TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jun 27, 2011

Application of a Multi-Person and Multi-Objective Decision-Making Model in Groundwater Resources Management

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 17, Issue 3

Abstract

The management of groundwater resources is complex, especially when decisions about the ecological environment and the social environment are considered. In addition to this, economic efficiency should be considered. The solution to these complex decision problems requires the use of mathematical techniques that are formulated to take into account conflicting objectives. With the development and application of coordinate game theory, many models based on the Nash solution exist for groundwater management systems, but there is still a gap in applying them to practical problems. In this paper, a model based on the marginal solution and the satisfaction function is adopted. In order to solve these multiperson and multi-objective decision-making problems, the arbitrating solution, which is the ideal state accepted by those parties, is first deduced by two-stage satisfying programming; and the final satisfying decision is then chosen by the close-degree principle, which is proposed using fuzzy pattern recognition. Additionally, this article uses groundwater system management in the Jinan Spring area as an example to show how the model can be applied. It is shown that this model is easy to solve and feasible to apply.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Aguado, E., and Remson, I. (1974). “Ground-water hydraulics in aquifer management.” J. Hydraul. Div., 100(1),103–118.
Batabyal, A. A. (1996). “The queuing theoretic approach to groundwater management.” Ecol. Model., 85(2-3), 219–227.
Cheng, C., and Chau, K. W. (2002). “Three-person multi-objective conflict decision in reservoir flood control.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 142(3), 625–631.
Dauer, J. P., and Krueger, R. J. (1980). “A multi-objective optimization model for water resources planning.” Appl. Math. Modell., 4(3), 171–175.
Demetriou, C., and Punthakey, J. F. (1998). “Evaluating sustainable groundwater management options using the MIKE SHE integrated hydrogeological modeling package.” Environ. Model. Software, 14(2–3), 129–140.
Deninger, R. A. (1970). “System analysis of water supply systems.” Water Resour. Bull., 6(4), 573–579.
Despic, O., and Simonovic, S. P. (2000). “Aggregation operators for soft decision making in water resources.” Fuzzy Sets Syst., 115(1), 11–33.
Elango, K., and Rouve, G. (1980). “Aquifers: Finite-element linear programming model.” J. Hydr. Div., 106(10), 1641–1658.
Haimes, Y. Y. (1975). “Hierachical modeling of regional total water resources systems.” Automatica, 11(1), 25–36.
He, X. (1997). “Research process and development trends of water resources management model.” Hydrogeol. Eng. Geol., 24(5), 24–26.
Ji, Y., Zhu, G., and Jiang, S. (2007). “Brief account of groundwater management model with GWM and algorithmic examples.” Site Invest. Sci. Tech., (1), 17–22.
Kentel, E., and Aral, M. M. (2007). “Fuzzy multiobjective decision-making approach for groundwater resources management.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 12(2), 206–217.
Lejano, R. P., and Davos, C. A. (1995). “Cost allocation of multiagency water resource projects: Game theoretic approaches and case study.” Water Resour. Res., 31(5), 1387–1393.
Li, D. (2007). “Compromise ratio method for fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making.” Appl. Soft Comput., 7(3), 807–817.
Li, D. (2009). “Relative ratio method for multiple attribute decision making problems.” Int. J. Inf. Tech. Decis. Making, 8(2), 289–311.
Maddock, T. (1972). “Algebraic technological function from a simulation model.” Water Resour. Res., 8(1), 129–134.
Nakas, M., Dennis, W., and Montgomery, J. (2002). “Game theory analysis of competition for groundwater involving El Paso, Texas and Ciudad Juarez, Mexico.” Moving with the Speed of Change: 2002 Ann. Meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Assoc., Milwaukee, WI, 18–31.
Neuman, S. P., and Krzysztofowiczm, R. (1977). “An iterative algorithm for interactive multiobjective programming.” Adv. Water Resour., 1(1), 1–14.
Ni, F. (2007). “A Numerical model for groundwater resources management in xiaonanhai spring catchment.” Hohai Univ. Master’s thesis, Nanjing, China, 12–14.
Raquel, S., Ferenc, S. Jr., Coppola, E., and Abraham, R. (2007). “Application of game theory for a groundwater conflict in Mexico.” J. Environ. Manage., 84(4), 560–571.
Ritzel, B. J., Eheart, J. W., and Ranjithan, S. (1994). “Using genetic algorithms to solve a multiple objective groundwater pollution containment problem.” Water Resour. Res., 30(5), 1589–1603.
Shu, Y., and Wang, H. (2005). “The development of groundwater management model.” Hydrogeol. Eng. Geol., 32(6), 85–90.
Zhu, S. J., and Cheng, T. (1993). “A model for multi-person and multi-criteria conflict decision.” Acta Autom. Sin., 19(3), 316–322.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 17Issue 3March 2012
Pages: 389 - 393

History

Received: Nov 13, 2008
Accepted: Jun 24, 2011
Published online: Jun 27, 2011
Published in print: Mar 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Guo Li Wang [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Hydraulic Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian 116024, China (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Li Li Huang
Ph.D. graduate, School of Hydraulic Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
Guo Hua Liang
Associate Professor, School of Hydraulic Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share