Technical Papers
Jan 15, 2013

Radar Rainfall Application in Distributed Hydrologic Modeling for Cypress Creek Watershed, Texas

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18, Issue 2

Abstract

Recent advances in hydrologic models have depended on the use of radar rainfall input in physically based, fully distributed models. Previous research conducted for case studies near Houston, Texas, have focused on the use of radar rainfall for large storm events such as tropical storms and hurricanes. A fully distributed model, Vflo, was used to model streamflow during small storm events in the Cypress Creek watershed, near Houston, Texas. Two events were simulated both with rain gauge—corrected radar data and exclusively with rain gauges. Then a third event was modeled exclusively with rain gauge data to assess model performance with only rain gauge data. The modeled streamflow was then compared to the USGS observed streamflow, using peak streamflow, time to peak, and volume streamflow, to evaluate the model performance between radar and rain gauge input. A comparison of the models for the events shows that the radar input results better match the observed streamflow for the streamflow volume and peak streamflow.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the USGS Woodlands office for streamflow monitoring and data acquisition support. In addition, the authors would also like to acknowledge Vieux and Associates, Norman, Oklahoma, for the use of the Vflo model and the processing and calibration of the radar rainfall data sets.

References

Ahnert, P., Hudlow, M., Johnson, E., and Greene, D. (1983). “Proposed ‘on-site’ precipitation processing system for NEXRAD.” 21st Conf. on Radar Meteorology, American Meteorological Society, Boston, 378–385.
Barnes, S. L. (1964). “A technique for maximizing details in numerical weather map analysis.” J. Appl. Meteorol., 3(4), 396–409.
Bedient, P., Holder, A., Benevides, J., and Vieux, B. (2003). “Radar-based flood warning system applied to Tropical Storm Allison.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 8(6), 308–318.
Bedient, P., Holder, A., Thompson, J., and Fang, Z. (2007). “Modeling of storm-water response under large tailwater conditions: Case study of the Texas Medical Center.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 12(3), 256–266.
Bedient, P., Huber, W., and Vieux, B. (2008). Hydrology and flood plain analysis, 4th Ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 688–692.
Borga, M. (2002). “Accuracy of radar rainfall estimates for streamflow simulation.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 267(1–2), 26–39.
Carpenter, T., and Georgakakos, K. (2004). “Impacts of parametric and radar rainfall uncertainty on the ensemble streamflow simulations of a distributed hydrologic model.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 298(1–4), 202–221.
Carpenter, T., Georgakakos, K., and Sperfslagea, J. (2001). “On the parametric and NEXRAD-radar sensitivities of a distributed hydrologic model suitable for operational use.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 253(1–4), 169–193.
Chellam, S., Sharma, R., Shetty, G., and Wei, Y. (2008). “Nanofiltration of retreated Lake Houston water: Disinfection by-product speciation, relationships and control.” Sep. Purif. Technol., 64(2), 160–169.
Chow, V. T. (1959). Open channel hydraulics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Crum, T. D., and Alberty, R. L. (1993). “The WSR-88D and the WSR-88D operational support facility.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 74(9), 1669–1688.
Delrieu, G. et al. (2009). “Weather radar and hydrology.” Adv. Water Resour., 32(7), 969–974.
Einfalt, T. et al. (2004). “Towards a roadmap for use of radar rainfall data in urban drainage.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 299(3–4), 186–202.
Esri. (2000). “Census 2000 TIGER.” 〈http://www.esri.com/data/download/census2000-tigerline/index.html〉 (Dec. 7, 2010).
Fang, Z., Bedient, P., Benevides, J., and Zimmer, A. (2008). “Enhanced radar-based flood alert system and floodplain map library.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 13(10), 926–938.
Fang, Z., Bedient, P., Robinson, H., and Vieux, B. (2010). “Using a distributed hydrologic model to evaluate the location of urban development and flood control storage.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 136(5), 597–601.
Gan, T., Dlamini, E., and Biftu, G. (1997). “Effects of model complexity and structure, data quality, and objective functions on hydrologic modeling.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 192(1–4), 81–103.
Haan, C., Barfield, J., and Hayes, J. (1994). Design hydrology and sedimentology for small catchments, Academic, New York, 84–85.
Harris County Office of Emergency Management (HCOEM). (2010). “Rainfall map.” 〈http://www.hcoem.org/HCRainfall.aspx〉 (Nov. 2010).
Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC). (2009). “Permitted domestic WWTP.” Clean Rivers Program, Houston.
Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC). (2002). “HEC-RAS, River analysis system.” U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, CA.
James, W., Robinson, C., and Bell, J. (1993). “Radar-assisted real time flood forecasting.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 119(1), 32–44.
Kim, B., Kim, B., and Kim, H. (2008). “Flood simulation using the gage-adjusted radar rainfall and physics-based distributed hydrologic model.” Hydrol. Processes, 22(22), 4400–4414.
Koren, V., Finnerty, B., Schaake, J., Smith, M., Seo, D., and Duan, Q. (1999). “Scale dependencies of hydrologic models to spatial variability of precipitation.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 217(3–4), 285–302.
Krajewski, W., and Smith, J. (2002). “Radar hydrology: Rainfall estimation.” Adv. Water Resour., 25(8–12), 1394–1837.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). (2006). “U.S. general soil map (STATSGO2) for Texas.” U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC, 〈http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov〉 (Apr. 26, 2010).
Rosenfeld, D., Wolff, D., and Atlas, D. (1993). “General probability-matched relationships between radar reflectivity and rain rate.” J. Appl. Meteorol., 32(1), 50–72.
Safiolea, E., Bedient, P., and Vieux, B. (2005). “Assessment of the relative hydrologic effects of land use change and subsidence using distributed modeling.” Managing Watersheds for Human and Natural Impacts: Engineering, Ecological, and Economic Challenges, Proc. of Watershed 2005, American Society of Civil Engineers, Williamsburg, Virginia.
Seo, D. (1998). “Real-time estimation of rainfall fields using radar rainfall and rain gage data.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 208(1–2), 37–52.
Seo, D., and Breidenbach, J. (2002). “Real-time correction of spatially nonuniform bias in radar rainfall data using rain gage measurements.” J. Hydrometeorol., 3(2), 93–111.
Seo, D., Breidenbach, J., and Johnson, E. (1999). “Real-time estimation of mean field bias in radar rainfall data.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 223(3), 131–147.
Sharif, H., Sparks, L., Hassan, A., Zeitler, J., and Xie, H. (2010). “Application of a distributed hydrologic model to the November 17, 2004, flood of Bull Creek watershed, Austin, Texas.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 15(8), 651–657.
Shaw, S., Stedinger, J., and Walter, M. (2010). “Evaluating urban pollutant buildup/wash-off models using a Madison, Wiscosin catchment.” J. Environ. Eng., 136(2), 194–203.
Smith, M., et al. (2004). “The distributed model intercomparison project (DMIP): motivation and experiment design.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 298(1–4), 4–26.
Sneck-Fahrer, D., Milburn, M., East, J., and Oden, J. (2005). “Water-quality assessment of Lake Houston near Houston, Texas, 2000–2004.”, U.S. Geologic Survey, Washington, DC.
Sun, X., Mein, R., Keenan, T., and Elliot, J. (2000). “Flood estimation using radar and rain gage data.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 239(1–4), 4–18.
Tropical Storm Allison Recovery Project (TSARP). (2006). “Tropical storm allison recovery project.” 〈http://hcfd.org/tsarp.asp〉 (Apr. 12, 2010).
Vieux, B. (2004). Distributed hydrologic modeling using GIS, 2nd Ed., Kluwer Academic, Boston, 182–184.
Vieux, B., and Bedient, P. (1998). “Estimation of rainfall for flood prediction from WSR-88D reflectivity: A case study, 17–18 October 1994.” Weather and Forecasting, 13(2), 407–415.
Vieux, B., and Bedient, P. (2004). “Assessing urban hydrologic prediction accuracy through event reconstruction.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 229(3–4), 217–236.
Vieux, B., Park, J., and Kang, B. (2009). “Distributed hydrologic prediction: Sensitivity to accuracy of initial soil moisture conditions and radar rainfall input.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 14(7), 671–689.
Wu, T., Gilbert, D., Fuelberg, H., Cooper, H., Bottcher, D., and Reed, C. (2008). “Doppler-derived rainfall data monitoring to support surface water modeling of TMDL.” J. Coastal Res., 52, 273–280.
Yilmaz, K., Gupta, H., and Wagener, T. (2008). “A process-based diagnostic approach to model evaluation: Application to the NWS distributed hydrologic model.” Water Resour. Res., 44(9), W09417.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18Issue 2February 2013
Pages: 219 - 227

History

Received: Dec 28, 2010
Accepted: Jan 4, 2012
Published online: Jan 15, 2013
Published in print: Feb 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Aarin Teague [email protected]
Sustainable Stormwater Specialist, Watershed Engineering, San Antonio River Authority, San Antonio TX; formerly, Postdoctoral Fellow, Office of Research and Development, U.S. EPA, Gulf Breeze, FL (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Jason Christian
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Engineering, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Philip Bedient
F.ASCE
Herman Brown Professor of Engineering, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice Univ., Houston, TX.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share