Technical Papers
Dec 14, 2011

Use of Storm Life Cycle Information and Lightning Data in Radar-Rainfall Estimation

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18, Issue 2

Abstract

Correcting real-time radar-rainfall estimates for mean field systematic errors (bias) is normally accomplished through gauge-based adjustment procedures. This study explores two auxiliary data sources derived from cloud-to-ground (CG) lightning measurements and storm tracking applied on radar images in terms of providing microphysical information useful for improving the efficiency of gauge-based bias adjustment techniques. The CG information is used to classify storms into thunderstorms (T-storms) versus showers (i.e., storms without lightning) and the tracking algorithm is used to classify storms according to their stage of maturity (i.e., growing, maturing, and decaying). Data for this study are based on high-resolution radar-rainfall estimates (2-km spatial grid resolution at 15-min intervals) available over the South Florida Water Management District for a period of 11 months, along with corresponding rain gauge measurements from 120 gauges and CG occurrences from the National Lightning Detection Network. The radar error analysis for T-storms versus showers and for the different storm maturity stages indicate that storm tracking and CG contain significant microphysical information that can improve radar-rainfall estimation. It is shown that radar rain estimates tend to underestimate convective rainfall, primarily associated with the growing stage of the storms or the occurrences of CG lightning; showers and storms at mature or decay stages are shown to be better represented by the standard reflectivity-rainfall (Z-R) relationship used for convective and tropical storms in Florida. Results from this study indicate that information regarding storm maturity stage derived from tracking radar images, and to a lesser extent, CG observations, can be used to reduce variability in the Z-R conversion and consequently improve accuracy in real-time radar-rainfall estimation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the South Florida Water Management District. Radar and rain gauge rainfall data were provided by the district. The NLDN lightning data were acquired from NASA’s Global Hydrology and Climate Center.

References

Anagnostou, E. N., and Krajewski, W. F. (1999a). “Real-time radar rainfall estimation: 1. Algorithm formulation.” J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 16(2), 189–197.
Anagnostou, E. N., and Krajewski, W. F. (1999b). “Real-time radar rainfall estimation: 2. Case study.” J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 16(2), 198–205.
Anagnostou, E. N., Krajewski, W. F., Seo, D.-J., and Johnson, E. R. (1998). “Mean-field radar rainfall bias studies for WSR-88D.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 3(3), 149–159.
Anagnostou, E. N., Morales, C., and Dinku, T. (2001). “The use of TRMM precipitation radar observations in determining ground radar calibration biases.” J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 18(4), 616–628.
Atlas, D., Ulbrich, C. W., Marks, F. D., Amitai, E., and Williams, C. (1999). “Systematic variation of drop size and radar-rainfall relations.” J. Geophys. Res., 104(D6), 6155–6169.
Austin, P. (1987). “Relation between measured radar reflectivity and surface rainfall.” Mon. Weather Rev., 115(5), 1053–1069.
Campos, E., and Zawadzki, I. (2000). “Instrumental uncertainties in Z-R relations.” J. Appl. Meteorol., 39(7), 1088–1102.
Chumchean, S., Sharma, A., and Seed, A. (2003). “Radar rainfall error variance and its impact on radar rainfall calibration.” Phys. Chem. Earth, 28(1–3), 27–39.
Cummins, K. L., Murphy, M. J., Bardo, E. A., Hiscox, W. L., Pyle, R. B., and Pifer, A. E. (1998). “A combined TOA/MDF technology upgrade of the U. S. National Lightning Detection Network.” J. Geophys. Res., 103(D8), 9035–9044.
Huebner, R. S., Pathak, C., and Hoblit, B. C. (2003). “Development and use of a NEXRAD database for water management in South Florida.” Proc., World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, EWRI/ASCE, Reston, VA, 216.
Krajewski, W. F., and Smith, J. A. (2002). “Radar hydrology: Rainfall estimation.” Adv. Water Resour., 25(8–12), 1387–1394.
Machado, L. A. T., Rossow, W. B., Guedes, R. L., and Walker, A. W. (1998). “Life cycle variations of mesoscale convective systems over the Americas.” Mon. Weather Rev., 126(6), 1630–1654.
Maddox, R. A., Zhang, J., Gourley, J. J., and Howard, K. W. (2002). “Weather radar coverage over the contiguous United States.” Weather Forecast., 17(4), 927–934.
Orville, R. E., and Huffines, G. R. (2001). “Cloud-to-ground lightning in the United States: NLDN results in the first decade, 1989–1998.” Mon. Weather Rev., 129(5), 1179–1193.
Pathak, C. S., ed. (2008). “Hydrologic monitoring network of South Florida Water management District – Appendix 2-1.” 2008 South Florida Environment Rep., South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FL. 〈https://my.sfwmd.gov/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/PG_GRP_SFWMD_SFER/PORTLET_SFER/TAB2236041/VOLUME1/appendices/v1_app_2-1.pdf〉 (Dec. 15, 2009).
Pathak, C. S., and Vieux, B. E. (2008). “Improvement of NEXRAD rainfall data for Central and South Florida.” Proc., World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, EWRI/ASCE, Reston, VA.
Rendon, S., Vieux, B., and Pathak, C. S. (2010). “Estimation of regionally specific Z-R relationships for radar-based hydrologic prediction.” Proc., World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, EWRI/ASCE, Reston, VA.
Seo, D. J. (1998). “Real-time estimation of rainfall fields using radar rainfall and rain gage data.” J. Hydrol., 208(1–2), 37–52.
Skinner, C., Bloetscher, F., and Pathak, C. S. (2009). “Comparison of NEXRAD and rain gauge precipitation measurements in South Florida.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 14(3), 248–260.
Smith, J. A., and Krajewski, W. F. (1991). “Estimation of the mean field bias of radar rainfall estimates.” J. Appl. Meteorol., 30(4), 397–412.
South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). (2008). “A pilot study on NEXRAD data quality improvement.” Draft Final Rep., prepared by E. N. Anagnostou, West Palm Beach, FL.
Steiner, M., Smith, J. A., Burges, S. J., Alonso, C. V., and Darden, R. W. (1999). “Effect of bias adjustment and rain gauge data quality control on radar rainfall estimation.” Water Resour. Res., 35(8), 2487–2583.
Tadesse, A., and Anagnostou, E. N. (2009a). “Characterization of warm season convective systems in the US in terms of their electrification and dynamics of clouds and precipitation.” Atmos. Res., 91(1), 36–46.
Tadesse, A., and Anagnostou, E. N. (2009b). “The effect of storm life cycle on satellite rainfall estimation error.” J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 26(4), 769–777.
Vila, D., Machado, L. A. T., Laurent, H., and Velasco, I. (2008). “Forecast and tracking the evolution of cloud clusters (ForTraCC) using satellite infrared imagery: Methodology and validation.” Weather Forecast., 23(2), 233–245.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18Issue 2February 2013
Pages: 168 - 174

History

Received: Feb 16, 2011
Accepted: Dec 12, 2011
Published online: Dec 14, 2011
Published in print: Feb 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Emmanouil N. Anagnostou [email protected]
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, CT (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Chandra S. Pathak
F.ASCE
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 441 G St. NW, Washington, DC 20314-1000; formerly, South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FL.
Carlos A. Morales
Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences, Univ. of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share