Technical Papers
Apr 26, 2012

Independent Assessment of Incremental Complexity in NWS Multisensor Precipitation Estimator Algorithms

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18, Issue 2

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive intercomparison analysis of different radar-based multisensor precipitation products generated operationally by the National Weather Service (NWS) Multisensor Precipitation Estimator (MPE) algorithm from the Weather Surveillance Radar–1988 Doppler version and concurrent rain gauge data. The analysis provides close insight into different effects of the increasing degree of complexitzy in the MPE algorithms. First, a gauge-only product produced by the MPE algorithm was assessed. Then six MPE products were analyzed: a radar-only product, a mean-field bias-adjusted product, a local bias-adjusted product, two products that are based on merging the bias-adjusted products with gauge observations, and a final product that includes human intervention by NWS forecasters. Data from a dense, carefully maintained experimental rain gauge cluster are used as an independent surface reference. A number of summary and conditional statistics are applied to the product intercomparisons. The results reported in this paper show that the most effective improvement of the rainfall products comes from applying the mean-field bias adjustment to the radar-only product. The analysis demonstrates that, for the current study site, some best-intended schemes for the optimal merging of radar and rain gauge data processing did not necessarily lead to clear improvements and, in some respects, caused accuracy degradation in the final products. This behavior by the MPE merging schemes is possibly attributed to the rather poor density of operational rain gauges that need to be available in real time for the implementation of such schemes. Future research is required to examine whether this behavior persists in other regions that may have better coverage and availability of operational rain gauges.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded in part by the LaSPACE Research Enhancement Awards program under the agreement NASA/LEQSF(2005-2010)-LaSPACE and the DART NSF-BORSF program. The authors thank Jeff Graschel at LMRFC for providing the different MPE products and for numerous insightful discussions. Paul Tilles of NWS/OHD is acknowledged for providing the list of the MPE parameters.

References

Bedient, P. B., Holder, A., Benavides, J., and Vieux, B. (2003). “Radar-based flood warning system applied to T.S. Allison.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 8(6), 308–318.
Bras, R. L., and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (1993). Random functions and hydrology, Dover, New York.
Brooks, H. E., and Doswell, C. A., III. (1996). “A comparison of measures-oriented and distributions-oriented approaches to forecast verification.” Weather Forecast., 11(3), 288–303.
Ciach, G. J. (2003). “Local random errors in tipping-bucket rain gauge measurements.” J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 20(5), 752–759.
Ciach, G. J., and Krajewski, W. F. (1999). “Radar-rain gauge comparisons under observational uncertainties.’’ J. Appl. Meteorol., 38(10), 1519–1525.
Ciach, G. J., Krajewski, W. F., and Villarini, G. (2007). “Product-error-driven uncertainty model for probabilistic quantitative precipitation estimation with NEXRAD data.” J. Hydrometeorol., 8(6), 1325–1347.
Ciach, G. J., Morrissey, M. L., and Krajewski, W. F. (2000). “Conditional bias in radar rainfall estimation.” J. Appl. Meteorol., 39(11), 1941–1946.
Dyer, J. L., and Garza, R. (2004). “A comparison of precipitation estimation techniques over Lake Okeechobee, Florida.” Weather Forecast., 19(6), 1029–1043.
Ebert, E. E., and McBride, J. L. (2000). “Verification of precipitation in weather systems: Determination of systematic errors.” J. Hydrol., 239(1–4), 179–202.
Fang, Z., Bedient, P. B., Benevides, J. A., and Zimmer, A. L. (2008). “Enhanced radar-based flood alert system and floodplain mapping.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 13(10), 926–938.
Fulton, R. A. (2002). “Activities to improve WSR-88D radar rainfall estimation in the National Weather Service.” Proc., 2nd Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conf., Subcomittee on Hydrology, Advisory Committee on Water Data, Las Vegas, NV.
Fulton, R. A., Breidenbach, J. P., Seo, D.-J., Miller, D. A., and O'Bannon, T. (1998). “The WSR-88D rainfall algorithm.” Weather Forecast., 13(2), 377–395.
Grassotti, C., Hoffman, R. N., Vivoni, E. R., and Entekhabi, D. (2003). “Multiple timescale intercomparison of two radar products and rain gauge observations over the Arkansas-Red River Basin.” Weather Forecast., 18(6), 1207–1229.
Greene, D. R., Hudlow, M. D., and Farnsworth, R. K. (1979). “A multiple sensor rainfall analysis system.” Proc., 3rd Conf. on Hydrometeor., American Meteorological Society, Bogota, Colombia.
Habib, E., et al. (2008). “Effect of rainfall spatial variability and sampling on salinity prediction in an estuarine system.” J. Hydrol., 350(1–2), 56–67.
Habib, E., Ciach, G. J., and Krajewski, W. F. (2004). “A method for filtering out raingauge representativeness errors from the verification distributions of radar and raingauge rainfall.” Adv. Water Resour., 27(10), 967–980.
Habib, E., and Krajewski, W. F. (2002). “Uncertainty analysis of the TRMM ground-validation radar-rainfall products: Application to the TEFLUN-B field campaign.” J. Appl. Meteorol., 41(5), 558–572.
Habib, E., Larson, B., and Graschel, J. (2009). “Validation of NEXRAD multisensor precipitation estimates using an experimental dense rain gauge network in south Louisiana.” J. Hydrol., 373(3–4), 463–478.
Katz, R. W., and Murphy, A. H., eds. (1997). Economic value of weather and climate forecasts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 222.
Kim, D., Nelson, B., and Seo, D.-J. (2009). “Characteristics of reprocessed hydrometeorological automated data system (HADS) hourly precipitation data.” Weather Forecast., 24(5), 1287–1296.
Kitchen, M., and Blackall, R. M. (1992). “Representativeness errors in comparisons between radar and gauge measurements of rainfall.” J. Hydrol., 134(1–4), 13–33.
Klazura, G. E., and Imy, D. A. (1993). “A description of the initial set of analysis products available from the NEXRAD WSR-88D system.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 74, 1293–1311.
Kondragunta, C., and Shrestha, K. (2006). “Automated real-time operational rain gauge quality controls in NWS hydrologic operations.” Proc., 20th AMS Conf. on Hydrol., American Meteorological Society, Boston, MA.
Lawrence, B. A., Shebsovich, M. I., Glaudemans, M. J., and Tilles, P. S. (2003). “Enhancing precipitation estimation capabilities at National Weather Service field offices using multisensor precipitation data mosaics.” 19th Int. Conf. on Interactive Information and Processing Systems (IIPS) for Meteorology, Oceanography, and Hydrology, American Meteorological Society, Boston, MA.
Marzban, C., and Sandgathe, S. (2006). “Cluster analysis for verification of precipitation fields.” Weather Forecast., 21(5), 824–838.
Marzen, J., and Fuelberg, H. (2005). “Developing a high resolution precipitation dataset for Florida hydrologic studies.” 21st Int. Conf. on Interactive Information Processing Systems (IIPS) for Meteorology, Oceanography, and Hydrology, American Meteorological Society, Boston, MA.
Musa, M., et al. (2003). “Quality control tools for meteorological data in the MeteoSwiss data warehouse system.” Proc., ICAM/MAP 2003, MeteoSwiss, Switzerland.
Neary, V., Habib, E., and Fleming, M. (2004). “Hydrologic modeling with NEXRAD precipitation.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 9(5), 339–349.
Over, T. M., Murphy, E. A., Ortel, T. W., and Ishii, A. L. (2007). “Comparisons between NEXRAD radar and tipping-bucket gage rainfall data: A case study for DuPage County, Illinois.” Proc., World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Seo, D. J. (1998). “Real-time estimation of rainfall fields using radar rainfall and rain gauge data.” J. Hydrol., 208(1–2), 37–52.
Seo, D. J., and Breidenbach, J. (2002). “Real-time correction of spatially nonuniform bias in radar rainfall data using rain gauge measurements.” J. Hydrometeorol., 3(2), 93–111.
Seo, D. J., Briedenbach, J. P., and Johnson, E. R. (1999). “Real-time estimation of mean field bias in radar rainfall data.” J. Hydrol., 223(3–4), 131–147.
Seo, D. J., Seed, A., and Delrieu, G. (2010). “Radar and multisensor rainfall estimation for hydrologic applications.” State of the Science, Geophysical Monograph Series, F. Y. Testik and M. Gebremichael, eds., Vol. 191, AGU, Washington, DC, 79–104.
Stellman, K., Fuelberg, H., Garza, R., and Mullusky, M. (2001). “An examination of radar and rain gauge-derived mean areal precipitation over Georgia watersheds.” Weather Forecast., 16(1), 133–144.
Villarini, G., and Krajewski, W. F. (2009). “Empirically based modelling of uncertainties in radar rainfall estimates for a C-band weather radar at different time scales.” Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 135, 1424–1438.
Villarini, G., and Krajewski, W. F. (2010). “Review of the different sources of uncertainty in single polarization radar-based estimates of rainfall.” Surv. Geophys., 31(1), 107–129.
Villarini, G., Mandapaka, P. V., Krajewski, W. F., and Moore, R. J. (2008). “Rainfall and sampling errors: A rain gauge perspective.” J. Geophys. Res., 113, D11102.
Wang, D., Smith, M., Zhang, Z., Koren, V., and Reed, S. (2001). “Statistical comparison of mean areal precipitation estimates from WSR-88D, operational and historical gage networks.” NWS Hydrology Laboratory Technical Rep., Hydrology Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD.
Wang, X., Xie, H., Sharif, H., and Zeitler, J. (2008). “Validating NEXRAD MPE and Stage III precipitation products for uniform rainfall on the Upper Guadalupe River Basin of the Texas Hill Country.” J. Hydrol., 348(1–2), 73–86.
Westcott, N. E., Knappb, H. V., and Hilberg, S. D. (2008). “Comparison of gage and multi-sensor precipitation estimates over a range of spatial and temporal scales in the Midwestern United States.” J. Hydrol., 348(1–2), 73–86.
Xie, H., et al. (2006). “Evaluation of NEXRAD Stage III precipitation data over semiarid region.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 42(1), 237–256.
Xie, H., Zhang, X., Yu, B., and Sharif, H. (2011). “Performance evaluation of interpolation methods for incorporating rain gauge measurements into NEXRAD precipitation data: A case study in the Upper Guadalupe River Basin.” Hydrol. Processes, 25(24), 3711–3720.
Yilmaz, K., Hogue, T., Hsu, K. L., Sorooshian, S., Gupta, H., and Wagener, T. (2005). “Intercomparison of rain gauge, radar, and satellite-based precipitation estimates with emphasis on hydrologic forecasting.” J. Hydrometeorol., 6(4), 497–517.
Young, C. B., Bradley, A., Krajewski, W., Kruger, A., and Morrissey, M. (2000). “Evaluating NEXRAD multisensor precipitation estimates for operational hydrologic forecasting.” J. Hydrometeorol., 1(3), 241–254.
Young, C. B., and Brunsell, N. A. (2008). “Evaluating NEXRAD estimates for the Missouri River Basin: Analysis using daily raingauge data.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 13(7), 549–553.
Zhang, J., et al. (2011). “National mosaic and multi-sensor QPE (NMQ) system: Description, results, and future plans.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 92, 1321–1338.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18Issue 2February 2013
Pages: 143 - 155

History

Received: Jan 30, 2011
Accepted: Apr 24, 2012
Published online: Apr 26, 2012
Published in print: Feb 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Louisiana, P.O. Box 42991, Lafayette, LA 70504 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Lingling Qin
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Louisiana, P.O. Box 42991, Lafayette, LA 70504.
Dong-Jun Seo
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas, Box 19308, Rm. 438 Nedderman Hall, 416 Yates St., Arlington, TX 76019-0308.
Grzegorz J. Ciach
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Louisiana, P.O. Box 42991, Lafayette, LA 70504; presently, 1203 Ash St., Iowa City, IA 52240.
Brian R. Nelson
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, NC.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share