Technical Papers
Aug 4, 2012

Time and Flow Characteristics of Component Hydrographs Related to Rainfall–Streamflow Observations

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18, Issue 6

Abstract

This study investigates the shape characteristics of hydrograph components of the Wu-Tu watershed in Taiwan based on observations of rainfall and streamflow. Component hydrographs were modeled using a model of three serial tanks with one parallel tank. The block kriging method was used to calculate the hourly mean rainfall of events, and eight model parameters of 34 cases were derived from the shuffled complex evolution optimal algorithm. The remaining 18 events were used to verify the applicability of the calibrated parameters. Results show that (1) times to peak of hydrograph components are positively nonlinearly correlated to peak time of rainfall; (2) peak discharges of hydrograph components are linearly proportional to those of streamflow hydrograph; and (3) relationships of total discharges also have direct ratios between hydrograph components and observed streamflow. Using the procedures proposed in this study, three evaluated shape characteristics of component hydrographs can be easily used to rapidly determine shapes of simple hydrographs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Agirre, U., Goñi, M., López, J. J., and Gimena, F. N. (2005). “Application of a unit hydrograph based on subwatershed division and comparison with Nash’s instantaneous unit hydrograph.” Catena, 64(2–3), 321–332.
Ahmad, M. M., Ghumman, A. R., and Ahmad, S. (2009). “Estimation of Clark’s instantaneous unit hydrograph parameters and development of direct surface runoff hydrograph.” Water Resour. Manage., 23(12), 2417–2435.
Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., Michel, C., Usart-Sanchez, I., and Lavabre, J. (2001). “Impact of imperfect rainfall knowledge on the efficiency and the parameters of watershed models.” J. Hydrol., 250(1–4), 206–223.
Basistha, A., Arya, D. S., and Goel, N. K. (2008). “Spatial distribution of rainfall in Indian Himalayas: A case study of Uttarakhand region.” Water Resour. Manage., 22(10), 1325–1346.
Bastin, G., Lorent, B., Duque, C., and Gevers, M. (1984). “Optimal estimation of the average rainfall and optimal selection of raingauge locations.” Water Resour. Res., 20(4), 463–470.
Bhadra, A., Bandyopadhyay, A., Singh, R., and Raghuwanshi, N. S. (2010). “Rainfall-runoff modeling: Comparison of two approaches with different data requirements.” Water Resour. Manage., 24(1), 37–62.
Carcano, E. C., Bartolini, P., Muselli, M., and Piroddi, L. (2008). “Jordan recurrent neural network versus IHACRES in modelling daily streamflows.” J. Hydrol., 362(3–4), 291–307.
Chen, R. S., Pi, L. C., and Huang, Y. H. (2003). “Analysis of rainfall-runoff relation in paddy fields by diffusive tank model.” Hydrol. Processes, 17(13), 2541–2553.
Cheng, K. S., Lin, Y. C., and Liou, J. J. (2008a). “Rain-gauge network evaluation and augmentation using geostatistics.” Hydrol. Processes, 22(14), 2554–2564.
Cheng, S. J., Hsieh, H. H., Lee, C. F., and Wang, Y. M. (2008b). “The storage potential of different surface coverings for various scale storms on Wu-Tu Watershed, Taiwan.” Nat. Hazards, 44(1), 129–146.
Cheng, S. J., Hsieh, H. H., and Wang, Y. M. (2007). “Geostatistical interpolation of space-time rainfall on Tamshui River Basin, Taiwan.” Hydrol. Processes, 21(23), 3136–3145.
Cheng, S. J., Lee, C. F., and Lee, J. H. (2010). “Effects of urbanization factors on model parameters.” Water Resour. Manage., 24(4), 775–794.
Cheng, S. J., and Wang, R. Y. (2002). “An approach for evaluating the hydrological effects of urbanization and its application.” Hydrol. Processes, 16(7), 1403–1418.
Clarke, R. T. (1973). “A review of some mathematical models used in hydrology, with observations on their calibration and use.” J. Hydrol., 19(1), 1–20.
Croke, B. F. W., Letcher, R. A., and Jakeman, A. J. (2006). “Development of a distributed flow model for underpinning assessment of water allocation options in the Namoi River Basin, Australia.” J. Hydrol., 319(1–4), 51–71.
Duan, Q., Gupta, V. K., and Sorooshian, S. (1993). “Shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient global minimization.” J. Optim. Theory Appl., 76(3), 501–521.
Evans, J. P. (2003). “Improving the characteristics of streamflow modeled by regional climate models.” J. Hydrol., 284(1–4), 211–227.
Franchini, M., and O’Connell, P. E. (1996). “An analysis of the dynamic component of the geomorphologic instantaneous unit hydrograph.” J. Hydrol., 175(1–4), 407–428.
Goovaerts, P. (2000). “Geostatistical approaches for incorporating elevation into the spatial interpolation of rainfall.” J. Hydrol., 228(1–2), 113–129.
Guhathakurta, P., and Rajeevan, M. (2008). “Trends in the rainfall pattern over India.” Int. J. Climatol., 28(11), 1453–1469.
Hashino, M., Yao, H., and Yoshida, H. (2002). “Studies and evaluations on interception processes during rainfall based on a tank model.” J. Hydrol., 255(1–4), 1–11.
Hsieh, L. S., and Wang, R. Y. (1999). “A semi-distributed parallel-type linear reservoir rainfall-runoff model and its application in Taiwan.” Hydrol. Processes, 13(8), 1247–1268.
Huang, H. J., Cheng, S. J., Wen, J. C., and Lee, J. H. (2008a). “Effect of growing watershed imperviousness on hydrograph parameters and peak discharge.” Hydrol. Processes, 22(13), 2075–2085.
Huang, S. Y., Cheng, S. J., Wen, J. C., and Lee, J. H. (2008b). “Identifying peak-imperviousness-recurrence relationships on a growing-impervious watershed, Taiwan.” J. Hydrol., 362(3–4), 320–336.
Jakeman, A. J., and Hornberger, G. M. (1993). “How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model?” Water Resour. Res., 29(8), 2637–2649.
Jakeman, A. J., Littlewood, I. G., and Whitehead, P. G. (1990). “Computation of the instantaneous unit hydrograph and identifiable component flows with application to two upland catchments.” J. Hydrol., 117(1–4), 275–300.
Jin, C. X. (1992). “A deterministic gamma-type geomorphologic instantaneous unit hydrograph based on path types.” Water Resour. Res., 28(2), 479–486.
Lebel, T., and Bastin, G. (1985). “Variogram identification by the mean squared interpolation error method with application to hydrologic field.” J. Hydrol., 77(1–4), 31–56.
Lee, Y. H., and Singh, V. P. (2005). “Tank model for sediment yield.” Water Resour. Manage., 19(4), 349–362.
Ma, Y., et al. (2011). “Water infiltration in layered soils with air entrapment: Modified Green-Ampt model and experimental validation.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 16(8), 628–639.
Madsen, H. (2000). “Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall–runoff model using multiple objectives.” J. Hydrol., 235(3–4), 276–288.
Mays, L. W., and Taur, C. K. (1982). “Unit hydrographs via nonlinear programming.” Water Resour. Res., 18(4), 744–752.
Melone, F., Corradini, C., and Singh, V. P. (1998). “Simulation of the direct runoff hydrograph at basin outlet.” Hydrol. Processes, 12(5), 769–779.
Mizumura, K., and Ito, Y. (2011). “Analytical solution of nonlinear kinematic wave model with time-varying rainfall.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 16(9), 736–746.
Moramarco, T., Melone, F., and Singh, V. P. (2005). “Assessment of flooding in urbanized ungauged basins: A case study in the upper Tiber area, Italy.” Hydrol. Processes, 19(10), 1909–1924.
Nash, J. E. (1957). “The form of the instantaneous unit hydrograph.” IAHS Publ., 45(3–4), 112–121.
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models: 1. A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol., 10(3), 282–290.
Nayak, P. C., Sudheer, K. P., and Ramasastri, K. S. (2005). “Fuzzy computing based rainfall-runoff model for real time flood forecasting.” Hydrol. Processes, 19(4), 955–968.
Nourani, V., Singh, V. P., and Delafrouz, H. (2009). “Three geomorphological rainfall-runoff models based on the linear reservoir concept.” Catena, 76(3), 206–214.
O’Connell, P. E., and Todini, E. (1996). “Modelling of rainfall, flow and mass transport in hydrological systems: An overview.” J. Hydrol., 175(1–4), 3–16.
Ponce, V. M., and Lugo, A. (2001). “Modeling looped ratings in Muskingum-Cunge routing.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 6(2), 119–124.
Schreider, S. Y., Jakeman, A. J., Letcher, R. A., Nathan, R. J., Neal, B. P., and Beavis, S. G. (2002). “Detecting changes in streamflow response to changes in non-climatic catchment conditions: Farm dam development in the Murray-Darling basin, Australia.” J. Hydrol., 262(1–4), 84–98.
Sugawara, M. (1979). “Automatic calibration of the tank model.” Hydrol. Sci. Bull., 24(3), 375–388.
Sugawara, M. (1995). “Tank model.” Chapter 6, Computer models of watershed hydrology, V. P. Singh, ed., Water Resources, Littleton, CO.
Syed, K. H., Goodrich, D. C., Myers, D. E., and Sorooshian, S. (2003). “Spatial characteristics of thunderstorm rainfall fields and their relation to runoff.” J. Hydrol., 271(1–4), 1–21.
Yue, S., and Hashino, M. (2000). “Unit hydrographs to model quick and slow runoff components of streamflow.” J. Hydrol., 227(1–4), 195–206.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18Issue 6June 2013
Pages: 675 - 688

History

Received: Jul 2, 2010
Accepted: Jun 19, 2012
Published online: Aug 4, 2012
Published in print: Jun 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Chun-dan Cheng
Ph.D. Student, Graduate School of Engineering Science and Technology, National Yunlin Univ. of Science and Technology, Douliou, Yunlin 640, Taiwan.
Shin-jen Cheng [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Leisure and Recreation Management, Taiwan Shoufu Univ., 168 Nan-shih Li, Madou 721, Tainan, Taiwan (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Jet-chau Wen
Professor, Dept. of Safety Health and Environmental Engineering, National Yunlin Univ. of Science and Technology, Douliou, Yunlin 640, Taiwan.
Ju-huang Lee
Assistant Professor, Water Resources Agency, Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taipei 106, Taiwan.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share