M. E. (1982). Concepts and techniques in hydrological network design, WMO Publication, 580.
Nour, M. H., Smit, D. W., and El-Din, M. G. (2006). “Geostatistical mapping of precipitation: Implications for rain gauge network design.” Water Sci. Technol., 53(10), 101–110.
Rodríguez-Iturbe, I., and Mejia, J. M. (1974). “The design of rainfall networks in time and space.” Water Resour. Res., 10(4), 713–728.
Scott, D. W. (1992). Multivariate density estimation: theory, practice and visualisation. Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Wiley, New York.
Şen, Z. (2012). “Innovative trend analysis methodology.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 1042–1046.
Şen, Z., Altunkaynak, A., and Özger, M. (2003). “Autorun persistence of hydrologic design.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 329–338.
Shannon, C. E. (1948). “A mathematical theory of communication.” Bell Syst. Tech. J., 27, 379–423, 623–656.
Sharma, A. (2000). “Seasonal to interannual rainfall probabilistic forecasts for improved water supply management: Part 1—A strategy for system predictor identification.” J. Hydrol., 239(1–4), 232–239.
Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Monographs on statistics and applied probability, Chapman and Hall, New York.
Singh, V. P. (1997). “The use of entropy in hydrology and water resources.” Hydrol. Process., 11(6), 587–626.
Sivakumar, B. (2009). “Nonlinear dynamics and chaos in hydrologic systems: Latest developments and a look forward.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 23(7), 1027–1036.
Sivakumar, B., and Singh, V. P. (2011). “Hydrologic system complexity and nonlinear dynamic concepts for a catchment classification framework.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 8(3), 4427–4458.
Stedinger, J. R., and Tasker, G. D. (1985). “Regional hydrologic analysis: 1. Ordinary, weighted, and generalized least squares compared.” Water Resour. Res., 21(9), 1421–1432.
Zhang, Z., Dehoff, A., and Pody, R. (2010). “New approach to identify trend pattern of streamflows.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 244–248.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 3, 2012
Accepted: Jan 13, 2014
Published online: Jan 15, 2014
Published in print: Aug 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Oct 21, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.