Technical Papers
Sep 14, 2013

Exploiting the Topographic Information in a PDM-Based Conceptual Hydrological Model

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 19, Issue 6

Abstract

In this work, a conceptual lumped model was developed to simulate runoff and analyze hydrological processes with the goal of incorporating the morphological information into a probability-distributed model (PDM). PDMs usually describe the process of runoff generation as the result of soil saturation excess caused by precipitation with soil storage capacity represented by a spatially distributed quantity and described by a probability distribution. The proposed model, called topography-based probability distributed model (TOPDM), based on a simple water balance whose components are basin soil moisture storage, precipitation, drainage to groundwater, evapotranspiration, and Dunnian and Hortonian surface runoff, is the result of the combination and integration of the topographic index within a PDM. A TOPDM was applied to the Baron Fork basin in Oklahoma in this research, and simulation results show that it provides a reasonably good estimation of runoff and a realistic representation of physical process in the catchment confirmed by the comparison with soil moisture data and with the results provided by a more complex, physically based distributed hydrological model.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Dr. Haksu Lee for his kind availability to provide Westville soil moisture data.

References

Arnone, E., Noto, L. V., Lepore, C., and Bras, R. L. (2011). “Physically-based and distributed approach to analyze rainfall-triggered landslides at watershed scale.” Geomorphology, 133(3–4), 121–131.
Bell, V. A., Kay, A. L., Jones, R. G., and Moore, R. J. (2007). “Development of a high-resolution-grid-based river flow model for use with regional climate model output.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11(1), 532–549.
Bell, V. A., Kay, A. L., Jones, R. G., Moore, R. J., and Reynard, N. S. (2009). “Use of soil data in a grid-based hydrological model to estimate spatial variation in changing flood risk across the UK.” J. Hydrol., 377(3–4), 335–350.
Bell, V. A., and Moore, R. J. (1998a). “A grid-based distributed flood-forecasting model for use with weather radar data. Part 1: Formulation.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 2(2–3) 265–281.
Bell, V. A., and Moore, R. J. (1998b). “A grid-based distributed flood-forecasting model for use with weather radar data. Part 2: Case studies.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 2(2–3) 283–298.
Beven, K. (1989). “Changing ideas in hydrology—The case of physically-based models.” J. Hydrol., 105(1–2), 157–172.
Beven, K. J., and Binley, A. M. (1992). “The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction.” Hydrol. Proc., 6(3), 279–298.
Beven, K. J., and Kirkby, M. J. (1979). “A physically-based variable contribution area of model of basin hydrology.” Hydrol. Sci. Bull., 24(1), 43–69.
Brock, F. V., et al. (1995). “The Oklahoma Mesonet: A technical overview.” J. Atmos. Ocean Technol., 12(1), 5–19.
Candela, A., Noto, L. V., and Aronica, G. (2005). “Influence of roughness surface in hydrological response of semiarid catchments.” J. Hydrol., 313(3–4), 119–131.
Caracciolo, D., Arnone, E., and Noto, L. (2014). “Influence of spatial precipitation sampling on hydrological response at catchment scale.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 544–553.
Eagleson, P. S. (1978). “Climate, soil, and vegetation. 3. A simplified model of soil moisture movement in the liquid phase.” Water Resour. Res., 14(5), 722–730.
Eagleson, P. S. (2002). Ecohydrology—Darwinian expression of vegetation form and function, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Famiglietti, J. S., and Wood, E. F. (1994). “Multiscale modeling of spatially variable water and energy balance processes.” Water Resour. Res., 30(11), 3061–3078.
Famiglietti, J. S., Wood, E. F., Sivapalan, M., and Thongs, D. J. (1992). “A catchment scale water balance model for FIFE.” J. Geophys. Res., 97(D17), 18997–19007.
Franchini, M., Wendling, J., Obled, C., and Todini, E. (1996). “Physical interpretation and sensitivity analysis of the TOPMODEL.” J. Hydrol., 175(1–4), 293–338.
Francipane, A., Ivanov, V. Y., Noto, L. V., Istanbulluoglu, E., Arnone, E., and Bras, R. L. (2012). “tRIBS-erosion: A parsimonious physically-based model for studying catchment hydro-geomorphic response.” CATENA, 92, 216–231.
Goodrich, D. C., Faurès, J.-M., Woolhiser, D. A., Lane, L. J., and Sorooshian, S. (1995). “Measurement and analysis of small-scale convective storm rainfall variability.” J. Hydrol., 173(1–4), 283–308.
Grayson, R., and Blöschl, G. (2000). Spatial patterns in catchment hydrology: Observations and modelling, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Grimaldi, S., Petroselli, A., Alonso, G., and Nardi, F. (2010). “Flow time estimation with variable hillslope velocity in ungauged basins.” Adv. Water Resour., 33(10), 1216–1223.
Helms, M., Ihringer, J., and Mikovec, R. (2012). “Hydrological simulation of extreme flood scenarios for operational flood management at the Middle Elbe River.” Adv. Geosci., 32, 41–48.
Ivanov, V. Y., Vivoni, E. R., Bras, R. L., and Entekhabi, D. (2004a). “Catchment hydrologic response with a fully-distributed triangulated irregular network model.” Water Resour. Res., 40(11), W11102.
Ivanov, V. Y., Vivoni, E. R., Bras, R. L., and Entekhabi, D. (2004b). “Preserving high-resolution surface and rainfall data in operational-scale basin hydrology: A fully-distributed, physically-based approach.” J. Hydrol., 298(1–4), 80–111.
Jakeman, A. J., and Hornberger, G. M. (1993). “How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model?” Water Resour. Res., 29(8), 2637–2649.
Lee, H., Seo, D. J., and Koren, V. (2011). “Assimilation of streamflow and in situ soil moisture data into operational distributed hydrologic models: Effects of uncertainties in the data and initial model soil moisture states.” Adv. Water Resour., 34(12), 1597–1615.
Lepore, C., Arnone, E., Noto, L. V., Sivandran, G., and Bras, R. L. (2013). “Physically based modeling of rainfall-triggered landslides: A case study in the Luquillo Forest, Puerto Rico.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17(9), 3355–3677.
Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, A. W., Palmer, R. N., Wood, E. F., and Stakhiv, E. Z. (1999). “Water resources implications of global warming: A U.S. regional perspective.” Clim. Change, 43(3), 537–579.
Liuzzo, L., Noto, L. V., Vivoni, E. R., and La Loggia, G. (2010). “Basin-scale water resources assessment in Oklahoma under synthetic climate change scenarios using a fully distributed hydrologic model.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 107–122.
Maidment, D. R., Olivera, F., Calver, A., and Eatherall, A. (1996). “A unit hydrograph derived from a spatially distributed velocity field.” Hydrol. Process., 10(6), 831–844.
Manfreda, S., Fiorentino, M., and Iacobellis, V. (2005). “DREAM: A distributed model for runoff, evapotranspiration, and antecedent soil moisture simulation.” Adv. Geosci., 2, 31–39.
Moore, R. J. (1985). “The probability-distributed principle and runoff production at point and basin scales.” J. Hydrol. Sci., 30(2), 273–297.
Moore, R. J. (1999). “Real-time flood forecasting systems: Perspectives and prospects.” Floods and landslides: Integrated risk assessment, R. Casale and C. Margottini, eds., Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 147–189.
Moore, R. J. (2007). “The PDM rainfall-runoff model.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11(1), 483–499.
Moore, R. J., and Bell, V. A. (2002). “Incorporation of groundwater losses and well level data in rainfall-runoff models illustrated using the PDM.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 6(1), 25–38.
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., and Veith, T. L. (2007). “Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations.” Trans. ASABE, 50(3), 885–900.
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I—A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol., 10(3), 282–290.
Niemann, J. D., and Eltahir, E. A. B. (2004). “Prediction of regional water balance components based on climate, soil, and vegetation parameters, with application to the Illinois River Basin.” Water Resour. Res., 40, W03103.
Noto, L. V., Ivanov, V. Y., Bras, R. L., and Vivoni, E. R. (2008). “Effects of initialization on response of a fully-distributed hydrologic model.” J. Hydrol., 352(1–2), 107–125.
Noto, L. V., and La Loggia, G. (2007). “Derivation of distributed unit hydrograph integrating GIS and remote sensing.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 639–650.
O'Callaghan, J. F., and Mark, D. M. (1984). “The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data.” Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process., 28, 323–344.
Pan, F., Peters-Lidard, C. D., Sale, M. J., and King, A. W. (2004). “A comparison of geographical information systems–based algorithms for computing the TOPMODEL topographic index.” Water Resour. Res., 40(6), W06303.
Robinson, J. S., Sivapalan, M., and Snell, J. D. (1995). “On the relative roles of hillslope processes, channel routing, and network geomorphology in the hydrologic response of natural catchments.” Water Resour. Res., 31(12), 3089–3101.
Sivapalan, M., Beven, K. J., and Wood, E. F. (1987). “On hydrologic similarity. 2: A scaled model of storm runoff production.” Water Resour. Res., 23(7), 1289–1299.
Sivapalan, M., Woods, R. A., and Kalma, J. D. (1997). “Variable bucket representation of TOPMODEL and investigation of the effects of rainfall heterogeneity.” Hydrol. Process., 11(9), 1307–1330.
Smith, M. B., et al. (2004). “The Distributed Model Intercomparison Project (DMIP): Motivation and experiment design.” J. Hydrol., 298(1–4), 4–26.
Tarboton, D. G. (1997). “A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models.” Water Resour. Res., 33(2), 309–319.
Todini, E. (1996). “The ARNO rainfall-runoff model.” J. Hydrol., 175(1–4), 339–382.
Vereecken, H., Kasteela, R., Vanderborghta, J., and Harterb, T. (2007). “Upscaling hydraulic properties and soil water flow processes in heterogeneous soils.” Vadose Zone J., 6(1), 1–28.
Viola, F., Pumo, D., and Noto, L. V. (2013). “EHSM: A conceptual ecohydrological model for daily streamflow simulation.” Hydrol. Proc., 28(9), 3361–3372.
Wittenberg, H., and Sivapalan, M. (1999). “Watershed groundwater balance estimation using streamflow recession analysis and baseflow separation.” J. Hydrol., 219(1), 20–33.
Wolock, D. M., and McCabe, G. J. (1995). “Comparison of single- and multiple-flow direction algorithms for computing topographic parameters.” Water Resour. Res., 31(5), 1315–1324.
Wood, E. F., Sivapalan, M., Beven, K., and Band, L. (1988). “Effects of spatial variability and scale with implications to hydrologic modelling.” J. Hydrol., 102(1–4), 29–47.
Zhao, Ren-Jun (1992). “The Xinanjiang model applied in China.” J. Hydrol., 135(1–4), 371–381.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 19Issue 6June 2014
Pages: 1173 - 1185

History

Received: Mar 5, 2013
Accepted: Sep 12, 2013
Published online: Sep 14, 2013
Discussion open until: Feb 14, 2014
Published in print: Jun 1, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Leonardo Valerio Noto [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale, Aerospaziale, dei Materiali (DICAM), Università di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, I-90128 Palermo, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share