TECHNICAL PAPERS
Apr 20, 2011

Comparative Case Study of Rainfall-Runoff Modeling between SWMM and Fuzzy Logic Approach

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 17, Issue 2

Abstract

A comprehensive hydrological model, like the storm water management model (SWMM), has been widely used for rainfall-runoff simulation. In recent years, simple and effective modern modeling techniques have also brought great attention to the prediction of runoff with rainfall input. A comparative case study between SWMM and a presently developed fuzzy logic model for the predictions of total runoff within the watershed of Cascina Scala, Pavia in Italy is presented. A data set of 23 events from 2000 to 2003 including with the total rainfall and total runoff are adopted to train fuzzy logic parameters. Other data (1990–1995) with detailed time variations of rainfall and runoff are available for the setup and calibration of SWMM for runoff modeling. Among the 1990–1995 data, 35 independent rainfall events are selected to test the prediction performance of the SWMM and fuzzy logic models by comparing the predicted total runoffs with measured data. Comparisons and performance analyses in terms of the root-mean-squared error and coefficient of efficiency are made between the SWMM and the fuzzy logic model. The predicted total runoffs from either the SWMM or the fuzzy logic model are found to agree reasonably well with the measured data. For large rainfall events, the fuzzy logic model generally outperforms the SWMM unless the modification of the impervious ratio is applied to improve the SWMM results. However, the SWMM can produce the time varying hydrograph whereas fuzzy logic is subject to limitation of the methodology and is unable to generate such an output.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Antonella Negri for her contribution of the rainfall and runoff data and help on the SWMM simulations during her short visit to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Houston in 1996.

References

Altunkaynak, A. (2010). “A predictive model for well loss using fuzzy logic approach.” Hydrol. Processes, 24(17), 2400–2404.
Altunkaynak, A., and Şen, Z. (2007). “Fuzzy logic model of lake water level fluctuations in Lake Van, Turkey.” Theor. Appl. Climatol., 90(3–4), 227–233.
Alvisi, S., Marcellani, G., Franchini, K., and Bardossy, A. (2006). “Water level forecasting through fuzzy logic and artificial neural network approaches.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10(1), 1–17.
Arteaga, R. (1989). “User’s manual for the optimization block of SWMM.” Northwest Florida Water Management District, Tallahassee, FL.
Barco, J., Papiri, S., and Stenstrom, M. K. (2008). “First flush in a combined sewer system.” Chemosphere, 71(5), 827–833.
Boyd, M. J., Bulfill, M. C., and Knee, R. M. (1993). “Pervious and impervious runoff in urban catchments.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 38(6), 463–478.
Boyd, M. J., Bulfill, M. C., and Knee, R. M. (1994). “Predicting pervious and impervious storm runoff from urban drainage basins.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 39(4), 321–332.
Bruen, M., and Yang, J. (2006). “Combined hydraulic and black-box models for flood forecasting in urban drainage systems.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 11(6), 589–596.
Chau, K. W., Wu, C. L., and Li, Y. S. (2005). “Comparison of several flood forecasting models in Yangtze River.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 10(6), 485–491.
Cheng, C. T., Ou, C. P., and Chau, K. W. (2002). “Combining a fuzzy optimal model with a genetic algorithm to solve multiobjective rainfall-runoff model calibration.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 268(1–4), 72–86.
Cheng, C. T., Wang, W. C., Xu, D. M., and Chau, K. W. (2008). “Optimizing hydropower reservoir operation using hybrid genetic algorithm and chaos.” Water Resour. Manage., 22(7), 895–909.
Desbordes, N. (1975). “Estimation des coefficientes de ruissellement urbain.” La Tribune de Cebedeau, 376, 106–110.
French, R. (2002). “The rational method: Past, present and future.” Water Panel, The Institute of Engineers Australia (Queensland Division), Technical Session, Brisbane, Australia, 1–8.
Huber, W. C., and Dickinson, R. E. (1988). Storm water management model, user’s manual, version 4.0, EPA-600/3-88-001a, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA.
Kothyari, U. C., and Singh, V. P. (1999). “A multiple input single output model for flow forecasting.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 220(1–2), 12–26.
Lin, J. Y., Cheng, C. T., and Chau, K. W. (2006). “Using support vector machines for long-term discharge prediction.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 51(4), 599–612.
Mamdani, E. H. (1974). “Application of fuzzy algorithms for simple dynamic plant.” Proc. IEEE, 121(12), 1585–1588.
Muftouglu, R. F. (1984). “New models for nonlinear catchment analysis.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 73(3–4), 335–357.
Ozelkan, E. C., and Duckstein, L. (2001). “Fuzzy conceptual rainfall-runoff models.” J. Hydrol., 253(1–4), 41–68.
Özger, M. (2009). “Comparison of fuzzy inference systems for streamflow prediction.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 54(2), 261–273.
Özger, M., Mishra, A. K., and Singh, V. P. (2011). “Scaling characteristics of precipitation data over Texas.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 16(12), 1009–1016.
Papiri, S. (1989). “Precipitazioni e deflussi nel bacino urbano sperimentale di Cascina Scala (Pavia).” Rapporto n. 166 del Dipartimento di Ingegneria Idraulica e Ambientale dell’Universita’ di Pavia.
Pappis, C. P., and Mamdani, E. H. (1977). “A fuzzy logic controller for a traffic junction.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 7(10), 707–717.
Poncea, V. M., and Shetty, A. V. (1995). “A conceptual model of catchment water balance: 1. Formulation and calibration.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 173(1–4), 27–40.
Rajurkar, M. P., Kothyari, U. C., and Chaube, U. C. (2002). “Artificial neural networks for daily rainfall-runoff modeling.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 47(6), 865–877.
Rosenbrock, H. H. (1960). “An automatic method for finding the greatest or least value of a function.” Comput J. (UK), 3(3), 175–184.
Ross, J. T. (1995). Fuzzy logic with engineering applications, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Rossman, L. A. (2004). Storm water management model, user’s manual, version 5.0, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati.
Şen, Z., and Altunkaynak, A. (2006). “A comparative fuzzy logic approach to runoff coefficient and runoff estimation.” Hydrol. Processes, 20(9), 1993–2009.
Takagi, T., and Sugeno, M. (1985). “Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modeling and control.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 15, 116–132.
Vernieuwe, H., Georgieva, O., De Baets, B., Pauwels, V. R. N., Verhoest, N. E. C., and De Troch, F. P. (2005). “Comparison of data-driven Takagi-Sugeno models of rainfall-discharge dynamics.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 302(1-4), 173–186.
Wang, K. H., and Arteaga, R. (1991). “Modeling storm water runoff in Bayou Chico.” Proc. of 27th Annual Conf. on Water Management of River Systems, American Water Resources Association (AWRA), Middleburg, VA, 389–390.
Wang, W. C., Chau, K. W., Cheng, C. T., and Qiu, L. (2009). “A comparison of performance of several artificial intelligence methods for forecasting monthly discharge time series.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 374(3–4), 294–306.
Wu, C. L., Chau, K. W., and Li, Y. S. (2009). “Predicting monthly streamflow using data-driven models coupled with data-preprocessing techniques.” Water Resour. Res., 45(8), W08432.
Xiong, L., Shamseldin, A. Y., and O’Connor, M. K. (2001). “A nonlinear combination of the forecasts of rainfall-runoff models by the first order Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy system.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 245(1–4), 196–217.
Xu, C. (1999). “Estimation of parameters of a conceptual water balance model for ungauged catchments.” Water Resour. Manage., 13(5), 353–368.
Yokoo, Y., Kazamaa, S., Sawamoto, M., and Nishimura, H. (2001). “Regionalization of lumped water balance model parameters based on multiple regression.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 246(1–4), 209–222.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). “Fuzzy sets.” Inf. Control, 8(3), 338–353.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 17Issue 2February 2012
Pages: 283 - 291

History

Received: May 8, 2010
Accepted: Apr 19, 2011
Published online: Apr 20, 2011
Published in print: Feb 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Keh-Han Wang, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Houston, 4800 Calhoun, Houston, TX 77204-4003 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Abdusselam Altunkaynak, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Hydraulics, Division, Istanbul Technical Univ., Maslak 34469, Istanbul, Turkey; presently, Visiting Scholar, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Houston, 4800 Calhoun, Houston, TX 77204-4003. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share