Case Studies
Jan 11, 2012

Prediction of Rainfall-Runoff in an Ungauged Basin: Case Study in the Mountainous Region of Northern Thailand

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18, Issue 2

Abstract

Reduction of uncertainty in hydrologic predictions is important for water resources development and management, especially in ungauged basins. The objective of this study was to predict rainfall and runoff in an ungauged basin located in a mountainous region of northern Thailand by using a weather radar to estimate rainfall and a modeling approach to simulate rainfall-runoff processes. The calibrated Ze-R relationship (Ze=18R1.45) was used to estimate rainfall over a gauged basin and an assumed ungauged basin. The runoff simulations in the gauged and ungauged basins were conducted using the quasi-distributed hydrological model HEC-HMS. The simulation results in the gauged basin, for both calibration and verification, were in agreement with the observed data. Model parameters in the assumed ungauged basin were estimated using transposition and regionalization techniques. The predicted direct runoff hydrograph in the assumed ungauged basin using radar measured rainfall and the regionalization technique matches well with the measurements at the basin outlet. Based on the study results, the radar rainfall estimates and regionalization of the hydrologic model parameters are promising alternatives for improved hydrologic predictions in ungauged basins.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study is part of the doctoral research conducted by the first author at Water Engineering and Management, Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand, which was supported by the Royal Thai Government. The authors express sincere gratitude to the staff of the 7th Watershed Management Center of the Royal Forestry Department, the Bureau of Royal Rainmaking and Agricultural Aviation, the Royal Irrigation Department and the Thai Meteorological Department who assisted and provided rainfall, radar, and streamflow data, in addition to valuable suggestions during the research.

References

Amitai, A. E., Marks, A. D., Wolff, B. D., Silberstein, S. D., Fisher, L. B., and Pippitt, L. J. (2006). “Evaluation of radar rainfall products: Lessons learned from the NASA TRMM validation program in Florida.” J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 23(11), 1492–1505.
Andrieu, H., Creutin, J. D., Delrieu, G., and Faure, D. (1997). “Use of a weather radar for the hydrology of a mountainous area. Part I: Radar measurement interpretation.” J. Hydrol., 193(1–4), 1–25.
Arlen, F. (2000). Hydrologic modeling system—HEC-HMS—Technical reference manual, Hydrologic Engineering Center, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, CA.
Battan, L. J. (1973). Radar observation of the atmosphere, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
Beven, K. J. (1995). “TOPMODEL.” Chapter 18, Computer models of watershed hydrology, V. P. Singh, ed., Water Resources Publications, Littleton, CO.
Beven, K. J. (2000). “Uniqueness of place and process representations in hydrological modeling.” Hydro. Earth Syst, Sci., 4(2), 203–213.
Bonnifait, L., et al. (2009). “Distributed hydrologic and hydraulic modelling with radar rainfall input: Reconstruction of the 8–9 September 2002 catastrophic flood event in the Gard region, France.” Adv. Water Resour., 32(7), 1077–1089.
Borga, M. (2002). “Accuracy of radar rainfall estimates for streamflow simulation.” J. Hydrol., 267(1–2), 26–39.
Chow, V. T., Maidment, D. R., and Mays, L. W. (1988). Applied hydrology, McGraw-Hill, Singapore.
Collier, C. G. (1996). Applications of weather radar systems: A guide to uses of radar data in meteorology and hydrology, Praxis Publishing Limited, Chichester, West Sussex, UK.
Dairaku, K., Emori, S., Oki, T., and Musiak, K. (2002). “Orographic rainfall in tropical mountainous region, the Mae Chaem Watershed.” Proc., 2002 Workshop on GAME-Topics and Hydrometeorological Studies in Thailand and Southeast Asia, University of Tokyo, Japan.
Danish Hydraulic Institute (DHI). (2003). MIKE basin: Rainfall-runoff modeling reference manual, Copenhagen, Denmark, 60–61.
Dutta, D., Herath, S., and Musiake, K. (2003). “A mathematical model for flood loss estimation.” J. Hydrol., 277(1–2), 24–49.
Fabry, F., and Seed, A. W. (2009). “Quantifying and predicting the accuracy of radar-based quantitative precipitation forecasts.” Adv. Water Resour., 32(7), 43–49.
Hoblit, B. C., and Curtis, D. C. (2001). “GIS highlights importance of high-resolution radar rainfall data.” Proc., 21st Annual ESRI Int. User Conf., ESRI, CA.
Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC). (1981). HEC-1 flood hydrograph package: Users manual, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, CA.
Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC). (2000). Hydrologic modeling system HEC-HMS user’s manual—Version 2, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, CA.
Imru, M., and Damisse, E. (2004). “Real time flow monitoring in a large scale water management system.” Proc., World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA, 2260–2271.
Jain, M. K., Kothyari, U. C., and Ranga Raju, K. G. (2004). “A GIS based distributed rainfall–runoff model.” J. Hydrol., 299(1–2), 107–135.
James, D. (2003). Geospatial hydrologic modeling extension HEC-GeoHMS—User’s Manual—Version 1.1, Hydrologic Engineering Center, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, CA.
Jinkang, D., Shunping, X., Youpeng, X., Xu, C., and Singh, V. P. (2007). “Development and testing of a simple physically-based distributed rainfall-runoff model for storm runoff simulation in humid forested basins.” J. Hydrol., 336(3–4), 334–346.
Joss, J., Schran, K., Thoms, J. C., and Waldvogel, A. (1970). “On the quantitative determination of precipitation by radar.” Wissenschaftlich Mitteilung No. 63, Eidgenössischen Kommission Zum Studium Der Hagelgilbung und der Hergelsher (in German), Swiss Meteorological Institute, Locarno-Monti, Switzerland.
Kim, U., and Kaluarachchi, J. J. (2008). “Application of parameter estimation and regionalization methodologies to ungauged basins of the Upper Blue Nile River Basin, Ethiopia.” J. Hydrol., 362(1–2), 39–56.
Kuraji, K., Punyatrong, K., and Sirisiyard, I. (2004). “Six years intensive rainfall observation in Mae Chaem Watershed, Northern Thailand.” 6th Int. Study Conf. on GEWEX in Asia and GAME, World Climate Research Programme, World Meteorological Association, United Nations, Geneva, Switzerland, 1–3.
Lakshmi, V. (2004). Use of satellite remote sensing in hydrological predictions in ungaged basins, Dept. of Geological Sciences, Univ. of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
Li, M., and Shao, Q. (2010). “An improved statistical approach to merge satellite rainfall estimates and raingauge data.” J. Hydrol., 385(1–4), 51–64.
Linsley, R. K., Kohler, M. A., and Paulhus, J. L. H. (1988). Hydrology for engineers, McGraw-Hill, London, UK.
Makungo, R., Odiyo, J. O., Ndiritu, J. G., and Mwaka, B. (2010). “Rainfall–runoff modelling approach for ungauged catchments: A case study of Nzhelele River sub-quaternary catchment.” Phys. Chem. Earth, 35(13–14), 596–607.
Marshall, J. S., and Palmer, W. Mc. (1948). “The distribution of raindrops with size.” J. Meteorol., 5(4), 165–166.
Mosley, M. P. (1981). “Delimitation of New Zealand hydrologic regions.” J. Hydrol., 49(1–2), 173–192.
Öztürka, K., and Yılmazerb, A. U. (2007). “Improving the accuracy of the radar rainfall estimates using gage adjustment techniques: Case study for west Anatolia, Turkey.” Atmos. Res., 86(2), 139–148.
Piman, T. (2007). “Improvements in radar rainfall estimation for hydrologic modelling.” Dissertation, Asian Institute of Technology, Khlong Luang, Thailand, 64–65.
Piman, T., Babel, M. S., and Gupta, A. D. (2006). “Comparison of rain gauge and radar measured rainfall for runoff simulation.” 7th Int. Conf. on Hydroinformatics, Research Publishing Services, Singapore.
Piman, T., Babel, M. S., Gupta, A. D., and Weesakul, S. (2007). “Development of a window correlation matching method for improved radar rainfall estimation.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11(4), 1361–1372.
Post, D. A., Jones, J. A., and Grant, G. E. (1998). “An improved methodology for predicting the daily hydrologic response of ungauged catchments.” Environ. Model. Software, 13(3–4), 395–403.
PUB. (2003). “Predictions in ungaged basins.” 〈http://cee.uiuc.edu/research/pub/default.asp〉 (Jun. 5, 2005).
Refsgaard, J. C., and Storm, B. (1995). “Chapter 23: MIKE SHE.” Computer models of watershed hydrology, V. P. Singh, ed., Water Resources Publications, Littleton, CO.
Rosenfeld, D., Wolff, D. B., and Atlas, D. (1993). “General probability-matched relations between radar reflectivity and rain rate.” J. Appl. Meteorol., 32(1), 50–72.
Schreider, S. Yu., Jakemanb, A. J., Gallant, J., and Merritt, W. S. (2002). “Prediction of monthly discharge in ungauged catchments under agricultural land use in the Upper Ping basin northern Thailand.” Math. Comput. Simul., 59(1–3), 19–33.
Sefton, C. E. M., Whitehead, P. G., Eartherall, A., Littlewood, I. G., and Jackeman, A. J. (1995). “Dynamic response characteristics of the plynlimon catchments and preliminary analysis of relationships to physical cathment description.” Environmentrics, 6(5), 465–472.
Singh, V. P. (1988). Hydrologic systems, Volume I: Rainfall-runoff modeling, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Sivapalan, M., et al. (2003). “IAHS decade on predictions in ungauged basins (PUB), 2003–2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 48(6), 857–880.
Sugawara, M., Ozaki, E., Watanabe, I., and Katsuyama, Y. (1974). Tank model and its application to Bird Creek, Wollombi Brook, Bikin River, Kitsu River, Sanga River and Nam Mune, National Research Center for Disaster Prevention, Kyoto, Japan.
Vandewiele, G. L., and Elias, A. (1995). “Monthly water balance of ungauged catchments obtained by geographical regionalization.” J. Hydrol., 170(1–4), 277–291.
Vieux, B. E. (2003). Combined use of radar and gauge measurements for flood forecasting using a physics-based distributed hydrologic model, Vieux and Associates, Inc., Norman, OK.
Vieux, B. E., and Vieux, J. E. (2002). “Vflo™: A real-time distributed hydrologic model.” Proc., 2nd Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conf., Advisory Committee on Water Information, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, 1–12.
Wagener, T., and Wheater, H. S. (2006). “Parameter estimation and regionalization for continuous rainfall-runoff models including uncertainty.” J. Hydrol., 320(1–2), 132–154.
Wagener, T., Wheater, H. S., and Gupta, H. V. (2004). Rainfall-runoff modeling in gauged and ungauged catchments, Imperial College Press, London, UK.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18Issue 2February 2013
Pages: 285 - 296

History

Received: Feb 14, 2011
Accepted: Jan 9, 2012
Published online: Jan 11, 2012
Published in print: Feb 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Fellow, 4800 Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, Univ. of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand 8140 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
M. S. Babel [email protected]
Associate Professor, Water Engineering and Management, Asian Institute of Technology, Pathumthani, 12120 Thailand. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share