Adjusting Error Calculation to Account for Temporal Mismatch in Evaluating Models
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 19, Issue 6
Abstract
A new method is proposed to compute prediction errors so as to not penalize models for good predictions with a temporal error. Traditional goodness of fit measures are based on model error calculated by pair-wise comparison of observed and simulated values at the same time, (which the authors term isotemporal predictions). However, even good models could have a random temporal error. Relatively small time shifts in predictions could produce large individual errors, especially if there are rapid changes in the system. This could lead to misleadingly poor goodness-of-fit statistics. The authors propose a modification to the calculation of model error that pairs each data point with a prediction that is closest in a Euclidean sense, (which the authors term proxitemporal prediction), instead of the same time. A normalization criterion is proposed to make the prediction and time scales commensurate based on the slope of the model predictions. The method is tested using stochastic simulation for a sinusoidal model and applied to an uncalibrated Escherichia coli water quality model. The stochastic simulation showed that the ability of the new method to accurately capture the true goodness of fit depends on the true prediction error and the true temporal error.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection for supporting the data collection and model building efforts which helped demonstrate the ideas presented in this paper.
References
Akaike, H. (1974). “A new look at the statistical model identification.” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 19(6), 716–723.
Allen, J. I., Somerfield, P. J., and Gilbert, F. J. (2007). “Quantifying uncertainty in high resolution coupled hydrodynamic-ecosystem models.” J. Marine Syst., 64(1–4), 3–14.
Anderson, P. D., et al. (2004). “Screening analysis of human pharmaceutical compounds in U.S. surface waters.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 38(3), 838–849.
Gupta, H. V., Sorroshian, S., and Yapo, P. O. (1999). “Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: Comparison with multilever expert calibration.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 135–143.
Haijema, R. (2008). Solving large structured Markov decision problems for perishable - inventory management and traffic control, Ph.D. thesis, Tinbergen Institute, Netherlands.
Jain, S. K., and Sudheer, K. P. (2008). “Fitting of hydrologic models: A close look at the Nash-Sutcliffe index.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 981–986.
Legates, D. R., and McCabe, G. J. (1999). “Evaluating the use of ‘goodness of fit’ measured in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation.” Water Resour. Res., 35(1), 233–241.
Microsoft [Computer software]. Microsoft, Gurgaon.
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., and Veith, T. L. (2007). “Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations.” Trans. ASABE, 50(3), 885–900.
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models: Part 1: A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol., 10(3), 282–290.
R Development Core Team. (2008). “R: A language and environment for statistical computing”. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Schwarz, G. (1978). “Estimating the dimension of a model.” Ann. Stat., 6(2), 461–464.
Singh, J., Knapp, H. V., and Demissie, M. (2005). “Hydrologic modeling of the Iroquois River watershed using HSPF and SWAT.” J. Am. Water Resour. As., 41(2), 343–360.
Stow, C. A., et al. (2009). “Skill assessment for coupled biological/physical models of marine systems.” J. Mar. Syst., 76(1–2), 4–15.
Willmott, C. J. (1981). “On the validation of models.” Phys. Geog., 2(2), 184–194.
Willmott, C. J., et al. (1985). “Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models.” J. Geophys. Res., 90(C5), 8995–9005.
Willmott, C. J., and Matsuura, K. (2005). “Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance.” Clim. Res., 30, 79–82.
Willmott, C. J., Robeson, S. M., and Matsuura, K. (2012). “A refined index of model performance.” Int. J. Climatol., 32, 2088–2094.
Wool, T. A., Ambrose, R. B., Martin, J. L., and Comer, E. A. (1993). Water quality analysis simulation program (WASP) DRAFT: User’s manual version 6.0, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Atlanta, GA.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 25, 2013
Accepted: Sep 3, 2013
Published online: Sep 5, 2013
Discussion open until: Feb 5, 2014
Published in print: Jun 1, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.