Technical Papers
Apr 5, 2013

Bayesian Artificial Intelligence Model Averaging for Hydraulic Conductivity Estimation

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 19, Issue 3

Abstract

This research presents a Bayesian artificial intelligence model averaging (BAIMA) method that incorporates multiple artificial intelligence (AI) models to estimate hydraulic conductivity and evaluate estimation uncertainties. Uncertainty in AI model outputs stems from errors in model input and nonuniqueness in selecting different AI methods. Using one single AI model tends to bias the estimation and underestimate uncertainty. The BAIMA employs a Bayesian model averaging (BMA) technique to address the issue of using one single AI model for estimation. The BAIMA estimates hydraulic conductivity by averaging the outputs of AI models according to their model weights. In this study, the model weights are determined using the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) that follows the parsimony principle. The BAIMA calculates the within-model variances to account for uncertainty propagation from input data to AI model output. Between-model variances are evaluated to account for uncertainty because of model nonuniqueness. The authors employ Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy logic (TS-FL), an artificial neural network (ANN), and neuro-fuzzy (NF) to estimate hydraulic conductivity for the Tasuj plain aquifer, Iran. The BAIMA combines three AI models and produces better fitting than individual models. Although NF was expected to be the best AI model owing to its utilization of both the TS-FL and ANN models, the NF model is nearly discarded by the parsimony principle. The TS-FL model and the ANN model show equal importance, although their hydraulic conductivity estimates are quite different. This results in significant between-model variances that are normally ignored by using one AI model.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by the Research Office at the University of Tabriz and Iran’s national Elites foundation. The Iran Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology provided a scholarship to A. A. Nadiri to conduct research at Louisiana State University. The study was also supported in part by Grant/Cooperative Agreement No. G10AP00136 from the United States Geological Survey for N. Chitsazan to conduct the BMA study. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the USGS. The authors acknowledge the East Azerbaijan Regional Water Authority for providing pertinent data.

References

Abkav Consulting Engineering. (1973). “Geophysical studies reports of Tabriz, Tasuj and Shabestar Plains.” A report prepared for East Azerbaijan Regional Water Authority (in Persian).
Akaike, H. (1977). “On entropy maximization principle.” Applications of statistics, P. R. Krishnaiah, ed., North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 27–41.
Anifowose, F., and Abdulraheem, A. (2011). “Fuzzy logic-driven and SVM-driven hybrid computational intelligence models applied to oil and gas reservoir characterization.” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., 3(3), 505–517.
Aqil, M., Kita, I., Yano, A., and Nishiyama, S. (2007). “Analysis and prediction of flow from local source in a river basin using a neuro-fuzzy modelling tool.” J. Environ. Manage., 85(1), 215–223.
ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. (2000a). “Artificial neural network in hydrology. I: Preliminary concepts.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 115–123.
ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. (2000b). “Artificial neural network in hydrology. II: Hydrologic applications.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 124–137.
Bárdossy, A., and Disse, M. (1993). “Fuzzy rule-based models for infiltration.” Water Resour. Res., 29(2), 373–382.
Batyrshin, I., Sheremetov, L., Markov, M., and Panova, A. (2005). “Hybrid method for porosity classification in carbonate formations.” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 47(1–2), 35–50.
Berger, J. O. (1985). Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis, 2nd Ed., Springer-Verlag, New York.
Bowden, G. J., Maier, H. R., and Dandy, G. C. (2002). “Optimal division of data for neural network models in water resources applications.” Water Resour. Res., 38(2), 2-1–2-11.
Box, G. E. P. (1976). “Science and statistics.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 71(356), 791–799.
Chen, C. H., and Lin, Z. S. (2006). “A committee machine with empirical formulas for permeability prediction.” Comput. Geosci., 32(4), 485–496.
Chen, M. S., and Wang, S. W. (1999). “Fuzzy clustering analysis for optimizing fuzzy membership functions.” Fuzzy Sets Syst., 103(2), 239–254.
Chiu, S. L. (1994). “Fuzzy model identification based on cluster estimation.” J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 2(3), 267–278.
Draper, D. (1995). “Assessment and propagation of model uncertainty.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B., 57(1), 45–97.
East Azerbaijan Regional Water Authority. (2001). Studying of groundwater resources and mathematical modeling of Tasuj Plain using GIS, Vol. 1, Tabriz, East Azerbaijan (in Persian).
East Azerbaijan Regional Water Authority. (2010). Annual report of water balance of Tasuj Plain, Tabriz, East Azerbaijan (in Persian).
Emberger, L. (1955). “Une classification biogéoaraphique des climats.” Rec. Trav. Lab. Bot. Géol. Fac. Se., 7(11), 3–43.
Garcia, L. A., and Shigidi, A. (2006). “Using neural networks for parameter estimation in groundwater.” J. Hydrol., 318(1–4), 215–231.
Harb, N., Haddad, K., and Farkh, S. (2010). “Calculation of transverse resistance to correct aquifer resistivity of groundwater saturated zones: Implications for estimating its hydrogeological properties.” Lebanese Sci. J., 11(1), 105–115.
Haykin, S. (1998). Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation, 2nd Ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 842.
Helmy, T., Fatai, A., and Faisal, K. (2010). “Hybrid computational models for the characterization of oil and gas reservoirs.” Expert Syst. Appl., 37(7), 5353–5363.
Hoeting, J. A., Madigan, D., Raftery, A. E., and Volinsky, Ch. T. (1999). “Bayesian model averaging: A tutorial.” Stat. Sci., 14(4), 382–417.
Huang, Y., Gedeon, T. D., and Wong, P. M. (2001). “An integrated neural-fuzzy-genetic-algorithm using hyper-surface membership functions to predict permeability in petroleum reservoirs.” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 14(1), 15–21.
Hurtado, N., Aldana, M., and Torres, J. (2009). “Comparison between neuro-fuzzy and fractal models for permeability prediction.” Comput. Geosci., 13(2), 181–186.
Hurvich, C. M., and Tsai, C.-L. (1989). “Regression and time series model selection in small samples.” Biometrika, 76(2), 297–307.
Iman, R. L., Helton, J. C., and Campbell, J. E. (1981). “An approach to sensitivity analysis of computer models, Part 1. Introduction, input variable selection and preliminary variable assessment.” J. Qual. Technol., 13(3), 174–183.
Kadkhodaie-Ilkhchi, A., and Amini, A. (2009). “A fuzzy logic approach to estimating hydraulic flow units from well log data: A case study from the Ahwaz oilfield, South Iran.” J. Petrol. Geol., 32(1), 67–78.
Kadkhodaie-Ilkhchi, A., Rezaee, M. R., and Rahimpour-Bonab, H. (2009). “A committee neural network for prediction of normalized oil content from well log data: An example from South Pars Gas Field, Persian Gulf.” J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 65(1–2), 23–32.
Karimpouli, S., Fathianpour, N., and Roohi, J. (2010). “A new approach to improve neural networks’ algorithm in permeability prediction of petroleum reservoirs using supervised committee machine neural network (SCMNN).” J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 73(3–4), 227–232.
Karul, C., Soyupak, S., Cilesiz, A. F., Akbay, N., and Germen, E. (2000). “Case studies on the use of neural networks in eutrophication modelling.” Ecol. Modell., 134(2–3), 145–152.
Kashyap, R. L. (1982). “Optimal choice of AR and MA parts in autoregressive moving average models.” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., PAMI-4(2), 99–104.
Kass, R. E., and Raftery, A. E. (1995). “Bayesian factor.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 90(430), 773–795.
Leamer, E. E. (1978). Specification searches: Ad hoc inference with nonexperimental data, Wiley, New York.
Li, H. X., Chen, C. L. P., and Huang, H. P. (2001). Fuzzy neural intelligent system, mathematical foundation and the application in engineering, CRC LLC, New York.
Li, X., and Tsai, F. T.-C. (2009). “Bayesian model averaging for groundwater head prediction and uncertainty analysis using multimodel and multimethod.” Water Resour. Res., 45, W09403.
Lim, J.-S. (2005). “Reservoir properties determination using fuzzy logic and neural networks from well data in offshore Korea.” J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 49(3–4), 182–192.
Lohani, A. K., Goel, N. K., and Bhatia, K. K. S. (2006). “Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy inference system for modeling stage–discharge relationship.” J. Hydrol., 331(1–2), 146–160.
Maier, H. R., and Dandy, G. C. (2000). “Neural network for the prediction and forecasting water resources variables: A review of modeling issues and applications.” Environ. Modell. Software, 15(1), 101–124.
Maier, H. R., Jain, A., Dandy, G. C., and Sudheer, K. P. (2010). “Methods used for the development of neural networks for the prediction of water resource variables in river systems: Current status and future directions.” Environ. Modell. Software, 25(8), 891–909.
Maillet, R. (1947). “The fundamental equations of electrical prospecting.” Geophysica, 12(4), 529–556.
Malki, H. A., and Baldwin, J. (2002). “A neuro-fuzzy based oil/gas producibility estimation method.” Proc., 2002 Int. Joint Conf. on Neural Networks, Vol. 1, IEEE, 896–901.
Marquardt, D. W. (1963). “An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters.” SIAM J. Appl. Math., 11(2), 431–441.
Masters, T. (1993). Practical neural network recipies in C++, Academic, San Diego.
Merdun, H., Çınar, Ö., Meral, R., and Apan, M. (2006). “Comparison of artificial neural network and regression pedotransfer functions for prediction of soil water retention and saturated hydraulic conductivity.” Soil Tillage Res., 90(1–2), 108–116.
Motaghian, H. R., and Mohammadi, J. (2011). “Spatial estimation of saturated hydraulic conductivity from terrain attributes using regression, kriging, and artificial neural networks.” Pedosphere, 21(2), 170–177.
Nadiri, A. A., Asghari Moghaddam, A., Tsai, F. T.-C., and Fijani, E. (2013). “Hydrogeochemical analysis for Tasuj plain aquifer, Iran.” J. Earth Syst. Sci., 122(4), 1091–1105.
Nayak, P. C., Sudheer, K. P., Rangan, D. M., and Ramasastri, K. S. (2004). “A neuro-fuzzy computing technique for modeling hydrological time series.” J. Hydrol., 291(1–2), 52–66.
Neuman, S. P. (2003). “Maximum likelihood Bayesian averaging of alternative conceptual-mathematical models.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 17(5), 291–305.
Nourani, V., Mogaddam, A. A., and Nadiri, A. O. (2008a). “An ANN-based model for spatiotemporal groundwater level forecasting.” Hydrol. Process., 22(26), 5054–5066.
Nourani, V., Mogaddam, A. A., Nadiri, A. O., and Singh, V. P. (2008b). “Forecasting spatiotemporal water levels of Tabriz aquifer.” Trends Appl. Sci. Res., 3(4), 319–329.
Olatunji, S. O., Selamat, A., and Abdulraheem, A. (2011). “Modeling the permeability of carbonate reservoir using type-2 fuzzy logic systems.” Computers in industry, 62(2), 147–163.
Olea, R. A. (1999). Geostatistics for engineering and earth scientists, Kluwer Academic, Boston.
Pulido-Calvo, I., and Gutiérrez-Estrada, J. C. (2009). “Improved irrigation water demand forecasting using a soft-computing hybrid model.” Biosyst. Eng., 102(2), 202–218.
Purvance, D. T., and Andricevic, R. (2000). “On the electrical-hydraulic conductivity correlation in aquifers.” Water Resour. Res., 36(10), 2905–2913.
Raftery, A. E., Madigan, D., and Hoeting, J. A. (1997). “Bayesian model averaging for linear regression models.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 92(437), 179–191.
Ross, J., Ozbek, M., and Pinder, G. F. (2007). “Hydraulic conductivity estimation via fuzzy.” Math. Geol., 39(8), 765–780.
Samani, N., Gohari-Moghadam, M., and Safavi, A. A. (2007). “A simple neural network model for the determination of aquifer parameters.” J. Hydrol., 340(1–2), 1–11.
Schaap, M. G., and Leij, F. J. (1998). “Using neural networks to predict soil water retention and soil hydraulic conductivity.” Soil Tillage Res., 47(1–2), 37–42.
Schwarz, G. (1978). “Estimating the dimension of a model.” Ann. Stat., 6(2), 461–464.
Seghouane, A.-K., and Bekara, M. (2004). “A small sample model selection criterion based on Kullback’s symmetric divergence.” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 52(12), 3314–3323.
Sezer, A., Göktepe, B. A., and Altun, S. (2010). “Adaptive neuro-fuzzy approach for sand permeability estimation.” Environ. Eng. Manage. J., 9(2), 231–238.
Shahin, M. A., Maier, H. R., and Jaksa, M. B. (2004). “Data division for developing neural networks applied to geotechnical engineering.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 105–114.
Singh, A., Mishra, S., and Ruskauff, G. (2010). “Model averaging techniques for quantifying conceptual model uncertainty.” Ground Water, 48(5), 701–715.
Soupios, P. M., Kouli, M., Vallianatos, F., Antonis Vafidis, A., and Stavroulakis, G. (2007). “Estimation of aquifer hydraulic parameters from surficial geophysical methods: A case study of Keritis Basin in Chania (Crete–Greece).” J. Hydrol., 338(1–2), 122–131.
Srivastav, R. K., Sudheer, K. P., and Chaubey, I. (2007). “A simplified approach to quantifying predictive and parametric uncertainty in artificial neural network hydrologic models.” Water Resour. Res., 43(10), W10407.
Stone, C. J. (1981). “Admissible selection of an accurate and parsimonious normal linear regression model.” Ann. Stat., 9(3), 475–485.
Sugeno, M., and Yasukawa, T. (1993). “A fuzzy-logic-based approach to qualitative modeling.” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 1(1), 7–31.
Sun, J., Zhao, Z., and Zhang, Y. (2011). “Determination of three dimensional hydraulic conductivities using a combined analytical/neural network model.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol., 26(2), 310–319.
Sun, N.-Z. (1994). Inverse problem in groundwater modeling, Kluwer Academic, Boston.
Takagi, T., and Sugeno, M. (1985). “Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modeling and control.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., SMC-15(1), 116–132.
Tamari, S., Wösten, J. H. M., and Ruiz-Suárez, J. C. (1996). “Testing an artificial neural network for predicting soil hydraulic conductivity.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 60(6), 1732–1741.
Tsai, F. T.-C., and Li, X. (2008a). “Inverse groundwater modeling for hydraulic conductivity estimation using Bayesian model averaging and variance window.” Water Resour. Res., 44(9), W09434.
Tsai, F. T.-C., and Li, X. (2008b). “Multiple parameterization for hydraulic conductivity identification.” Ground Water, 46(6), 851–864.
Tukey, J. W. (1961). “Discussion, emphasizing the connection between analysis of variance and spectrum analysis.” Technometrics, 3(2), 191–219.
Tutmez, B. (2010). “Assessment of porosity using spatial correlation-based radial basis function and neuro-fuzzy inference system.” Neural Comput. Appl., 19(3), 499–505.
Tutmez, B., and Hatipoglu, Z. (2007). “Spatial estimation model of porosity.” Comput. Geosci., 33(4), 465–475.
Ye, M., Meyer, P. D., Lin, Y. F., and Neuman, S. P. (2010). “Quantification of model uncertainty in environmental modeling.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 24(6), 807–808.
Ye, M., Meyer, P. D., and Neuman, S. P. (2008). “On model selection criteria in multimodel analysis.” Water Resour. Res., 44(3), W03428.
Ye, M., Neuman, S. P., and Meyer, P. D. (2004). “Maximum likelihood Bayesian averaging of spatial variability models in unsaturated fractured tuff.” Water Resour. Res., 40(5), W05113.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). “Fuzzy sets.” Inf. Control, 8(3), 338–353.
Zounemat-Kermani, M., and Teshnehlab, M. (2008). “Using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for hydrological time series prediction.” Appl. Soft Comput., 8(2), 928–936.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 19Issue 3March 2014
Pages: 520 - 532

History

Received: Aug 1, 2012
Accepted: Apr 4, 2013
Published online: Apr 5, 2013
Discussion open until: Sep 5, 2013
Published in print: Mar 1, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ata Allah Nadiri [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Geology, Faculty of Natural Science, Univ. of Tabriz, 29 Bahman Blvd., Tabriz, 5166616471 East Azarbaijan, Iran. E-mail: [email protected]
Nima Chitsazan [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State Univ., 3418G Patrick F. Taylor Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803. E-mail: [email protected]
Frank T.-C. Tsai [email protected]
M.ASCE
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State Univ., 3418G Patrick F. Taylor Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Asghar Asghari Moghaddam [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Geology, Faculty of Natural Science, Univ. of Tabriz, 29 Bahman Blvd., Tabriz, 5166616471 East Azarbaijan, Iran. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share