Performance and Water Table Responses of Retrofit Rain Gardens
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 19, Issue 8
Abstract
The alteration of natural flow regimes associated with land use change increases storm water runoff volume, increases peak flows, and reduces the time to peak flow. This can cause flooding, erosion, and higher pollutant loading in streams, rivers, lakes, and estuaries. Rain gardens represent a sustainable and economic method to decrease the volume of water that flows into rivers and streams from impervious areas during storm events. For developments that were built without permanent storm water controls, rain gardens may be a viable retrofit instead of centralized and more costly alternatives. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the performance of rain gardens in urban retrofit applications. In this rain garden study, the hydrologic performance of terraced, street-side rain gardens was examined by monitoring inflow and outflow volumes and water tables during simulated runoff events. Areas of uncertainty that were addressed include general relationships between inflow and hydrologic performance, and analyzing the behavior of the internal saturation zone. The performance variables quantified were runoff volume reduction, reduction in peak flow, and peak delay. For eight simulated runoff events of equivalent rainfall depths ranging from 0.1–1.7 cm, the street-side rain gardens reduced storm water volume by an overall total of 37% with mean individual simulation values for volume reduction, peak flow reduction, and peak delay of 52%, 62%, and 16 min, respectively. Regression relationships between equivalent rainfall depth and volume reduction were developed from the simulated runoff events for rain gardens of different surface area to catchment area ratios. From these relationships, it was conservatively predicted that the rain gardens retained the entire runoff volume for 26% of the 38 natural storm events monitored during the study. The results of this study suggest that rain gardens can benefit existing developments by reducing runoff volume and peak flow, and provide a dynamic internal saturation zone with the potential for water quality benefits. The findings also show the importance of understanding interactions with the in situ soil, the existing drainage system, and the entire catchment area when sizing rain gardens in urban retrofits to meet desired reduction objectives.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors of this article would like to thank members of the capstone design team for help in designing the rain gardens (Phil Cherosky, Adam Peterca, Ryan Schmid, and Kevin White), staff of the City of Westerville (Eric Beverly, Tom Hockman, Andy Adkins, Kyle Allen, and Alex Whitsel), Ohio State University students (Richard Ciotola, Caitlin Eger, Paul Kosmerl, Abigail Tamkin, and Aleksandr Yakhnitsky), and Rusty Schmidt of the Washington Conservation District, Stillwater, Minnesota.
References
Barr Engineering Company. (2006). “Burnsville stormwater retrofit study.” City of Burnsville, Minneapolis, MN.
Carpenter, D. D., and Hallam, L. (2010). “Influence of planting soil mix characteristics of bioretention cell design and performance.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 404–416.
Davis, A. P. (2008). “Field performance of bioretention: Hydrology impacts.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 90–95.
DeBusk, K. M., Hunt, W. F., and Line, D. E. (2011). “Bioretention outflow: Does it mimic nonurban watershed shallow interflow?” J. Hydrol. Eng., 274–279.
Dietz, M. E., and Clausen, J. C. (2006). “Saturation to improve pollutant retention in a rain garden.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 40(4), 1335–1340.
Dougherty, M., LeBleu, C., Brantley, E., and Francis, C. (2007). “Evaluation of bioretention nutrient removal in a rain garden with an internal water storage (IWS) layer.” ASABE Annual Int. Meeting, Vol. 17, 20.
Dussaillant, A. R., Wu, C. H., and Potter, K. W. (2004). “Richards equation model of a rain garden.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 219–225.
Franklin County Auditor. (2011). “Franklin County auditor’s real estate page.” 〈http://www.franklincountyoh.metacama.com〉 (Mar. 1, 2011).
Hatt, B. E., Fletcher, T. D., and Deletic, A. (2009). “Hydrologic and pollutant removal performance of stormwater biofiltration systems at the field scale.” J. Hydrol., 365(3–4), 310–321.
Hunt, W. F., Jarrett, A. R., Smith, J. T., and Sharkey, L. J. (2006). “Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 600–608.
Li, H., Sharkey, L. J., Hunt, W. F., and Davis, A. P. (2009). “Mitigation of impervious surface hydrology using bioretention in North Carolina and Maryland.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 407–415.
Lucas, W. C. (2010). “Design of integrated biofiltration-detention urban retrofits with design storm and continuous simulation methods.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 486–498.
Roy-Poirier, A., Champagne, P., and Filion, Y. (2010). “Review of bioretention system research and design: Past, present, and future.” J. Environ. Eng., 878–889.
Soil Science Society of America (SSSA). (2002). Methods of soil analysis. Part 4: Physical methods, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.
United States Dept. of Agriculture-Soil Conservation Service (USDA-SCS). (1986). “Urban hydrology for small watersheds.”, Washington, DC.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2003). “After the storm: A citizens guide to understanding stormwater.”.
Walsh, C. J., Fletcher, T. D., and Ladson, A. R. (2009). “Retention capacity: A metric to link stream ecology and storm-water management.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 399–406.
Wossink, G. A., and Hunt, W. F. (2003). “Cost effectiveness analysis of structural stormwater best management practices in North Carolina.”, North Carolina Water Resources Research Institute, Raleigh, NC.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 6, 2012
Accepted: Feb 1, 2013
Published online: Feb 4, 2013
Published in print: Aug 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Oct 9, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.