Technical Papers
Aug 20, 2012

Bayesian Approach for Uncertainty Analysis of an Urban Storm Water Model and Its Application to a Heavily Urbanized Watershed

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18, Issue 10

Abstract

The significance of uncertainty analysis (UA) to quantify reliability of model simulations is being recognized. Consequently, literature on parameter and predictive uncertainty assessment of water resources models has been rising. Applications dealing with urban drainage systems are, however, very limited. This study applies formal Bayesian approach for uncertainty analysis of a widely used storm water management model and illustrates the methodology using a highly urbanized watershed in the Los Angeles Basin, California. A flexible likelihood function that accommodates heteroscedasticity, non-normality, and temporal correlation of model residuals has been used for the study along with a Markov-chain Monte Carlo-based sampling scheme. The solution of the UA model has been compared with the solution of the conventional calibration methodology widely practiced in water resources modeling. Results indicate that the maximum likelihood solution determined using the UA model produced runoff simulations that are of comparable accuracy with the solution of the traditional calibration method while also accurately characterizing structure of the model residuals. The UA model also successfully determined both parameter uncertainty and total predictive uncertainty for the watershed. Contribution of parameter uncertainty to total predictive uncertainty was found insignificant for the study watershed, underlying the importance of other sources of uncertainty, including data and model structure. Overall, the UA methodology proved promising for sensitivity analysis, calibration, parameter uncertainty, and total predictive uncertainty analysis of urban storm water management models.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Amenu, G. G. (2011). “A comparative study of water quality conditions between heavily urbanized and less urbanized watersheds of Los Angeles Basin.” Proc., World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2011: Bearing Knowledge for Sustainability, ASCE, Reston, VA, 680–690.
Ball, J. E. (2009). “Discussion of ‘Automatic calibration of the U.S. EPA SWMM model for a large urban catchment’ by J. Barco, K. M. Wong, and M. K. Stenstrom.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 135(12), 1108–1110.
Barco, J., Wong, K. M., and Stenstrom, M. K. (2008). “Automatic calibration of the U.S. EPA SWMM model for a large urban catchment.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 134(4), 466–474.
Bay, S., Jones, B. H., Schiff, K., and Washburn, L. (2003). “Water quality impacts of stormwater discharges to Santa Monica Bay.” Marine Environ. Res., 56(1–2), 205–223.
Beven, K. (2006). “A manifesto for the equifinality thesis.” J. Hydrol., 320(1–2), 28–36.
Beven, K., and Freer, J. (2001). “Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modeling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology.” J. Hydrol., 249(1–4), 11–29.
Beven, K. J., and Binley, A. M. (1992). “The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction.” Hydrol. Processes, 6(3), 279–298.
Beven, K. J., and Freer, J. (2001). “Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modeling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology.” J. Hydrol., 249(1–4), 11–29.
Box, G. E. P., and Tiao, G. C. (1992). Bayesian inference in statistical analysis, Wiley, New York.
Burian, S. J., McPherson, T. N., Brown, M. J., and Turin, H. J. (2000). “Development of a stormwater model for the Ballona Creek watershed.”, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Presented at 1st Ballona Wetlands Symp., Los Angeles, CA.
Deletic, A., et al. (2012). “Assessing uncertainties in urban drainage models.” Phys. Chem. Earth, Parts A/B/C, 42–44(2012), 3–10.
Dotto, C. B. S., et al. (2012). “Comparison of different uncertainty techniques in urban stormwater quantity and quality modelling.” Water Res., 46(8), 2545–2558.
Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V. K. (1992). “Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models.” Water Resour. Res., 28(4), 1015–1031.
EPA. (2007). “National water quality inventory: Report to congress; 2002 reporting cycle.”, Washington, DC.
Fang, T., and Ball, J. E. (2007). “Evaluation of spatially variable parameters in a complex system: An application of a genetic algorithm.” J. Hydroinform., 9(3), 163–173.
Feyen, L., Khalas, M, and Vrugt, J. A. (2008). “Semi-distributed parameter optimization and uncertainty assessment for large-scale streamflow simulation using global optimization.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 53(2), 293–308.
Freni, G., Mannina, G., and Viviani, G. (2008). “Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: The effect of acceptability threshold in the GLUE methodology.” Water Res., 42(8–9), 2061–2072.
Freni, G., Mannina, G., and Viviani, G. (2009a). “Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: The influence of likelihood measure formulation in the GLUE methodology.” Sci. Total Environ., 408(1), 138–145.
Freni, G., Mannina, G., and Viviani, G. (2009b). “Urban runoff modelling uncertainty: Comparison among Bayesian and pseudo-Bayesian methods.” Environ. Modell. Software, 24(9), 1100–1111.
Gelman, A., and Rubin, D. B. (1992). “Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences.” Stat. Sci., 7(4), 457–472.
Gironás, J., Niemann, J. D., Roesner, L. A., Rodriguez, F., and Andrieu, H. (2010). “Evaluation of methods for representing urban terrain in storm-water modeling.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 15(1), 1–14.
Gotzinger, J., and Bardossy, A. (2008). “Generic error model for calibration and uncertainty estimation of hydrological models.” Water Resour. Res., 44(12), W00B07.
Green, W. H., and Ampt, G. (1911). “Studies of soil physics. Part 1. The flow of air and water through soils.” J. Agr. Soc., 4, 1–24.
Holland, J. H. (1975). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
Horton, R. E. (1937). “Determination of infiltration-capacity for large drainage basins.” Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 18, 371–385.
Kavetski, D., Kuczera, G., and Franks, S. W. (2006). “Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 1. Theory.” Water Resour. Res., 42(3), W03407.
Kuczera, G. (1983). “Improved parameter inference in catchment models, 1. Evaluating parameter uncertainty.” Water Resour. Res., 19(5), 1151–1162.
Kuczera, G., Kavetski, D., Franks, S., and Thyer, M. (2006). “Towards a Bayesian total error analysis of conceptual rainfall runoff models: Characterizing model error using storm-dependent parameters.” J. Hydrol., 331(1–2), 161–177.
Kuczera, G., and Parent, E. (1998). “Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: The Metropolis algorithm.” J. Hydrol., 211(1–4), 69–85.
Laloy, E., and Vrugt, J. A. (2012). “High-dimensional posterior exploration of hydrologic models using multiple-try DREAM(ZS) and high-performance computing.” Water Resour. Res., 48, W01526.
Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW). (2011). “Ballona Creek Watershed.” 〈http://ladpw.org/wmd/watershed/bc/〉 (Jul. 26, 2011).
Mannina, G., and Viviani, G. (2010). “An urban drainage stormwater quality model: Model development and uncertainty quantification.” J. Hydrol., 381(3–4), 248–265.
Mantovan, P., and Todini, E. (2006). “Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: Incoherence of the GLUE methodology.” J. Hydrol., 330(1–2), 368–381.
Montanari, A., Shoemaker, C. A., and van de Giesen, N. (2009). “Introduction to special section on uncertainty assessment in surface and subsurface hydrology: An overview of issues and challenges.” Water Resour. Res., 45(12), W00B00.
Moradkhani, H., and Sorooshian, S. (2008). “General review of rainfall-runoff modeling: Model calibration, data assimilation, and uncertainty analysis.” Hydrological modeling and water cycle: Coupling of the atmospheric and hydrological models, Vol. 63, Springer, Water Science and Technology Library, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1–23.
Muleta, M. K. (2010). “Comparison of model evaluation methods to develop a comprehensive watershed simulation model.” World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2010, ASCE, Reston, VA, 2492–2501.
Muleta, M. K. (2012). “Sensitivity of model performance to the efficiency criteria used as objective function during automatic calibrations.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 17(6), 756–767.
Muleta, M. K., and Nicklow, J. W. (2005). “Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis coupled with automatic calibration for a distributed watershed model.” J. Hydrol., 306(1–4), 127–145.
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I- A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol., 125, 277–291.
National Oceanic, and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (2013). “Atlas 14 point precipitation frequency estimates.” Silver Spring, MD. 〈http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_map_pr.html〉 (Jun. 25, 2013).
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). (2013). “Soil data mart.” U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC. 〈http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov/〉 (Jun. 25, 2013).
National Research Council (NRC). (2008). Urban stormwater management in the United States, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
Rossman, L. A. (2010). “Stormwater management model user’s manual, version 5.”, U.S. EPA, Cincinnati.
Schoups, G., and Vrugt, J. A. (2010). “A formal likelihood function for parameter and predictive inference of hydrologic models with correlated, heteroscedastic, and non-Gaussian errors.” Water Resour. Res., 46(10), W10531.
Soil Conservation Service. (1964). “National engineering handbook.” Section 4, Hydrology, Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, 450.
Sorooshian, S., and Dracup, J. A. (1980). “Stochastic parameter estimation procedures for hydrologic rainfall-runoff models: Correlated and heteroscedastic error cases.” Water Resour. Res., 16(2), 430–442.
Stedinger, J. R., Vogel, R. M., Lee, S. U., and Batchelder, R. (2008). “Appraisal of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method.” Water Resour. Res., 44(12), W00B06.
Stein, E. D., and Tiefenthaler, L. L. (2005). “Dry-weather metals and bacteria loading in an arid, urban watershed: Ballona Creek, California.” Water Air Soil Pollut., 164(1–4), 367–382.
Stenstrom, M. K., and Strecker, E. (1993). “Assessment of storm drain sources of contaminants to Santa Monica Bay: Annual pollutants loadings to Santa Monica Bay from stormwater runoff.”, Vol. 1, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, 1–248.
Thiemann, M., Trosset, M., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S. (2001). “Bayesian recursive parameter estimation for hydrologic models.” Water Resour. Res., 37(10), 2521–2535.
Thyer, M., Renard, B., Kavetski, D., Kuczera, G., Franks, S. W., and Srikanthan, S. (2009). “Critical evaluation of parameter consistency and predictive uncertainty in hydrological modeling: A case study using Bayesian total error analysis.” Water Resour. Res., 45(12), W00B14.
Tolson, B. A., and Shoemaker, C. A. (2007). “Dynamically dimensioned search algorithm for computationally efficient watershed model calibration.” Water Resour. Res., 43(1), W01413.
USGS. (2013). “The national map.” USGS, Washington, DC. 〈http://seamless.usgs.gov/〉 (Jun. 25, 2013).
Vrugt, J. A., Diks, C. G. H., Gupta, H. V., Bouten, W., and Verstraten, J. M. (2005). “Improved treatment of uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Combining the strengths of global optimization and data assimilation.” Water Resour. Res., 41(1), W01017.
Vrugt, J. A., Gupta, H. V., Bouten, W., and Sorooshian, S. (2003). “A Shuffled Complex Evolution Metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters.” Water Resour. Res., 39(8), SWC 1-1–SWC 1-14.
Vrugt, J. A., Ter Braak, C. J. F., Clark, M. P., Hyman, J. M., and Robinson, B. A. (2008). “Treatment of input uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Doing hydrology backward with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation.” Water Resour. Res., 44(12), W00B09.
Vrugt, J. A., Ter Braak, C. J. F., Diks, C. G. H., Higdon, D., Robinson, B. A., and Hyman, J. M. (2009a). “Accelerating Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation by differential evolution with self-adaptive randomized subspace sampling.” Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 10(3), 271–288.
Vrugt, J. A., Ter Braak, C. J. F., Gupta, H. V., and Robinson, B. A. (2009b). “Equifinality of formal (DREAM) and informal (GLUE) Bayesian approaches to hydrologic modeling?” Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 23(7), 1011–1026.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18Issue 10October 2013
Pages: 1360 - 1371

History

Received: Feb 29, 2012
Accepted: Aug 8, 2012
Published online: Aug 20, 2012
Discussion open until: Jan 20, 2013
Published in print: Oct 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Misgana K. Muleta [email protected]
M.ASCE
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, California Polytechnic State Univ., San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Jonathan McMillan
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, California Polytechnic State Univ., San Luis Obispo, CA 93407.
Geremew G. Amenu
Dept. of Civil Engineering and Construction Engineering Management, California State Univ., Long Beach, CA 90840.
Steven J. Burian
M.ASCE
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share