Technical Papers
Sep 7, 2013

Impacts of Spatial Distribution of Impervious Areas on Runoff Response of Hillslope Catchments: Simulation Study

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 19, Issue 6

Abstract

This study analyzes variations in the model-projected changes in catchment runoff response after urbanization that stem from variations in the spatial distribution of impervious areas, interevent differences in temporal rainfall structure, and antecedent soil moisture (ASM). In this work, an ensemble of hypothetical imperviousness scenarios created for two small (<1ha) watersheds were incorporated into the gridded surface subsurface hydrologic analysis (GSSHA) model, which was calibrated against 41 runoff events under natural conditions. Each event was resimulated for each imperviousness scenario. Variations in the model-projected changes in runoff were characterized and related to temporal rainfall dispersion, ASM, and two metrics: (1) proximity of imperviousness from the outlet, and (2) normalized number of downstream pervious elements. Key findings include the following: First, interscenario variations in the simulated runoff were relatively subdued on an event-mean basis but were much wider for individual events. For example, the coefficient of variation (CV) was less than 7.8% for runoff peak but was beyond 20% for certain events. Second, the rate of increase in simulated runoff peaks with elevated imperviousness tends to be lower for events with higher temporal rainfall dispersion and ASM, with one of the largest events exhibiting the slowest rate of increase. Third, both metrics were found to be negatively correlated with simulated runoff depth. These findings point to the possibility of refining the model projection by incorporating indicators of overall locations of impervious areas, rainfall dispersion, and soil moisture conditions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to Dr. James Bonta at USDA ARS Coshocton Experiment Station who provided data for this work and contributed a number of valuable ideas. Three anonymous reviewers offered insightful comments that have greatly improved the quality of the work, and their contributions are gratefully acknowledged here.

References

Alley, W., and Veenhuis, J. (1983). “Effective impervious area in urban runoff modeling.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 313–319.
Arnold, C., and Gibbons, J. (1996). “Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key environmental indicator.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc., 62(2), 243–258.
Batelaan, O., Chormanski, J., Canters, F., and Van de Voorde, T. (2007). “Improved distributed runoff modelling of urbanised catchments by integration of multi-resolution remote sensing.” Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp., 2007, ISEE, 5021–5024 (July).
Beighley, R., Kargar, M., and He, Y. (2009). “Effects of impervious area estimation methods on simulated peak discharges.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 388–398.
Beighley, R. E., and Moglen, G. (2003). “Adjusting measured peak discharges from an urbanizing watershed to reflect a stationary land use signal.” Water Resour. Res., 39(4), 4-1–4-11.
Blackler, G., and Guo, J. (2013). “Paved area reduction factors under temporally varied rainfall and infiltration.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 173–179.
Bonta, J., et al. (2003). “Quantification of urbanization in experimental watersheds.” Proc., First Interagency Conference on Research in the Watersheds (ICRW), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 355–363.
Booth, D. B., and Jackson, C. R. (1997). “Urbanization of aquatic systems: Degradation thresholds, stormwater detection, and the limits of mitigation.” J. Am. Resour. Assoc., 33(5), 1077–1089.
Brabec, E., Schulte, S., and Richards, P. L. (2002). “Impervious surfaces and water quality: A review of current literature and its implications for watershed planning.” J. Planning Literature, 16(4), 499–514.
Canters, F., Chormanski, J., Van de Voorde, T., and Batelaan, O. (2005). “Effects of different methods for estimating impervious surface cover on runoff estimation at catchment level.” 7th Int. Symp. on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, M. Caetano and M. Painho, eds., IEEE international, 557–566.
Cleveland, W. S. (1979). “Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 74(368), 829–836.
Downer, C. W., and Ogden, F. L. (2002). GSSHA—User’s manual, version 1.43 for WMS 6.1.
Downer, C. W., Ogden, F. J., Martin, W. D., and Harmon, R. S. (2002). “Theory, development, and applicability of the surface water hydrologic model CASC2D.” Hydrol. Processes, 16(2), 255–275.
Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., and Yapo, P. O. (1998). “Towards improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and non-commensurable measures of information.” Water Resour. Res., 34(4), 751–763.
Han, W., and Burian, S. (2009). “Determining effective impervious area for urban hydrologic modeling.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 111–120.
Kelley, G. E. (1975). “Soils of the North Appalachian experimental watershed.”, USDA, Coshocton, OH.
Kuzmin, V., Seo, D. -J., and Koren, V. (2008). “Fast and efficient optimization of hydrologic model parameters using a priori estimates and stepwise line search.” J. Hydrol., 353(1–2), 109–128.
Lea, N. L. (1992). “An aspect driven kinematic routing algorithm.” Overland flow: Hydraulics and erosion mechanisms, A. J. Parsons and A. D. Abrahams eds., Chapman and Hall, New York.
Lee, J., and Heaney, J. (2003). “Estimation of urban imperviousness and its impacts on storm water systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 419–426.
Leopold, L. B. (1968). “Hydrology for urban land planning—A guidebook on the hydrologic effects of urban land use.” USGS Circular, U.S. Geological Survey, 554.
Mejia, A., and Moglen, G. (2009). “Spatial patterns of urban development from optimization of flood peaks and imperviousness-based measures.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 416–424.
Ogden, F. L., and Saghafian, B. (1997). “Green and Ampt infiltration with redistribution.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 386–393.
Pappas, E., Smith, D., Huang, C., Shuster, W., and Bonta, J. (2008). “Impervious surface impacts to runoff and sediment discharge under laboratory rainfall simulation.” Catena, 72(1), 146–152.
Pucci, A. A., and Pope, D. A. (1995). “Simulated effects of development on regional ground-water/surface-water interactions in the northern coastal plains of New Jersey.” J. Hydrol., 167(1–4), 241–262.
Randhir, T. (2003). “Watershed-scale effects of urbanization on sediment export: Assessment and policy.” Water Resour. Res., 39(6), 1169.
Rawls, W. J., Brakensiek, D. L., and Saxton, K. E. (1982). “Estimation of soil water properties.” Trans. ASAE, 25(5), 1316–1328.
Shuster, W. D., Bonta, J., Thurston, H., Warnemuende, E., and Smith, D. (2005). “Impacts of impervious surface on watershed hydrology: A review.” Urban Water, 2(4), 263–275.
Shuster, W. D., and Pappas, E. (2011). “Laboratory simulation of urban runoff and estimation of runoff hydrographs with experimental curve numbers implemented in USEPA SWMM.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 343–351.
Shuster, W. D., Warnemuende, E., and Zhang, Y. (2008). “A laboratory-scale simulation of runoff response from pervious-impervious systems.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 886–893.
Soil Survey Division Staff. (1993). “Soil Survey Manual.” Soil Conservation Service, USDA Handbook 18 〈http://soils.usda.gov/technical/manual/〉 (Jun. 2013).
Turner, D. F., Smith, J. A., and Bates, P. D. (2003). “Attenuating reaches and the regional flood response of an urbanizing drainage basin.” Adv. Water Resour., 26(6), 673–684.
Zhang, Y., Adams, T., and Bonta, J. V. (2007). “Sub-pixel scale rainfall variability and the effects on separation of radar and gauge rainfall errors.” J. Hydrometeorol., 8(6), 1348–1363.
Zhang, Y., Smith, J. A., and Baeck, M. L. (2003). “Space-time variability of rainfall and extreme flood response in the Menomonee River Basin, Wisconsin.” J. Hydrometeorol., 4(3), 506–517.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 19Issue 6June 2014
Pages: 1089 - 1100

History

Received: Aug 29, 2012
Accepted: Sep 5, 2013
Published online: Sep 7, 2013
Discussion open until: Feb 7, 2014
Published in print: Jun 1, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hydrologist, USEPA, National Risk Assessment Laboratory, 26 Martin Luther King Dr., OH 45268 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
William Shuster [email protected]
Research Hydrologist, USEPA, National Risk Assessment Laboratory, 26 Martin Luther King Dr., OH 45268. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share