Grid-Size Dependency of Evapotranspiration Simulations in Shallow Aquifers: An Optimal Approach
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 19, Issue 10
Abstract
This research aims at improving the performance of regional groundwater models by incorporating high-resolution elevation data into the head-dependent packages of MODFLOW. Model code specific to the evapotranspiration package (EVT) of MODFLOW was modified to account for the variability in elevation data and to effectively delineate the evapotranspiration (ET) simulated region at user-specified digital elevation model (DEM) resolution. The regional groundwater model of the Rincon Valley–Mesilla Basins (NMOSE-2007 flow model) was improved and considered to evaluate and validate the developed code. The base DEM of the study area is smoothened and aggregated to various resampled resolutions that are integer divisors of NMOSE-2007 flow model resolution for use with ET simulation. A gradual decrease in ET outflow is observed when the variability in elevation is eliminated across the grid cell. Also, changes in cumulative ET outflow (as a fraction of total outflow) at different resampled grids followed a similar trend during the simulation. The computational cost is high for the models simulated at fine resolution, whereas the simulation accuracy is low for the models simulated at coarse resolution. To select the optimum resampled DEM resolution to simulate the ET component of groundwater for use with the NMOSE-2007 flow model, a chi-square test of homogeneity was performed at 5 and 10% significance levels by considering computational cost and simulation accuracy as the base parameters. Results of the statistical analysis concluded that simulating ET component at 80.467-m resolution and integrating the outflows to model cell (402.336 m) resolution would significantly improve the performance of the flow model without compromising on the computational cost.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Bawazir, A. S. (2000). “Saltcedar and Cottonwood riparian evapotranspirationin the Middle Rio Grande.” Ph.D. dissertation, New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces, NM.
Brunner, P., Li, H. T., Kinzelbach, W., Li, W. P., and Dong, X. G. (2008). “Extracting phreatic evaporation from remotely sensed maps of evapotranspiration.” Water Resour. Res., 44(8), W08428, 12.
Chaubey, I., Cotter, A. S., Costello, T. A., and Soerens, T. S. (2005). “Effect of DEM data resolution on SWAT output uncertainty.” Hydrol. Process. J., 19(3), 621–628.
Harbaugh, A. W. (2005). “MODFLOW-2005: The US Geological Survey modular ground-water model—The ground-water flow process.” US Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 6-A16, Reston, VA.
Harbaugh, A. W., Banta, E. R., Hill, M. C., and McDonald, M. G. (2000). “MODFLOW-2000: The US Geological Survey modular groundwater model—User guide to modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process.”, Reston, VA, 121.
Hawley, J. W., and Kennedy, J. F. (2004). “Creation of digital hydrogeologic framework model of the Mesilla basin and southern Jornada basin.”, New Mexico Water Resources Research Institute, Las Cruces, NM, 105.
Kambhammettu, BVN. P. (2010). “Effect of elevation resolution on evapotranspiration simulations using MODFLOW.” Ph.D. dissertation, New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces, NM.
Kambhammettu, BVN. P., Schmid, W., King, J. P., and Creel, B. J. (2012). “Effect of elevation resolution on evapotranspiration simulations using MODFLOW.” Ground Water J., 50(3), 367–375.
Kuniansky, E. L., Lowery, M. A., and Campbell, B. G. (2009). “How processing of digital elevation models can affect simulated water budgets.” Ground Water J., 47(1), 97–107.
Li, H. T., Kinzelbach, W., Brunner, P., Li, W. P., and Dong, X. G. (2008). “Topography representation methods for improving evaporation simulation in groundwater modeling.” J. Hydrol., 356(1–2), 199–208.
Luo, W. (1994). “Calibrating the SCS Blaney-Criddle crop coefficients for the Middle Rio Grande basin.” Master’s thesis, New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces, NM.
Maddock, T., III, and Baird, K. J. (2003). A riparian evapotranspiration package for MODFLOW-96 and MODFLOW-2000, US Geological Survey, Denver, CO.
McDonald, M. G., and Harbaugh, A. W. (1988). “A modular three-dimensional finite difference ground-water flow model.”, US Geological Survey, Denver, CO.
McDonald, M. G., and Harbaugh, A. W. (1996). “Programmer’s documentation for MODFLOW-96, an update to the US Geological Survey modular finite-difference ground-water flow model.” US Geological Survey Open-File Rep., US Geological Survey, Reston, VA, 96–486.
Mehl, S., Hill, M. C., and Leake, S. A. (2006). “Comparison of local grid refinement methods for MODFLOW.” Ground Water J., 44(6), 792–796.
Niswonger, R. G., and Prudic, D. E. (2005). “Documentation of the streamflow-routing (SFR2) package to include unsaturated flow beneath streams—A modification to SFR1.” Chapter A13: US geological survey techniques and methods Book 6, US Geological Survey, Reston, VA, 47.
Peifa, W., Jinkang, D., Xuezhi, F., and Guoding, K. (2006). “Effect of uncertainty of grid DEM on TOPMODEL: Evaluation and analysis.” Chin. Geophys. Sci. J., 16(4), 320–326.
Prudic, D. E., Konikow, L. F., and Banta, E. R. (2004). “A new streamflow-routing (SFR1) package to simulate stream-aquifer interaction with MODFLOW-2000.”, Reston, VA, 95.
Schmid, W., and Hanson, R. T. (2009). “The farm process version 2 (FMP2) for MODFLOW-2005—Modifications and upgrades to FMP1.” Chapter A32: US Geological Survey techniques in water resources investigations, Book 6, US Geological Survey, Reston, VA, 102.
Schmid, W., Hanson, R. T., Maddock, T., III, and Leake, S. A. (2006). “User’s guide for the farm process (FMP1) for the US Geological Survey’s modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model, MODFLOW-2000.”, Reston, VA, 127.
S.S. Papadopulos and Associates. (2007). “Groundwater flow model for administration and management in the Lower Rio Grande basin: Main report.” Technical Rep. Prepared for the State of New Mexico, Boulder, CO.
Usul, N., and Pasaoğullari, O. (2003). “Effect of map scale and grid size for hydrological modelling.” Proc., ICGRHWE at the Three Gorges Dam, International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS), France, 602–607.
Vieux, B. (1993). “DEM aggregation and smoothing effects on surface runoff modeling.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 310–338.
Waltemeyer, S. D. (2001). “Estimates of mountain-front streamflow available for potential recharge to the Tularosa basin, New Mexico.”, Reston, VA, 8.
Wang, M., Hjelmfelt, A. T., and Garbrecht, J. (2000). “DEM Aggregation for watershed modeling.” J. Am. Water Res. Assoc., 36(3), 579–584.
Wu, S., Li, J., and Huang, G. H. (2008). “Characterization and evaluation of elevation data uncertainty in water resources modeling with GIS.” J. Water Resour. Manage., 22, 959–972.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 19 • Issue 10 • October 2014
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 21, 2012
Accepted: Dec 11, 2013
Published online: Dec 13, 2013
Published in print: Oct 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Nov 30, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.